A Dual-sensitive Hydrogel Based on Poly(Lactide-co-Glycolide)-Polyethylene GlycolPoly(Lactide-co-Glycolide) Block Copolymers for 3D Printing
The thermo-sensitive hydrogel formed by triblock copolymers of polyethylene glycols and aliphatic polyesters serves as a promising candidate for bioink due to its excellent biodegradability and biocompatibility. However, the thermocrosslinking alone cannot achieve a robust hydrogel to support the 3D printed constructs without collapse. Herein, a photocrosslinkable group was introduced into the triblock copolymers to achieve a dual-sensitive hydrogel. A triblock copolymer poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-polyethylene glycol-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) decorated with acrylate group in the chain end was prepared. The obtained aqueous solutions of the copolymers could transform into hydrogels with excellent shear thinning properties and rapid elastic recovery properties spontaneously on the increase of temperature. The resulted thermogels also allowed for photo-crosslinking by exposure to ultraviolet radiation, with storage modulus dramatically increased to stable the printed constructs. Through a two-step crosslinking strategy, complicated tissue-like constructs with high shape fidelity can be printed using the dual-sensitive inks. Moreover, the mechanical strength, swelling ratio, and printability of the hydrogels can be tuned by varying the substitution rate of the acrylate group without compromising the inks’ extrudability. We expect that the dual-sensitive hydrogels may be used as bioinks to print large constructs for applications in tissue engineering.
1. Noor N, Shapira A, Edri R, et al., 2019, 3D Printing of Personalized Thick and Perfusable Cardiac Patches and Hearts. Adv Sci, 6:1900344. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201900344
2. Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, et al., 2016, A 3D Bioprinting System to Produce Human-scale Tissue Constructs with Structural Integrity. Nat Biotechnol, 34:312–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3413
3. Grigoryan B, Paulsen SJ, Corbett DC, et al., 2019, Multivascular Networks and Functional Intravascular Topologies within Biocompatible Hydrogels. Science, 364:458–64.
4. Bedell ML, Navara AM, Du Y, et al., 2020, Polymeric Systems for Bioprinting. Chem Rev, 120:10744–92.
5. Li X, Liu B, Pei B, et al., 2020, Inkjet Bioprinting of Biomaterials. Chem Rev, 120:10793–833.
6. Valot L, Martinez J, Mehdi A, et al., 2019, Chemical Insights Into Bioinks for 3D Printing. Chem Soc Rev, 48:4049–86. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00718c
7. Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and Organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32:773–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
8. Jin Y, Liu C, Chai W, et al., 2017, Self-Supporting Nanoclay as Internal Scaffold Material for Direct Printing of Soft Hydrogel Composite Structures in Air. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 9:17456–65. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b03613
9. Lee A, Hudson AR, Shiwarski DJ, et al., 2019, 3D Bioprinting of Collagen to Rebuild Components of the Human Heart. Science, 365:482–7.
10. Yin J, Yan M, Wang Y, et al., 2018, 3D Bioprinting of Low-Concentration Cell-Laden Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) Bioinks with a Two-Step Cross-linking Strategy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10:6849–57. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b16059.s001
11. Colosi C, Shin SR, Manoharan V, et al., 2016, Microfluidic Bioprinting of Heterogeneous 3D Tissue Constructs Using Low-Viscosity Bioink. Adv Mater, 28:677–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503310
12. Singh YP, Bandyopadhyay A, Mandal BB, 2019, 3D Bioprinting Using Cross-Linker-Free Silk-Gelatin Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 11:33684–96. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b11644
13. Schacht K, Jungst T, Schweinlin M, et al., 2015, Biofabrication of Cell-Loaded 3D Spider Silk Constructs. Angew Chem Int Ed, 54:2816–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201409846
14. Kim SH, Yeon YK, Lee JM, et al., 2018, Precisely Printable and Biocompatible Silk Fibroin Bioink for Digital Light Processing 3D Printing. Nat Commun, 9:1620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04517-w
15. Highley CB, Rodell CB, Burdick JA, 2015, Direct 3D Printing of Shear-Thinning Hydrogels into Self-Healing Hydrogels. Adv Mater, 27:5075–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201501234
16. Petta D, Armiento A R, Grijpma D, et al., 2018, 3D Bioprinting of a Hyaluronan Bioink through Enzymatic-and Visible Light-Crosslinking. Biofabrication, 10:044104. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aadf58
17. Shi L, Carstensen H, Hölzl K, et al., 2017, Dynamic Coordination Chemistry Enables Free Directional Printing of Biopolymer Hydrogel. Chem Mater, 29:5816–23. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00128.s001
18. Pati F, Jang J, Ha DH, et al., 2014, Printing Three-Dimensional Tissue Analogues with Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioink. Nat Commun, 5:3935. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4935
19. Nielsen JE, Zhu K, Sande SA, et al., 2017, Structural and Rheological Properties of Temperature-Responsive Amphiphilic Triblock Copolymers in Aqueous Media. J Phys Chem B, 121:4885–99. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b01174.s001
20. Bae SJ, Suh JM, Sohn YS, et al., 2005, Thermogelling Poly (Caprolactone-b-Ethylene Glycol-b-Caprolactone) Aqueous Solutions. Macromolecules, 38:5260–5. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma050489m
21. Chen L, Ci T, Li T, et al., 2014, Effects of Molecular Weight Distribution of Amphiphilic Block Copolymers on Their Solubility, Micellization, and Temperature-Induced Sol-Gel Transition in Water. Macromolecules, 47:5895–903. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma501110p
22. Cui S, Yu L, Ding J, 2019, Thermogelling of Amphiphilic Block Copolymers in Water: ABA Type Versus AB or BAB Type. Macromolecules, 52:3697–715. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.9b00534
23. Chen L, Ci T, Yu L, et al., 2015, Effects of Molecular Weight and Its Distribution of PEG Block on Micellization and Thermogellability of PLGA-PEG-PLGA Copolymer Aqueous Solutions. Macromolecules, 48:3662–71. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00168
24. Zhang Z, Ni J, Chen L, et al., 2011, Biodegradable and Thermoreversible PCLA-PEG-PCLA Hydrogel as a Barrier for Prevention of Post-Operative Adhesion. Biomaterials, 32:4725–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.046
25. Yoshida Y, Kawahara K, Inamoto K, et al., 2016, Biodegradable Injectable Polymer Systems Exhibiting Temperature-Responsive Irreversible Sol-to-Gel Transition by Covalent Bond Formation. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 3:56–67. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00581.s001
26. Vidyasagar A, Ku SH, Kim M, et al., 2017, Design and Characterization of a PVLA-PEG-PVLA Thermosensitive and Biodegradable Hydrogel. ACS Macro Lett, 6:1134–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.7b00523
27. Cui S, Yu L, Ding J, 2018, Semi-Bald Micelles and Corresponding Percolated Micelle Networks of Thermogels. Macromolecules, 51:6405–20. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.8b01014
28. Jeong B, Bae YH, Kim SW, 1999, Thermoreversible Gelation of PEG-PLGA-PEG Triblock Copolymer Aqueous Solutions. Macromolecules, 32:7064–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma9908999
29. Yu L, Zhang H, Ding J, 2006, A Subtle End-Group Effect on Macroscopic Physical Gelation of Triblock Copolymer Aqueous Solutions. Angew Chem Int Ed, 45:2232–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200503575
30. Zhou X, He X, Shi K, et al., 2020, Injectable Thermosensitive Hydrogel Containing Erlotinib-Loaded Hollow Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as a Localized Drug Delivery System for NSCLC Therapy. Adv Sci, 7:2001442. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202001442
31. Ci T, Shen Y, Cui S, et al., 2017, Achieving High Drug Loading and Sustained Release of Hydrophobic Drugs in Hydrogels through In Situ Crystallization. Macromol Biosci, 17:1600299. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201600299
32. Ni P, Ding Q, Fan M, et al., 2014, Injectable Thermosensitive PEG-PCL-PEG Hydrogel/acellular Bone Matrix Composite for Bone Regeneration in Cranial Defects. Biomaterials, 35:236–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.016
33. Zhang Z, Lai Y, Yu L, et al., 2010, Effects of Immobilizing Sites of RGD Peptides in Amphiphilic Block Copolymers on Efficacy of Cell Adhesion. Biomaterials, 31:7873–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.014
34. Yu L, Ding J, 2008, Injectable Hydrogels as Unique Biomedical Materials. Chem Soc Rev, 37:1473–81. https://doi.org/10.1039/b713009k
35. Park MH, Joo MK, Choi BG, et al., 2012, Biodegradable Thermogels. Acc Chem Res, 45:424–33.
36. Song KH, Highley C B, Rouff A, et al., 2018, Complex 3D-Printed Microchannels within Cell-Degradable Hydrogels. Adv Funct Mater, 28:1801331. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201801331
37. Wang Z, An G, Zhu Y, et al., 2019, 3D-Printable Self-Healing and Mechanically Reinforced Hydrogels with Host-Guest Non-Covalent Interactions Integrated Into Covalently Linked Networks. Mater Horiz, 6:733–42. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8mh01208c
38. Wlodarczyk-Biegun MK, Paez JI, Villiou M, et al., 2020, Printability Study of Metal Ion Crosslinked PEG-Catechol Based Inks. Biofabrication, 12:035009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab673a
39. Chimene D, Peak CW, Gentry JL, et al., 2018, Nanoengineered Ionic-Covalent Entanglement (NICE) Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10:9957–68. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b19808
40. Pi Q, Maharjan S, Yan X, et al., 2018, Digitally Tunable Microfluidic Bioprinting of Multilayered Cannular Tissues. Adv Mater, 30:1706913. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201706913
41. Rutz AL, Gargus ES, Hyland KE, et al., 2019, Employing PEG Crosslinkers to Optimize Cell Viability in Gel Phase Bioinks and Tailor Post Printing Mechanical Properties. Acta Biomater, 99:121–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.09.007
42. Rutz AL, Hyland KE, Jakus AE, et al., 2015, A Multimaterial Bioink Method for 3D Printing Tunable, Cell-Compatible Hydrogels. Adv Mater, 27:1607–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201405076
43. Mehrotra S, de Melo BA, Hirano M, et al., 2020, Nonmulberry Silk Based Ink for Fabricating Mechanically Robust Cardiac Patches and Endothelialized Myocardium-on-a-Chip Application. Adv Funct Mater, 30:1907436. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201907436
44. Sakai S, Mochizuki K, Qu Y, et al., 2018, Peroxidase- Catalyzed Microextrusion Bioprinting of Cell-laden Hydrogel Constructs in Vaporized ppm-Level Hydrogen Peroxide. Biofabrication, 10:045007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aadc9e
45. Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, et al., 2015, Synthesis, Properties, and Biomedical Applications of Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) Hydrogels. Biomaterials, 73:254–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045
46. Kirillova A, Maxson R, Stoychev G, et al., 2017, 4D Biofabrication Using Shape-Morphing Hydrogels. Adv Mater, 29:1703443. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703443
47. Peak CW, Stein J, Gold KA, et al., 2018, Nanoengineered Colloidal Inks for 3D Bioprinting. Langmuir, 34:917–25. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02540
48. He Y, Yang F, Zhao H, et al., 2016, Research on the Printability of Hydrogels in 3D Bioprinting. Sci Rep, 6:29977.
49. Ouyang L, Yao R, Zhao Y, et al., 2016, Effect of Bioink Properties on Printability and Cell Viability for 3D Bioplotting of Embryonic Stem Cells. Biofabrication, 8:035020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020
50. Ribeiro A, Blokzijl MM, Levato R, et al., 2017, Assessing Bioink Shape Fidelity to Aid Material Development in 3D Bioprinting. Biofabrication, 10:014102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa90e2
51. Xu C, Lee W, Dai G, et al., 2018, Highly Elastic Biodegradable Single-Network Hydrogel for Cell Printing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10:9969–79. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b01294