AccScience Publishing / TD / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/TD025410107
REVIEW ARTICLE

Management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A comprehensive review of multimodal treatment strategies

John Spiliotis1,2,3 Irina Noskova4* Alexandros Apostolopoulos3
Show Less
1 Peritoneal Malignancy Unit, European Interbalkan Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece
2 Peritoneal Malignancy Unit, Athens Medical Center, Athens, Greece
3 Department of Surgery, YGIA Polyclinic, Limassol, Cyprus
4 Department of Oncology, Iatriko Athens Medical Center–Palaio Faliro Clinic, Athens, Greece
Tumor Discovery, 025410107 https://doi.org/10.36922/TD025410107
Received: 8 October 2025 | Revised: 1 January 2026 | Accepted: 19 January 2026 | Published online: 26 May 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) accounts for approximately 40% of newly diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cases and is characterized by extensive vascular invasion without distant metastases. Historically, treatment with chemotherapy alone has resulted in poor outcomes, with median overall survival ranging from 11 to 15 months. This study synthesizes the rapidly evolving multimodal treatment paradigm for LAPC. LAPC is typically defined by tumors larger than 4 cm or by greater than 180° encasement of major arterial structures, such as the superior mesenteric artery or celiac axis, often accompanied by venous involvement that is not amenable to reconstruction. Advances in neoadjuvant systemic therapy, including FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, have enabled tumor downstaging in a subset of patients, with reported median overall survival approaching 20 months. Locoregional ablative strategies have further expanded treatment options. Irreversible electroporation preserves critical vascular and ductal structures and has demonstrated high technical success with overall survival ranging from 18 to 27 months when combined with chemotherapy. Radiofrequency ablation has also shown survival benefits, though with higher complication rates. Additional approaches, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy and peritoneal patch vascular reconstruction, have increased resectability in selected patients. Multimodal treatment strategies now allow conversion to resectable disease in 20–30% of cases and have been associated with substantial survival improvements, particularly in high-volume centers. Overall, the integration of systemic chemotherapy, ablative technologies, and advanced surgical techniques represents a paradigm shift in the management of LAPC, offering the potential to significantly extend survival while emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary expertise and individualized patient care.

Keywords
Locally advanced pancreatic cancer
Irreversible electroporation
Radiofrequency ablation
Vascular reconstruction
Multimodal treatment
Tumor downstaging
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Rawla P, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: global trends, etiology and risk factors. World J Oncol. 2019;10(1):10-27. doi: 10.14740/wjon1166
  2. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2022. American Cancer Society; 2022. Available from: https:// www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2022/ cancer-facts-and-figures-2022.pdf [Last accessed on January 20, 2026].
  3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Version 1.2023. Available from: https:// www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [Last accessed on January 20, 2026].
  4. Spiliotis J, Metaxas T, Farmakis D, et al. Irreversible electroporation for stage III locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Single-center experience. Int J Front Med Surg Res. 2022;2(1):001-006. doi: 10.53294/ijfmsr.2022.2.1.0068
  5. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1817-1825. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923
  6. Birrer M, Saad B, Drews S, et al. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: meta-analysis & systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2025;39(1):141- 152. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11450-1
  7. Yousaf MN, Ehsan H, Muneeb A, et al. Role of radiofrequency ablation in the management of unresectable pancreatic cancer. Front Med. 2021;7:624997. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.624997
  8. Martin RC 2nd, Kwon D, Chalikonda S, et al. Treatment of 200 locally advanced (stage III) pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with irreversible electroporation: safety and efficacy. Ann Surg. 2015;262(3):486-494. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001441
  9. Suker M, Beumer BR, Sadot E, et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(6):801- 810. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00172-8
  10. Ballehaninna UK, Chamberlain RS. The clinical utility of serum CA 19-9 in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an evidence based appraisal. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2012;3(2):105-119. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2011.021
  11. Heldin CH, Rubin K, Pietras K, Ostman A. High interstitial fluid pressure—an obstacle in tumor therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(10):806-813. doi: 10.1038/nrc1456
  12. Spiliotis J. Commentary on pancreatic carcinoma: the role of radiofrequency ablation in advanced disease. Cancers (Basel). 2010;2(4):2055-2057. doi: 10.3390/cancers2042055
  13. Spadi R, Brusa F, Ponzetti A, et al. Current therapeutic strategies for advanced pancreatic cancer: a review for clinicians. World J Clin Oncol. 2016;7(1):27-43. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v7.i1.27
  14. Davalos RV, Mir IL, Rubinsky B. Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005;33(2):223-231. doi: 10.1007/s10439-005-8981-8
  15. Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, et al. FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(25):2395-2406. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809775
  16. Cillo U, Perri G, Bassi D, et al. Pancreatectomy with venous resection and peritoneal patch reconstruction: bridging transplantation and pancreatic surgery to combine the advantages of tangential and segmental resections. HPB. 2025;27(10):1318-1327. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.07.010
  17. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
  18. Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(18):1691-1703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304369
  19. Wang-Gillam A, Li CP, Bodoky G, et al. Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1): a global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10018):545-557. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00986-1
  20. Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Fu B, Yachida S, et al. DPC4 gene status of the primary carcinoma correlates with patterns of failure in patients with pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(11):1806-1813. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.7188
  21. Janssen QP, O’Reilly EM, van Eijck CHJ, Groot Koerkamp B. Neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:41. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00041
  22. Charpentier KP, Wolf F, Noble L, et al. Irreversible electroporation of the pancreas in swine: a pilot study. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12(5):348-351. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00174.x
  23. Spiliotis J. Irreversible electroporation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a ray of hope in a difficult problem. SciBase Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;1(1):1004. doi: 10.52768/SciBaseGastroenterolHepatol/1004
  24. Spiliotis JD, Datsis AC, Michalopoulos NV, Kekelos SP, et al. Radiofrequency ablation combined with palliative surgery may prolong survival of patients with advanced cancer of the pancreas. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007;392(1):55-60. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0098-5
  25. Stoop TF, Rompen IF, Ali M, et al. Resectability stages of pancreatic cancer: nationwide reference. Br J Surg. 2025;112(7):znaf120. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf120
  26. Turpin A, et al. Maintenance with OSE2101 plus FOLFIRI vs FOLFIRI alone after FOLFIRINOX (FFX) induction in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC): primary endpoint results of a randomized TEDOPAM GERCOR D17-01 PRODIGE 63 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(16_suppl):4009. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.4009
  27. Promising advances in pancreatic cancer: ASCO 2025 highlights. Digestive Cancers Europe. August 7, 2025. Available from: https://digestivecancers.eu/promising-advances-in-pancreatic-cancer-asco-2025-highlights/ [Last accessed on December 3, 2025].
  28. Clinical trials register: search for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. EU Clinical Trials Register. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/ search?query=Locally+Advanced+Pancreatic+Cancer [Last accessed on December 3, 2025].
  29. Topal H, Venken T, Ayse Bassez, et al. Progression-free survival for unresectable non-metastatic locally advanced pancreatic cancer after surgical microwave ablation plus durvalumab and tremelimumab: phase-2 non-randomized prospective clinical trial. Commun Med. 2025;5(1):112. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01186-x
  30. Testing higher dose radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06958328. Updated April 24, 2025. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06958328 [Last accessed on December 3, 2025].
  31. Shenoy A, Yousif A, Hussain MD. Recent Advances and Challenges in the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: An Update on Completed and Ongoing Clinical Trials. Cancers (Basel). 2025;17(8):1319. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081319
  32. Adapted guided stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with ivonescimab. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06844422. Updated February 18, 2025. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06844422 [Last accessed on December 3, 2025].
  33. Data supports additional use of electric-based therapy in LAPC. ESMO Daily Reporter. October 19, 2025. Available from: https://dailyreporter.esmo.org/esmo-gastrointestinal-cancers-congress-2025/news/data-supports-the-use-of-an-electric-based-therapy [Last accessed on December 3, 2025].
  34. Radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic carcinomas. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05191940. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/ NCT05191940 [Last accessed on December 3, 2025].
  35. Intra-arterial gemcitabine vs. IV gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03257033. Updated August 16, 2017. Available from: https:// clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03257033 [Last accessed on December 3, 2025].
  36. A phase III randomized trial of dose escalated radiation. UC Irvine Health Clinical Trials. October 29, 2025. Available from: https://www.ucihealth.org/clinical-trials/NRG-GI011 [Last accessed on December 3, 2025].
  37. Seufferlein T, Cubillo Gracian A, Kueng M. PANOVA-4 (EF- 39): Pilot study of tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy with atezolizumab, gemcitabine (GEM), and nab-paclitaxel (NabP) as first-line (1L) treatment for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(3_ suppl):TPS718. doi: 10.1200/jco.2024.42.3_suppl.tps718
  38. Hank T, Strobel O. Conversion surgery for advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Med. 2019;8(11):1945. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111945
Share
Back to top
Tumor Discovery, Electronic ISSN: 2810-9775 Print ISSN: 3060-8597, Published by AccScience Publishing