AccScience Publishing / CHR / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/CHR025070004
REVIEW ARTICLE

Strategic human resource management in English as a foreign language education: The role of culturally sensitive feedback in enhancing teacher well-being and performance in Iranian language institutes

Pourya Javahery1* Mahshid Shafiee2
Show Less
1 Department of English, Faculty of Humanities, Khayyam University, Mashhad, Iran
2 Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
Received: 13 February 2025 | Revised: 12 August 2025 | Accepted: 15 August 2025 | Published online: 29 August 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Effective feedback in Iranian language institutes hinges on a deep understanding of cultural, psychological, and professional identity dynamics. This article explores how deeply rooted Iranian cultural values, such as abru (honor) and ru dar abysti (facing emotional strain), shape teachers’ receptiveness to feedback, often leading to resistance when critiques threaten social standing or trigger stress. Beyond culture, teachers’ personality types (dominance, influence, steadiness, conscientiousness [DiSC]), and levels of emotional intelligence (EI) further influence feedback outcomes: high-EI teachers are more likely to embrace growth-oriented critiques, whereas their low-EI counterparts may respond defensively or disengage. Crucially, the article highlights the often-overlooked role of teacher identity formation, arguing that supervision must evolve from evaluative checklists toward supportive processes that align feedback with educators’ evolving self-concepts. Recommended strategies include culturally sensitive communication, DiSC-informed feedback delivery, EI training workshops, and reflective practices that affirm professional identity. By bridging cultural respect, psychological insight, and identity-aware mentorship, supervisors can transform feedback into a catalyst for empowerment, ultimately fostering resilient, reflective professionals in Iran’s language education landscape.

Keywords
Feedback reception
Cultural values
Emotional intelligence
Teacher identity
Iranian education
DiSC model
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References

Agheshteh, H. (2020). Deconstructing the discourse: Mitigation in the supervisory discourse of language teacher supervisors in Iran. Iranian Journal Language Teaching Research, 2020;8(2):137-162. https://doi.org/10.22054/ILT.2020.39392.373

 

Atefinia, A., & Alavinia P. (2019). Supervisory feedback: The weight of compliments, criticisms and suggestions revisited. International Journal English Language Translation Studies, 2019;7(3):59-66.

 

Bale, R., & Rossiter MP. (2023). The role of cultural and linguistic factors in shaping feedback practices: The perspectives of international higher education teaching staff. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(6):810-821. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2188179

 

Cruikshank, I. (1998). Video: A method of delivering student feedback. Journal of Art and Design Education, 17(1):87-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00109

 

Dabir, S., & Tafazoli, D. (2024). University students’ challenges and coping strategies in emergency remote teaching: Fostering a humanized culture in Iran. The JALT CALL Journal, 220(2):1-21. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v20n2.1068

 

Derakhshan, A., Wang, Y., & Ghiasvand, F. (2024). “I never make a permanent decision based on a temporary emotion”: Unveiling EFL teachers’ perspectives about emotions in assessment. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(6):2659-2684. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2023-0089

 

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1):3-18. https://doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054

 

Feeney, EJ. (2007). Quality feedback: The essential ingredient for teacher success. The Clearing House. 80(4):191-198. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.80.4.191-198

 

Flores, M.A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2):219-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.002

 

Hakanen, J.J., Bakker, A.B., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6):495-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001

 

Jamshidian, S., Haghani, F., Yamani, N., & Sabri, M. (2019). Advocating a bottom-up approach in the teaching of feedback skills to medical students [response to letter]. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 10:749-750. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S218411

 

Javahery, P. (2024). Caught in the rye: Novice teachers’ journeys of self-discovery and identity formation. Forum for Education Studies, 3(1):1919. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes1919

 

Javahery, P. (2024). Prescribed pedagogy: An autoethnographic analysis of coursebook constraints, teacher identity, and power dynamics in Iran through Foucault’s lens. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3):2104. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v7n3.2104

 

Javahery, P. (2025). Exploring the influence of Aberu on teacher trainees in Iran: A cultural-historical perspective. Forum for Education Studies, 3(3):2651. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes2651

 

Javahery, P., & Kamali, J. (2023). Teachers’ personality types and their attitude toward receiving and employing postobservation feedback. Psychology in the Schools, 60(8):3073-3089. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22900

 

Jodaie, M., & Farrokhi, F. (2012). An exploration of private language institute teachers’ perceptions of written grammar feedback in EFL classes. English Language Teaching, 5(2):58-67. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n2p58

 

Kamali, J., & Javahery, P. (2024). Examining the Interplay of Teacher Emotional Intelligence and Feedback Responsiveness in Post-Observation Conferences: Voices from Iran. Hum Arenas; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-024-00438-x

 

Keiler, L.S., Diotti, R., Hudon, K., & Ransom, J.C. (2020). The role of feedback in teacher mentoring: How coaches, peers, and students affect teacher change. Mentoring and Tutoring Partnership in Learning, 28(2):126-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2020.1749345

 

Khany, R., & Tazik, K. (2016). On the relationship between psychological empowerment, trust, and Iranian EFL teachers’ job satisfaction: The case of secondary school teachers. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(1):112-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714565362

 

Killingback, C., Drury, D., Mahato, P., & Williams, J. (2020). Student feedback delivery modes: A qualitative study of student and lecturer views. Nurse Education Today, 84:104237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104237

 

Leung, A., Fine, P.D., Blizard, R., Tonni, I., Ilhan, D., & Louca, C. (2022). Teacher feedback and student learning-the students’ perspective. Journal Dentistry, 2022;125:104242.

 

Maleki, A. (2022). The attitudes of Iranian female EFL learners towards peer feedback. Global Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.20448/gjelt.v2i1.3989

 

Malik, A., Kiran, F., & Farooq, F. (2021). Feedback: Different concepts and practices in a culturally different environment-faculty perceptions. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal (PAFMJ), 71(2):655-662. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i2.6283

 

Mehrpour, S., & Agheshteh, H. (2017). Supervisory feedback efficiency: Developing a framework based on Iranian EFL teachers’ and supervisors’ perceptions. Internatioal Journal of Applied Linguistics English Literature, 6(3):24-33. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.3p.24

 

Norouz Kermanshahi, P., & Pishghadam, R. (2022). Teachers’ burnout and their feedback-ability. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 10(2):95-114. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2022.121185

 

Rovagnati, V., & Pitt, E. (2022). Exploring intercultural dialogic interactions between individuals with diverse feedback literacies. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7):1057-1070. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2006601

 

Sheldon, O.J., Dunning, D., & Ames, D.R. (2014). Emotionally unskilled, unaware, and uninterested in learning more: Reactions to feedback about deficits in emotional intelligence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1):125-137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034138

 

Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23(1):103-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829202300107

 

Shvetsova, O.A. (2017). Smart Education in High School: New Perspectives in Global World. In: 2017 International Conference on Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies (IT&QM&IS); 2017. p. 688-691. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITMQIS.2017.8085917

 

Wilcoxen, C.L., & Lemke, J. (2021). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of feedback: The importance of timing, purpose, and delivery. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(8):13. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.8.13

 

Wilson, A. (2012). Student engagement and the role of feedback in learning. Journal of Pedagogic Development, 2(1):15-19.

 

Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers’ choice and learners’ preference of corrective feedback types. Language Awareness, 17(1):78-93. https://doi.org/10.2167/la429.0

Share
Back to top
Current Human Resource, Published by AccScience Publishing