On higher grounds: Negotiating the legal framework for conserving Lantau Mountain Camp
Amid rapid urbanization and globalization, rural architectural heritage in Hong Kong faces mounting pressures from development and fragmented regulatory structures. This study investigates the architectural significance of the Lantau Mountain Camp, a site established by international, multi-denominational Protestant missionaries, and explores its role as a case study for heritage conservation in rural contexts. The camp exemplifies cultural exchange and offers insights into the intersection of local identities and global influences. Its unique lithic architectural character, which departs from traditional Chinese styles and urban standards, raises critical questions about representation, social justice, and the politics of heritagization. This article underscores the necessity for community involvement and the incorporation of local knowledge into legal frameworks to ensure inclusive conservation approaches that empower stakeholders. Drawing on international conservation frameworks, the study proposes a tailored conservation plan that gives equal attention to both recognized and non-statutory heritage sites. Engaging community advocacy groups and fostering public awareness are identified as key strategies for garnering broad-based support. Furthermore, the study highlights the essential role of public funding and heritage impact assessments in enhancing stakeholder understanding and long-term commitment. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the complexities of rural architectural heritage in Hong Kong and provide valuable lessons for comparable contexts worldwide. By advocating for collaborative, community-oriented approaches, the study calls for innovative conservation practices that honor historical significance while advancing sustainability and cultural diversity. Ultimately, the Lantau Mountain Camp serves as a compelling model for heritage conservation, reinforcing a renewed sense of community ownership and responsibility in safeguarding cultural heritage for future generations.
Antiquities Advisory Board. (2024). List of New Items for Grading Assessment with Assessment Results. Hong Kong: The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Available from: https://www.amo.gov.hk/filemanager/amo/common/form/list%20of%20 new%20items%20for%20grading%20assessment%20(bilingual).pdf [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 02].
Chan, E. H., & Hou, J. (2015). Developing a framework to appraise the critical success factors of transfer development rights (TDRs) for built heritage conservation. Habitat International, 46:35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.018
Chau, K., Lai, L. W., & Chua, M. H. (2022). Post-colonial conservation of colonial built heritage in Hong Kong: A statistical analysis of historic building grading. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 49(2):671-686. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083211023507
Cid Aguayo, B. E. (2008). Global villages and rural cosmopolitanism: Exploring global ruralities. Globalizations, 5(4):541-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747730802500281
Country Parks Ordinance, Cap. 208 (1976). Hong Kong: The Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Crossette, B. (1998). The Great Hill Stations of Asia. New York: Basic Books.
Daily, C. (2013). Robert Morrison and the Protestant Plan for China. Vol. 1. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Davies, O., Brisibe, W., & Davies, I. (2024). Challenges to implementation of adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 7(2):19-32. doi: 10.37628/IJAH
Development Bureau. (2009). Heritage Impact Assessment Mechanism for Capital Works Projects. Hong Kong: The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Frowe, H., & Matravers, D. (2019). Conflict and Cultural Heritage: A Moral Analysis of the Challenges of Heritage Protection. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Publications.
Gonçalves, J., Mateus, R., & Silvestre, J. (2019). Mapping professional practice challenges in built heritage. In: Professionalism in the Built Heritage Sector. United States: CRC Press, pp. 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429397912-16
Guerrero Baca, L. F., & Soria López, F. J. (2018). Traditional architecture and sustainable conservation. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 8(2):194-206. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2017-0036
Harrison, R., DeSilvey, C., Holtorf, C., Macdonald, S., Bartolini, N., Breithoff, E., et al. (2020). Heritage Futures: Comparative Approaches to Natural and Cultural Heritage Practices. London: UCL Press.
Jagielska-Burduk, A. (2022). Cultural Heritage as a Legal Hybrid. Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04946-0
Jenkins, V. (2018). Protecting the natural and cultural heritage of local landscapes: Finding substance in law and legal decision making. Land Use Policy, 73:73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.056
Kennedy-Skipton, G. S. (1962). Notes on Laan Tau Mountain Camp. Hong Kong: Lantau Mountain Camp Residents Association.
Lantau Mountain Camp Residents Association. (1961). Constitution of the Lantau Mountain Camp Residents Association. Hong Kong: Lantau Mountain Camp Residents Association.
Lee, H. Y., Cummer, K., & DiStefano, L. D. (2018). From crisis to conservation: A critical review of the intertwined economic and political factors driving built heritage conservation policy in Hong Kong and a possible way forward. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 33:539-553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-018-9611-8
Mitchell, I. E. (1924a). Memorandum to LMS Members of the South China District Committee: Mountain Camp. Lan Tau Island, Hong Kong: Lantau Development Advisory Committee, p. 1.
Mitchell, I. E. (1924b). To Members of the Mountain Camp. Hong Kong: Mountain Camp Association, pp. 1.
Morgan, C. (1979). An Informal Sketch of Laantau Mountain Camp. Hong Kong: Laantau Mountain Camp Association.
Mualam, N., & Alterman, R. (2018). Looking into the ‘black box’of heritage protection: Analysis of conservation area disputes in London through the eyes of planning inspectors. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24(6):599-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1399284
Patiwael, P. R., Groote, P., & Vanclay, F. (2019). Improving heritage impact assessment: an analytical critique of the ICOMOS guidelines. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25(4):333-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1477057
Petrillo, P. L. (2019). Intangible cultural heritage and comparative law. Towards a global legal protection of the intangible cultural heritage. In: The Legal Protection of the Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Comparative Perspective. Berlin: Springer, pp. 231-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72983-1_11
Unknown Author. (1940). Lantau Mountain… Its Camp Has a History. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Telegraph.
Zhang, H., Wang, F., Guo, F., Cai, J., & Dong, J. (2023). Urban built heritage protection and realistic dilemmas: The development process, protection system, and critical thinking of historic districts in Dalian. Built Heritage, 7(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-023-00106-z