AccScience Publishing / JCTR / Volume 7 / Issue 5 / DOI: 10.18053/jctres.07.202105.006
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Relationship between anthropometric and kinematic measures to practice velocity in elite American 100 m sprinters

Amber Murphy1* Kenneth P. Clark2 Nicholas Murray3 Bridget Melton4 Ralph Mann5 Randall Rieger6
Show Less
1 Department of Exercise Science, Concordia University Chicago, Chicago, USA
2 Department of Kinesiology, West Chester University of PA, USA
3 Department of Kinesiology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA
4 Department of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, Georgia Southern University
5 CompuSport, Las Vegas, NV, 6. Department of Mathematics, West Chester University of PA, USA
Received: 10 March 2021 | Revised: 11 June 2021 | Accepted: 25 August 2021 | Published online: 27 September 2021
© 2021 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background: There exists a paucity of anthropometric and kinematic data for elite United States (US) sprinters and further analysis of how these variables correlate with sprint velocity in practice is warranted.
Aim: The purpose of this investigation was to examine the relationship of anthropometric and kinematic variables and practice sprint velocity of elite sprint athletes when separated by gender.
Methods: Participants included elite US 100m sprinters (total: N=38, male: n=19, female: n=19). Inclusion criteria was participation in the 100m semifinals or finals at the US Outdoor National Championships from 2015-2019. Anthropometric data and 300 Hz video during maximum velocity sprinting were collected during a practice session and video was digitized to determine the kinematic variables of interest. Relationships with maximal sprint velocity were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis.
Results: Males showed significant unadjusted relationships between practice velocity and step length (r = 0.668; p = 0.002), horizontal backward foot velocity at touchdown (r = 0.459; p = 0.048) and upper leg full extension angle (r = -0.585; p = 0.009). Multiple regression analysis found that when adjusting for these three variables step length was the only significant predictor of practice velocity in males which accounted for 44.6% of the variability in practice velocity in males. The females showed a significant relationship between practice velocity and step length (r = 0.629; p = 0.004) which accounted for 39.5% of the variability in practice velocity.
Conclusion: These results provide researchers and coaches with important information regarding the anthropometric and kinematic variables related to elite top speed sprinting performance.
Relevance for patients: Training focused on increasing step length may be an efficient way to improve velocity in practice.

Conflict of interest
The authors state that there are no conflicts of interest with respect to this research.
References

[1] World Rankings: Men’s 100m; 2020. Available from: https://www.worldathletics.org/world-rankings/100m/ men. Last accessed on 2020 Oct 13.

[2] World Rankings: Women’s 100m; 2020. Available from: https://www.worldathletics.org/world-rankings/100m/ women. Last accessed on 2020 Oct 13.

[3] 2019 World Track and Field Championships Results, OlympicTalk: NBC Sports; 2019. Available from: https:// www.olympics.nbcsports.com/2019/09/28/track-andfield-world-championships-results-athletics. Last accessed on 2019 Oct 07.

[4] Slawinski J, Termoz N, Rabita G, Guilhem G, Dorel S, Morin JB, et al. How 100-m Event Analyses Improve Our Understanding of World-Class Men’s and Women’s Sprint Performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2015;27:45-54.

[5] Rabita G, Dorel S, Slawinski J, Sàez-de‐Villarreal E, Couturier A, Samozino P, et al. Sprint Mechanics in WorldClass Athletes: A New Insight into the Limits of Human Locomotion. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2015;25:583-94.

[6] Clark KP, Weyand PG. Are Running Speeds Maximized with Simple-Spring Stance Mechanics? J Appl Physiol 2014;117:604-15.

[7] Debaere S, Jonkers I, Delecluse C. The Contribution of Step Characteristics to Sprint Running Performance in High-Level Male and Female Athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2013;27:116-24.

[8] Haugen T, Danielsen J, Alnes LO, McGhie D, Sandbakk Ø, Ettema G. On the Importance of “Front-Side Mechanics” in Athletics Sprinting. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2018;13:420-7.

[9] Manzer S, Mattes K, Hollander K. Kinematic Analysis of Sprinting Pickup Acceleration Versus Maximum Sprinting Speed. Biol Exerc 2016;12:55-67.

[10] Mattes K, Habermann N, Schaffert N, Muhlbach T. A longitudinal study of kinematic stride characteristics in maximal sprint running. J Hum Sport Exerc 2014;9:686-99.

[11] Clark KP, Meng CR, Stearne DJ. Whip from the Hip: Thigh Angular Motion, Ground Contact Mechanics, and Running Speed. Biol Open 2020;9:bio053546.

[12] Mann R, Herman J. Kinematic Analysis of Olympic Sprint Performance: Men’s 200 Meters. Int J Sport Biomech 1985;1:151-62.

[13] Miyashiro K, Nagahara R, Yamamoto K, Nishijima T. Kinematics of Maximal Speed Sprinting with Different Running Speed, Leg Length, and Step Characteristics. Front Sports Act Living 2019;1:37.

[14] Mann RV, Murphy A. The Mechanics of Sprinting and Hurdling. Las Vegas, NV: CompuSport; 2018.

[15] Murphy A, Clark KP, Murray N, Melton B, Mann R, Rieger R. Relationship between Performance and Kinematic Measures to Competition Velocity in ELITE AMERICAN 100m Sprinters, in Review; 2021.

[16] Mann R. Sprint Teaching Computer Software; 2020. Available from: http://www.compusport.com. [Last accessed on 2021 Feb 02].

[17] Bezodis I, Irwin G, Kuntze G, Kerwin D. Changes in Step Characteristics Between the Maximum Velocity and Deceleration Phases of the Sprint Run. Port J Sports Sci 2011;11 Suppl 2:455-8.

Share
Back to top
Journal of Clinical and Translational Research, Electronic ISSN: 2424-810X Print ISSN: 2382-6533, Published by AccScience Publishing