AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/AJWEP025120080
Submit to AJWEP
Cite this article
7
Download
58
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Economic performance analysis of construction waste recycling and utilization in Shaanxi: Perspectives from construction and recycling sectors

Han Liu1,2* ,  Muhammad Noor Hisyam Jusoh1
Show Less
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Technology and Built Environment, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2 Department of Engineering Management, School of Economics and Management, Ankang University, Ankang, Shaanxi, China
AJWEP, 025120080 https://doi.org/10.36922/AJWEP025120080
Received: 17 March 2025 | Revised: 16 June 2025 | Accepted: 1 July 2025 | Published online: 18 July 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

China currently faces challenges related to the high volume of construction waste and its low utilization rate, which have varying impacts on resources and the environment. This study focuses on Shaanxi province in China and conducted online interviews with 12 respondents, comprising four representatives each from construction companies, recycling enterprises, and government departments. The research aims to explore the actual economic performance of recycling and utilization processes. Interview outlines were tailored to the professional attributes of the participants, revealing key issues: construction companies highlighted costs associated with the sorting process, recycling companies reported on the underdeveloped market for recycled products, and the government representatives identified challenges in the continuity and specificity of support policies. Based on these findings, this study proposes several recommendations to enhance the economic performance of recycling-related industries in the sample region and to improve recycling rates and resource utilization.

Keywords
Economic performance
Recycling and utilization
Construction waste
Shaanxi province
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Statistics SPBo. Shaanxi Statistical Yearbook; 2023. Available from: https://tjj.shaanxi.gov.cn/upload/2023/ zk/indexch.htm [Last accessed on 2024 Dec 12].

 

  1. China TMoHaU-RDo. Strengthening Construction Waste Management to Promote Green and Low- Carbon Development. Available from: https://www. gov.cn/xinwen/2021-12/09/content_5659650.htm [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 22].

 

  1. Bo W. In-Depth Research Report on Construction Waste Management in 2024; 2024. Available from: https:// news.sohu.com/a/841439415_100180709 [Last accessed on 2025 Feb 01].

 

  1. Gálvez-Martos JL, Styles D, Schoenberger H, Zeschmar- Lahl B. Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;136:166-178. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.016

 

  1. Kabirifar K, Mojtahedi M, Wang C, Tam VW. Construction and demolition waste management contributing factors coupled with reduce, reuse, and recycle strategies for effective waste management: A review. J Clean Prod. 2020;263:121265. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121265

 

  1. MOHURD. In: China TMoHaU-RDotPsRo, editor. Regulations on Urban Construction Waste Management; 2008. Available from: https://www. shaanxi.gov.cn/zfxxgk/zfgb/2005/d9q_4300/200806/ t20080626_1639769_wap.html [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 25].

 

  1. EEB. In: City EEBoXa, editor. Announcement by the Ecological Environment Bureau of Xi’an City on the Release of Information Regarding Solid Waste Pollution Prevention in 2022; 2023. Available from: https://xaepb. xa.gov.cn/hbyw/wrfz/6486ca0ff8fd1c1a70339303.html [Last accessed on 2024 Dec 22].

 

  1. Alhashemy AA, Hameed AH, Rashid HA. Study of the application of construction waste management strategies in the city of Baghdad. Acad Open. 2024;9(1). doi: 10.21070/acopen.9.2024.8386

 

  1. Thomson P, Low JK, Berry TA. Addressing barriers and unveiling opportunities for plastic waste recycling in the New Zealand construction industry. Opinion. Front Sustain. 2025;5:1487972. doi: 10.3389/frsus.2024.1487972

 

  1. Ma W, Hao JL. Enhancing a circular economy for construction and demolition waste management in China: A stakeholder engagement and key strategy approach. J Clean Prod. 2024;450:141763. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141763

 

  1. Ma M, Tam VW, Le KN. C&D Waste recycling and management: Chinese practices. In: Zuo J, Shen L, Chang R, editors. Circular Economy for Buildings and Infrastructure: Principles, Practices and Future Directions. Berlin: Springer International Publishing; 2024. p. 193-211.

 

  1. Chen J, Tian Y, Chan FT, Tang H, Che PH. Pricing, greening, and recycling decisions of capital-constrained closed-loop supply chain with government subsidies under financing strategies. J Clean Prod. 2024;438:140797. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140797

 

  1. Hua C, Chen L, Liu C, Yang C. The effect of incentive policies on the diffusion of construction and demolition waste recycling: A government perspective. Waste Manag Res. 2024;43(1):50-61. doi: 10.1177/0734242X241231400

 

  1. Peng X, Jiang Y, Chen Z, et al. Recycling municipal, agricultural and industrial waste into energy, fertilizers, food and construction materials, and economic feasibility: A review. Environ Chem Lett. 2023;21(2):765-801. doi: 10.1007/s10311-022-01551-5

 

  1. Zhang C, Hu M, Di Maio F, Sprecher B, Yang X, Tukker A. An overview of the waste hierarchy framework for analyzing the circularity in construction and demolition waste management in Europe. Sci Total Environ. 2022;803:149892. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149892

 

  1. Liu J, Gong E, Wang X. Economic benefits of construction waste recycling enterprises under tax incentive policies. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(9):12574-12588. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13831-8

 

  1. Omer MM, Rahman RA, Almutairi S. Construction waste recycling: Enhancement strategies and organization size. Phys Chem Earth Parts ABC. 2022;126:103114. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2022.103114

 

  1. Lim WM. What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australas Mark J. 2024;3(2):199-229. doi: 10.1177/14413582241264619

 

  1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101.

 

  1. Sharma SK, Mudgal SK, Gaur R, Chaturvedi J, Rulaniya S, Sharma P. Navigating sample size estimation for qualitative research. J Med Evid. 2024;5(2):133-139. doi: 10.4103/JME.JME_59_24

 

  1. Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(3):398-405. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12048

 

  1. Neuendorf KA. Content analysis and thematic analysis. Advanced Research Methods for Applied Psychology. United Kingdom: Routledge; 2018. p. 211-223.

 

  1. Bao Z, Lee WM, Lu W. Implementing on-site construction waste recycling in Hong Kong: Barriers and facilitators. Sci Total Environ. 2020;747:141091. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141091

 

  1. Islam MT, Iyer-Raniga U, Trewick S. Recycling perspectives of circular business models: A review. Recycling. 2022;7(5):79. doi: 10.3390/recycling7050079

 

  1. Islam N, Sandanayake M, Muthukumaran S, Navaratna D. Review on sustainable construction and demolition waste management-challenges and research prospects. Sustainability. 2024;16(8):3289. doi: 10.3390/su16083289

 

  1. Santos G, Esmizadeh E, Riahinezhad M. Recycling construction, renovation, and demolition plastic waste: Review of the status Quo, challenges and opportunities. J Polym Environ. 2024;32(2):479-509. doi: 10.1007/s10924-023-02982-z

 

  1. Nozharov S. The institutional economics of collective waste recovery systems: An empirical investigation. Economic Studies. 2018;(5):172-180.

 

  1. Yu L, Ge Q, Han K, Ji W, Liu Y. Designing optimal subsidy schemes and recycling plans for sustainable treatment of construction and demolition waste. arXiv Preprint arXiv:250410955; 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.10955

 

  1. Tiara Adhya R, Tjahjono B, Beltran M, Rayns F, Longhurst P. Leveraging resource management and duality theories to strengthen circular economy practices in the waste-to-energy industry. Business Strategy Environ. 2025;34(4):4642-4660. doi: 10.1002/bse.4219

 

  1. RILA. Mandatory Recycled Content Laws For Packaging; 2022. Available from: https://www.rila.org/ getmedia/4fa32355-5afd-46ad-93c6-5bfb9a9a6840/ mandatory-recycled-content-laws-for-packaging3. pdf?ext=.pdf [Last accessed on 08 June 2025].

 

  1. Zhang W, Wang Z. Can SMEs benefit equally from supportive policies in China? PloS One. 2023;18(3):e0280253.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280253

 

  1. China Tsco. Policies Seek to Boost Efficiencies in Nation’s Waste Recycling System; 2025. Available from: https:// english.www.gov.cn/policies/policywatch/202403/20/ c o n t e n t _ w s 6 5 f a 4 5 2 5 c 6 d 0 8 6 8 f 4 e 8 e 5 4 3 9 . h t m l # : ~ : t e x t = s u p p o r t % 2 0 s u c h % 2 0 a s % 2 0 grants%2c%20subsidies,efficient%20recycling%20 practices%2c%20xu%20added [Last accessed on 2025 June 08.

 

  1. Liu Z, Liu J, Osmani M. Integration of digital economy and circular economy: Current status and future directions. Sustainability. 2021;13(13):7217. doi: 10.3390/su13137217

 

  1. Su Y, Si H, Chen J, Guangdong W. Promoting the sustainable development of the recycling market of construction and demolition waste: A stakeholder game perspective. J Cleaner Prod. 2020;277:122281. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122281

 

  1. Zhao X. Stakeholder-associated factors influencing construction and demolition waste management: A systematic review. Buildings. 2021;11(4):149. doi: 10.3390/buildings11040149

 

  1. Nozharov S. Transaction costs in collective waste recovery systems in the EU. Economic Archive. 2018;(1):18-30.

 

  1. Korstanje R, Katarzyna J, Anton VR, Roos C. Barriers to municipal solid waste management policy implementation. A case study in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. S Afr Geograph J. 2024;106(3):323-339. doi: 10.1080/03736245.2024.2315944

 

  1. Koiwanit J, Filimonau V. Stakeholder collaboration for solid waste management in a small tourism island. PLOS One. 2023;18(7):e0288839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288839

 

  1. OECD. Waste Management and the Circular Economy in Selected OECD Countries: Evidence from Environmental Performance Reviews. Paris: OECD; 2019.

 

  1. He L, Yuan H, Wu H. Collaborative mechanism for promoting the cross-regional management of construction and demolition waste. J Clean Prod. 2022;372:133706. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133706

 

  1. Purchase CK, Al Zulayq DM, O’Brien BT, et al. Circular economy of construction and demolition waste: A literature review on lessons, challenges, and benefits. Materials. 2022;15(1):76. doi: 10.3390/ma15010076

 

  1. Alite M, Abu-Omar H, Agurcia MT, et al. Construction and demolition waste management in Kosovo: A survey of challenges and opportunities on the road to circular economy. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. 2023;25(2):1191-1203. doi: 10.1007/s10163-022-01577-5

 

  1. Idir R, Djerbi A, Tazi N. Optimising the circular economy for construction and demolition waste management in Europe: Best practices, innovations and regulatory avenues. Sustainability. 2025;17(8):3586. doi: 10.3390/su17083586

 

  1. Ferriz-Papi JA, Lee A, Alhawamdeh M. Examining the challenges for circular economy implementation in construction and demolition waste management: A comprehensive review using systematic methods. Buildings. 2024;14(5):1237. doi: 10.3390/buildings14051237
Next article in this issue
Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept