3D-Printed Gelatin-Alginate Hydrogel Dressings for Burn Wound Healing: A Comprehensive Study
Burn wound treatment is still a clinical challenge due to the severity of tissue damage and dehydration. Among various wound dressings, hydrogel materials have gained significant attention for burn wound treatment in clinical practice due to their soothing and moisturizing activity. In this study, 3D-printed dressings were fabricated using clinically relevant hydrogels for deep partial-thickness burn (PTB) wounds. Different ratios of gelatin and alginate mixture were 3D-printed and examined in terms of rheological behavior, shear thinning behavior, mechanical properties, degradation rate, and hydration activity to tune the hydrogel composition for best functionality. The cell-laden dressings were bioprinted to evaluate the effect of the gelatin: alginate ratio on the proliferation and growth of human dermal fibroblasts. The present findings confirm that the higher alginate content is associated with higher viscosity and Young’s modulus, while higher gelatin content is associated with faster degradation and higher cell viability. Together, the 3D-printed dressing with 75% gelatin and 25% alginate showed the best tradeoff between mechanical properties, hydration activity, and in vitro biological response. Findings from in vivo test using the most effective dressing showed the positive effect of 3D-printed porous pattern on wound healing, including faster wound closure, regenerated hair follicles, and non-traumatic dressing removal compared to the non-printed hydrogel with the same composition and the standard of care. Results from this research showed that 3D-printed dressings with an adequate gelatin: alginate ratio enhanced wound healing activity for up to 7 days of moisture retention on deep PTB wounds.
1. Kowal S, Kruger E, Bilir P, et al., 2019, Cost-effectiveness of the Use of Autologous Cell Harvesting Device Compared to Standard of Care for Treatment of Severe Burns in the United States. Adv Ther, 36:1715–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00961-2
2. James SL, Lucchesi LR, Bisignano C, et al., 2020, Epidemiology of Injuries from Fire, Heat and Hot Substances: Global, Regional and National Morbidity and Mortality Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study. Inj Prev, 26:i36–45. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043299
3. Price K, Lee KC, Woolley KE, et al., 2021, Burn Injury Prevention in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: Scoping Systematic Review. Burns Trauma, 9:tkab037. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkab037
4. Zavlin D, Chegireddy V, Boukovalas S, et al., 2018, Multi institutional Analysis of Independent Predictors for Burn Mortality in the United States. Burns Trauma, 6:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-018-0127-y
5. Yu TC, Zhang X, Smiell J, et al., 2020, Healthcare Resource Utilization, Treatment Patterns, and Cost of Care Among Patients with Thermal Burns and Inpatient Autografting in Two Large Privately Insured Populations in the United States. Burns, 46:825–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2019.10.019
6. Gonzalez AC, Costa TF, Andrade ZD, et al., 2016, Wound Healing a Literature Review. An Bras Dermatol, 91:614–20. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20164741
7. Han G, Ceilley R, 2017, Chronic Wound Healing: A Review of Current Management and Treatments. Adv Ther, 34:599–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-017-0478-y
8. Dhaliwal K, Lopez N, 2018, Hydrogel Dressings and their Application in Burn Wound Care. Br J Community Nurs, 23:S24–7. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2018.23.Sup9.S24
9. Kordestani SS, 2019, Atlas of Wound Healing-E-Book: A Tissue Regeneration Approach. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
10. Rowan MP, Cancio LC, Elster EA, et al., 2015, Burn wound Healing and Treatment: Review and Advancements. Crit Care, 19:243. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0961-2
11. Auger FA, Lacroix D, Germain L, 2009, Skin Substitutes and Wound Healing. Skin Pharmacol Physiol, 22:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1159/000178868
12. Shpichka A, Butnaru D, Bezrukov EA, et al., 2019, Skin Tissue Regeneration for Burn Injury. Stem Cell Res Ther, 10:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1203-3
13. Sood A, Granick MS, Tomaselli NL, 2014, Wound Dressings and Comparative Effectiveness Data. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 3:511–29. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2012.0401
14. Selig HF, Lumenta DB, Giretzlehner M, et al., 2012, The Properties of an “ideal” Burn Wound Dressing-what do we Need in Daily Clinical Practice? Results of a Worldwide Online Survey Among Burn Care Specialists. Burns, 38:960–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2012.04.007
15. Zhu Y, Ma Z, Kong L, et al., 2020, Modulation of Macrophages by Bioactive Glass/Sodium Alginate Hydrogel is Crucial in Skin Regeneration Enhancement. Biomaterials, 256:120216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120216
16. Manning JH, Stark JH, 1977, Diester Crosslinked Polyglucan Hydrogels and Reticulated Sponges Thereof. Google Patents.
17. Kamoun EA, Kenawy ER, Chen X, 2017, A Review on Polymeric Hydrogel Membranes for Wound Dressing Applications: PVA-based Hydrogel Dressings. J Adv Res, 8:217–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2017.01.005
18. Lee WR, Park JH, Kim KH, et al., 2009, The Biological Effects of Topical Alginate Treatment in an Animal Model of Skin Wound Healing. Wound Repair Regen, 17:505–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00496.x
19. Abbasi AR, Sohail M, Minhas MU, et al., 2020, Bioinspired Sodium Alginate Based Thermosensitive Hydrogel Membranes for Accelerated Wound Healing. Int J Biol Macromol, 155:751–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.248
20. Etxabide A, Vairo C, Santos-Vizcaino E, et al., 2017, Ultra Thin Hydro-films Based on Lactose-crosslinked Fish Gelatin for Wound Healing Applications. Int J Pharm, 530:455–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.001
21. Afjoul H, Shamloo A, Kamali A, 2020, Freeze-gelled Alginate/Gelatin Scaffolds for Wound Healing Applications: An In Vitro, In Vivo Study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 113:110957.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110957
22. Augustine R, 2018, Skin Bioprinting: A Novel Approach for Creating Artificial Skin from Synthetic and Natural Building Blocks. Prog Biomater, 7:77–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-018-0087-0
23. Velasquillo C, Galue EA, Rodriquez L, et al., 2013, Skin 3D Bioprinting. Applications in Cosmetology. J Cosmet Dermatol Sci Appl, 3:85–9.
24. He P, Zhao J, Zhang J, et al., 2018, Bioprinting of Skin Constructs for Wound Healing. Burns Trauma, 6:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-017-0104-x
25. Fayyazbakhsh F, Leu MC, 2020, A Brief Review on 3D Bioprinted Skin Substitutes. Procedia Manuf, 48:790–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.115
26. Ding H, Chang RC, 2018, Simulating Image-guided In Situ Bioprinting of a Skin Graft Onto a Phantom Burn Wound Bed. Addit Manuf, 22:708–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.022
27. Navarro J, Clohessy RM, Holder RC, et al., 2020, In Vivo Evaluation of Three-dimensional Printed, Keratin-based Hydrogels in a Porcine Thermal Burn Model. Tissue Eng Part A, 26:265–78. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2019.0181
28. Desanlis A, Albouy M, Rousselle P, et al., 2021, Validation of an Implantable Bioink Using Mechanical Extraction of Human Skin Cells: First Steps to a 3D Bioprinting Treatment of Deep Second Degree Burn. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 15:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.3148
29. Teoh JH, Mozhi A, Sunil V, et al., 2021, 3D Printing Personalized, Photocrosslinkable Hydrogel Wound Dressings for the Treatment of Thermal Burns. Adv Funct Mater, 31:2105932. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202105932
30. Pirayavaraporn C, Rades T, Tucker IG, 2012, Determination of Moisture Content in Relation to Thermal Behaviour and Plasticization of Eudragit RLPO. Int J Pharm, 422:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.10.028
31. Legrand M, Barraud D, Constant I, et al., 2020, Management of Severe Thermal Burns in the Acute Phase in Adults and Children. Anaesth Crit Care Pa, 39:253–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2020.03.006
32. Schaefer TJ, Lopez ON, 2020, Burn Resuscitation and Management. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing.
33. Altavilla D, Saitta A, Cucinotta D, et al., 2001, Inhibition of Lipid Peroxidation Restores Impaired Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression and Stimulates Wound Healing and Angiogenesis in the Genetically Diabetic Mouse. Diabetes, 50:667–74. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.50.3.667
34. Xing Q, Yates K, Vogt C, et al., 2014, Increasing Mechanical Strength of Gelatin Hydrogels by Divalent Metal Ion Removal. Sci Rep, 4:4706. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04706
35. Gao T, Gillispie GJ, Copus JS, et al., 2018, Optimization of Gelatin-alginate Composite Bioink Printability Using Rheological Parameters: A Systematic Approach. Biofabrication, 10:034106. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aacdc7
36. Wang Y, Müller WD, Rumjahn A, et al., 2020, Parameters Influencing the Outcome of Additive Manufacturing of Tiny Medical Devices Based on PEEK. Materials (Basel), 13:466. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13020466
37. Chimene D, Kaunas R, Gaharwar AK, 2020, Hydrogel Bioink Reinforcement for Additive Manufacturing: A Focused Review of Emerging Strategies. Adv Mater, 32:1902026. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201902026
38. Zhao Y, Hu F, Evans JJ, et al., 2011, Study of Sol-gel Transition in Calcium Alginate System by Population Balance Model. Chem Eng Sci, 66:848–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.11.025
39. Zou Z, Zhang B, Nie X, et al., 2020, A Sodium Alginate-based Sustained-release Ipn Hydrogel and its Applications. RSC Adv, 10:39722–30. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA04316H
40. Koehler J, Brandl FP, Goepferich AM, 2018, Hydrogel Wound Dressings for Bioactive Treatment of Acute and Chronic Wounds. Eur Polym J, 100:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.12.046
41. Pawlaczyk M, Lelonkiewicz M, Wieczorowski M, 2013, Age dependent Biomechanical Properties of the Skin. Postepy Dermatol Alergol, 30:302–6. https://doi.org/10.5114/pdia.2013.38359
42. Aprilliza M, Editor. 2017, Characterization and Properties of Sodium Alginate from Brown Algae Used as an Ecofriendly Superabsorbent. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science And Engineering. Bristol, United Kingdom: IOP Publishing.
43. Dalal SR, Hussein MH, El-Naggar NEA, et al., 2021, Characterization of Alginate Extracted from Sargassum latifolium and its Use in Chlorella vulgaris Growth Promotion and Riboflavin Drug Delivery. Sci Rep, 11:1–17.
44. Sarker B, Papageorgiou DG, Silva R, et al., 2014, Fabrication of Alginate-gelatin Crosslinked Hydrogel Microcapsules and Evaluation of the Microstructure and Physico-chemical Properties. J Mater Chem B, 2:1470–82. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TB21509A
45. Lim J, Shameli K, Ibrahim N, et al., 2011, Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles in Chitosan, Gelatin and Chitosan/Gelatin Bionanocomposites by a Chemical Reducing Agent and their Characterization. Molecules, 16:7237–48. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16097237
46. Srinivasan P, Gottam R, 2018, Infrared Spectra: Useful Technique to Identify the Conductivity Level of Emeraldine form of Polyaniline and Indication of Conductivity Measurement Either Two or Four Probe Technique. Mater Sci Res India, 15:209–17.
47. Bao SP, Tjong SC, Tang CY, 2010, 8-Crystallization Behavior of Semicrystalline Polymer–Clay Nanocomposites. In: Tjong SC, Mai YW, editors. Physical Properties and Applications of Polymer Nanocomposites. Sawston, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing. p280–314.
48. Nagoba BS, Suryawanshi NM, Wadher B, et al., 2015, Acidic Environment and Wound Healing: A Review. Wounds Compend Clin Res Pract, 27:5–11.
49. Kulig D, Zimoch-Korzycka A, Jarmoluk A, et al., 2016, Study on Alginate-chitosan Complex formed with Different Polymers Ratio. Polymers (Basel), 8:167. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8050167
50. Wang F, Li Y, Shen Y, et al., 2013, The Functions and Applications of RGD in Tumor Therapy and Tissue Engineering. Int J Mol Sci, 14:13447–62. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140713447
51. Kim AY, Kim Y, Lee SH, et al., 2017, Effect of Gelatin on Osteogenic Cell Sheet Formation Using Canine Adipose derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Cell Transplant, 26:115–23. https://doi.org/10.3727/096368916X693338
52. Singer AJ, Boyce ST, 2017, Burn Wound Healing and Tissue Engineering. J Burn Care Res, 38:e605–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/bcr.0000000000000538
53. Benson A, Dickson WA, Boyce DE, 2006, ABC of Wound Healing: Burns. BMJ, 332:649–52.
54. Jones K, 2015, Fibrotic Response to Biomaterials and All Associated Sequence of Fibrosis. Host Response to Biomaterials. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, p189–237.