AccScience Publishing / IJPS / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJPS025130051
PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE

Ageism in the workplace from Singapore to Canada: A translational perspective

Lynn Yu Ling Ng1* Swapna Dayanandan2,3
Show Less
1 Department of Politics, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Professional Studies, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2 Department of Gerontology, S R Nathan School of Human Development, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore
3 Joy in Living Aged Care Services Ptd Ltd, Singapore
Received: 25 March 2025 | Revised: 31 July 2025 | Accepted: 6 August 2025 | Published online: 18 August 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

This perspective piece tackles transnational ageism in the workplace by focusing on the Singapore case and national context while making connections to timely observations in Canada. Following existing studies, our review finds that although cultural circumstances of Confucian filial piety (in Singapore and East Asia) lead to higher degrees of implicit rather than explicit age discrimination, ageism is equally serious, and similarly intense, across contexts. Our discussion challenges the oversimplification of cultural differences between “East” and “West” in how societies are thought to address aging and age discrimination, as well as how ageism in various settings of daily life manifests. By analyzing policies, workplace practices, and social attitudes in Singapore, then situating these in global trends such as in Canada, we reveal common anxieties faced by older adults regarding financial insecurity and access to re-employment. This transnational lens underscores the importance of delving deeper into the culturally specific ways ageism manifests while simultaneously working toward the creation of effective international strategies. Deeper shifts are needed in the hearts and minds of people for significant changes to occur. In our view, shifting global demographics and rapid workplace changes necessitate a move beyond stereotypes and toward intergenerational cooperation, especially but not just in the workplace. We emphasize the importance of addressing ageism at all levels, relationally and transnationally, interpersonally to institutionally, to promote age-inclusive societies and secure a more dignified future for aging populations. Both authors’ perspectives are anchored in lived experiences as Singapore citizens. In what follows, we weave together our academic and community-engaged practitioner expertise in Singapore’s context of workplace ageism in light of ongoing community and social gerontology trends. We offer some observations in Canada for a comparative lens by way of gesturing to future transnational research directions for population studies.

Keywords
Cross-cultural ageism
Age discrimination
Workplace
Canada
Singapore
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References

Bae, S., & Choi, M. (2023). Age and workplace ageism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 66(6):724-738. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2022.2161685

 

Basu, R. (2016). Safe but Soulless: Nursing Homes Need a New Narrative. Singapore: Lien Foundation and Khoo Chwee Neo Foundation.

 

Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2018). A manifesto for the new community gerontology: Why social inequality matters in later life. Ageing and Society, 38(10):1826-1842. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1700068X

 

Burnes, D., Shepherd, L., & Henderson, C. (2020). A systematic review of interventions to reduce ageism. Ageing and Society, 40(10):2143-2166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1900070X

 

Chan, A. (2017). Singapore’s action plan for successful ageing: The role of the government in enabling productive ageing. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 29(2):181-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2016.1236649

 

Chih, J., & Chang, M. (2025). Fair Play at Work: Unpacking Singapore’s Workplace Fairness Act. Mayer Brown. Available from: https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/ publications/2025/07/fair-play-at-work-unpacking-singapores-workplace-fairness-act [Last accessed on 2025 Aug 13].

 

Ching, S.Y.L. (2023). Healthy Ageing in Singapore: Opportunities, Challenges and the Way Forward. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0872-1_1

 

Dayanandan, S., & Mehta, K. (2022). What does joy in living mean to elderly residents of nursing homes in Singapore? Religions, 13(5):469. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050469

 

De Stefano, V. (2021). Regulating algorithmic fairness in the labor market. International Labour Review, 160(1):127-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12164

 

Firzly, N., Van de Beeck, L., & Lagacé, M. (2021). Let’s work together: Assessing the impact of intergenerational dynamics on young workers’ ageism awareness and job satisfaction. Canadian Journal on Aging, 40(3):489-499. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980820000173

 

Government of Canada. (2024). Discussion Guide on Ageism in Canada. Available frAQ4 om: https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/corporate/seniors-forum-federal-provincial-territorial/consultation-ageism/discussion-guide.html [Last accessed on 2025 Aug 13].

 

Herron, R., Kelly, C., & Aubrecht, K. (2021). A conversation about ageism: Time to deinstitutionalize long-term care? University of Toronto Quarterly, 90(2):183-206. https://doi.org/10.3138/utq.90.2.09

 

Higgs, P., & Gilleard, C. (2020). The ideology of ageism versus the social imaginary of the fourth age: Two differing approaches to the negative contexts of old age. Ageing and Society, 40(8):1617-1630. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X19000096

 

Holstein, M.B., & Minkler, M. (2003). Self, society, and the “new gerontology.” The Gerontologist, 43(6):787-796. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/43.6.787

 

Katz, S. (2019). Critical gerontology for a new era. The Gerontologist, 59(2):396-397. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz008

 

Koh, F. (2025). Over 20,000 Seniors to get Easier Access to Active Ageing Programmes near their Homes. Channel News Asia. Available from: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/ singapore/active-ageing-seniors-elderly-west-coast-moh-mnd-desmond-lee-ong-ye-kung-5039346

 

Koh, S.K., Lim, K.H., & Koh, D. (2021). Housing wealth, financial wealth and retirement adequacy of older Singaporeans. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36(3):1047-1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09789-7

 

Kuper, H., & Jivraj, S. (2022). Intersectional ageism: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative empirical studies. The Gerontologist, 62(3):330-340. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab163

 

Lagacé, M., Donizzetti, A.R., Van de Beeck, L., Bergeron, C.D., Rodrigues-Rouleau, P., & St-Amour, A. (2022). Testing the shielding effect of intergenerational contact against ageism in the workplace: A Canadian study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8):4866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084866

 

Lahey, J.N. (2020). Age discrimination against older workers: An experimental study. Labour Economics, 66:101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101889

 

Leong, C. (2024). CPF Basic, Full and Enhanced Retirement Sum: Updates and Policy Changes That You Should Know About in 2024. Yahoo Finance MoneySmart. Available from: https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/cpf-basic-full-enhanced-retirement-000058652.html [Last accessed on 2025 Aug 13].

 

Lim, K.H., & Koh, S.K. (2021). Intergenerational transfers and retirement adequacy in Singapore. Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 20:100345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2021.100345

 

Ma, C. (2020). Applied Research in Singapore’s AgeingSociety: Methods, Philosophies, and Approaches. SUSS Researchers @ Work. Available from: https://www.suss. edu.sg/about/engagement-collaboration/centres/centre-for-applied-research/suss-researchers---work-issue-03/applied-research-in-singapore’s-ageing-society--methods-- philosophies--and-approaches [Last accessed on 2025 Aug 13].

 

Marcus, J. (2022). The confluence of culture and ageism at work. Work, Aging and Retirement, 8(4):352-354. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waab041

 

Maulod, A., & Lu, S.Y. (2019). “I’m slowly ageing but I still have my value”: Challenging ageism and empowering older persons through lifelong learning in Singapore. Educational Gerontology, 46(10):628-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2020.1796280

 

Michael Page Singapore. (2023). Workplace Ageism Tops DE and I Concerns in Singapore. Available from: https://www. michaelpage.com.sg/advice/management-advice/diversity-and-inclusion/workplace-ageism-age-discrimination [Last accessed on 2025 Aug 13].

 

Ministry of Manpower. (2023). Passing of Workplace Fairness Bill Marks Next Step in Building Fair and Harmonious Workplaces. Available from: https://www.mom.gov.sg/ newsroom/press-releases/2025/passing-of-workplace-fairness-bill-marks-next-step-in-building-fair-and-harmonious-workplaces [Last accessed on 2025 Aug 13].

 

Ng, L.Y.L. (2023). Choosing whom to care for: Children versus elderly. Journal of Aging and Social Change, 13(1):125-149. https://doi.org/10.18848/2576-5310/CGP/v13i01/125-149

 

Ng, L.Y.L. (2025). Uncovering connections between ageism and child-centric care. International Journal of Population Studies, 11:4971. https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.4971

 

Ng, T.W.H., & Feldman, D.C. (2021). Ageism at work: A review and synthesis of research since 2000. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8:185-211. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091305

 

North, M.S. (2022). Chinese versus United States workplace ageism as GATE-ism: Generation, age, tenure, experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:817160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817160

 

North, M.S., & Fiske, S.T. (2021). Modern attitudes toward older adults in the workplace: A critical review and conceptual extension. Work, Aging and Retirement, 7(1):1-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaa020

 

Randstad Singapore. (2023). Ageism in the Workplace Singapore. Available from: https://www.randstad.com.sg/hr-trends/workforce-trends/ageism-in-the-workplace-singapore [Last accessed on 2025 Aug 13].

 

Retirement and Re-employment Act. (2017). Singapore Statutes Online. Available from: https://sso.agc.gov.sg/act/rra2012 [Last accessed on 2025 Aug 13].

 

Rozario, P.A., & Hong, S.I. (2019). Foreign domestic workers and eldercare in Singapore: Who hires them? Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 31(3):197-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2019.1578605

 

Rudman, D., & Aldrich, R. (2021). Producing precarity: The individualization of later life unemployment within employment support provision. Journal of Aging Studies, 57:100924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100924

 

TOUCH Elderly Group. (2023). Active Ageing Activities for Seniors. Available from: https://www.touch.org.sg/get-assistance/seniors/active-ageing-activities.html

 

Wilson, D.M., Errasti-Ibarrondo, B., & Low, G. (2019). Where are we now in relation to determining the prevalence of ageism in this era of escalating population ageing? Ageing Research Reviews, 51:78-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2019.03.001

 

Yeo, G.B., & Lee, C.S. (2022). Retirement adequacy of older workers in Singapore: The role of the central provident fund and supplementary financial planning. The Singapore Economic Review, 67(3):825-851. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021759082150019X

 

Zhan, S., & Huang, L. (2023). State familism in action: aging policy and intergenerational support in Singapore. China Population and Development Studies, 7(2):111-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42379-023-00132-5

Share
Back to top
International Journal of Population Studies, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8606 Print ISSN: 2424-8150, Published by AccScience Publishing