3D Printing and Computer-Aided Design for Precision Osteotomy-Aided Modules in Bone Biomechanical Study

Daofeng Wang^1,2†, Lin Han^3†, Gaoxiang Xu^1,2†, Wupeng Zhang^1,2,4, Hua Li^1,2, Cheng Xu^1,2, Huanyu Li⁵, Jitian Li^6*, Hao Zhang^1,2*, Jiantao Li^1,2*

Show Less

¹ Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China

² National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing, China

³ Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China

⁴ Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China

⁵ Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China

⁶ Henan Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital), Henan Institute of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Luoyang, China

IJB 2022, 8(4), 607 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i4.607

Submitted: 3 May 2022 | Accepted: 4 June 2022 | Published: 23 August 2022

(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing of Advanced Biomedical Devices)

© 2022 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Download PDF

Cite

XML

Abstract

Precise and shape-matching osteotomy models are determinants of the experimental homogeneity in the assessment of orthopedic biomechanical properties. At present, however, publications on detailed description of osteotomy in bone biomechanical study are scanty. The purposes of this study were to design a new method of osteotomy-aided module production for bone biomechanical study with the help of three-dimensional (3D) printing and computer-aided design (CAD) and to test the accuracy of osteotomy. Fourteen fourth-generation composite femurs were analyzed. The composite bone was scanned using computed tomography (CT) scanner and loaded in Mimics for reconstruction and, then, imported into 3-Matic software to design intertrochanteric region, distal femur, and rotation control lever models. 3D printer was used to print each component. After assembling Sawbones and osteotomy modules, a horizontal band-saw was used to create fracture models. The volume and mass of intermediate fragments were calculated and analyzed. Satisfactory osteotomies of all composite Sawbones were achieved. The mean volume and mass of intermediate fragments were 21.0 ± 1.5 mm3 and 19.0 ± 1.2 g, respectively. Range of deviation from average of volumes was −1.9 – 2.8 mm3 and most of these deviations fall within the range of −1.4 – 2.1 mm3 . Range of deviation from average of mass was −2.0 – 1.6 g and most of these deviations fall within the range of −1.4 – 1.6 g. One-dimensional histogram of deviation from average shows the precise and stable osteotomy performed based on the modules accordingly. A new method of osteotomy-aided module production for bone biomechanical study with the help of 3D printing and CAD was designed and the accuracy of osteotomy was verified. This method is expected to achieve homogeneity and standardization of osteotomy in bone biomechanical study

Keywords

Osteotomy

3D printing

Computer-aided design

Bone biomechanics

References

1. Weeks CA, Begum F, Beaupre LA, et al., 2013, Locking Plate Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures with Impaction of the Fracture Site to Restore Medial Column Support: A Biomechanical Study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 22:1552–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.02.003

2. Rosenblum SF, Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, et al., 1992, A Biomechanical Evaluation of the Gamma Nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 74:352–7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.74b3.1587875

3. Elkin DM, Galloway JD, Koury K, et al., 2021, Patella Fracture Fixation with a Non-locked Anterior Plating Technique: A Biomechanical Study. Injury, 52:686–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.040

4. Johnson J, Deren M, Chambers A, et al., 2019, Biomechanical Analysis of Fixation Devices for Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 27:e41–8. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00155

5. Polat G, Akgül T, Ekinci M, et al., 2019, A Biomechanical Comparison of Three Fixation Techniques in Osteoporotic Reverse Oblique Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture with Fragmented Lateral Cortex. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 45:499–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-1061-1

6. Zdero R, Olsen M, Bougherara H, et al., 2008, Cancellous Bone Screw Purchase: A Comparison of Synthetic Femurs, Human Femurs, and Finite Element Analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 222:1175–83. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544119jeim409

7. Duplantier NL, Mitchell RJ, Zambrano S, et al., 2018, A Biomechanical Comparison of Fifth Metatarsal Jones Fracture Fixation Methods. Am J Sports Med, 46:1220–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517753376

8. Windell L, Kulkarni A, Alabort E, et al., 2021, Biomechanical Comparison of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Risk in Three Femoral Components in a Sawbone Model. J Arthroplasty, 36:387–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.061

9. Windolf M, Braunstein V, Dutoit C, et al., 2009, Is a Helical Shaped Implant a Superior Alternative to the Dynamic Hip Screw for Unstable Femoral Neck Fractures? A Biomechanical Investigation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 24:59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.07.004

10. Stafford P, Goulet R, Norris B, 2000, The Effect of Screw Insertion Site and Unused Drill Holes on Stability and Mode of Failure after Fixation of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fracture. Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 28:11–6. https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v28.i12.40

11. Huang Y, Zhang C, Luo Y, 2013, A Comparative Biomechanical Study of Proximal Femoral Nail (InterTAN) and Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation for Intertrochanteric Fractures. Int Orthop, 37:2465–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2120-1

12. Rupprecht M, Grossterlinden L, Sellenschloh K, et al., 2011, Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures with Posterior Comminution: A Biomechanical Comparison of DHS® and Intertan Nail®. Int Orthop, 35:1695–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1199-x

13. Li J, Han L, Zhang H, et al., 2019, Medial Sustainable Nail Versus Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Treating AO/OTA 31-A2.3 Fractures: Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Evaluation. Injury, 50:648–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.02.008

14. Bartel T, Rivard A, Jimenez A, et al., 2018, Medical Three-dimensional Printing Opens up New Opportunities in Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery. Eur Heart J, 39:1246–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx016

15. Prendergast ME, Burdick JA, 2020, Recent Advances in Enabling Technologies in 3D Printing for Precision Medicine. Adv Mater, 32:e1902516. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201902516

16. Wang Z, Yang Y, 2021, Application of 3D Printing in Implantable Medical Devices. Biomed Res Int, 2021:6653967. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6653967

17. Gardner MP, Chong AC, Pollock AG, et al., 2010, Mechanical Evaluation of Large-size Fourth-generation Composite Femur and Tibia Models. Ann Biomed Eng, 38:613–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9887-7

18. Heiner A D, 2008, Structural Properties of Fourth-generation Composite Femurs and Tibias. J Biomech, 41:3282–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.013

19. Nicayenzi B, Shah S, Schemitsch EH, et al., 2011, The Biomechanical Effect of Changes in Cancellous Bone Density on Synthetic Femur Behaviour. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 225:1050–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411911420004

20. Nicayenzi B, Crookshank M, Olsen M, et al., 2012, Biomechanical Measurements of Cortical Screw Stripping Torque in Human Versus Artificial Femurs. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 226:645–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411912450998

21. Fensky F, Nüchtern JV, Kolb JP, et al., 2013, Cement Augmentation of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Pertrochanteric Fractures—a Biomechanical Cadaver Study. Injury, 44:802–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.03.003

22. Knobe M, Gradl G, Maier KJ, et al., 2013, Rotationally Stable Screw-anchor Versus Sliding Hip Screw Plate Systems in Stable Trochanteric Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Evaluation. J Orthop Trauma, 27:e127–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318278112a

23. Bellato E, Kim Y, Fitzsimmons JS, et al., 2017, Coronoid Reconstruction using Osteochondral Grafts: A Biomechanical Study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 26:1794–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.010

24. Högel F, Hoffmann S, Panzer S, et al., 2013, Biomechanical Comparison of Intramedullar Versus Extramedullar Stabilization of Intra-articular Tibial Plateau Fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 133:59–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1629-x

25. Bellato E, Fitzsimmons JS, Kim Y, et al., 2018, Articular Contact Area and Pressure in Posteromedial Rotatory Instability of the Elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 100:e34. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.16.01321

26. Gray AB, Alolabi B, Ferreira LM, et al., 2013, The Effect of a Coronoid Prosthesis on Restoring Stability to the Coronoid deficient Elbow: A Biomechanical Study. J Hand Surg Am, 38:1753–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.05.004

27. Jung MK, von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt GVR, Jung AL, et al., 2021, Evaluation of External Stabilization of Type II Odontoid Fractures in Geriatric Patients-an Experimental Study on a Newly Developed Cadaveric Trauma Model. PLoS One, 16:e0260414. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260414

28. Zhang RY, Li JT, Zhao JX, et al., 2022, The Oblique Triangle Configuration of Three Parallel Screws for Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation using Computer-aided Design Modules. Sci Rep, 12:325. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03666-1

29. Guo H, Li J, Gao Y, et al., 2021, A Finite Element Study on the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fracture with a New Spinal Fixation System. Biomed Res Int, 2021:8872514. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8872514

30. Li J, Zhang LC, Li J, et al., 2020, A Hybrid Uniplanar Pedicle Screw System with a New Intermediate Screw for Minimally Invasive Spinal Fixation: A Finite Element Analysis. Biomed Res Int, 2020:5497030. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5497030

Previous article in this issue

Next article in this issue

International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing