AccScience Publishing / JCAU / Volume 6 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.36922/jcau.1084
Cite this article
57
Download
1022
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Ecological thinking in regenerative architecture: Relevance of abduction in ecoLogic Studio’s Deep Green research project

Xiao Wang1 Claudia Pasquero1,2,3*
Show Less
1 Synthetic Landscape Lab, IOUD, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
2 Urban Morphogenesis Laboratory, the Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London, London, United Kingdom
3 ecoLogicStudio, London, United Kingdom
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism 2024, 6(1), 1084 https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.1084
Submitted: 15 June 2023 | Accepted: 20 September 2023 | Published: 19 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regenerative Architecture)
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This article explores the connotations of regenerative architecture in the context of the Anthropocene, emphasizing the role of abduction on human cognition and its potential impact on innovation, especially when applied to a bio-cybernetic design method. The DeepGreen research project, developed by ecoLogicStudio in collaboration with the University of Innsbruck and the Bartlett UCL, serves as an exemplification of this method. The project combines biological and artificial intelligence to create an urban ecological infrastructure that integrates architectural and ecological systems. Centering on the DeepGreen project, this study discusses the creative potential and ecological embodiment of bio-cybernetic design protocols. It focuses on the mechanism of abduction in triggering innovative design solutions from a logical perspective, aligning with the principles of mind ecology at a cognitive level. The analysis suggests an innovative and ecological design thinking mode, asserting that regenerative architecture can encompass not only material aspects but also informational and spiritual dimensions. This approach ultimately promotes a holistic and harmonious urban environment. Furthermore, this research posits that the bio-cybernetic stance and the morphogenetic approach share commonalities with the holistic conception of nature and the ecological view in ancient Chinese Daoist philosophy. This contribution can potentially offer a contemporary interpretation of the Daoist principles of “Nature and Humans in One Unity (天人合一)” and “The Dao Imitates the Laws of Nature (道法自然).” Such an interpretation is deemed beneficial for addressing today’s concerns related to holistic, balanced, and harmonious urbanism. Henceforth, the study endeavors to facilitate discourse between Eastern and Western trends of thought, culminating in a cohesive yet heterogeneous regenerative approach.

Keywords
Regenerative design
Abduction
Bio-digital computation
Design innovation
Ecological thinking
Funding
Main support funding came from The University of Innsbruck, The Bartlett UCL, the United Nations Development Program, The Venice Architectural Biennale, The Center Pompidou in Paris, The City of Tallinn, and The City of Aarhus, among others.
References

Adamatzky, A. (2010). Physarum Machines: Computers from Slime Mould. Singapore: World Scientific.

 

Adamatzky, A. (2019). Slime Mould in Arts and Architecture. Denmark: River Publishers.

 

Almodovar-Melendo, J. M., & Cabeza-Lainez, J. M. (2018). Environmental features of Chinese architectural heritage: The standardization of form in the pursuit of equilibrium with nature. Sustainability, 10(7):2443. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072443

 

Attolico, N. (2019). Abductive Reasoning for Speculative Minds. From Semiotics to Speculative Design Practice+Speculative Infopoetry. Milan: Politecnico di Milano, p. 75-76. Available from: https://www.politesi.polimi.it/handle/10589/147158 [Last accessed on 2023 Aug 26].

 

Auger, J. (2013). Speculative design: Crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity, 24(1):11-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.767276

 

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and Nature: A Necessity Unity. Portland: Wildwood House.

 

Bateson, G., & Bateson, M. C. (1987). Angels Fear: Towards an Epistemology of the Sacred. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

 

Borden, R. J. (2017). Gregory Bateson’s search for “patterns which connect” ecology and mind. Human Ecology Review, 23(2):87-96. https://doi.org/10.22459/HER.23.02.2017.09

 

Bratton, B. H. (2016). On Speculative Design. DIS Magazine. Available from: https://dismagazine.com/discussion/81971/ on-speculative-design-benjamin-h-bratton [Last accessed on 2023 Aug 26].

 

Burks, A. W. (1946). Peirce’s theory of abduction. Philosophy of Science, 13(4):301-306. https://doi.org/10.1086/286904

 

Cross, N., Dorst, K., & Roozenburg, N., (eds.). (1992). Research in Design Thinking. Delft. The Netherlands: Delft University Press.

 

Davis, W. H., & Davis, W. H. (1972). Peirce’s Epistemology. Leiden: M. Nijhoff.

 

Dong, A., Mounarath, R., & Lovallo, D. (2012). The Language of Abduction in Choosing Innovation. In: ICDC 2012- 2nd International Conference on Design Creativity, Proceedings. Vol. 1. p. 179-188.

 

Dorst, K. (2011). The core of “design thinking” and its application. Design Studies, 32(6):521-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006

 

Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

 

Gardner, E. (2009). Reasoning in Architecture (Dissertation). Delft: Delft University of Technology.

 

Geddes, P. (1915). Cities in Evolution. London: Williams and Norgate.

 

Goldschmidt, G., & Weil, M. (1998). Contents and structure in design reasoning. Design Issues, 14(3): 85-100. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511899

 

Haig, B. D. (2014). Investigating the Psychological World: Scientific Method in the Behavioral Sciences. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

 

Hawkins, J., & Blakeslee, S. (2005). Intelligence. Australia: CampusPress.

 

Hayles, N. K. (2014). Cognition everywhere: The rise of the cognitive nonconscious and the costs of consciousness. New Literary History, 45(2):199-220.

 

Hintikka, J. (1998). What is abduction? The fundamental problem of contemporary epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 34(3):503.

 

Kroll, E., & Koskela, L. (2017): Studying Design Abduction in the Context of Novelty. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17). Design Theory and Research Methodology. Vol. 7. Vancouver, Canada.

 

Kwinter, S., & Davidson, C. (2008). Far from Equilibrium Essays on Technology and Design Culture. New York: Actar.

 

Liedtka, J. (2018). Why design thinking works. Harvard Business Review, 96(5):72-79.

 

Littman, J. A. (2009). Regenerative Architecture: A Pathway Beyond Sustainability (Dissertation). Amherst, the United States: University of Massachusetts Amherst.

 

March, L. (1976). The logic of design and the question of value. In: The Architecture of Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 1-40.

 

Nassetti, F., Pasquero, C., & Zaroukas, E. (2019). The inhuman City-Arachno-Computational Languages for Urban Design. In: Responsive Cities-Disrupting though Circular Design. Proceeding for the IAAC Responsive city Conference. Barcelona, p. 250-267.

 

Odum, E. P. (1993). Ecology and Our Endangered Life-Support Systems. Sunderland: Sinauer.

 

Paay, J., Kuys, B., & Taffe, S. (2021). Innovating product design through university-industry collaboration: Codesigning a bushfire rated skylight. Design Studies, 76:101031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101031

 

Parisi, L. (2013). Speculation: A method for the unattainable. In: Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. London: Routledge, p. 232-244.

 

Pask, G. (1969). The architectural relevance of cybernetics. In: Architectural Design. Cambridge: MIT Press.

 

Pasquero, C., & Poletto, M. (2017). Biodigital design workflows: ecoLogicStudio’s solana open aviary in Ulcinj, Montenegro. In: 4D Hyperlocal: A Cultural Toolkit for the Open-Source City. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, p. 44-57.

 

Pasquero, C., & Poletto, M. (2019). Tallinn Wet City: Eka. ecoLogicStudio. Available from: https://www.ecologicstudio. com/knowledge-room/tallinn-wet-city [Last accessed on 2023 Jun 10].

 

Pasquero, C., & Poletto, M. (2020). Bio-digital aesthetics as value system of post-anthropocene architecture. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 18(2):120-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077120922941

 

Pasquero, C., & Poletto, M. (2021a). Deep Green: Coupling Biological and Artificial Intelligence in Urban Design. In: Distributed Proximities Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture. United States: Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, p. 668-677.

 

Pasquero, C., & Poletto, M. (2021b). Deep Green. ecoLogicStudio. Available from: https://www.ecologicstudio.com/projects/ deep-green [Last accessed on 2023 Jun 10].

 

Pasquero, C., & Poletto, M. (2021c). Deep Green: Urbansphere: Venice. ecoLogicStudio. Available from: https://www. ecologicstudio.com/projects/deep-green-urbansphere-venice [Last accessed on 2023 Jun 10].

 

Pasquero, C., & Poletto, M. (2022). Gan Physarum: La Derive Numerique. ecoLogicStudio. Available from: https://www. ecologicstudio.com/projects/gan-physarum-la-derive-numerique [Last accessed on 2023 Jun 10].

 

Pasquero, C., & Poletto, M. (2023a). Chapter 3.2 Biomorphic intelligence deploying biotechnology in architecture for human health and wellbeing. In: M Kanaani (ed.). The Routledge Companion to Ecological Design Thinking: Healthful Ecotopian Visions for Architecture and Urbanism. Milton Park: Routledge.

 

Pasquero, C., & Poletto, M. (2023b). Gan physarum-shaping the future of the urbansphere. Architectural Design, 93:120-127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2902

 

Pasquero, C., & Zaroukas, E. (2016). Design Prototype. In: The Association of Architectural Educators (aae) Conference on “Research-Based Education”. p. 96-108.

 

Pasquero, C., Poletto, M., & Alexopoulos, K. (2019). Tallinn Wet City. ecoLogicStudio. Available from: https://www. ecologicstudio.com/knowledge-room/tallinn-wet-city [Last accessed on 2023 Jun 10].

 

Peirce, C. S. (1878). Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. Popular Science Monthly, 13:470-482.

 

Poletto, M. (2018). The Urbansphere. Architecture in the Age of Ubiquitous Computing. Melbourne: RMIT University. Available from: https://researchrepository.rmit.edu.au/esploro/ outputs/doctoral/the-urbansphere-architecture-in-the-age/9921861966101341#file-0 [Last accessed on 2023 May 15].

 

Poletto, M., & Pasquero, C. (2012). Systemic Architecture: Operating Manual for the Self Organizing City. Abingdon: Routledge.

 

Reed, B. (2007). A Living Systems Approach to Design. Livebetter Magazine. Available from: https://livebettermagazine.com/ article/a-living-systems-approach-to-design [Last accessed on 2023 May 10].

 

Roozenburg, N. (1993). On the pattern of reasoning in innovative design. Design Studies, 14(1):4-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(05)80002-x

 

Roozenburg, N. F. M., & Eekels, J. (1995). Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods. Chichester, England: Wiley.

 

Shaviro, S. (2016). Discognition. London: Repeater.

 

Sober, E. (2019). Core Questions in Philosophy: A Text with Readings. Abingdon: Routledge.

 

Wrigley, C., Nusem, E., & Straker, K. (2020). Implementing design thinking: Understanding organizational conditions. California Management Review, 62(2):125-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619897606

 

Yin, Z. (2012). Taoist philosophy on environmental protection. In Z Mou (ed.). Taoism (Religious Studies in Contemporary China Collection). Vol. 2. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, p. 279-292.

Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, Electronic ISSN: 2717-5626 Published by AccScience Publishing