AccScience Publishing / JCAU / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JCAU025320066
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Optimization of the space design of the ethnic cultural transmission hall based on post-occupancy evaluation

Xingcan Zhao1 Thirawut Bunyasakseri1*
Show Less
1 Department of Art and Design, Faculty of Architecture, Art and Design, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 025320066 https://doi.org/10.36922/JCAU025320066
Received: 7 August 2025 | Revised: 10 November 2025 | Accepted: 20 November 2025 | Published online: 10 December 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Ethnic cultural transmission halls play a vital role in preserving and revitalizing intangible cultural heritage, yet many suffer from low youth engagement due to design shortcomings. This study applies the post-occupancy evaluation method—combining surveys, on-site observations, and expert interviews—to assess the spatial design of eight Chuanxi Halls. According to the survey, 80.1 percent of young participants preferred interactive workshops, and 68.7 percent favored immersive exhibitions, confirming the importance of experiential learning spaces. Building on these findings, the study develops an integrated design model that organizes spaces into layers for cultural learning, social interaction, and accessibility support. This framework aligns with Self-Determination Theory and Field Theory, offering both theoretical contributions and practical guidance for creating youth-friendly cultural halls that strengthen intergenerational cultural transmission.

Keywords
Chuanxi Hall
Post-occupancy evaluation
Cultural heritage
Spatial design
Inclusive design
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References

Al Mughairi, M., Beach, T., & Rezgui, Y. (2023). Post-occupancy evaluation for enhancing building performance and automation deployment. Journal of Building Engineering, 77, 107388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107388

 

Altomonte, S., Schiavon, S., Kent, M.G., & Brager, G. (2019). Indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction in green-certified buildings. Building Research and Information, 47(3), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1383715

 

Beijing Municipal Bureau of Culture and Tourism. (2024). Statistical Overview of Beijing’s Culture and Tourism Development; 2024. Available from: https://whlyj.beijing. gov.cn/zwgk/zxgs/tjxx/202409/p020240903524630570618. pdf [Last accessed on 2025 Dec 09].

 

Chai-Arayalert, S., Suttapong, K., & Chumkaew, S. (2023). Design of digital environments to enhance handicraft co-learning experiences. Cogent Business and Management, 10(3), 2286687. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2286687

 

Chan, S. H. G., Lee, W. H. H., Tang, B. M., & Chen, Z. (2024). Legacy of culture heritage building revitalization: Place attachment and culture identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1314223. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1314223

 

Chen, X. T. (2016). Architects’ Post-Occupancy Evaluation Methods and their Practice in Museums (Doctoral Dissertation). South China University of Technology.

 

Cheng, V. W. S., Piper, S. E., Ottavio, A., Davenport, T. A., & Hickie, I. B. (2021). Recommendations for designing health information technologies for mental health drawn from self-determination theory and co-design with culturally diverse populations: Template analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(2), e23502. https://doi.org/10.2196/23502

 

Dos Santos, A. L. T., Villa, S. B., Garcia, G. M., & Leão, C. R. (2023). Incorporation of post-occupancy evaluation in building information modeling: A case study in Brazil. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20, 789-807. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2233974

 

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th ed. London: Sage Publications.

 

Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., Vantieghem, W., & Gheyssens, E. (2020). Exploring the interrelationship between universal design for learning (UDL) and differentiated instruction (DI): A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 29, 100306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100306

 

Guo, J., & Ahn, B. (2023). Tacit knowledge sharing for enhancing the sustainability of intangible cultural heritage (ICH) crafts: A perspective from artisans and academics under craft-design collaboration. Sustainability, 15(20), 14955. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014955

 

Hou, S. (2023). The introduction and application of immersive experience by museum exhibition in space reconstruction. SHS Web of Conferences, 165, 1019. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316501019

 

Hu, W., Li, M., Chi, X., Wang, X., & Khan, A. U. (2024). Intangible cultural heritage research in China from the perspective of intellectual property rights based on bibliometrics and knowledge mapping. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 825. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03314-9

 

Ibrahim, F., Zainin, N. M., & Jamal, S. A. (2021). The need for interactive technology in Brunei Museum: An empirical study of visitor experience. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(16), 180-198. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i16/11227

 

Jiexin, Z., & Ying, L. (2022). The impediments of intangible cultural heritage inheritance and conversation and the path breakthrough in the context of digital survival. Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(19), 101-105. https://doi.org/10.25236/ajhss.2022.051918

 

Jones, T., Bui, H. T., & Ando, K. (2020). Zoning for world heritage sites: Dual dilemmas in development and demographics. Tourism Geographies, 24(1), 33-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1780631

 

Jun, Z., & Li, X. (2022). Research on the mining of intangible cultural heritage digital resources in the manual online teaching system of preschool education. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 2136597. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2136597

 

Kent, M., Parkinson, T., Kim, J., & Schiavon, S. (2021). A data-driven analysis of occupant workspace dissatisfaction. Building and Environment, 205, 108270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108270

 

Kim, S., & Kwon, H. (2020). Sustainable regeneration through the cultural conversion of urban heritage. Sustainability, 12(7), 2932. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072932

 

Li, J., He, M., Yang, Z., & Siu, K. W. M. (2025). Anthropological insights into emotion semantics in intangible cultural heritage museums: A case study of Eastern Sichuan, China. Electronics, 14(5), 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14050891

 

Lin, S. H., Zhang, H., Li, J. H., Ye, C. Z., & Hsieh, J. C. (2022). Evaluating smart office buildings from a sustainability perspective: A model of hybrid multi-attribute decision-making. Technology in Society, 68, 101824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101824

 

Maslova, S., & Burgess, G. (2023). Delivering human-centred housing: Understanding the role of post-occupancy evaluation and customer feedback in traditional and innovative social housebuilding in England. Construction Management and Economics, 41(4), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.2111694

 

Meirissa, A. S., Sarihati, T., & Haristianti, V. (2021). Implementation of experience design on museum interiors. Case study: East Java Cultural Museum. Journal of Architectural Design and Urbanism, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.14710/jadu.v4i1.11929

 

Mosca, E. I., & Capolongo, S. (2020). Universal Design-based Framework to assess Usability and Inclusion of Buildings. In: International Conference on Computational Science and its Applications Cham: Springer International Publishing, p. 316-331.

 

Mundo-Hernández, J., Valerdi-Nochebuena, M. C., & Sosa- Oliver, J. (2015). Post-occupancy evaluation of a restored industrial building: A contemporary art and design gallery in Mexico. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 4(4), 330-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2015.09.003

 

Ng, W. K., Chen, C. L., & Huang, Y. H. (2024). Revitalization of cultural heritage in the digital era: A case study in Taiwan. Urban Resilience and Sustainability, 2(3), 215-235. https://doi.org/10.3934/urs.2024011

 

Ni, D. C., & Ji, Y. F. (2013). Exploring the university library field from the perspective of Bourdieu’s field theory. Library Work and Research, 7, 15-18. (In Chinese).

 

Patrick, V. M., & Hollenbeck, C. R. (2021). Designing for all: Consumer response to inclusive design. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(2), 360-381. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1225

 

Peponis, J. (2024). Museums as spatial configurations. In: Museum Configurations. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, p. 1-31.

 

Preiser, W. F., White, E., & Rabinowitz, H. (2015). Post- Occupancy Evaluation (Routledge Revivals). Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.

 

Ryan, C. O., Browning, W. D., Clancy, J. O., Andrews, S. L., & Kallianpurkar, N. B. (2014). Biophilic design patterns: Emerging nature-based parameters for health and well-being in the built environment. ArchNet-IJAR, 8(2), 62-76. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v8i2.436

 

Strange, C. C., & Banning, J. H. (2015). Designing for Learning: Creating Campus Environments for Student Success. 2nd ed. United States: Jossey-Bass.

 

Vietze, J., Juang, L. P., & Schachner, M. K. (2019). Peer cultural socialisation: A resource for minority students’ cultural identity, life satisfaction, and school values. Intercultural Education, 30(5), 579-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2019.1586213

 

Vischer, J. C. (2001). Post-occupancy evaluation: A multifaceted tool for building improvement. In: Preiser, W. F. E, editor. Learning from our Buildings. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, p. 23-34.

 

Von Naumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. United States: Princeton University Press.

 

Wang, H. L. (2017). Analysis and reflections on the profits of ancient Chinese handicrafts. Modernization of the Market, 1, 232-234. (In Chinese).

 

Wang, H., Gao, Z., Zhang, X., Du, J., Xu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2024). Gamifying cultural heritage: Exploring the potential of immersive virtual exhibitions. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 15, 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100150

 

Wang, J. Y. (2020). Research on the Recognition, Evaluation, and Redesign of Wilderness Spaces in Urban Gaps in Central Beijing (Master’s Thesis). Beijing Institute of Fashion Technology.

 

Wang, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence-driven interactive experience for intangible cultural heritage: Sustainable innovation of blue clamp-resist dyeing. Sustainability, 17(3), 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030898

 

Weng, Y., Shen, T., Chen, S., & Xiao, B. (2019). Gamification in local intangible cultural heritage museums for children. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer, p. 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23538-3_18

 

Wong, C. H., & Aziz, A. A. (2020). Perceptions of youngsters on interior space quality in relation to materiality and spatial design. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 8(1), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v8.n1.630

 

Xiao, W., & Yoon, J. E. (2024). A post occupancy evaluation of the space utilization of cultural heritage in children’s education: A case study of Wuhan’s historical districts, China. Buildings, 14(9), 2682. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092682

 

Xie, R., Xia, H., Li, X., & Zhong, C. (2024). A Method for Intangible Cultural Heritage Image Enhancement based on Digital Twin. United States: Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4592119/v1

 

Yan, W. J., & Li, K. R. (2023). Sustainable cultural innovation practice: Heritage education in universities and creative inheritance of intangible cultural heritage craft. Sustainability, 15(2), 1194. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021194

 

Yidan, H., Yip, J., & Theavar, V. (2025). Exploring the potential of mobile phone applications in the transmission of intangible cultural heritage among the younger generation. Preservation Digital Technology & Culture. 54, 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2024-0058

 

Zhang, Q. L. (2022). Handicraft archaeology promotes the study of the origin of civilization. China Social Sciences News, p. 001. (In Chinese).

 

Zhu, Y. P. (2016). The materials, power, and types of traditional handicraft tools. Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Transmission, 3, 3. (In Chinese).

Share
Back to top
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, Electronic ISSN: 2717-5626 Published by AccScience Publishing