Life-cycle economic benefits analysis of passive and active buildings in cold regions of northern China
Rising energy costs and continued reliance on fossil fuels for winter heating have intensified economic and environmental pressures in cold-climate regions such as northern China, underscoring the importance of passive building strategies for improving efficiency and sustainability. This study investigated passive and active building types in Harbin, China, using life-cycle economic benefit analysis to evaluate their relative economic performance. A cross-sectional study with purposive sampling was conducted, involving developers, owners, architects, and engineers from 30 buildings through structured interviews. While the exploratory sample size limits generalizability, the findings provide valuable insights for this emerging field in cold-climate regions. The results demonstrate that incorporating natural elements and energy-efficient measures in passive building design yields superior economic and ecological benefits. Net present value analysis showed negative values for active buildings but positive values for passive buildings. The benefit-cost ratio for passive structures was 1.434 compared to 0.774 for active buildings. In practical terms, passive buildings generate approximately $1.43 in benefits for every dollar invested, while active buildings recover only $0.77 per dollar invested. A detailed case study of two 5,000 sqm buildings with comparable specifications validated these findings. To achieve widespread adoption and maximize long-term sustainability, this study highlights the need to prioritize passive design principles in cold-climate construction and to incorporate life-cycle cost calculations into mandatory building standards rather than voluntary guidelines.
Andersson, L., Engström, A., & Lindström, G. (2012). Energy- Efficient Passive House using thermal mass to achieve high thermal comfort. REHVA, 49(1):44-49.
Badea, A., Baracu, T., Dinca, C., Tutica, D., Grigore, R., & Anastasiu, M. (2014). A life-cycle cost analysis of the passive house “POLITEHNICA” from Bucharest. Energy and Buildings, 80:542-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.044
Chang, K. H., Sun, Y. J., Lai, C. A., Chen, L. D., Wang, C. H., Chen, C. J., et al. (2021). Big data analytics energy-saving strategies for air compressors in the semiconductor industry - an empirical study. International Journal of Production Research, 60(6):1782-1794. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1870015
Chen, P. Y., & Popovich, P. M. (2002). Correlation: Parametric and Nonparametric Measures. London: Sage Publications.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. United States: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3):297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Department of Energy. (2022). Buildings Energy Data Book. New Delhi: U.S. Department of Energy.
Farghali, M., Osman, A. I., Mohamed, I. M. A., Chen, Z., Chen, L., Ihara, I., et al. (2023). Strategies to save energy in the context of the energy crisis: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(2003-2039):1-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01591-5
Fernandez-Antolin, M. M., Del Río, J. M., Costanzo, V., Nocera, F., & Gonzalez-Lezcano, R. A. (2019). Passive design strategies for residential buildings in different Spanish climate zones. Sustainability, 11(18):4816. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184816
Figueiredo, A., Figueira, J., Vicente, R., & Maio, R. (2016). Thermal comfort and energy performance: Sensitivity analysis to apply the Passive House concept to the Portuguese climate. Building and Environment, 103:276-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.03.031
Gong, G., Huang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2012). Optimizing passive design indicators across 25 Chinese cities. Building and Environment, 56:46-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.02.029
Goudarzi, H., & Mostafaeipour, A. (2017). Energy saving evaluation of passive systems for residential buildings in hot and dry regions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68(Part 1):432-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.002
Guan, Y., Yan, J., Shan, Y., Zhou, Y., Hang, Y., Li, R., et al. (2023). Burden of the global energy price crisis on households. Nature Energy, 8(3):304-316. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01209-8
Han, F., Liu, B., Wang, Y., Dermentzis, G., Cao, X., Zhao, L., et al. (2022). Verifying of the feasibility and energy efficiency of the largest certified passive house office building in China: A three-year performance monitoring study. Journal of Building Engineering, 46:103703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103703
Harkouss, F., Fardoun, F., & Biwole, P. H. (2018). Passive design optimization of low energy buildings in different climates. Energy, 165:591-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.019
Jayasena, A., Hewage, K., Siddiqui, O., & Sadiq, R. (2022). Socio-economic and environmental cost-benefit analysis of passive houses: A life cycle perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 373:133718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133718
Jiang, P. (2011). Analysis of national and local energy-efficiency design standards in the public building sector in China. Energy for Sustainable Development, 15(4):443-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2011.09.006
Kerdan, I. G., Raslan, R., Ruyssevelt, P., & Gálvez, D. M. (2016). An exergoeconomic-based parametric study to examine the effects of active and passive energy retrofit strategies for buildings. Energy and Buildings, 133:155-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.029
Kovacic, I., Reisinger, J., & Honic, M. (2018). Life cycle assessment of embodied and operational energy for a passive housing block in Austria. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82(Part 2):1774-1786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.058
Li, S., Wang, M., Shen, P., Cui, X., Bu, L., Wei, R., et al. (2022). Energy saving and thermal comfort performance of passive retrofitting measures for traditional rammed earth house in Lingnan, China. Buildings, 12(10):1716. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101716
Li, X., Deng, Q., Ren, Z., Shan, X., & Yang, G. (2021). Parametric study on residential passive house building in different Chinese climate zones. Sustainability, 13(8):4416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084416
Lund, J. R. (1992). Benefit-cost ratios: Failures and alternatives. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 118(1):94-100. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1992)118:1(94)
Major, D. C. (1969). Benefit-cost ratios for projects in multiple objective investment programs. Water Resources Research, 5(6):1174-1178. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR005i006p01174
NAHB. (2024). New Refrigerants in HVAC. National Association of Home Builders. Available from: https://www.nahb.org/ blog/2024/05/new-refrigerants-hvac [Last accessed on 2025 Jun 25].
National Bureau of Statistics. (2023). China Building Cost Index 2023. China: China Statistics Press.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. United States: McGraw-Hill.
Oberndorfer, E., Broomfield, T., Lundholm, J., & Ljubicic, G. (2020). Inuit cultural practices increase local-scale biodiversity and create novel vegetation communities in Nunatsiavut (Labrador, Canada). Biodiversity and Conservation, 29(3):991-1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-01931-9
Passive House Institute. (2023). Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) Version 10. Germany: Passive House Institute.
Petrovič, B., Zhang, X., Eriksson, O., & Wallhagen, M. (2021). Life cycle cost analysis of a single-family house in Sweden. Buildings, 11(5):215. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11050215
Przesmycka, A., & Wieczorek, D. (2021). Maintenance strategies, periodic renovations and building modernisation in the aspect of the criterion of the whole life costs. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports, 31(2):15-29. https://doi.org/10.2478/ceer-2021-0017
Schmidt, D., & Feist, W. (2024). Economic analysis of passive house construction in Germany: Market trends and policy implications. Building Research and Information, 52(3):287-304.
Schnieders, J., Feist, W., & Rongen, L. (2015). Passive houses for different climate zones. Energy and Buildings, 105:71-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.032
Smith, A., Johnson, B., & Williams, C. (2019). Sample size considerations in building performance research. Building and Environment, 156:234-245.
Sogerman, K. (2017). Building for the Future: Passive Houses in Canada. So German. Available from: https://sogerman.ca/ story/building-for-the-future-passive-houses-in-canada [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 10].
Stephan, A., Crawford, R. H., & De Myttenaere, K. (2013). A comprehensive assessment of the life cycle energy demand of passive houses. Applied Energy, 112:23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.076
Vargas, A. P., & Hamui, L. (2021). Thermal energy performance simulation of a residential building retrofitted with passive design strategies: A case study in Mexico. Sustainability, 13(14):8064. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148064
Walsh, B., Murphy, G., & O’Sullivan, P. (2023). Passive house economics in cold climates: Canadian case study analysis. Energy Policy, 178:113891.
Wang, Z., Xue, Q., Ji, Y., & Yu, Z. (2018). Indoor environment quality in a low-energy residential building in winter in Harbin. Building and Environment, 135:194-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.012
Xue, Q., Wang, Z., & Chen, Q. (2022). Multi-objective optimization of building design for life cycle cost and CO₂ emissions: A case study of a low-energy residential building in a severe cold climate. Building Simulation, 15(1):83-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0796-5
Yang, W., Chang, J., Xu, B., Peng, C., & Ge, Y. (2008). Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: A case study in Hangzhou, China. Ecological Economics, 68(1- 2):116-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.008
Zhang, Z., Hou, Q., Tao, J., Zhang, H., Chou, X., & Jiang, X. (2021). Comparative analysis of low-energy buildings to help achieve carbon neutrality technology. E3S Web of Conferences, 261:04035. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126104035