AccScience Publishing / ESAM / Volume 2 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.36922/ESAM026120006
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Material extrusion additive manufacturing of 17-4PH stainless steel via bound metal deposition: Densification, microstructures, and tensile properties

Haruka Shima1,2 Kenta Yamanaka1* Manami Mori3 Chengli Yuan4 Kenji Nitta4 Akihiko Chiba1,5
Show Less
1 Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
2 Department of Materials Processing, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
3 Department of General Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Sendai College, Natori, Japan
4 Marubeni I-DIGIO Group, Tokyo, Japan
5 New Industry Creation Hatchery Center, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
ESAM 2026, 2(2), 026120006 https://doi.org/10.36922/ESAM026120006
Received: 22 March 2026 | Revised: 6 May 2026 | Accepted: 14 May 2026 | Published online: 12 June 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Metal material extrusion, which is based on debinding and subsequent sintering of 3D-printed green bodies, is gaining attention as a low-cost additive manufacturing process. In this study, we comprehensively examined the densification behavior, microstructure, and tensile properties of 17-4PH stainless steel prepared using bound metal deposition (BMD). The specimens were fabricated in the standard and dense modes, with the latter programmed to apply a higher extrusion pressure. The dense mode resulted in a relative density of approximately 98%, surpassing the 95% achieved in the standard mode. We investigated the impact of the build angle (0° or 90°) relative to the build direction (BD) and various printing parameters, including the specimen thickness, hatch spacing, print speed, and nozzle temperature, on the relative density and tensile properties. The results highlight the crucial role of the build angle in determining the tensile properties, leading to mechanical anisotropy. X-ray computed tomography captured linear printing defects aligned perpendicular to the BD, which contributed to premature fractures during tensile loading along the BD. The as-sintered microstructures contained α- and δ-ferrite with spherical nanoscale copper precipitates. The solution-treated and subsequently aged H900 specimens exhibited strength levels comparable to or superior to those of their wrought counterparts. These findings provide fundamental insights into the production of industrial parts using BMD.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Bound metal deposition
Material extrusion
17-4PH stainless steel
Build defects
Microstructure
Tensile properties
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
Kenta Yamanaka serves as an Editorial Board Member of this journal, but was not in any way involved in the editorial and peer-review process conducted for this paper, directly or indirectly. The authors declared that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.
References
  1. Turner BN, Strong R, Gold SA. A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyp J. 2014;20(3):192-204. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-01-2013-0012
  2. Thompson Y, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Kukla C, Felfer P. Fused filament fabrication, debinding and sintering as a low cost additive manufacturing method of 316L stainless steel. Addit Manuf. 2019;30:100861. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100861
  3. Gong H, Snelling D, Kardel K, Carrano A. Comparison of stainless steel 316L parts made by FDM- and SLM-based additive manufacturing processes. JOM. 2019;71(3):880- 885. doi: 10.1007/s11837-018-3207-3
  4. Naim M, Chemkhi M, Alhussein A, Retraint D. Effect of post-treatments on the tribological and corrosion behavior of 17–4PH stainless steel processed via fused filament fabrication. Addit Manuf Lett. 2023;7:100158. doi: 10.1016/j.addlet.2023.100158
  5. Godec D, Cano S, Holzer C, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J. Optimization of the 3D printing parameters for tensile properties of specimens produced by fused filament fabrication of 17-4PH stainless steel. Materials. 2020;13(3):774. doi: 10.3390/ma13030774
  6. Singh G, Missiaen JM, Bouvard D, Chaix JM. Additive manufacturing of 17–4 PH steel using metal injection molding feedstock: Analysis of 3D extrusion printing, debinding and sintering. Addit Manuf. 2021;47:102287. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102287
  7. Sadaf M, Bragaglia M, Nanni F. A simple route for additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel via Fused Filament Fabrication. J Manuf Process. 2021;67:141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.055
  8. Waalkes L, Längerich J, Holbe F, Emmelmann C. Feasibility study on piston-based feedstock fabrication with Ti-6Al-4V metal injection molding feedstock. Addit Manuf. 2020;35:101207. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101207
  9. Zhang Y, Bai S, Riede M, Garratt E, Roch A. A comprehensive study on fused filament fabrication of Ti-6Al-4V structures. Addit Manuf. 2020;34:101256. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101256
  10. Wang Y, Zhang L, Li X, Yan Z. On hot isostatic pressing sintering of fused filament fabricated 316L stainless steel – Evaluation of microstructure, porosity, and tensile properties. Mater Lett. 2021;296:129854. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.129854
  11. Singh P, Balla VK, Atre S V., German RM, Kate KH. Factors affecting properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloy additive manufactured by metal fused filament fabrication. Powder Technol. 2021;386:9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.03.026
  12. Stiers C, Koube K, Sinclair E, Sim H, Winterscheidt E, Kacher J. Additive manufacturing of carbon steels by materials extrusion of oxide precursors and hydrogen reduction. Addit Manuf Lett. 2023;7:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.addlet.2023.100166
  13. Lengauer W, Duretek I, Fürst M, et al. Fabrication and properties of extrusion-based 3D-printed hardmetal and cermet components. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater. 2019;82:141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2019.04.011
  14. Carroll BE, Palmer TA, Beese AM. Anisotropic tensile behavior of Ti–6Al–4V components fabricated with directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Acta Mater. 2015;87:309-320. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.054
  15. Thijs L, Montero Sistiaga ML, Wauthle R, Xie Q, Kruth JP, Van Humbeeck J. Strong morphological and crystallographic texture and resulting yield strength anisotropy in selective laser melted tantalum. Acta Mater. 2013;61(12):4657-4668. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.036
  16. Pellegrini A, Lavecchia F, Guerra MG, Galantucci LM. Influence of aging treatments on 17–4 PH stainless steel parts realized using material extrusion additive manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2023;126(1-2):163- 178. doi: 10.1007/s00170-023-11136-3
  17. Forcellese P, Mancia T, Simoncini M, Bellezze T. Investigation on corrosion resistance properties of 17-4 PH bound metal deposition as-sintered specimens with different build-up orientations. Metals. 2022;12(4):588. doi: 10.3390/met12040588
  18. Di Pompeo V, Santoni A, Santecchia E, Spigarelli S. On the Short-Term Creep Response at 482 °C (900 °F) of the 17-4PH Steel Produced by Bound Metal Deposition. Metals. 2022;12(3):477. doi: 10.3390/met12030477
  19. Fongsamootr T, Thawon I, Tippayawong N, Tippayawong KY, Suttakul P. Effect of print parameters on additive manufacturing of metallic parts: performance and sustainability aspects. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):19292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22613-2
  20. Parenti P, Puccio D, Colosimo BM, Semeraro Q. A new solution for assessing the printability of 17-4 PH gyroids produced via extrusion-based metal AM. J Manuf Process. 2022;74:557-572. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.043
  21. Gabilondo M, Cearsolo X, Arrue M, Castro F. Influence of build orientation, chamber temperature and infill pattern on mechanical properties of 316L parts manufactured by bound metal deposition. Materials. 2022;15(3):1183. doi: 10.3390/ma15031183
  22. Bose A, Reidy JP, Tuncer N, Jorgensen L. Processing of tungsten heavy alloy by extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater. 2023;110:106021. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2022.106021
  23. ASTM A564/A564M-19a. Standard specification for hot-rolled and cold-finished age-hardening stainless steel bars and shapes. In: ASTM International; 2019.
  24. ASTM E8/E8M-22. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. In: ASTM International; 2022.
  25. Bada T, Miura H, Honda T, Tokuyama Y. Properties of 17-4 PH stainless steels produced by metal injection molding process. J Jpn Soc Powder Powder Metall. 1995;42(10):1119- 1123. doi: 10.2497/jjspm.42.1119
  26. MPIF Standard 35. Materials standards for metal injection molded parts. In: Metal Powder Industries Federation; 2018.
  27. Harvig H, Kirchner G, Hillert M. On the ferrite-austenite equilibrium in the Fe-Cu system. Metall Trans. 1972;3(1):329-332. doi: 10.1007/BF02680612
  28. Hwang JY, Jung HY. Electrical conductivity upon sintering of pure Cu produced by material extrusion additive manufacturing: Effects of pore, grain size, and impurity. J Manuf Process. 2024;118:63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.03.049
  29. Chang CW, Chen PH, Hwang KS. Enhanced mechanical properties of injection molded 17-4PH stainless steel through reduction of silica particles by graphite additions. Mater Trans. 2010;51(12):2243-2250. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.M2010209
  30. Koseski RP, Suri P, Earhardt NB, German RM, Kwon YS. Microstructural evolution of injection molded gas- and water-atomized 316L stainless steel powder during sintering. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;390(1-2):171-177. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.08.002
  31. Tunberg T, Nyborg L. Surface reactions during water atomisation and sintering of austenitic stainless steel powder. Powder Metall. 1995;38(2):120-130. doi: 10.1179/pom.1995.38.2.120
  32. Li SX. Effects of inclusions on very high cycle fatigue properties of high strength steels. Int Mater Rev. 2012;57(2):92-114. doi: 10.1179/1743280411Y.0000000008
  33. Guo L, Gao J, Li C, Guo Z. Removal of fine SiO2 composite inclusions from 304 stainless steel using super-gravity. ISIJ Int. 2020;60(2):238-246. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2019-301
  34. Karyappa R, Zhang D, Zhu Q, Ji R, Suwardi A, Liu H. Newtonian liquid-assisted material extrusion 3D printing: Progress, challenges and future perspectives. Addit Manuf. 2024;79:103903. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2023.103903
Share
Back to top
Engineering Science in Additive Manufacturing, Electronic ISSN: 3082-849X Published by AccScience Publishing