AccScience Publishing / IJB / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJB025430439
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Early Access

Design and evaluation of a transoral tracheal intubation fixation device using 3D printing technology

Guihua Hao1,2† Dinghao Luo3† Yayuan Tian1† Yu Guo3 Tian Xie4 Lili Hou1* Yongqiang Hao3* Jingjing Dai1*
Show Less
1 Department of Nursing, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P. R. China
2 Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Nursing, Shanghai, P. R. China
3 Clinical and Translational Research Center for 3D Printing Technology, Shanghai, 200011, P. R. China
4 Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, P. R. China
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 24 October 2025 | Accepted: 8 December 2025 | Published online: 17 December 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Effective fixation of endotracheal tube is essential to prevent displacement, unplanned extubation, and pressure injuries (PIs), which remain common complications with traditional fixation methods. Advances in 3D-printing technology offer opportunities to design personalized devices that may improve airway security and patient outcomes. However, no prior study has evaluated the use of 3D-printed fixation devices as an alternative to traditional methods. We aimed to design and evaluate the effectiveness of an endotracheal tube fixation device using 3D printing technology in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. We designed and manufactured the device and conducted a finite element mechanical analysis. In a single-center prospective non-concurrent controlled cohort trial, patients with an expected duration of mechanical ventilation exceeding 24 hours were stratified into the observation group (3D-printing device) and control group (traditional device) based on the order of hospital admission. The primary endpoints were tracheal tube displacement and unplanned endotracheal extubation (UEE). Ultimately, 51 patients from the observation group and 97 from the control group were subjected to statistical analysis. The incidence of endotracheal tube displacement was 1/51(1.9%) in observation group versus 12/97(12.4%) in control group (OR 6.28, 95%CI (1.91-21.05)), yielding a 99% probability of benefit. UEE incidence was 0/51 in the observation group, whereas it was 4/97(4.1%) in the control group (OR 5.26, 95% CI (1.08-26.31)), yielding a 98% probability of benefit. Lip PI occurred in 0/51 patients in the observation group vs. 10/97(10.3%) patients in the control group (OR 8.72, 95% CI (2.11-35.98)), yielding a 99% probability of benefit. The observation group exhibited significantly higher nurse satisfaction scores compared with the control group (P=0.015). There were no significant differences in facial PI between the two groups. These findings suggest that the 3D-printing device reduced the incidence of tracheal tube displacement, UEE and lip PI, while improving nurse satisfaction.

Keywords
Endotracheal tube
Tracheal tube displacement
Pressure injury
3D printing
Fixation
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, including the Nursing Development Program (SJTUHLXK2024) and the Excellent Nursing Talent Training Program of the Ninth People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine (JYHRC22-L02), and the Nursing Research Project of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (Jyhl2519).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing