AccScience Publishing / JCAU / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JCAU026210035
Cite this article
15
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
REVIEW ARTICLE

Beyond visual preservation: The conditions of living heritage continuity in rural cultural landscapes

Wanyi Yang1† Linfeng Shi1,2†* Faziawati Abdul Aziz1 Mohd. Yazid Mohd. Yunos1
Show Less
1 Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor , Malaysia
2 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guizhou Institute of Technology, Guiyang, Guizhou , China
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 026210035 https://doi.org/10.36922/JCAU026210035
Received: 21 May 2026 | Revised: 25 August 2026 | Accepted: 26 August 2026 | Published online: 10 September 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Rural cultural landscape research increasingly treats heritage as living and relational, yet it remains unclear how far this shift has changed the analytical core of conservation research and management. This review examines how the continuity of living heritage has been conceptualised in rural cultural landscape research from 2010 to 2025. A hybrid design combined bibliometric mapping of 233 English-language journal articles indexed in Web of Science and Scopus with comparative thematic synthesis of a focused analytical subset of 80 studies; 20 anchor studies supported closer interpretation of mechanisms and contextual variation. The literature expanded rapidly after 2020, and China accounted for the largest share of studies. The reviewed studies show that formal conservation practices continue to favour values that can be more easily bounded, documented and administered, leaving everyday use and local knowledge less visible in assessment. Participation often produces responsibility asymmetry: communities undertake much of the work needed to sustain heritage while retaining limited influence over interpretation and priority setting. Tourism and rural revitalisation generate selective continuity by directing visibility and resources towards some heritage forms while weakening the everyday conditions on which others depend. Together, these processes shape the reproductive capacity of rural cultural landscapes: the ability of communities to keep inherited places in use, adapt them and carry their meanings forward. The review therefore reframes living heritage continuity as an outcome of interactions among formal recognition, community influence and everyday practice.

Keywords
Rural landscapes
Heritage conservation
Heritage assessment
Community participation
Selective continuity
Sustainable development
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References

Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1-2), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002

 

Brumann, C., & Gfeller, A. É. (2022). Cultural landscapes and the UNESCO World Heritage List: Perpetuating European dominance. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(2), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.1941197

 

Chen, F. (2022). Comparison of unofficial recognition and conservation approaches to informal architectural heritage: Cases from Hong Kong, China and Iwate Prefecture, Japan. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 21(4), 1364-1380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2021.1941988

 

Chen, Y., & Wang, Y.-W. (2024). Approaches to sustaining people-place bonds in conservation planning: From value-based, living heritage, to the glocal community. Built Heritage, 8, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00121-8

 

Court, S., & Wijesuriya, G. (2015). People-centred approaches to the conservation of cultural heritage: Living heritage. ICCROM. Accessed July 19, 2026. https://www.iccrom.org/publication/people-centred-approaches-conservation-cultural-heritage-living-heritage

 

Csurgó, B., & Smith, M. K. (2022). Cultural heritage, sense of place and tourism: An analysis of cultural ecosystem services in rural Hungary. Sustainability, 14(12), 7305. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127305

 

Do, T. D. (2025). Preserving cultural landscapes: An integrated framework for the conservation and sustainable development of Mang Thit Pottery Village, Vietnam. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Engineering and Architecture. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43995-025-00255-5

 

Dragouni, M., & Lekakis, S. (2023). Co-creating the future of heritage in-the-making: Empirical evidence from community deliberation at Naxos Island, Greece. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 29(4), 294-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2181376

 

Gao, J., Lin, H., & Zhang, C. (2021). Locally situated rights and the ‘doing’ of responsibility for heritage conservation and tourism development at the cultural landscape of Honghe Hani Rice Terraces, China. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(2-3), 193-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1727912

 

Gao, J., Yang, J., Chen, C., & Chen, W. (2023). From ‘forsaken site’ to ‘model village’: Unraveling the multi-scalar process of rural revitalization in China. Habitat International, 133, Article 102766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102766

 

Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). SAGE. Accessed June 6, 2026. https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/an-introduction-to-systematic-reviews-2-245742

 

Hanafiah, M. H., Jamaluddin, M. R., & Riyadi, A. (2021). Local community support, attitude and perceived benefits in the UNESCO World Heritage Site. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 11(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-03-2020-0034

 

ICOMOS-IFLA. (2017). Principles concerning rural landscapes as heritage. Accessed July 19, 2026. https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/GA2017_6-3-1_RuralLandscapesPrinciples_EN_adopted-15122017.pdf

 

Jimura, T. (2011). The impact of World Heritage Site designation on local communities: A case study of Ogimachi, Shirakawa-mura, Japan. Tourism Management, 32(2), 288-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.02.005

 

Katapidi, I. (2021). Heritage policy meets community praxis: Widening conservation approaches in the traditional villages of central Greece. Journal of Rural Studies, 81, 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.09.012

 

Katapidi, I. (2023). The role of conservation policies in local understandings of heritage in living heritage places: A Greek testimony. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 29(4), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2181377

 

Khalaf, R. W. (2020). Authenticity or continuity in the implementation of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention? Scrutinizing statements of Outstanding Universal Value, 1978-2019. Heritage, 3(2), 243-274. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage3020015

 

Law, L.-Y., Chen, H., Liu, S., & Cheung, M.-H. (2025). Top-down rural heritage revitalization and economic development: A case study of Tangwei Village, Dongguan, Guangdong, China. Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 7(3), 5029. https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.5029

 

le Masurier, B. (2025). An anti-oppressive methodology for more equitable heritage work in the Anthropocene: A case study of nature and Barbuda. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 31(2), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2024.2417054

 

Li, J., Krishnamurthy, S., Pereira Roders, A., & van Wesemael, P. (2020). State-of-the-practice: Assessing community participation within Chinese cultural World Heritage properties. Habitat International, 96, 102107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102107

 

Li, R., Zhang, Y., Li, W., & Xu, X. (2024). Identification model of traditional village cultural landscape elements and its application from the perspective of living heritage—A case study of Chentian Village in Wuhan. Buildings, 14(11), 3535. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113535

 

Marzi, G., Balzano, M., Caputo, A., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2025). Guidelines for bibliometric-systematic literature reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 27(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12381

 

Meneghin, E., Longhi, A., & Segre, G. (2023). Cultural heritage in non-urban areas: Identifying and understanding values. Il Capitale Culturale. Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage, (28), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.13138/2039-2362/3199

 

Nancarrow, J. H., Yang, C., & Yang, J. (2021). An emotions-informed approach for digital documentation of rural heritage landscapes: Baojiatun, a traditional Tunpu village in Guizhou, China. Built Heritage, 5, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-021-00029-7

 

Paulino, I., Burgos-Tartera, C., & Aulet, S. (2023). Participatory governance of intangible heritage to develop sustainable rural tourism: The timber-raftsmen of La Pobla de Segur, Spain. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 18(5), 710-729. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2023.2235440

 

Poulios, I. (2014). Discussing strategy in heritage conservation: Living heritage approach as an example of strategic innovation. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 16-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-10-2012-0048

 

Reeves, K., & Long, C. (2011). Unbearable pressures on paradise? Tourism and heritage management in Luang Prabang, a World Heritage Site. Critical Asian Studies, 43(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2011.537849

 

Santoro, A., Venturi, M., & Agnoletti, M. (2021). Landscape perception and public participation for the conservation and valorization of cultural landscapes: The case of the Cinque Terre and Porto Venere UNESCO site. Land, 10(2), Article 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020093

 

Scazzosi, L. (2018). Rural landscape as heritage: Reasons for and implications of Principles Concerning Rural Landscapes as Heritage ICOMOS-IFLA 2017. Built Heritage, 2, 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03545709

 

Settimini, E. (2021). Cultural landscapes: Exploring local people’s understanding of cultural practices as “heritage.” Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 11(2), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-03-2020-0042

 

Shi, X., Beza, B. B., Liu, C., Wu, B., & Qiu, N. (2024). Differences in perspectives between experts and residents on living heritage: A study of traditional Chinese villages in the Luzhong region. Buildings, 14(12), Article 4022. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14124022

 

Smith, A., McNiven, I. J., Rose, D., Brown, S., Johnston, C., & Crocker, S. (2019). Indigenous knowledge and resource management as World Heritage values: Budj Bim Cultural Landscape, Australia. Archaeologies, 15(2), 285-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-019-09368-5

 

Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263

 

Suhartana, I. K., Demmallino, E. B., Ali, M. S. S., & Lakare, H. (2025). The role of social capital of the Sanur Indigenous Community in the development of the heritage tourism industry on Sanur Beach in Bali, Indonesia. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 20(3), 414-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2024.2436520

 

Sun, S., & Nakajima, N. (2023). Community co-creation in living heritage conservation: From object-centered to people-centered planning for the ancient city of Pingyao. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, X-M-1-2023, 253-262. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-M-1-2023-253-2023

 

Sun, Y., & Ou, Q. (2021). Research on the traditional zoning, evolution, and integrated conservation of village cultural landscapes based on “production-living-ecology spaces”: A case study of villages in Meicheng, Guangdong, China. Open Geosciences, 13(1), 1303-1317. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0279

 

Taylor, K. (2012). Landscape and meaning: Context for a global discourse on cultural landscape values. In K. Taylor & J. L. Lennon (Eds.), Managing cultural landscapes (pp. 21-44). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203128190-10

 

Taylor, K., & Lennon, J. (2011). Cultural landscapes: A bridge between culture and nature? International Journal of Heritage Studies, 17(6), 537-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.618246

 

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

 

Wang, Y. (2016). A sustainable approach for post-disaster rehabitation of rural heritage settlements. Sustainable Development, 24(5), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1632

 

Wang, Y., Sulaiman, M. K. A. M., & Harun, N. Z. (2025). Reframing place identity for traditional village conservation: A theoretical model with evidence from Dali Dong Village. Heritage, 8(10), Article 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8100427

 

Wardana, A., & Haryanto, V. (2026). Development for whom? The politics of heritage conservation-cum-tourism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 56(3), 459-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2025.2561810

 

Waterton, E., & Smith, L. (2010). The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1-2), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441671

 

Wijesuriya, G. (2018). Living heritage. In A. Heritage & J. Copithorne (Eds.), Sharing conservation decisions: Current issues and future strategies (pp. 43-56). ICCROM. Accessed July 19, 2026. https://www.iccrom.org/publication/sharing-conservation-decisions-current-issues-and-future-strategies

 

Xue, E. Y. (2022). Tourism as creative destruction: Place making and resilience in rural areas. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 20(6), 827-841. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2022.2114359

 

Yan, H. (2015). World Heritage as discourse: Knowledge, discipline and dissonance in Fujian Tulou sites. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(1), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2014.894930

 

Yodsurang, P., Kiatthanawat, A., Sanoamuang, P., Kraseain, A., & Pinijvarasin, W. (2022). Community-based tourism and heritage consumption in Thailand: An upside-down classification based on heritage consumption. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), Article 2096531. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2096531

 

Yu, H. (2015). A vernacular way of “safeguarding” intangible heritage: The fall and rise of rituals in Gouliang Miao Village. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(10), 1016-1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2015.1048813

 

Yuan, C., Yin, H., Li, T., & Zeng, Z. (2026). Rethinking placemaking through rural tourism in Chengkan Village, China. Tourism Geographies, 28(2), 191-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2025.2595297

 

Zhao, X. (2019). Negotiating contestations for community-oriented heritage management: A case study of Loushang in China. Built Heritage, 3(4), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03545719

 

Zhu, Y. (2026). Beyond classification: Rethinking heritage through dialogical reproduction. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 32(4), 604-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2026.2619181

 

Zuo, D., Li, C., Lin, M., Chen, P., & Kong, X. (2022). Tourism, residents agent practice and traditional residential landscapes at a cultural heritage site: The case study of Hongcun Village, China. Sustainability, 14(8), 4423. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084423

Share
Back to top
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, Electronic ISSN: 2717-5626 Published by AccScience Publishing