Community arts and participatory engagement in a panda-themed environmental art initiative

Existing research recognizes art’s role in environmental awareness, but seldom examines participatory art as both method and engagement. This study explores how participatory art practices can foster ecological awareness in the context of wildlife tourism. Conducted at the Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, the research invited over 1,000 tourists to draw circles representing their perceived relationships with nature, giant pandas, and pets—an activity inspired by Schultz’s Connectedness to Nature (CNT) scale. Although the task was initially designed as a visual survey, it quickly evolved into a shared, creative experience that generated spontaneous participation, meaningful conversations, and emotional engagement. What began as a scientific investigation revealed itself to be an ecological art project. Participants were not merely data contributors but co-creators, offering their own cultural and personal narratives to the panda–human coexistence. Drawing from Timothy Morton’s theory that art can foster non-coercive, relational experiences with the more-than-human world; this paper frames the drawing activity as an act of ecological art. Here, the giant panda is not simply a passive subject but an active participant in shaping a shared affective space, prompting reflections on conservation, interspecies coexistence, and emotional entanglements. This art-based approach illustrates how cultural and affective dimensions can be integrated into environmental communication through the engagement of both pandas and tourists. It highlights the value of participatory creativity as both a research method and a meaningful form of public engagement. As environmental challenges intensify, this study suggests that ecological art offers a promising pathway for fostering inclusive, grounded, and emotionally resonant environmental discourse. It contributes not only to research on CNT but also to the broader work of reimagining human relationships with the natural world.
- Morton T. All Art is Ecological. London, UK: Penguin; 2021.
- Blandy D, Congdon KG, Krug DH. Art, ecological restoration, and art education. Stud Art Educ. 1998;39(3):230-243. doi: 10.1080/00393541.1998.11650026
- Inwood H. Artistic Approaches to Ecological Literacy: Developing Eco-Art Education in Elementary Classrooms. In: Marilyn Zurmuehlen Working Papers in Art Education; 2007.
- Song YIK. Crossroads of public art, nature and environmental education. Environ Educ Res. 2012;18(6):797-813. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2012.670208
- Wallen R. Ecological art: A call for visionary intervention in a time of crisis. Leonardo. 2012;45(3):234-242. doi: 10.1162/leon_a_00365
- Weintraub L. To Life!: Eco art in Pursuit of a Sustainable Planet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2012.
- Marks M, Chandler L, Baldwin C. Environmental art as an innovative medium for environmental education in biosphere reserves. Environ Educ Res. 2017;23(9):1307-1321. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2016.1214864
- Papavasileiou V, Nikolaou E, Andreadakis N, Xanthacou Y, Kaila M. The role of art in environmental education. IJAEDU Int E-J Adv Educ. 2021;6(18):287-295.
- Doyle J. Practicing care through creative and collaborative climate communication. Environ Commun. 2024;18(1- 2):28-34. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2023.2299355
- Ricci K, Li N. Communicating environmental and ecological sciences through visual arts: A cross-disciplinary review. Environ Commun. 2024;18(7):831-846. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2024.2334749
- Schultz PW. Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In: Psychology of Sustainable Development. New York: Springer; 2002. p. 61-78.
- Stoltz B. A nature thing: What does contemporary ecological art produce? Arts. 2023;12(2):67. doi: 10.3390/arts12020067
- Kagan S. The practice of ecological art. Plastic-Art Sci. 2014;4:1-6.
- Clapp EP. Participatory Creativity: Introducing Access and Equity to the Creative Classroom. London, UK: Routledge; 2016.
- Simus J. Environmental art and ecological citizenship. Environ Ethics. 2008;30(1):21. doi: 10.1515/9780823254521-009
- Simon S. Systemic educational approaches to environmental issues: The contribution of ecological art. Syst Pract Action Res. 2006;19(2):143-157. doi: 10.1007/s11213-006-9008-6
- Song YIK. Community participatory ecological art and education. Int J Art Des Educ. 2009;28(1):4-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.2009.01588.x
- Roe E, Buser M. Becoming ecological citizens: Connecting people through performance art, food matter and practices. Cult Geogr. 2016;23(4):581-598. doi: 10.1177/14744740156242
- Mamur N, Çelik T. Ecological art pedagogy: Co-creation for ecological transformation. Educ 3-13. 2023:1-18. doi: 10.1080/03004279.2023.2266510
- Rathwell KJ, Armitage D. Art and artistic processes bridge knowledge systems about social-ecological change: An empirical examination with Inuit artists from Nunavut, Canada. Ecol Soc. 2016;21(2):21. doi: 10.5751/es-08369-210221
- Naess A. The basics of deep ecology. Trumpeter. 2005;21(1):61-71.
- Bennett J. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2020.
- Olivos P, Aragonés JI, Amérigo M. The connectedness to nature scale and its relationship with environmental beliefs and identity. Int J Hispanic Psychol. 2011;4(1):5-19.
- Beery TH, Wolf-Watz D. Nature to place: Rethinking the environmental connectedness perspective. J Environ Psychol. 2014;40:198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.06.006
- Restall B, Conrad E. A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. J Environ Manage. 2015;159:264-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.022
- Lengieza ML, Swim JK. The paths to connectedness: A review of the antecedents of connectedness to nature. Front Psychol. 2021;12:763231. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.763231
- Martin C, Czellar S. The extended inclusion of nature in self scale. J Environ Psychol. 2016;47:181-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.006
- Howlett K, Turner EC. What can drawings tell us about children’s perceptions of nature? PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0287370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287370
- Montgomery LN, Gange AC, Watling D, Harvey DJ. Children’s perception of biodiversity in their school grounds and its influence on their wellbeing and resilience. J Adventure Educ Outdoor Learn. 2024;24(2):187-201. doi: 10.1080/14729679.2022.2100801
- Snaddon JL, Turner EC, Foster WA. Children’s perceptions of rainforest biodiversity: Which animals have the lion’s share of environmental awareness? PLoS One. 2008;3(7):e2579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002579
- Kleespies MW, Braun T, Dierkes PW, Wenzel V. Measuring connection to nature-a illustrated extension of the inclusion of nature in self scale. Sustainability. 2021;13(4):1761. doi: 10.3390/su13041761
- Maneja-Zaragoza R, Linde DV, Juncà MB. Drawing analysis: Tools for understanding children’s perceptions of community conservation. In: Community Action for Conservation: Mexican Experiences. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 159-170.
- Cainey J, Humphrey L, Bowker R. Drawing experiences in marine conservation. In: Drawing for Science Education: An International Perspective. Berlin: Springer; 2017. p. 97-109.
- McConnell AR, Jacobs TP. Self-nature representations: On the unique consequences of nature-self size on pro-environmental action. J Environ Psychol. 2020;71:101471. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101471
- Clayton S, Opotow S. Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003.
- Ashmore RD, Deaux K, McLaughlin-Volpe T. An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychol Bull. 2004;130(1):80-114. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80
- Isenlin. 公园城市年度热词④-1200万人次!破译公园城市的野保“生态密码; 2024. Available from: https://www.isenlin.cn/sf_878a579789184e8588190486f9d1 3eea_209_0a c5f489143.html [Last accessed on 2025 Mar 05].
- Fook J. Reflexivity as method. Annu Rev Health Soc Sci. 1999;9(1):11-20. doi: 10.5172/hesr.1999.9.1.11
- Guillemin M, Gillam L. Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qual Inq. 2004;10(2):261-280. doi: 10.1177/1077800403262360
- Palaganas EC, Sanchez MC, Molintas MVP, Caricativo RD. Reflexivity in qualitative research: A journey of learning. Qual Rep. 2017;22(2):426-438. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2552
- Dodgson JE. Reflexivity in qualitative research. J Hum Lact. 2019;35(2):220-222. doi: 10.1177/0890334419830990
- Skukauskaite A, Yilmazli Trout I, Robinson KA. Deepening reflexivity through art in learning qualitative research. Qual Res. 2022;22(3):403-420. doi: 10.1177/1468794120985676
- Bogumil E, Capous-Desyllas M, Lara P, Reshetnikov A. Art as mode and medium: A pedagogical approach to teaching and learning about self-reflexivity and artistic expression in qualitative research. Int J Res Method Educ. 2017;40(4):360-378. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2015.1114602
- Feige DM. Art as reflexive practice. Proc Eur Soc Aesthet. 2010;2:125-142.
- Schober P, Vetter TR. Logistic regression in medical research. Anesth Analg. 2021;132(2):365-366. doi: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005247
- Li C. The confucian ideal of harmony. Philos East West. 2006;56(4):583-603. doi: 10.1353/pew.2006.0055
- Wei X, Li Q. The Confucian value of harmony and its influence on Chinese social interaction. Cross-Cult Commun. 2013;9(1):60-66. doi: 10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020130901.12018
- Li S, Shaw G. Creative tourism and creative tourists: A review. In: Creative Business Education: Exploring the Contours of Pedagogical Praxis. Germany: Springer Nature; 2022. p. 199-219.
- Orusa T, Viani A, D’Alessio SG, Orusa R, Caminade C. One health approaches and modeling in parasitology in the climate change framework and possible supporting tools adopting GIS and remote sensing. Front Media SA. 2025;4:1560799. doi: 10.3389/fpara.2025.1560799
- Viani A, Orusa T, Divari S, et al. Detection of Bartonella spp. in foxes’ populations in piedmont and Aosta Valley (NW Italy) coupling geospatially-based techniques. Front Vet Sci. 2025;11:1388440. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1388440