A novel bioactive PEEK/HA composite with controlled 3D interconnected HA network
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a high-performance thermoplastic biomaterial which is currently used in a variety of biomedical orthopaedic applications. It has comparable tensile and compressive strength to cortical bone with favourable biocompatibility. However, natural grade PEEK-OPTIMA has shown insufficient bioactivity and limited bone integration. Bioactive PEEK composites (e.g., PEEK/calcium phosphates or Bioglass) and porous PEEK have been used to improve bone-implant interface of PEEK-based devices, but the bioactive phase distribution or porosity control is poor. In this paper, a novel method is developed to fabricate a bioactive PEEK/hydroxyapatite (PEEK/HA) composite with a unique configuration in which the HA (bioactive phase) distribution is computer-controlled within a PEEK matrix. This novel process results in complete interconnectivity of the HA network within a composite material, representing a superior advantage over alternative forms of product. The technique combines extrusion freeforming, a type of additive manufacturing (AM), and compression moulding. Compression moulding parameters, including pressure, temperature, dwelling time, and loading method together with HA microstructure were optimized by experimentation for successful biocomposite production. PEEK/HA composites with a range of HA were produced using static pressure loading to minimise air entrapment within PEEK matrix. In addition, the technique can also be employed to produce porous PEEK structures with controlled pore size and distribution.
1. Roeder RK and Conrad TL 2012, Bioactive Polyaryletherketone Composites, In PEEK Biomaterials Handbook. Oxford: William Andrew Publishing.
2. Abu Bakar MS, Cheng MHW, Tang SM, et al. 2003, Tensile properties, tension–tension fatigue and biological response of polyetheretherketone–hydroxyapatite composites for load-bearing orthopedic implants, Biomaterials, vol. 24: 2245-2250.
3. Tang SM, Cheang P, Abu bakar MS, et al. 2004, Tension–Tension Fatigue Behavior Of Hydroxyapatite Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Composites, International Journal Of Fatigue, vol. 26: 49-57.
4. Abu Bakar MS, Cheang P and Khor KA 2003, Mechanical Properties of Injection Molded Hydroxyapatite-Polyetheretherketone Biocomposites, Composites Science and Technology, vol. 63: 421-425.
5. Wong KL, Wong CT, Liu WC, et al. 2009, Mechanical Properties And In Vitro Response Of Strontium Containing Hydroxyapatite/Polyetheretherketone Composites, Biomaterials, vol. 30: 3810-3817.
6. Converse GL, Yue W and Roeder RK 2007, Processing and Tensile Properties of Hydroxyapatite-Whisker-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone, Biomaterials, vol. 28: 927-935.
7. Converse GL, Conrad TL and Roeder RK 2009, Mechanical Properties of Hydroxyapatite Whisker Reinforced Polyetherketoneketone Composite Scaffolds, Journal of The Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 2: 627-635.
8. Converse GL, Conrad TL, Merrill CH, et al. 2010, Hydroxyapatite Whisker-Reinforced Polyetherketoneketone Bone Ingrowth Scaffolds, Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 6: 856-863.
9. Yu S, Hariram KP, Kumar R, et al. 2005, In Vitro Apatite Formation and Its Growth Kinetics on Hydroxyapatite/Polyetheretherketone Biocomposites, Biomaterials, vol. 26: 2343-2352.
10. Hengky C, Kelsen B and Cheang P 2009, Mechanical And Biological Characterization of Pressureless Sintered Hydroxapatite-Polyetheretherketone Biocomposite, in 13th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Lim C and Goh JH (Eds.), Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
11. Kim IY, Sugino A, Kikuta K, et al. 2009, Bioactive Composites Consisting of PEEK and Calcium Silicate Powders, Journal Of Biomaterials Applications, vol. 24: 105-118.
12. Tan KH, Chua CK, Leong KF, et al. 2003, Scaffold Development using Selective Laser Sintering of Polyetheretherketone–Hydroxyapatite Biocomposite Blends, Biomaterials, vol. 24: 3115-3123.
13. Tan KH, Chua CK, Leong KF, et al. 2005, Fabrication And Characterization of Three-Dimensional Poly(Ether-Ether-Ketone)/-Hydroxyapatite Biocomposite Scaffolds using Laser Sintering, Proceedings Of The Institution Of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal Of Engineering In Medicine, vol. 219: 183-194.
14. Schmidt M, Pohle D and Rechtenwald T 2007, Selective Laser Sintering Of PEEK, Cirp Annals - Manufacturing Technology, vol. 56: 205-208.
15. Yang S, Yang H, Chi X, et al. 2008. Rapid Prototyping of Ceramic Lattices for Hard Tissue Scaffolds, Materials & Design, vol. 29: 1802-1809.
16. Lu X, Lee Y, Yang S, et al. 2009, Fabrication of Millimeter-Wave Electromagnetic Bandgap Crystals using Microwave Dielectric Powders, Journal of The American Ceramic Society, vol. 92: 371-378.
17. Lu X, Lee Y, Yang S, et al. 2010, Solvent-Based Paste Extrusion Solid Freeforming, Journal of The European Ceramic Society, vol. 30: 1-10.
18. Lu X, Lee Y, Yang S, et al. 2009, Extrusion Freeforming of Millimeter-Wave Electromagnetic Bandgap (Ebg) Photonic Crystals, Tsinghua Science And Technology, vol. 14: 168-174.
19. Lu X, Lee Y, Yang S, et al. 2009, Fine Lattice Structures Fabricated by Extrusion Freeforming: Process Variables, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 209: 4654-4661.
20. Lu X, Lee Y, Yang S, et al. 2009. Extrusion Freeforming of Millimeter Wave Electromagnetic Bandgap (Ebg) Structures, Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 15: 42 - 51.
21. Lu X, Lee Y, Yang S, et al. 2008, Fabrication of Electromagnetic Crystals By Extrusion Freeforming, Metamaterials, vol. 2: 36-44.
22. Yang HY, Yang S, Chi XP, et al. 2008, Sintering Behaviour of Calcium Phosphate Filaments for use as Hard Tissue Scaffolds, Journal Of The European Ceramic Society, vol. 28: 159-167.
23. Lu X, Chen L, Amini N, et al. 2012, Novel Methods To Fabricate Macroporous 3D Carbon Scaffolds and Ordered Surface Mesopores on Carbon Filaments, Journal of Porous Materials, vol. 19: 529-536.
24. Yang H, Yang S, Chi X, et al. 2006, Fine Ceramic Lattices Prepared by Extrusion Freeforming, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 79b: 116-121.
25. Yang HY, Thompson I, Yang S, et al. 2008, Dissolution Characteristics of Extrusion Freeformed Hydroxyapatite–Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds, Journal of Materials Science: Materials In Medicine, vol. 19: 3345-3353.
26. Jaekel DJ, Macdonald DW and Kurtz SM 2011, Characterization of PEEK Biomaterials using The Small Punch Test, Journal of The Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 4: 1275-1282.
27. Nieminen T, Kallela I, Wuolijoki E, et al. 2008, Amorphous and Crystalline Polyetheretherketone: Mechanical Properties and Tissue Reactions During A 3-Year Follow-Up, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 84a: 377-383.
28. Conrad TL, Jaekel DJ, Kurtz SM, et al. 2013, Effects of The Mold Temperature on The Mechanical Properties and Crystallinity of Hydroxyapatite Whisker-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Scaffolds, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 101b: 576-583.
29. Yang HY, Chi XP, Yang S, et al. 2010, Mechanical Strength of Extrusion Freeformed Calcium Phosphate Filaments. Journal of Materials Science: Materials In Medicine, vol. 21: 1503-1510.
30. Luo H, Xiong G, Yang Z, et al. 2014, Preparation of Three-Dimensional Braided Carbon Fiber-Reinforced PEEK Composites For Potential Load-Bearing Bone Fixations. Part I. Mechanical Properties And Cytocompatibility, Journal of The Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials, vol. 29: 103-113.
31. Tai NH, Ma CCM and Wu SH 1995, Fatigue Behaviour of Carbon Fibre/PEEK Laminate Composites, Composites, vol. 26: 551-559.
32. Mrse AM and Piggott MR 1993, Compressive Properties of Unidirectional Carbon Fibre Laminates: The Effects of Unintentional and Intentional Fibre Misalignments, Composites Science and Technology, vol. 46: 219-227.
33. Vaezi M, Chianrabutra S, Mellor B, et al. 2013, Multiple Material Additive Manufacturing – Part 1: A Review, Virtual And Physical Prototyping, vol. 8: 19-50.
34. Vaezi M, Seitz H and Yang S 2013, A Review on 3D Micro-Additive Manufacturing Technologies, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 67: 1721-1754.
35. Martínez-Vázquez FJ, Perera FH, Miranda P, et al. 2010, Improving The Compressive Strength of Bioceramic Robocast Scaffolds By Polymer Infiltration, Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 6: 4361-4368.
36. Seol YJ, Park DY, Park JY, et al. 2013, A New Method of Fabricating Robust Freeform 3D Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 110:1444-1455.
37. Lee BT, Quang D, Youn MH, et al. 2008, Fabrication of Biphasic Calcium Phosphates/Polycaprolactone Composites by Melt Infiltration Process, Journal of Materials Science: Materials In Medicine, vol. 19: 2223-2229.
38. Fedotov AY, Bakunova NV, Komlev VS, et al. 2013, Increase In Mechanical Properties of Porous Materials By Polymer Impregnation, Inorganic Materials: Applied Research, vol. 4: 7-11.
39. Alge DL and Chu TMG 2010, Calcium Phosphate Cement Reinforcement By Polymer Infiltration and In Situ Curing: A Method For 3D Scaffold Reinforcement, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 94a: 547-555.
40. Bang LT, Kawachi G, Nakagawa M, et al. 2013, The Use of Poly (Ε-Caprolactone) To Enhance The Mechanical Strength of Porous Si-Substituted Carbonate Apatite, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 130: 426-433.
41. Ma R, Fang L, Luo Z, et al. 2014, Mechanical Performance and In Vivo Bioactivity of Functionally Graded PEEK–HA Biocomposite Materials, Journal of Sol-Gel Science And Technology, vol. 70: 339-345.
42. Duan B, Cheung WL and Wang M 2011, Optimized fabrication of Ca-P/PHBV nanocomposite scaffolds via selective laser sintering for bone tissue engineering. Biofabrication, vol. 3: 015001
43. Huang W, Feng P, Gao C, et al. 2015, Microstructure, Mechanical, and Biological Properties of Porous Poly(vinylidene fluoride) Scaffolds Fabricated by Selective Laser Sintering. International Journal of Polymer Science, vol. 2015: 1-9.