AccScience Publishing / JCAU / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/jcau.4138
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Re-approaching the origins of waterfront public space on Shanghai’s historic Bund: Social negotiation and urban construction, 1840s–1870s

Yingchun Li1* Xinyu Meng1
Show Less
1 Department of Architecture, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 4138 https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.4138
Received: 3 July 2024 | Revised: 30 September 2024 | Accepted: 31 October 2024 | Published online: 12 August 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Shanghai’s historic Bund is one of the earliest examples of urban public space developed for recreational purposes in modern China. Drawing on the Riparian Rights, 1845–1930: General Collection from the Shanghai Municipal Archive, alongside other unpublished sources, this study reveals that the Bund’s promenade and lawns were not part of the original plan for the British settlement. Instead, these public features emerged in 1879, following three decades of protracted negotiation. This urban process involved four key stakeholders: The Bund lot holders, the Shanghai Municipal Council, the Shanghai Daotai, and the British consuls. While Bund lot holders repeatedly sought to privatize the waterfront, the other three parties collectively resisted, with the British consuls playing a decisive yet historically overlooked role. Theoretically, this study challenges dominant paradigms, such as the “impact and response” model and the “colonizer–colonized confrontation” framework, which often frame Western powers and indigenous populations in binary opposition. In contrast, it highlights the complexity of pluralistic negotiations within colonial urban contexts. Practically, the study emphasizes the value of such negotiation processes in shaping sustainable public spaces.

Keywords
Urban form
Urban process
Public space
Social negotiation
The Bund
Shanghai
Funding
The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51878453).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Cai, Y., (eds.). (2005). Shanghai Daoqi [Shanghai Title Deed]. Shanghai: Shanghai Chinese Classics Publishing House.

 

Camerin, F. (2019). From “Ribera plan” to “diagonal mar”, passing through 1992 “Vila Olímpica”. How Urban renewal took place as urban regeneration in Poblenou district (Barcelona). Land Use Policy, 89:104226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104226

 

Camerin, F., & Álvarez Mora, A. (2019). Regenerating Bilbao: From productive industries to productive services. Territorio, 89:145-154. https://doi.org/10.3280/TR2019-089019

 

Dennys, N.B. (eds.). (1867). The Treaty ports of China and Japan. Available from: https://www.virtualshanghai.net/maps/ collection?id=402 [Last accessed on 2025 Aug 08].

 

Hibbard, P. (2007). The Bund, Shanghai: China Faces West. Hong Kong: Odyssey Books and Guides.

 

Home, R. (1997). Of Planting and Planning: The Making of British Colonial Cities. London: E and FN Spon.

 

Kostof, S. (1991). The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meanings through History. Boston: Little, Brown.

 

Kostof, S. (1992). The City Assembled: The Elements of Urban Form through History. London: Thames and Hudson.

 

Kotenev, A.M. (1930). Riparian Rights, 1845-1930: General. China: Shanghai Municipal Archive U1-1-1250.

 

Lee, L.O. (1999). Shanghai Modern: The Flowering of a New Urban Culture in China, 1930-1945. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

 

Leung, Y.S. (1990). The Shanghai Taotai: Linkage Man in a Changing Society, 1843-90. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

 

North China Herald and North China Daily News Offices, Shanghai. (1870). Available from: https://www. virtualshanghai.net/maps/collection?id=179 [Last accessed on 2025 Aug 08].

 

Porfyriou, H., & Sepe, M. (2017). Waterfronts Revisited: European Ports in a Historic and Global Perspective. England: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.

 

Qian, Z. (2005). Bainian Huiwang: Shanghai Waitan Jianzhu yu Jingguan de Lishi Bianqian (A Hundred Years of Looking Back: Historical Changes in the Architecture and Landscape of Shanghai Bund). Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers.

 

Shanghai Municipal Council (SMC). (1866). Report for the Year Ended 31st March, 1866. Shanghai: Printed by Kelly and Walsh, Ltd., Canton Road.

 

Shanghai Municipal Council (SMC). (1870). Report for the Year Ended 31st March, 1870. Shanghai: Printed by Kelly and Walsh, Ltd., Canton Road.

 

Shanghai Municipal Council (SMC). (1872). Report for the Year Ended 31st March, 1872. Shanghai: Printed by Kelly and Walsh, Ltd., Canton Road.

 

Shanghai Municipal Council (SMC). (1879). Report for the Year Ended 31st March, 1879. Shanghai: Printed by Kelly and Walsh, Ltd., Canton Road.

 

Smith, H., & Garcia Ferrari, M.S. (Eds.). (2012). Waterfront Regeneration: Experiences in City-Building. 1st ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203133378

 

Sun, Q. (2009). Shanghai Jindai Chengshi Gonggong Guanli Zhidu Yu Kongjian Jianshe (Urban Administration and Public Space in Modern Shanghai). Nanjing: Nanjing Southeast University Press.

 

Taylor, J.E. (2002). The bund: Littoral space of empire in the treaty ports of East Asia. Social History, 27(2):125-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071020210128364

 

Zhang, P. (2008). Dushi Xingtai de Lishi Genji: Shanghai Gonggong Zujie Shizheng Fazhan Yu Dushi Bianqian Yanjiu (A Study on the Relationship between Municipal Construction and Transformation of Urban Space in the International Settlement of Shanghai). Shanghai: Tongji University Press.

Share
Back to top
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, Electronic ISSN: 2717-5626 Published by AccScience Publishing