Rethinking pocket parks as relational infrastructure for urban micro-renewal: Spatial legibility, social inclusion, and adaptive governance in historic urban districts
Pocket parks are now crucial tactics for enhancing access to green space and urban micro-renewal in densely inhabited, historically layered urban districts. However, their presence does not necessarily result in meaningful use, indicating that social life cannot be ensured by physical provision alone. This study explores how perceptual experience, cultural meaning, spatial legibility, and governance conditions relate to how pocket parks are used on a daily basis. Ten pocket parks across three historic urban settings (Taiyuan and Xi’an in China, and George Town in Penang, Malaysia) were examined through a qualitative multiple-case study. Semi-structured interviews with 21 participants, document analysis, and field observations were used to gather data. The findings suggest that entry visibility, circulation clarity, environmental comfort, cultural recognition, and adaptive management are associated with user engagement. Lower levels of daily use were observed in parks that had sufficient amenities but ambiguous spatial signals, poor contextual connections, or limited management support. The findings further suggest that spatial design, user behavior, cultural interpretation, and institutional responses interact in shaping how pocket parks function as relational public infrastructures. This study develops a relational framework for pocket-park performance centered on perceptual spatial justice, cultural negotiation, and institutional flexibility, offering a more comprehensive understanding of how small urban green spaces may contribute to inclusive and socially meaningful urban renewal.
Abdelhamid, M. M., & Elfakharany, M. M. (2020). Improving urban park usability in developing countries: Case study of Al-Shalalat Park in Alexandria. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59(1), 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.042
Alders, W. (2024). Rural Settlement Dynamics in a Rapidly Urbanizing Landscape: Insights from Satellite Remote Sensing and Archaeological Field Surveys in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Journal of Field Archaeology, 49(8), 634-652. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2024.2402962
Bajwoluk, T., & Langer, P. (2023). The pocket park and its impact on the quality of urban space on the local and supralocal scale—Case study of Krakow, Poland. Sustainability, 15(6), 5153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065153
Bazrafshan, M., Tabrizi, A. M., Bauer, N., & Kienast, F. (2021). Place attachment through interaction with urban parks: A cross-cultural study. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 61, 127103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127103
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Chu, X., Inkuer, A., Mayusoh, C., & Puntien, P. (2025). Pocket park design strategy to realize humanistic care in urban micro renewal. Procedia of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(3), 52. https://so09.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PMR/article/download/6185/3811
Dong, J., Guo, R., Guo, F., Guo, X., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Pocket parks-a systematic literature review. Environmental Research Letters, 18(8), 083003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ace7e2
Espitia, L. F. F., Rosenbaum, M. S., & Contreras-Ramírez, G. (2025). Reimagining the servicescape: a systematic review and multi-stakeholderconceptual framework. Journal of Services Marketing, 39(8), 1055-1067. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-04-2025-0270
Faridtehrani, S. (2025). The impacts of physical and social environmental factors on women’s use and well-being experiences in pocket parks: A case study of Salsbury Park, Vancouver [Master’s thesis, Simon Fraser University]. https://summit.sfu.ca/_flysystem/fedora/2025-06/etd23721.pdf
Franck, K., & Stevens, Q. (2006). Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life. Routledge.
Gehl, J. (2012). Life between buildings: using public space. Princeton University Press.
Hassan Murtadha, J. (2024). The importance of community participation and effective waste management systems in maintaining the sustainability of urban parks. International Journal of Advances Engineering and Civil Research, 4(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijaecr.2025.386088.1035
He, S., & Li, Y. (2024). Understanding impacts of neighbourhood micro renewal through a lens of place value: A case study of Wuhan, China. Land, 13(11), 1910. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111910
Heydari, M. T., Majidi Heravi, A., & Rahmani, M. (2022). Creating Pocket Parks for Regenerating People’s Social Interactions, Case study: Khorramdareh City. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism, 13(2), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2021.264783.1605
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Vintage Books.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Khaleghımoghaddam, N. (2024). The Role of Nature and Physical Environment in Mental Relaxation: Konya Kyoto Park. Artium, 12(1), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.51664/artium.1379482
Kiss, B., Sekulova, F., Hörschelmann, K., Salk, C. F., Takahashi, W., & Wamsler, C. (2022). Citizen participation in the governance of nature‐based solutions. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(3), 247-272. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1987
Kunyuan, Y., & Hellquist, T. (2014). The transformation of brownfields based on the concept of “organic update” [Master’s thesis, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola]. DiVA. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:829257/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews. Sage.
Labuz, R. (2019). Pocket Park – A New Type of Green Public Space in Kraków (Poland). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471, 112018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/471/11/112018
Li, J., & Nassauer, J. I. (2020). Cues to care: A systematic analytical review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 201, 103821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103821
Liu, C., Gan, H., & He, M. (2025). Evaluating the Flexibility of Rural Public Cultural Spaces Based on Polyvalence Theory: A Case Study of Xiangyang Village, Shanghai. Land, 14(6), 1177. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061177
Liu, J., He, Q., Song, W., & Wang, Y. (2023). Sustainable urban neighborhood renewal in China: An MOPA analysis of its past, present and future. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4468301
Lynch, K. (1964). The image of the city. MIT Press.
Lynch, K. (2013). “The Image of the Environment” and “The City Image and Its Elements”: From The Image of the City (1960). In The Urban Design Reader (pp. 125-138). Routledge. https://www.academia.edu/download/46359078/Image_of_the_City.pdf
Ma, D., Wang, Y., Zhou, D., & Zhu, Z. (2022). Cooling effect of the pocket park in the built-up block of a city: a case study in Xi’an, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(9), 23135–23154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23809-9
Madanipour, A. (2018). Temporary use of space: Urban processes between flexibility, opportunity and precarity. Urban Studies, 55(5), 1093-1110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017705546
Madanipour, A., Shucksmith, M., & Brooks, E. (2022). The concept of spatial justice and the European Union’s territorial cohesion. European Planning Studies, 30(5), 807-824. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1928040
Matan, A., & Newman, P. (2016). People Cities: The Life and Legacy of Jan Gehl. Island Press.
Mehta, V. (2014). Evaluating public space. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 53-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698
Monty, K. M. I. (2022). Pocket park: a new idea for creating qualified social green open space in an extremely dense area of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 4 (61), 292-305. https://doi.org/10.24412/1998-4839-2022-4-292-305
Mosler, S. (2019). Everyday heritage concept as an approach to place-making process in the urban landscape. Journal of Urban Design, 24(5), 778-793. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2019.1568187
Patria, A. H., Hussain, M. R. M., & Tukiman, I. (2025). Preserving cultural values through pocket parks in an urban environment: a narrative review. Journal of Surveying, Construction and Property, 16(1), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.22452/jscp.vol16no1.6
Patton, C., Sawicki, D., & Clark, J. (2015). Basic Methods of Policy Analysis and Planning -- Pearson eText. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315664736
Rigolon, A., & Németh, J. (2020). Green gentrification or ‘just green enough’: Do park location, size and function affect whether a place gentrifies or not? Urban Studies, 57(2), 402-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019849380
Rosso, F., Cappa, F., Spitzmiller, R., & Ferrero, M. (2022). Pocket parks towards more sustainable cities. Architectural, environmental, managerial and legal considerations towards an integrated framework: A case study in the Mediterranean region. Environmental Challenges, 7, 100402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100402
Shu, X., Mesimäki, M., Kotze, D. J., Wales, M., Xie, L., Benicke, R., & Lehvävirta, S. (2022). Needs and expectations of German and Chinese children for livable urban green spaces revealed by the method of empathy-based stories. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 68, 127476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127476
Song, Y., Newman, G., Huang, X., & Ye, X. (2022). Factors influencing long term city park visitations for mid-sized US cities: A big data study using smartphone user mobility. Sustainable Cities and Society, 80, 103815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103815
Stevens, Q. (2020). Activating urban waterfronts: planning and design for inclusive, engaging and adaptable public spaces. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003034872
Tan, S. K., Tan, S. H., Kok, Y. S., & Choon, S. W. (2018). Sense of place and sustainability of intangible cultural heritage–The case of George Town and Melaka. Tourism Management, 67, 376-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.02.012
Tu, Y., Chen, B., Yu, L., Xin, Q., Gong, P., & Xu, B. (2021). How does urban expansion interact with cropland loss? A comparison of 14 Chinese cities from 1980 to 2015. Landscape Ecology, 36(1), 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01137-y
Wang, Y., & Wu, F. (2025). Micro-regeneration and participatory governance: a local social governance experiment in China. Journal of Chinese Governance, 10(3), 394–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2025.2493988
Wartmann, F. M., Stride, C. B., Kienast, F., & Hunziker, M. J. L. E. (2021). Relating landscape ecological metrics with public survey data on perceived landscape quality and place attachment. Landscape Ecology, 36(8), 2367-2393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01290-y
Wen, C., Albert, C., & Von Haaren, C. (2020). Equality in access to urban green spaces: A case study in Hannover, Germany, with a focus on the elderly population. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 55, 126820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126820
Wu, Z., & Sharudin, S. A. (2025). Study on Urban Renewal and Micro-Space Optimization Strategies in Zhengzhou: A Perspective on Function Enhancement and Cultural Heritage. Journal of Education, Humanities, and Social Research, 2(1), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.71222/72133451
Xu, J., Qiu, B., Zhang, F., & Zhang, J. (2024). Restorative effects of pocket parks on mental fatigue among young adults: a comparative experimental study of three park types. Forests, 15(2), 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020286
Ye, L., Peng, X., Aniche, L. Q., Scholten, P. H., & Ensenado, E. M. (2021). Urban renewal as policy innovation in China: From growth stimulation to sustainable development. Public Administration and Development, 41(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1903
Zhang, L., Xu, X., & Guo, Y. (2023). The impact of a child-friendly design on children’s activities in urban community pocket parks. Sustainability, 15(13), 10073. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310073
Zhou, Y. (2012). The research and application of the urban organic update theory in historic conservation districts regeneration [Master’s thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology]. DiVA. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-2096