Nursing robots in healthcare: The new employee
The development of robots incorporating artificial general intelligence has achieved rapid advancements, with tangible changes being observed on the labor market, such as in the healthcare industry. With the expansion of research targeted at robot development, it is anticipated that robots demonstrating artificial intelligence-associated cognitive properties that reflect individuality and distinctiveness will soon be entering the care system. These nursing robots take over some of the work traditionally done by humans in the elderly and nursing care system, encountering very vulnerable elderly individuals. Therefore, there is a need to reconsider and redefine the aspects of social values, data integrity, and the dignity of working with and on people when the nursing robots are taken into account. Their introduction presents opportunities for workforce redistribution and potential benefits for employees and underscores the urgent need for clear legal regulations. In this context, employing our knowledge in social science to foster constructive cooperation between humans and intelligent machines has become more important than ever.

- Wang Y. Jacques de vaucanson (1709-1782). In: Ceccarelli M, Fang Y, editors. Distinguished Figures in Mechanism and Machine Science. MESROB 2018. History of Mechanism and Machine Science. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 15-46. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-32398-1_2
- Hollings C, Martin U, Rice A. Ada Lovelace and the Analytical Engine. Bodleian Libraries. Available from: https://blogs.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/adalovelace/2018/07/26/ada/lovelace/ and/the/analytical-engine [Last accessed on 2018 Jul 26].
- Bajrang C. AI Pioneer Geoffrey Hinton Says World is not Prepared for What’s Coming. Available from: https://lifesyncmedia.beehiiv.com/p/ai/pioneer/geoffrey/hinton/ says/world/is/not/prepared-for-what-s-coming [Last accessed on 2025 Apr 27].
- Kitwood T. Dementia Reconsidered: The Person Comes First. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 1997.
- LaGrandeur K. The consequences of AI hype. AI Ethics. 2023;4:653-656. doi: 10.1007/s43681-023-00352-y
- Dahlin E. Who says artificial intelligence is stealing our jobs? Socius. 2024;10:5. doi: 10.1177/23780231241259672
- Liu Z, Wang S. How far we have come: Testing decompilation correctness of C decompilers. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis. 2020. p. 475-487. Available from: https://monkbai. github.io/files/issta-20.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 Nov 21].
- Fenwick A, Molnar G. The importance of humanizing AI: Using a behavioral lens to bridge the gaps between humans and machines. Discov Artif Intellig. 2022;2(14). doi: 10.1007/s44163-022-00030-8
- Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh RP, Rab S, Suman R. Significant application of cobots in the field of manufacturing. Cogn Robot. 2022;2:222-223. doi: 10.1016/j.cogr.2022.10.001
- Shayganfar M, Rich C, Sidner C, Hylák B. “It was not your fault” - emotional 9. awareness improves collaborative robots. In: IEEE International Conference on Humanized Computing and Communication (HCC). Laguna Hills, CA, USA: IEEE; 2019. p. 7-15. doi: 10.1109/HCC46620.2019.00010
- Wittgenstein L. Notes. In: Anscombe GEM, Von Wright GH, Translator. Certainty [Über Gewißheit]. Berlin, Germany: About Suhrkamp; 1984. p. 104-105.
- Kimmelman J. Can AI feel distress? Inside a new framework to assess sentience. Nature. 2024;633(8031):761-762. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-03076-z
- Wittgenstein L. Part two. In: Anscombe GEM, Wright GH, editors. Philosophical Investigations [Philosophische Untersuchungen]. Berlin, Germany: Suhrkamp; 1984. p. 495.
- Frisch M. In: Landgrebe J, editors. Homo Faber. A Report. 87th ed. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp; 2021. p. 75.
- Björk S, Juthberg C, Lindkvist M, et al. Exploring the prevalence and variance of cognitive impairment, pain, neuropsychiatric symptoms and ADL. Dependency among persons living in nursing homes; A cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:154. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0328-9
- Robots in the Care of Older People. Opinion of the Bioethics Commission. Bioethics Commission, Federal Chancellery. Digital Print Center of the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Vienna, Austria. Available from: https://www.com/file:///c/ users/leder/downloads/robots_care_older_people.pdf [Last accessed on 2017 Feb 16].
- Code of Ethics for Robotics Engineers (2010) the IEEE; the European Parliament Resolution of 16 February 2017 with Recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules in the Field of Robotics. Available from: https://eur/lex.europa.eu/legal/content/en/txt/pdf/?uri=celex: 52017IP0051 [Last accessed on 2018 Jul 18].
- Grabler R, Koeszegi ST. Privacy beyond data: Assessment and mitigation of privacy risks in robotic technology for elderly care. ACM Trans Hum Robot Interact. 2024;14(6):1-23. doi: 10.1145/3689216
- Bao A, Zeng Y, Lu E. Mitigating emotional risks in human-social robot interactions through virtual interactive environment indication. Hum Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10:638. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-02143-6
- Robinson H, MacDonald B, Kerse N, Broadbent E. The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(9):661-667. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.007
