AccScience Publishing / BH / Volume 1 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.36922/bh.0384
Cite this article
94
Download
1265
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Renal denervation guided by novel blood pressure response patterns of renal nerve stimulation in human: A case series study

Zhenhong Ou1,4 Huaan Du1 Weijie Chen1 Hao Zhou1 Hang Liu1 Kun Cui4 Bo Zhang1 Dan Li1 Tianli Xia1 Huang Zhou1 Yunlin Chen1 Wenjiang Chen1 Mingyang Xiao1 Xue Kuang1 Changzhi Zhang1 Jie Yang1 Chunxia Gan1 Kamsang Woo2 Zrenner Bernhard3 Zengzhang Liu1 Yuehui Yin1*
Show Less
1 Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Cardiac Arrhythmia Therapeutic Service Center, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Arrhythmia, Chongqing, China
2 Institute of Future Cities, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
3 Department of Cardiology, Medizinische Klinik I, Krankenhaus Landshut/Achdorf, Germany
4 Department of Cardiology, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, China
Brain & Heart 2023, 1(2), 0384 https://doi.org/10.36922/bh.0384
Submitted: 11 April 2023 | Accepted: 25 May 2023 | Published: 15 June 2023
© 2023 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Renal nerve stimulation (RNS) could localize the renal nerve innervation through rapid blood pressure (BP) changes for renal denervation (RDN). Recently, novel BP response patterns have been demonstrated in animals. The current study was to verify the presence of these patterns in humans and examine the feasibility of using them to guide selective RDN. Fourteen patients with mild resistant hypertension were included in this prospective analysis. RNS was performed before and after radiofrequency-based RDN. Invasive monitoring was used continuously to obtain beat-to-beat BP. Ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring was measured at baseline, 5–7 days, and 6–12 months, respectively. Five types of BP responses were summarized during RNS before RDN, namely: (1) BP persistently elevated; (2) BP dropped and then elevated above the baseline; (3) BP dropped and then recovered, but not over the baseline; (4) BP fluctuated in the vicinity of the baseline; and (5) BP persistently dropped. Selective RDN was performed at the site with elevated BP. The 24-h ABP decreased from 141 ± 12/94 ± 9 mmHg at baseline to 130 ± 11/85 ± 8 mmHg at 5 – 7 days (P = 0.001 for systolic BP [SBP], P = 0.003 for diastolic BP [DBP]) and 127 ± 11/85 ± 8 mmHg at 6 – 12 months (P = 0.009 for SBP, P = 0.019 for DBP). The average heart rate fell from 77 ± 8 bpm to 71 ± 5 bpm (P = 0.01) and 72 ± 7 bpm (P = 0.043), respectively. Our study showed five types of BP responses elicited by RNS in humans. RDN guided by these BP responses was feasible and resulted in obvious BP reduction, and they may potentially provide precise guidance for RDN.

Keywords
Renal nerve stimulation
Renal denervation
Hypertension
Funding
Technology Star Cultivation Program from the Science and Technology Association of Chongqing
Surface project from the Chongqing Municipal Health Bureau
Kuanren Talents Program of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
References
  1. Bhatt DL, Kandzari DE, O’Neill WW, et al., 2014, A controlled trial of renal denervation for resistant hypertension. N Engl J Med, 370: 1393–1401. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1402670

 

  1. Desch S, Okon T, Heinemann D, et al., 2015, Randomized sham-controlled trial of renal sympathetic denervation in mild resistant hypertension. Hypertension, 65: 1202–1208. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.115.05283

 

  1. Mathiassen ON, Vase H, Bech JN, et al., 2016, Renal denervation in treatment-resistant essential hypertension. A randomized, SHAM-controlled, double-blinded 24-h blood pressure-based trial. J Hypertens, 34: 1639–1647. https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000000977

 

  1. Kandzari DE, Bhatt DL, Brar S, et al., 2015, Predictors of blood pressure response in the SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial. Eur Heart J, 36: 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu441

 

  1. Bhatt DL, Vaduganathan M, Kandzari DE, et al., 2022, Long-term outcomes after catheter-based renal artery denervation for resistant hypertension: Final follow-up of the randomised SYMPLICITY HTN-3 Trial. Lancet, 400: 1405–1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01787-1

 

  1. Kandzari DE, Böhm M, Mahfoud F, et al., 2018, Effect of renal denervation on blood pressure in the presence of antihypertensive drugs: 6-month efficacy and safety results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED proof-of-concept randomised trial. Lancet, 391: 2346–2355. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30951-6

 

  1. Bohm M, Kario K, Kandzari DE, et al., 2020, Efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation in the absence of antihypertensive medications (SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal): A multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet, 395: 1444–1451. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30554-7

 

  1. Azizi M, Sanghvi K, Saxena M, et al., 2021, Ultrasound renal denervation for hypertension resistant to a triple medication pill (RADIANCE-HTN TRIO): A randomised, multicentre, single-blind, sham-controlled trial. Lancet, 397: 2476–2486. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00788-1

 

  1. Azizi M, Schmieder RE, Mahfoud F, et al., 2018, Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation to treat hypertension (RADIANCE-HTN SOLO): A multicentre, international, single-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet, 391: 2335–2345. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31082-1

 

  1. Fudim M, Sobotka AA, Yin YH, et al., 2018, Selective vs. Global renal denervation: A case for less is more. Curr Hypertens Rep, 20: 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-018-0838-2

 

  1. Chinushi M, Izumi D, Iijima K, et al., 2013, Blood pressure and autonomic responses to electrical stimulation of the renal arterial nerves before and after ablation of the renal artery. Hypertension, 61: 450–456. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.111.00095

 

  1. Murai H, Okuyama Y, Sakata Y, et al., 2015, Different responses of arterial blood pressure to electrical stimulation of the renal artery in patients with resistant hypertension. Int J Cardiol, 190: 296–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.196

 

  1. Tsiachris D, Tsioufis C, Dimitriadis K, et al., 2014, Electrical stimulation of the renal arterial nerves does not unmask the blindness of renal denervation procedure in swine. Int J Cardiol, 176: 1061–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.141

 

  1. De Jong MR, Hoogerwaard AF, Adiyaman A, et al., 2018, Renal nerve stimulation identifies aorticorenal innervation and prevents inadvertent ablation of vagal nerves during renal denervation. Blood Press, 27: 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2018.1463817

 

  1. Sakakura K, Ladich E, Cheng Q, et al., 2014, Anatomic assessment of sympathetic peri-arterial renal nerves in man. J Am Coll Cardiol, 64: 635–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.059

 

  1. Cheng X, Zhang Y, Chen R, et al., 2022, Anatomical evidence for parasympathetic innervation of the renal vasculature and pelvis. J Am Soc Nephrol, 33: 2194–2210. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2021111518

 

  1. Tan K, Lai Y, Chen W, et al., 2019, Selective renal denervation guided by renal nerve stimulation: Mapping renal nerves for unmet clinical needs. J Hum Hypertens, 33: 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-019-0244-5

 

  1. Zhou H, Li Y, Xu Y, et al., 2022, Mapping renal innervations by renal nerve stimulation and characterizations of blood pressure response patterns. J Cardiovasc Transl Res, 15: 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-021-10149-1

 

  1. Liu H, Chen W, Lai Y, et al., 2019, Selective renal denervation guided by renal nerve stimulation in Canine. Hypertension, 74: 536–545. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.119.12680

 

  1. Olbers J, Gille A, Ljungman P, et al., 2018, High beat-to-beat blood pressure variability in atrial fibrillation compared to sinus rhythm. Blood Press, 27: 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2018.1436400

 

  1. DiBona GF, Kopp UC, 1997, Neural control of renal function. Physiol Rev, 77: 75–197. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1997.77.1.75

 

  1. Zheng H, Patel KP, 2017, Integration of renal sensory afferents at the level of the paraventricular nucleus dictating sympathetic outflow. Auton Neurosci, 204: 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2016.08.008

 

  1. Mompeo B, Maranillo E, Garcia-Touchard A, et al., 2016, The gross anatomy of the renal sympathetic nerves revisited. Clin Anat, 29: 660–664. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22720

 

  1. Lu J, Wang Z, Zhou T, et al., 2015, Selective proximal renal denervation guided by autonomic responses evoked via high-frequency stimulation in a preclinical canine model. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 8: e001847. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.115.001847

 

  1. Gal P, de Jong MR, Smit JJ, et al., 2015, Blood pressure response to renal nerve stimulation in patients undergoing renal denervation: A feasibility study. J Hum Hypertens, 29: 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2014.91

 

  1. De Jong MR, Adiyaman A, Gal P, et al., 2016, Renal nerve stimulation-induced blood pressure changes predict ambulatory blood pressure response after renal denervation. Hypertension, 68: 707–714. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.116.07492

 

  1. Ukena C, Seidel T, Rizas K, et al., 2020, Effects of renal denervation on 24-h heart rate and heart rate variability in resistant hypertension. Clin Res Cardiol, 109: 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01543-6

 

  1. Böhm M, Mahfoud F, Townsend RR, et al., 2019, Ambulatory heart rate reduction after catheter-based renal denervation in hypertensive patients not receiving anti-hypertensive medications: Data from SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED, a randomized, sham-controlled, proof-of-concept trial. Eur Heart J, 40: 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy871

 

  1. Böhm M, Tsioufis K, Kandzari DE, et al., 2021, Effect of heart rate on the outcome of renal denervation in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol, 78: 1028–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.044
Conflict of interest
None.
Share
Back to top
Brain & Heart, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4139 Published by AccScience Publishing