Development of polycaprolactone grafts with improved physical properties and body stability using a screw extrusion-type 3D bioprinter
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinter including screw extruder was developed, and the polycaprolactone (PCL) grafts fabricated by screw-type and pneumatic pressure-type bioprinters were comparatively evaluated. The density and tensile strength of the single layers printed by the screw-type were 14.07% and 34.76% higher, respectively, than those of the single layers produced by the pneumatic pressure-type. The adhesive force, tensile strength, and bending strength of the PCL grafts printed by the screw-type bioprinter were 2.72 times, 29.89%, and 67.76% higher, respectively, than those of the PCL grafts prepared by the pneumatic pressure-type bioprinter. By evaluating the consistency with the original image of the PCL grafts, we found that it had a value of about 98.35%. The layer width of the printing structure was 485.2 ± 0.004919 µm, which was 99.5% to 101.8% compared to the set value (500 µm), indicating high accuracy and uniformity. The printed graft had no cytotoxicity, and there were no impurities in the extract test. In the in vivo studies, the tensile strength of the sample 12 months after implantation was reduced by 50.37% and 85.43% compared to the initial point of the sample printed by the screw-type and the pneumatic pressure-type, respectively. Through observing the fractures of the samples at 9- and 12-month samples, we found that the PCL grafts prepared by the screw-type had better in vivo stability. Therefore, the printing system developed in this study can be used as a treatment for regenerative medicine.
1. She Y, Fan Z, Wang L, et al., 2021, 3D printed biomimetic PCL scaffold as framework interspersed with collagen for long segment tracheal replacement. Front Cell Dev Biol, 9: 1-14.
2. Cha M, Jin Yuan-Zhe, et al., 2021, Three-dimensional printed polylactic acid scaffold integrated with BMP-2 laden hydrogel for precise bone regeneration. Biomater Res, 25(35): 1–11.
3. Bahcecioglu G, Hasirci N, Bilgen B, et al., 2019, A 3D printed PCL/hydrogel construct with zone-specific biochemical composition mimicking that of the meniscus. Biofabrication, 11(2): 025002.
4. Dursun Usal T, Yesiltepe M, Yucel D, et al., 2022, Fabrication of a 3D printed PCL nerve guide: In vitro and in vivo testing. Macromol Biosci, 22(3): 2100389.
5. Gao M, Zhang H, Dong W, et al., 2017, Tissue engineered trachea from a 3D printed scaffold enhances whole segment tracheal repair. Sci Rep, 7(1): 5246.
6. Park JH, Yoon JK, Shin YM, et al., 2019, Experimental tracheal replacement using 3-dimensional bioprinted artificial trachea with autologous epithelial cells and chondrocytes. Sci Rep, 9(1): 2103.
7. Temple JP, Hutton DL, Hung BP, et al., 2014, Engineering anatomically shaped vascularized bone grafts with hASCs and 3D printed PCL scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A, 102(12): 4317–4325.
8. Marchment T, Sanjayan J, Xia M, 2019, Method of enhancing interlayer bond strength in construction scale 3D printing with mortar by effective bond area amplification. Mater Design, 169: 107684.
9. Xia M, Sanjayan J, 2016, Method of formulating geopolymer for 3D printing for construction applications. Mater Design, 110: 382–390.
10. Zareiyan B, Khoshnevis B, 2017, Interlayer adhesion and strength of structures in contour crafting—Effects of aggregate size, extrusion rate, and layer thickness. Autom Constr, 81: 112–121.
11. Olubamiji AD, Izadifar Z, Si JL, et al., 2016, Modulating mechanical behaviour of 3D-printed cartilage-mimetic PCL scaffolds: Influence of molecular weight and pore geometry. Biofabrication, 8(2): 025020.
12. Jiao Z, Luo B, Xiang S, et al., 2019, 3D printing of HA/PCL composite tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res, 2(4): 196–202.
13. Zimmerling A, Yazdanpanah Z, Cooper DML, et al., 2021, 3D printing PCL/nHA bone scaffolds: Exploring the influence of material synthesis techniques. Biomater Res, 25(1): 3.
14. Kim SH, Kim SH, Jung Y, 2015, TGF-β3 encapsulated PLCL scaffold by a supercritical CO2-HFIP co-solvent system for cartilage tissue engineering. J Control Release, 206: 101–107.
15. Kim SH, Jung Y, Kim SH, 2013, A biocompatible tissue scaffold produced by supercritical fluid processing for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 19(3): 181–188.
16. Hyvärinen M, Jabeen R, Kärki T, 2020, The modelling of extrusion processes for polymers—A review. Polymers, 12(6): 1306.
17. Jariyavidyanont K, Mallardo S, Cerruti P, et al., 2021, Shear induced crystallization of polyamide 11. Rheol Acta, 60(5): 231–240.
18. Gao J, Zhang Q, Wang K, et al., 2012, Effect of shearing on the orientation, crystallization and mechanical properties of HDPE/attapulgite nanocomposites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf, 43(4):562–569.
19. Farah S, Anderson DG, Langer R, 2016, Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications—A comprehensive review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 107: 367–392.
20. Kim N, Kim H, Lee J, et al., 2006, Numerical analysis of internal flow and mixing performance in polymer extruder I: single screw element. Korea Aust. Rheol. J., 18(3): 143-151.