AccScience Publishing / IJB / Volume 6 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.18063/ijb.v6i4.267
Cite this article
26
Download
824
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
REVIEW

3D-printed Bioreactors for In Vitro Modeling and Analysis

Balasankar Meera Priyadarshini1 Vishwesh Dikshit1 Yi Zhang1,2*
Show Less
1 HP-NTU Digital Manufacturing Corporate Lab, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Ave, 639798, Singapore
2 School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Ave, 639798, Singapore
© Invalid date by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

In recent years, three-dimensional (3D) printing has markedly enhanced the functionality of bioreactors by offering the capability of manufacturing intricate architectures, which changes the way of conducting in vitro biomodeling and bioanalysis. As 3D-printing technologies become increasingly mature, the architecture of 3D-printed bioreactors can be tailored to specific applications using different printing approaches to create an optimal environment for bioreactions. Multiple functional components have been combined into a single bioreactor fabricated by 3D-printing, and this fully functional integrated bioreactor outperforms traditional methods. Notably, several 3D-printed bioreactors systems have demonstrated improved performance in tissue engineering and drug screening due to their 3D cell culture microenvironment with precise spatial control and biological compatibility. Moreover, many microbial bioreactors have also been proposed to address the problems concerning pathogen detection, biofouling, and diagnosis of infectious diseases. This review offers a reasonably comprehensive review of 3D-printed bioreactors for in vitro biological applications. We compare the functions of bioreactors fabricated by various 3D-printing modalities and highlight the benefit of 3D-printed bioreactors compared to traditional methods.

Keywords
Cell culture
Bacteria
Three-dimensional-printed chip
Three-dimensional-printed devices
Three-dimensionalprinted bioreactors
References

1. Wang D, Liu W, Han B, et al., 2005, The Bioreactor: A Powerful Tool for Large-scale Culture of Animal Cells. Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 6:397–403.

2. Govoni M, Lotti F, Biagiotti L, et al., 2014, An Innovative Stand-alone Bioreactor for the Highly Reproducible Transfer of Cyclic Mechanical Stretch to Stem Cells Cultured in a 3D Scaffold. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 8:787–93.

3. Shimizu T, Sekine H, Yamato M, et al., 2009, Cell Sheet based Myocardial Tissue Engineering: New Hope for Damaged Heart Rescue. Curr Pharm Des, 15:2807–14.

4. Ozturk SS, 1996, Engineering Challenges in High Density Cell Culture Systems. Cytotechnology, 22:3–16.

5. Capel AJ, Rimington RP, Lewis MP, et al., 2018, 3D Printing for Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Applications. Nat Rev Chem, 2:422–36.

6. Hjertager BH, Morud K, 1995, Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Bioreactors. J Mod Identif Control,16:177–91.

7. Lee W, Kwon D, Choi W, et al., 2015, 3D-printed Microfluidic Device for the Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria Using Size based Separation in Helical Channel with Trapezoid Cross section. Sci Rep, 5:7717.

8. Kim Y, Lee J, Park S, 2018, A 3D-printed Millifluidic Platform Enabling Bacterial Preconcentration and DNA Purification for Molecular Detection of Pathogens in Blood. Micromachines, 9:472.

9. Alessandri K, Feyeux M, Gurchenkov B, et al., 2016, A 3D Printed Microfluidic Device for Production of Functionalized Hydrogel Microcapsules for Culture and Differentiation of Human Neuronal Stem Cells (hNSC). Lab on a Chip, 16:1593–604.

10. Bancroft GN, Sikavitsas VI, Mikos AG, 2003, Design of a Flow Perfusion Bioreactor System for Bone Tissue-engineering Applications. Tissue Eng, 9:549–54.

11. Richards DJ, Tan Y, Jia J, et al., 2013, 3D Printing for Tissue Engineering. Israel J Chem, 53:805–14.

12. Pasirayi G, Auger V, M Scott S, et al., 2011, Microfluidic Bioreactors for Cell Culturing: A Review. Micro Nanosyst, 3:137–60.

13. Erkal JL, Selimovic A, Gross BC, et al., 2014, 3D Printed Microfluidic Devices with Integrated Versatile and Reusable Electrodes. Lab Chip, 14:2023–32.

14. Rupal BS, Garcia EA, Ayranci C, et al., 2018, 3D Printed 3D-Microfluidics: Recent Developments and Design Challenges. J Integr Des Proc Sci, 22:5–20.

15. Ball O, Nguyen BN, Placone JK, et al., 2016, 3D Printed Vascular Networks Enhance Viability in High-volume Perfusion Bioreactor. Ann Biomed Eng, 44:3435–45.

16. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, et al., 2018, Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges. Compos B Eng, 143:172–96.

17. Oskui SM, Diamante G, Liao C, et al., 2015, Assessing and Reducing the Toxicity of 3D-Printed Parts. Environ Sci Technol Lett, 3:1–6.

18. Urrios A, Parra-Cabrera C, Bhattacharjee N, et al., 2016, 3D-printing of Transparent Bio-microfluidic Devices in PEGDA. Lab Chip, 16:2287–94.

19. Jiménez M, Romero L, Domínguez IA, et al., 2019, Additive Manufacturing Technologies: An Overview about 3D Printing Methods and Future Prospects. Complexity, 2019;2019:9656938.

20. Maia MR, Marques S, Cabrita AR, et al., 2016, Simple and Versatile Turbidimetric Monitoring of Bacterial Growth in Liquid Cultures Using a Customized 3D Printed Culture Tube Holder and a Miniaturized Spectrophotometer: Application to Facultative and Strictly Anaerobic Bacteria. Front Microbiol, 7:1381.

21. Dong Y, Fan SQ, Shen Y, et al., 2015, A Novel bio-carrier Fabricated Using 3D Printing Technique for Wastewater Treatment. Sci Rep, 5:12400.

22. Qing Y, Li K, Li D, et al., 2019, Antibacterial Effects of Silver Incorporated Zeolite Coatings on 3D Printed Porous Stainless Steels. Mater Sci Eng C, 108:110430.

23. Bassous NJ, Jones CL, Webster TJ, 2019, 3-D Printed Ti-6Al-4V Scaffolds for Supporting Osteoblast and Restricting Bacterial Functions without Using Drugs: Predictive Equations and Experiments. Acta Biomater, 96:662–73.

24. Morgan AJ, San Jose LH, Jamieson WD, et al., 2016, Simple and Versatile 3D Printed Microfluidics Using Fused Filament Fabrication. PLoS One, 11:e0152023.

25. Rosati G, Cunego A, Fracchetti F, et al., 2019, Inkjet Printed Interdigitated Biosensor for Easy and Rapid Detection of Bacteriophage Contamination: A Preliminary Study for Milk Processing Control Applications. Chemosensors, 7:8.

26. Bernasconi R, Carrara E, Hoop M, et al., 2019, Magnetically Navigable 3D Printed Multifunctional Microdevices for Environmental Applications. Addi Manufact, 28:127–35.

27. Lerman MJ, Lembong J, Gillen G, et al., 2018, 3D Printing in Cell Culture Systems and Medical Applications. Appl Phys Rev, 5:041109.

28. Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, et al., 1997, Geometric Control of Cell Life and Death. Science, 276:1425–8.

29. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang Y, 2005, Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of their Substrate. Science, 310:1139–43.

30. Baker BM, Chen CS, 2012, Deconstructing the Third Dimension how 3D Culture Microenvironments Alter Cellular Cues. J Cell Sci, 125:3015–24.

31. Gross BC, Anderson KB, Meisel JE, et al., 2015, Polymer Coatings in 3D-printed Fluidic Device Channels for Improved Cellular Adherence Prior to Electrical Lysis. Anal Chem, 87:6335–41.

32. Ong LJ, Islam A, DasGupta R, et al., 2017, A 3D Printed Microfluidic Perfusion Device for Multicellular Spheroid Cultures. Biofabrication, 9:045005.

33. Lin H, Lozito TP, Alexander PG, et al., 2014, Stem Cell based Microphysiological Osteochondral System to Model Tissue Response to Interleukin-1β. Mol Pharm, 11:2203–12.

34. Anderson KB, Lockwood SY, Martin RS, et al., 2013, A 3D Printed Fluidic Device that Enables Integrated Features. Anal Chem, 85:5622–6.

35. Cevenini L, Calabretta MM, Tarantino G, et al., 2016, Smartphone-interfaced 3D Printed Toxicity Biosensor Integrating Bioluminescent “Sentinel Cells”. Sens Actuators B Chem, 225:249–57.

36. Wang YI, Abaci HE, Shuler ML, 2017, Microfluidic Blood Brain Barrier Model Provides In Vivo-Like Barrier Properties for Drug Permeability Screening. Biotechnol Bioeng, 114:184–94.

37. Grix T, Ruppelt A, Thomas A, et al., 2018, Bioprinting Perfusion-enabled Liver Equivalents for Advanced Organon-a-chip Applications. Genes, 9:176.

38. Costa PF, Albers HJ, Linssen JE, et al., 2017, Mimicking Arterial Thrombosis in a 3D-Printed Microfluidic In Vitro Vascular Model Based on Computed Tomography Angiography Data. Lab Chip, 17:2785–92.

39. Li X, Brooks JC, Hu J, et al., 2017, 3D-templated, Fully Automated Microfluidic Input/Output Multiplexer for Endocrine Tissue Culture and Secretion Sampling. Lab Chip, 17:341-9.

40. Hao S, Ha L, Cheng G, et al., 2018, A Spontaneous 3D Boneon-a-chip for Bone Metastasis Study of Breast Cancer Cells. Small, 14:1702787.

41. Singh M, Tong Y, Webster K, et al., 2017, 3D Printed Conformal Microfluidics for Isolation and Profiling of Biomarkers from Whole Organs. Lab Chip, 17:2561–71.

42. Alessandri K, Andrique L, Feyeux M, et al., 2017, All-inone 3D Printed Microscopy Chamber for Multidimensional Imaging, the UniverSlide. Sci Rep, 7:42378.

43. Lembong J, Lerman MJ, Kingsbury TJ, et al., 2018, A Fluidic Culture Platform for Spatially Patterned Cell Growth, Differentiation, and Cocultures. Tissue Eng A, 24:1715–32.

44. Au AK, Bhattacharjee N, Horowitz LF, et al., 2015, 3D-printed Microfluidic Automation. Lab Chip, 15:1934–41.

45. Takenaga S, Schneider B, Erbay E, et al., 2015, Fabrication of Biocompatible Lab-on-chip Devices for Biomedical Applications by Means of a 3D-Printing Process. Phys Status Solidi, 212:1347–52.

46. Zhang Y, 2017, Post-printing Surface Modification and Functionalization of 3D-Printed Biomedical Device. Int. J.Bioprint, 3:93–9.

47. Zhang Y, 2019, Three-dimensional-printing for Microfluidics or the Other Way Around? Int J Bioprint, 5:61-73.

48. Kadiak A, 2017, Advanced Manufacturing and Microenvironment Control for Bioengineering Complex Microbial Communities. Available from: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/1340.

49. Walsh ME, Ostrinskaya A, Sorensen MT, et al., 2016, 3D-Printable Materials for Microbial Liquid Culture. 3D Print Addit Manufact, 3:113–8.

50. Chudobova D, Cihalova K, Skalickova S, et al., 2015, 3D-printed Chip for Detection of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Labeled with Gold Nanoparticles. Electrophoresis, 36:457–66.

51. Krejcova L, Nejdl L, Rodrigo MAM, et al., 2014, 3D Printed Chip for Electrochemical Detection of Influenza Virus Labeled with CdS Quantum Dots. Biosens Bioelectron, 54:421–7.

52. Sweet EC, Liu N, Chen J, et al., Entirely-3D Printed Microfluidic Platform For On-site Detection of Drinking Waterborne Pathogens. In: IEEE 32nd International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2019. IEEE, pp. 79–82.

53. Zheng L, Cai G, Wang S, et al., 2019, A Microfluidic Colorimetric Biosensor for Rapid Detection of Escherichia coli O157: H7 Using Gold Nanoparticle Aggregation and Smart Phone Imaging. Biosens Bioelectron, 124:143–9.

54. Lee W, Kwon D, Chung B, et al., 2014, Ultrarapid Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria Using a 3D Immunomagnetic Flow Assay. Anal Chem, 86:6683–8.

55. Park C, Lee J, Kim Y, et al., 2017, 3D-printed Microfluidic Magnetic Preconcentrator for the Detection of Bacterial Pathogen Using an ATP Luminometer and Antibody conjugated Magnetic Nanoparticles. J Microbiol Methods, 132:128–33.

56. Chen J, Zhou Y, Wang D, et al., 2015, UV-nanoimprint Lithography as a Tool to Develop Flexible Microfluidic Devices for Electrochemical Detection. Lab Chip, 15:3086–94.

57. Cox CA, 2016, A Multi-Channel 3D-Printed Bioreactor for Evaluation of Growth and Production in the microalga Dunaliella sp. Available from: https://digitalcommons. library.umaine.edu/etd/2560.

58. Lee S, Thio SK, Park SY, et al., 2019, An Automated 3D-printed Smartphone Platform Integrated with Opto electrowetting (OEW) Microfluidic Chip for on-site Monitoring of Viable Algae in Water. Harmful Algae, 88:101638.

59. Duarte LC, Figueredo F, Ribeiro LE, et al., 2019, Label-free Counting of Escherichia coli Cells in Nanoliter Droplets Using 3D Printed Microfluidic Devices with Integrated Contactless Conductivity Detection. Anal Chim Acta, 1071:36–43.

60. Zhu Y, Huang X, Xie X, et al., 2018, Propidium Monoazide Pretreatment on a 3D-Printed Microfluidic Device for Efficient PCR Determination of “Live Versus Dead’microbial Cells. Environ Sci, 4:956–63.

61. Wilson L, Iqbal K M, Simmons-Ehrhardt T, et al., 2019, Customizable 3D Printed Diffusion Chambers for Studies of Bacterial Pathogen Phenotypes in Complex Environments. J Microbiol Methods, 162:8–15.

62. Achinas S, Euverink GJ, 2019, Development of an Anaerobic Digestion Screening System Using 3D-Printed Mini-Bioreactors. In: New Advances on Fermentation Processes. Intech Open, London.

63. Elliott O, Gray S, McClay M, et al., 2017, Design and Manufacturing of High Surface Area 3D-Printed Media for Moving Bed Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment. J Contemp Water Res Educ, 160:144–56.

64. Koch AL, 2009, Microbial Growth Measurement, Methods. Encyclopedia of Industrial Biotechnology: Bioprocess, Bioseparation, and Cell Technology. Willy, Hoboken, New Jersey, pp. 1–11.

65. Okoh AI, Odjadjare EE, Igbinosa EO, et al., 2007, Wastewater Treatment Plants as a Source of Microbial Pathogens in Receiving Watersheds. Afr J Biotechnol, 6:2932–44.

Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing