AccScience Publishing / IJOCTA / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJOCTA026040014
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effective suppression of broadband disturbances using a dual-loop stabilization system

Vadim Zhmud1,2* Lubomir Dimitrov3,4
Show Less
1 Department of Electronic Laser Systems, Institute of Laser Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
2 Department of Monitoring of Crustal Deformations, Altai-Sayan branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science Geophysical Service of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
3 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
4 Laboratory Mechatronic Systems for Discrete Manufacturing Processes, Centre of Competence MIRACle, Sofia, Bulgaria
Received: 24 January 2026 | Revised: 6 March 2026 | Accepted: 12 March 2026 | Published online: 6 May 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This article proposes a solution to the problem of suppressing broadband disturbances acting on a controlled object. These disturbances include large low-frequency components and small to medium-frequency components. The paper presents the development of an existing approach that uses two methods to influence the output variable. It is proven that a fundamental property of different control loops is the mandatory intersection of their logarithmic amplitude–frequency characteristics at the frequency corresponding to the boundary between the influence ranges of these loops. This is achieved only if these characteristics have different slopes in this region. Consequently, the slow loop must take the form of a higher-order filter than the fast loop. On this basis, it is demonstrated that the order of the slow loop should be second or higher, while the order of the fast loop is preferably first order. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated, for the first time, through simulation, including cases with third- and fifth-order transfer functions for the slow loop.

Keywords
Proportional–integral–derivative
Frequency stabilization
Motion separation
Numerical optimization
Mathematical modelling
Funding
This work was accomplished by the Center of Competence for Mechatronics and Clean Technologies ``Mechatronics, Innovation, Robotics, Automation and Clean Technologies''–MIRACle, with the financial support of contract no. BG16RFPR002-1.014-0019-C01, funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Program ``Research, Innovation and Digitalization for Smart Transformation'' (PRIDST) 2021–2027.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the publication of this article.
References
  1. Wu Y, Qin F, Li Y, Ding Z, Xu R. Designing an Automatic Frequency Stabilization System for an External Cavity Diode Laser Using a Data Acquisition Card in the LabVIEW Platform. Appl. Sci. 2024;14:308. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/app14010308

 

  1. Petrenko MV, Pazgalev AS, Vershovskii AK. Method of Laser Frequency Stabilization Based on the Effect of Linear Dichroism in Alkali Metal Vapors in a Modulated Transverse Magnetic Field. Photonics. 2024;11:926. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/photonics11100926

 

  1. Jin K, Geng X, Liang Z, et al. Design of Portable Self-Oscillating VCSEL-Pumped Cesium Atomic Magnetometer. Electronics. 2022;11:3666. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/electronics11223666

 

  1. Singh V, Tiwari VB, Mishra SR, Rawat HS. A tunable Doppler-free dichroic lock for laser frequency stabilization. Appl Phys B. 2016;122(225). https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s00340-016-6497-6

 

  1. Zhao W, Zhou X, Shang J, et al. Synchronous achievement of laser frequency stabilization and tunability via modulation transfer spectroscopy on the rubidium D1 line. Opt Commun. 2024;574. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2024.131153

 

  1. Jeong J, Lee S, Hwang S, Baek J, Noh,HR, Moon G. Theoretical and Experimental Study of Optimization of Polarization Spectroscopy for the D2 Closed Transition Line of 87Rb Atoms. Appl Sci. 2021;11(16):7219. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/app11167219

 

  1. Beica HC, Winter S, Mok C, Barrett B, Berthiaume R, Vorozcovs A, et al. Laboratory Courses on Laser Spectroscopy and Atom Trapping. Atoms. 2020;8(2):25. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/atoms8020025

 

  1. Kim J, Kim K, Lee D, et al. Locking Multi-Laser Frequencies to a Precision Wavelength Meter: Application to Cold Atoms. Sensors. 2021;21: 6255. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/s21186255

 

  1. Wang J, Gao Y, Yu J, et al. Multi-Wavelength Narrow-Spacing Laser Frequency Stabilization Technology Based on Fabry -Perot Etalon. Micromachines. 2024;15:1269. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/mi15101269

 

  1. Liu C, Yue Z, Xu Z, Ding M, Zhai Y. Far Off-Resonance Laser Frequency Stabilization Technology. Appl. Sci. 2020;10:3255. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/app10093255

 

  1. Bengalskii D, Kharasov D, Fomiryakov E, Nikitin S, Nanii O, Treshchikov V. (2023). Characterization of Laser Frequency Stability by Using Phase-Sensitive Optical Time-Domain Reflectometry. Photonics. 2023;10:1234. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/photonics10111234

 

  1. Wu Y, Qin F, Ding Z, Xu R, Li D. Research on the Frequency Stabilization System of an External Cavity Diode Laser Based on Rubidium Atomic Modulation Transfer Spectroscopy Technology. Photonics. 2024;11:298. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/photonics11040298

 

  1. Fan L, Jiao D, Liu J, et al. Prompt Frequency Stabilization of Ultra-Stable Laser via Improved Mean Shift Algorithm. Electronics. 2022;11; 1319. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/electronics11091319

 

  1. Ming Z, Li X, Wang Y, et al. Compact High-Precision Cascade PID-Control Laser Driver for Airborne Coherent LiDAR Applications. Sensors. 2025;25:2851. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/s25092851

 

  1. Wei Y, Wang Z, Wang Y, et al. Red-Pitaya-Based Frequency Stabilization of 1560-nm Fiber Laser to 780-nm Rubidium Atomic Transition via Single-Pass Frequency Doubling. Photonics. 2026;13:57. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/photonics13010057

 

  1. Bagaev S, Vasilenko L, Goldort V, Dmitriev A, and Dychkov S. (1977). Helium - neon laser emitting λ = 3.39 μ line of 7 Hz width. Sov J Quantum Electron. 1977;7(5):665-666. https://www.doi.org/10.1070/QE1977v007n05ABEH012784

 

  1. Bagayev SN, Belkin AM, Dychkov AS, et al. Frequency reference in the 732-nm region for precision laser spectroscopy of muonium. Quantum Electronics. 2000;30(7):641-646.https://www.doi.org/10.1070/QE2000v030n07ABEH001782

 

  1. Zhuang S, Li J, Wang H, Deng J, Mao Y. Multi-Channel Phase-Compensated Active Disturbance Rejection Control with an Improved Backstepping Strategy for Electro-Optical Tracking Systems. Actuators. 2024;13:117. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/act13030117

 

  1. Zhmud VA. New approaches to controlling the frequency of laser light. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. 2019;20981):020020. https://www.doi.org/10.1063/1.5098164

 

  1. Salabun W, Wieckowski J, Shekhovtsov A, Palczewski K, Jaszczak S, W¸atr´obski J. How to Apply Fuzzy MISO PID in the Industry? An Empirical Study Case on Simulation of Crane Relocating Containers. Electronics. 2020;9:2017. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/electronics9122017

 

  1. Ramos-Martinez M, Brizuela -Mendoza JA, Torres- Cantero CA, et al. Implementation of an Intelligent Controller Based on Neural Networks for the Simulation of Pressure Swing Adsorption Systems. Algorithms. 2025;18:215. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/a18040215

 

  1. Stefanoiu D, Culita J. Optimal Identification and Metaheuristic PID Control of a Two-Tank System. Electronics. 2021;10:1101. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/electronics10091101

 

  1. Belmonte LM, Segura E, Fern´andez -Caballero A, Somolinos JA, Morales R. Generalized Proportional Integral Control for Magnetic Levitation Systems Using a Tangent Linearization Approach. Mathematics. 2021;9:1424. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/math9121424

 

  1. S´aez JF, Ba˜nos A. Reset Control of Parallel MISO Systems. Mathematics. 2021;9:1823. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/math9151823

 

  1. Dyga L, Alhasheem M, Davari P, Rymarski Z. Robustness of Model-Predictive and Passivity-Based Control in the Three-Phase DC/AC Converter Application. Appl Sci. 2022;12:4329. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/app12094329

 

  1. Reyes-L´ua A, Skogestad S. Multiple-Input Single-Output Control for Extending the Steady-State Operating Range—Use of Controllers with Different Setpoints. Processes. 2019;7:941. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/pr7120941

 

  1. Zhmud VA, Dimitrov LV. The influence of the type of the test signal on the result of numerical optimization of regulators. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2017;803:012186. https://www.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/803/1/012186

 

  1. Zhmud V. Controlling of Multichannel Objects with Non-Square Transfer Function. Automation. 2025;6:27. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/automation6030027

 

  1. Zhmud V, Dimitrov L. Control of Linear Multichannel Objects with Numerical Optimization. Appl. Sci. 2025;15(16):8927. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/app15168927

 

  1. Zhmud VA, Nosek J, Dimitrov LV, Boyarchikov EYu. Nonlinear PID Controller for Effective Suppression of Oscillations When Controlling an Oscillating Object with a Delay. In: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Springer Nature Singapore; 2022:175-182. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8759-4\_19
Share
Back to top
An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications, Electronic ISSN: 2146-5703 Print ISSN: 2146-0957, Published by AccScience Publishing