AccScience Publishing / JCAU / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JCAU025310062
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Urban landscape and symbolic ornamentation: The role of Liao Tricolor in multi-ethnic architecture

Ying Li1*
Show Less
1 National Research Center, Yunnan University for Studies of Borderland Ethnic Minorities, Southwest China, Kunming, Yunnan, China
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 025310062 https://doi.org/10.36922/JCAU025310062
Received: 29 July 2025 | Revised: 22 October 2025 | Accepted: 3 November 2025 | Published online: 17 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conservation and Revitalization of Architectural Heritage)
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Liao Sancai—also known as Liao tricolor ceramics—has long been treated and dismissed as purely funerary ware. This study argues that such a view is too narrow and obscures the role of these ceramics in the everyday and urban visual culture of the Liao dynasty (907–1125 CE). Drawing on Umberto Eco’s semiotics of ornament and concepts of non-verbal communication, the present study combines archaeological evidence from kiln sites with a typological analysis of ceramic motifs. Dragons, lotus scrolls, and vegetal arabesques are interpreted as more than decorative efflorescences: They functioned as a unifying visual language that helped bind a multi-ethnic state. Produced in ethnically diverse kilns (such as Longquanwu, Gangwayao, and Balinyouqi) and distributed to city centers like Dalian, Liao Sancai adorned not only funerary vessels but also sacred and civic architecture. Their repeated ornamental patterns structured urban experience, creating a semiotic infrastructure that mediated cultural plurality without imposing assimilation. This article, therefore, proposes the notion of “visual diplomacy” to describe how Liao Sancai crossed ethnic boundaries and articulated a shared imperial identity within a politically and culturally stratified field. The study further situates Liao decorative strategies within broader comparative perspectives on symbolic rule in multi-ethnic polities, and examines how contemporary Chinese museums are rebranding Liao Sancai. By mobilizing themes of harmony and common heritage, these institutions recast Liao tricolor ceramics as a vehicle for narratives of ethnic unity and cultural coexistence that continue to resonate today.

Keywords
Visual semiotics
Architectural ornamentation
Imperial identity
Material culture
Cultural diplomacy
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References

Bell, D. A., & De-Shalit, A. (2013). The Spirit of Cities: Why the Identity of a City Matters in a Global Age. United States: Princeton University Press.

 

Bondanella, P., editor. (2009). New Essays on Umberto Eco. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Di Cosmo, N. (2010). Ethnography of the Nomads and ‘Barbarian’ History in Han China. Intentional History Edited by Lin Foxhall/Hans-Joachim Gehrke/Nino Luraghi. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, p. 299.

 

Dong, X. (2020). The Shangjing norm of the Liao dynasty and the Dongjing mode of the Northern Song dynasty. Chinese Archaeology, 20(1):179-192. https://doi.org/10.1515/char-2020-0017

 

Eco, U. (1986). Function and sign: Semiotics of architecture. In: The City and the Sign: An Introduction to Urban Semiotics. Columbia University Press, p. 55-86.

 

Endicott-West, E. (2020). Mongolian Rule in China: Local Administration in the Yuan dynasty. Vol. 29. The Netherlands: BRILL.

 

Fei, X. (2017). The formation and development of the Chinese nation with multi-ethnic groups. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 1(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-017-0001-z

 

Fu, L. H. (1950). Natpat and Ordo: A Study of the Way of Life and Military Organization of the Khitan Emperors and their People. University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies (United Kingdom).

 

Gao, R. (2018). Ethnic Culture and Literature of Western Liao Dynasty. In: 2nd International Conference on Art Studies: Science, Experience, Education (ICASSEE 2018). Atlantis Press, p. 204-209. https://doi.org/10.2991/jnmp.2006.13.4.1

 

Glazier, R. (1899). A Manual of Historic Ornament: Treating Upon the Evolution, Tradition, and Development of Architecture and Other Applied Arts. London: BT Batsford.

 

Jiang, Q. (2009). Tang Sancai (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford).

 

King, A. (2004). Spaces of Global Cultures: Architecture, Urbanism, Identity. Oxfordshire: Routledge.

 

Li, W. (2014). Ceramics technology. In A History of Chinese Science and Technology. Vol. 2. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p. 301-378.

 

Louis, F. (2003). Shaping symbols of privilege: Precious metals and the early liao aristocracy. Journal of Song-Yuan Studies, 50(33):71-109.

 

Quanjin, G. A. O. (2024). The Transformation of Chinese Traditional Painting into Ceramic Art Based on Taoism (Doctoral dissertation, Silpakorn University).

 

Rutkiewicz, P., Malik, I., Wistuba, M., & Sady, A. (2017). Charcoal kilns as a source of data on the past iron industry (an example from the River Czarna valley, Central Poland). Environmental and Socio-Economic Studies, 5(3):12-22.

 

Sattler, G. (2024). Temple diplomacy, sacred rites, and overseas chinese during the reign of Song Emperor Zhenzong (997– 1022). Religions, 15(11):1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111401

 

Shen, H., & Wang, S. (2024). Traditional Chinese ideology and material culture: An archaeological exploration of historical perspectives and artefacts. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 24(3):237-252.

 

Shojaee, S. M., & Saremi, A. A. (2018). Explaining the Methods of Architecture Representation Using Semiotic Analysis. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 8(3):33-48.

 

Steinhardt, N. S. (1994). Liao: An architectural tradition in the making. Artibus Asiae, 54(1/2):5-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250078

 

Taylor, J. (2020). Buddhism, nomadism, and the making of new religio-political places: Deleuzian thought about Borderlands, movement and itinerant a/theology. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 21(2):103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1694573

 

Thorp, R. L. (1986). Architectural principles in early imperial China: Structural problems and their solution. The Art Bulletin, 68(3):360-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.1986.10788358

 

Trilling, J. (2003). Ornament: A Modern Perspective. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

 

Vasyutin, S. A. (2015). The model of the political transformation of the Da Liao as an alternative to the evolution of the structures of authority in the early medieval pastoral empires of Mongolia. Complexity of Interaction Along the Eurasian Steppe Zone in the First Millennium CE. Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology 7. Bonn University Press, Bonn, pp. 391-436.

 

Wang, C. (2020). Museum Representations of Chinese Diasporas: Migration Histories and the Cultural Heritage of the Homeland. London: Routledge.

 

Xu, Y. (2019). Grids of Chinese Ancient Cities: Spatial Planning Tools for Achieving Social Aims. Italy: Altralinea Edizioni.

 

Zhang, Y., & Sirisuk, M. (2024). The influence of tang sancai on Persian and Japanese ceramics. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Cultural Studies, 19(2):55. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-008X/CGP/v19i02/55-77

Share
Back to top
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, Electronic ISSN: 2717-5626 Published by AccScience Publishing