AccScience Publishing / IJB / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJB026110094
RESEARCH ARTICLE

BioPrint-LKM: An evidence-grounded large knowledge model for bioprinting knowledge retrieval and parameter initialization

Xi Huang1* Hanqi Su2 Zhengjie Cui1 Jia Min Lee1 Xinchao Gao1 Renzhi Hu1 Jay Lee2 Wai Yee Yeong1*
Show Less
1 School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
2 Center for Industrial Artificial Intelligence, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States of America
Received: 13 March 2026 | Accepted: 24 March 2026 | Published online: 10 April 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s).. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Bioprinting workflows often require repeated trial-and-error to achieve acceptable print quality, while relevant process knowledge and parameter ranges are dispersed across a rapidly growing literature. General-purpose language models can assist with scientific questions, but their output may be difficult to verify and can include unsupported claims. In this work, we present BioPrint-LKM, a bioprinting large knowledge model (LKM) implemented using a retrieval-augmented generation pipeline with citation grounding to provide traceable, evidence-based responses for bioprinting tasks. A curated knowledge base was constructed from 621 bioprinting papers, which were converted to text, segmented into passages, embedded into a vector index, and retrieved using exact nearest-neighbor similarity search. Retrieved passages were assembled into an augmented context and used to constrain generation under a domain prompt guideline that enforces source and page-level citation. The LKM was evaluated using 30 bioprinting-related questions and three large language model (LLM) backbones (GPT-4o, Claude-Sonnet-4.6, and Gemini-2.5-Flash). Across the tested 30-question benchmark, retrieval and citation grounding improved question-answer accuracy compared with LLM-only baselines by an average of 24.7%, particularly for queries requiring paper specific details such as component concentrations, mixing ratios, and instrument settings. A retrieval hyperparameter sweep further showed that top-k and passage length affect both evidence coverage and noise, with an intermediate passage length providing the best overall performance. Beyond knowledge retrieval, the LKM was applied to bioprinting process setup by generating initial parameter sets that were used to warm-start multi-objective Bayesian optimization toward target filament width and height. Compared with manual initialization, BioPrint-LKM-assisted initialization reduced the number of calibration trials by an average of 36.0% and supported downstream printing demonstrations, including conductive cell-laden hydrogel lines and an anatomical ear model. These results suggest that BioPrint-LKM, a citation grounded LKM, can serve as a practical lab-assistive tool to accelerate bioprinting setup and improve reproducibility.

 

 

Graphical abstract
Keywords
3D bioprinting
Biofabrication
Large knowledge model
Retrieval-augmented generation
Citation grounding
Machine learning
Hydrogel
Process calibration
Funding
This research is supported by the National Research Foundation for NRF Investigatorship Award No.: NRFNRFI07- 2021-0007.
Conflict of interest
Wai Yee Yeong serves as an Associate Editor of this journal, but was not in any way involved in the editorial and peer-review process conducted for this paper, directly or indirectly. The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K, Kim DH. 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34(4):422- 434. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011
  2. Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(8):773-785. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2958
  3. Groll J, Boland T, Blunk T, et al. Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field. Biofabrication. 2016;8(1):013001. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/013001
  4. Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Inci I, Zhang YS, Khademhosseini A, Dokmeci MR. Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview. Biomater Sci. 2018;6(5):915-946. doi: 10.1039/c7bm00765e
  5. Sun W, Starly B, Daly AC, et al. The bioprinting roadmap. Biofabrication. 2020;12(2):022002. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab5158
  6. Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF. Print Me An Organ! Why We Are Not There Yet. Prog Polym Sci. 2019;97:101145. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145
  7. Lee JM, Ng WL, Yeong WY. Resolution and shape in bioprinting: Strategizing towards complex tissue and organ printing. Appl Phys Rev. 2019;6(1):011307. doi: 10.1063/1.5053909
  8. Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M. Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials. 2016;76:321-343. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076
  9. Meng Z, He J, Li J, Su Y, Li D. Melt-based, solvent-free additive manufacturing of biodegradable polymeric scaffolds with designer microstructures for tailored mechanical/biological properties and clinical applications. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2020;15(4):417-444. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2020.1808937
  10. Choe YE, Kim GH. A PCL/cellulose coil-shaped scaffold via a modified electrohydrodynamic jetting process. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2020;15(4):403-416. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2020.1808269
  11. Li X, Liu B, Pei B, et al. Inkjet Bioprinting of Biomaterials. Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):10793-10833. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008
  12. Weygant J, Entezari A, Koch F, et al. Droplet 3D cryobioprinting for fabrication of free-standing and volumetric structures. Aggregate. 2024;5(5):e599. doi: 10.1002/agt2.599
  13. Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al. Vat polymerization-based bioprinting—process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges. Biofabrication. 2020;12(2):022001. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034
  14. Lin H, Zhang D, Alexander PG, et al. Application of visible light-based projection stereolithography for live cell-scaffold fabrication with designed architecture. Biomaterials. 2013;34(2):331-339. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.048
  15. Lemma ED, Spagnolo B, De Vittorio M, Pisanello F. Studying Cell Mechanobiology in 3D: The Two-Photon Lithography Approach. Trends Biotechnol. 2019;37(4):358-372. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.09.008
  16. Miri AK, Khalilpour A, Cecen B, Maharjan S, Shin SR, Khademhosseini A. Multiscale bioprinting of vascularized models. Biomaterials. 2019;198:204-216. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.006
  17. Lee A, Hudson AR, Shiwarski DJ, et al. 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science. 2019;365(6452):482-487. doi: 10.1126/science.aav9051
  18. Parihar A, Parihar DS, Gaur K, Arya N, Choubey VK, Khan R. 3D bioprinting for drug development and screening: Recent trends towards personalized medicine. Hybrid Adv. 2024;7:100320. doi: 10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100320
  19. Parihar A, Pandita V, Khan R. 3D printed human organoids: High throughput system for drug screening and testing in current COVID-19 pandemic. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2022;119(10):2669-2688. doi: 10.1002/bit.28166
  20. Grijalva Garces D, Strauß S, Gretzinger S, et al. On the reproducibility of extrusion-based bioprinting: round robin study on standardization in the field. Biofabrication. 2023;16(1):015002. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/acfe3b
  21. Schwab A, Levato R, D’Este M, Piluso S, Eglin D, Malda J. Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting. Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):11028-11055. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084
  22. He Y, Yang F, Zhao H, Gao Q, Xia B, Fu J. Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):29977. doi: 10.1038/srep29977
  23. Compaired PM, García-Gareta E, Pérez MÁ. An experimental workflow for bioprinting optimization: Application to a custom-made biomaterial ink. Int J Bioprinting. 2025;11(3):397-415. doi: 10.36922/IJB025120094
  24. Tian S, Zhao H, Lewinski N. Key parameters and applications of extrusion-based bioprinting. Bioprinting. 2021;23:e00156. doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00156
  25. Yu C, Jiang J. A Perspective on Using Machine Learning in 3D Bioprinting. Int J Bioprinting. 2020;6(1):253. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v6i1.253
  26. Shangguan P, Zhou H, Huang X, Su J, Yeong WY, Sing SL. Artificial intelligence-driven material development for additive manufacturing: A critical review. Int J AI Mater Des. 2025;2(2):1-26. doi: 10.36922/IJAMD025100007
  27. Zolfagharian A, Jin L, Ge Q, et al. Roadmap on Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Additive Manufacturing. Adv Intell Syst. 2026:e202500484. doi: 10.1002/aisy.202500484
  28. Sani AR, Zolfagharian A, Kouzani AZ. Artificial Intelligence- Augmented Additive Manufacturing: Insights on Closed-Loop 3D Printing. Adv Intell Syst. 2024;6(10):2400102. doi: 10.1002/aisy.202400102
  29. Huang X, Ng WL, Yeong WY. Predicting the number of printed cells during inkjet-based bioprinting process based on droplet velocity profile using machine learning approaches. J Intell Manuf. 2024;35(5):2349-2364. doi: 10.1007/s10845-023-02167-4
  30. Huang X, Wong YX, Goh GL, Gao X, Lee JM, Yeong WY. Machine learning-driven prediction of gel fraction in conductive gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels. Int J AI Mater Des. 2024;1(2):61-75. doi: 10.36922/ijamd.3807
  31. Shi X, Sun Y, Tian H, Abhilash PM, Luo X, Liu H. Material Extrusion Filament Width and Height Prediction via Design of Experiment and Machine Learning. Micromachines. 2023;14(11):2091. doi: 10.3390/mi14112091
  32. Ruberu K, Senadeera M, Rana S, et al. Coupling machine learning with 3D bioprinting to fast track optimisation of extrusion printing. Appl Mater Today. 2021;22:100914. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100914
  33. Freeman S, Calabro S, Williams R, Jin S, Ye K. Bioink Formulation and Machine Learning-Empowered Bioprinting Optimization. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:913579. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.913579
  34. Lewis P, Perez E, Piktus A, et al. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. In: Larochelle H, Ranzato M, Hadsell R, Balcan MF, Lin H, editors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  35. In: Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2020); December 6–12, 2020; Online. Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc. (NeurIPS); 2020:9459-9474.
  36. Huang L, Yu W, Ma W, et al. A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 2025;43(2):42. doi: 10.1145/3703155
  37. Tshitoyan V, Dagdelen J, Weston L, et al. Unsupervised word embeddings capture latent knowledge from materials science literature. Nature. 2019;571(7763):95-98. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1335-8
  38. Lee J, Su H. A unified industrial large knowledge model framework in Industry 4.0 and smart manufacturing. Int J AI Mater Des. 2024;1(2):41-47. doi: 10.36922/ijamd.3681
  39. Lee J, Su H. Rethinking industrial artificial intelligence: A unified foundation framework. Int J AI Mater Des. 2025;2(2):56-68. doi: 10.36922/IJAMD025080006
  40. Lee J, Su H, Ji DY, Minami T. Engineering Artificial Intelligence: Framework, Challenges, and Future Direction. Mach Learn Eng. 2025;1(1):013001. doi: 10.1088/3049-4761/adce0d
  41. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. arXiv. Posted online December 10,
  42. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1512.03385
  43. Sani AR, Zolfagharian A, Kouzani AZ. Automated defects detection in extrusion 3D printing using YOLO models. J Intell Manuf. 2026;37(1):351-371. doi: 10.1007/s10845-024-02543-8
  44. Sani AR, Kouzani AZ, Zolfagharian A. Real-time defect monitoring in material extrusion 3D printing using optimized YOLO models. Prog Addit Manuf. 2026;11(1):1115-1137. doi: 10.1007/s40964-025-01401-0
  45. Daulton S, Balandat M, Bakshy E. Differentiable Expected Hypervolume Improvement for Parallel Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization. arXiv. Posted online June 9, 2020. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2006.05078
  46. Lee J, Su H. Agentic AI for smart manufacturing. Manuf Lett. 2025;46:92-96. doi: 10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.10.013

 

 

 

Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing