Investigation of Ceramic Dental Prostheses Based on ZrSiO4 -Glass Composites Fabricated by Indirect Additive Manufacturing
Dental prosthesis and restoration technologies have been developed in the past years. Despite the advantages of additive manufacturing, computer-aided design, and computer-aided manufacturing technologies are still the dominant type of method for fabricating prostheses. Therefore, the main goal of this study is to assess the feasibility of using indirect fused deposition modeling to fabricate dental prosthesis made of ZrSiO4 -glass composites. To achieve this goal, filaments were filled by 90% of ZrSiO4 and 50 μm glass spheres to fabricate prosthesis. Multivariable approach was applied to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed method. Holding temperature, holding time, heating rate, and cooling rate were considered the control factors, while shrinkage, flexural strength, and process feasibility were the study responses. In addition, the flexural strength of materials was found between 25 and 85 MPa, while shrinkage fluctuated between 10 and 25%.
1. Cunico MW, de Carvalho J, 2016, Development of Novel Additive Manufacturing Technology: An Investigation of a Selective Composite Formation Process. Rapid Prototyp J, 22:51–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-04-2014-0049.
2. Sulaiman TA, 2020, Materials in Digital Dentistry a Review. J Esthet Restor Dent, 32:171–81.
3. Li RW, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP, 2014, Ceramic Dental Biomaterials and CAD/CAM Technology: State of the Art. J Prosthodont Res, 58:208–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.003.
4. Karthick A, Malarvizhi D, Tamilselvi R, et al., 2019, Ceramics in dentistry? A review. Indian J Public Health Res Dev, 10:6065.
5. Gali S, Sirsi S, 2015, 3D Printing: The Future Technology in Prosthodontics. J Dent Orofac Res, 11:37–40.
6. Uriondo A, Esperon-Miguez M, Perinpanayagam S, 2015, The Present and Future of Additive Manufacturing in the Aerospace Sector: A Review of Important Aspects. Proc Inst Mech Eng G, 229:2132–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410014568797.
7. Najmon JC, Raeisi S, Tovar A, 2019, Review of Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Applications in the Aerospace Industry. In: Additive Manufacturing for the Aerospace Industry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-814062-8.00002-9.
8. Espera AH, Dizon JR, Chen Q, et al., 2019, 3D-printing and Advanced Manufacturing for Electronics. Prog Addit Manuf, 4:245–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-019-00077-7.
9. Saengchairat N, Tran T, Chua CK, 2017, A Review: Additive Manufacturing for Active Electronic Components. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 12:31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1253181.
10. Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF, 2019, Print me an Organ! Why we are not there yet. Prog Polym Sci, 97:101145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145.
11. Lee JM, Ng WL, Yeong WY, 2019, Resolution and Shape in Bioprinting: Strategizing Towards Complex Tissue and Organ Printing. Appl Phys Rev, 6:011307. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5053909.
12. Prinz FB, 1997, Rapid Prototyping in Europe and Japan. Center Adv Technol, 1997:102.
13. Vandenbroucke B, Kruth JP, 2007, Selective Laser Melting of Biocompatible Metals for Rapid Manufacturing of Medical Parts. Rapid Prototyp J, 13:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540710776142.
14. Wong J, 2010, Biocompatible Tantalum Fiber Scaffolding for Bone and Soft Tissue Prosthesis, Google Patents.
15. Mueller B, 2012, Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing. Assembly Autom, 32:3332. https://doi.org/10.1108/aa.2012.03332baa.010.
16. Anusavice KJ, 2013, Phillips Materiais Dentários. Elsevier, Brasil.
17. Denry IL, 1996, Recent Advances in Ceramics for Dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 7:134–43.
18. Lin L, Fang Y, Liao Y, et al., 2019, 3D Printing and Digital Processing Techniques in Dentistry: A Review of Literature. Adv Eng Mater, 21:1801013. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201801013.
19. Torabi K, Farjood E, Hamedani S, 2015, Rapid Prototyping Technologies and their Applications in Prosthodontics, a Review of Literature. J Dent, 16:1.
20. Denry I, Kelly J, 2014, Emerging Ceramic-based Materials for Dentistry. J Dent Res, 93:1235–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514553627.
21. Ishida Y, Miyasaka T, 2016, Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Casting Patterns Created by 3D Printers. Dent Mater J, 35:250–6. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-278.
22. Shujaat S, Shaheen E, Novillo F, et al., 2020, Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Derived Casts: A Comparative Study. J Prosthet Dent, 2020:21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.021.
23. Dikova T, Dzhendov DA, Ivanov D, et al., 2018, Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Roughness of Polymeric Dental Bridges Produced by Different 3D Printing Processes. Arch Mater Sci Eng, 94:65–75. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.8660.
24. Thompson Y, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Kukla C, et al., 2019, Fused Filament Fabrication, Debinding and Sintering as a Low Cost Additive Manufacturing Method of 316L Stainless Steel. Addit Manuf, 30:100861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100861.
25. Saude N, Ibrahim M, Ibrahim MH, 2014, Mechanical Properties of Highly Filled Iron-ABS Composites in Injection Molding for FDM Wire Filament. Mater Sci Forum, 773–774:448–53.
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.773-774.448.
26. Abdullah AM, Rahim TN, Mohamad D, et al., 2017, Mechanical and Physical Properties of Highly ZrO2/β-TCP Filled Polyamide 12 Prepared via Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) 3D Printer for Potential Craniofacial Reconstruction Application. Mater Lett, 189:307–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.11.052.
27. Denry I, Kelly JT, 2008, State of the Art of Zirconia for Dental Applications. Dent Mater, 24:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007.
28. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N, 2013, Mechanical Properties of Polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network Materials. Dent Mater, 29:419–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.002.
29. Junior SA, Zanchi CH, de Carvalho RV, et al., 2007, Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Different Types of Resin-based Composites. Braz Oral Res, 21:16–21. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-83242007000100003.
30. Silva LH, de Lima E, de Paula Miranda RB, et al., 2017, Dental Ceramics: A Review of New Materials and Processing Methods. Braz Oral Res, 31:e58.
31. Abd El-Ghany OS, Sherief AH, 2016, Zirconia Based Ceramics, Some Clinical and Biological Aspects. Future Dent J, 2:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2016.10.002.
32. Bicalho LA, Baptista CA, Barboza MJ, et al., 2011, ZrO2-Bioglass Dental Ceramics: Processing, Structural and Mechanics Characterization. In: Advances in Ceramics Electric and Magnetic Ceramics, Bioceramics, Ceramics and Environment. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia. https://doi.org/10.5772/22334.
33. Christel P, Meunier A, Heller M, et al., 1989, Mechanical Properties and Short-term In Vivo Evaluation of Yttriumoxide- partially-stabilized Zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res, 23:45–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820230105.
34. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, et al., 2004, Strength, Fracture Toughness and Microstructure of a Selection of All-ceramic Materials. Part I. Pressable and Alumina Glass infiltrated Ceramics. Dent Mater, 20:441–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.003.
35. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, et al., 2004, Strength, Fracture Toughness and Microstructure of a Selection of All ceramic Materials. Part II. Zirconia-Based Dental Ceramics. Dent Mater, 20:449–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002.
36. Ilie N, Hickel R, 2009, Investigations on Mechanical Behaviour of Dental Composites. Clin Oral Investig, 13:427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0258-4.
37. Galante R, Figueiredo-Pina CG, Serro AP, 2019, Additive Manufacturing of Ceramics for Dental Applications: A Review. Dent Mater, 35:825–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.026.
38. Virdi M, 2015, Emerging Trends in Oral Health Sciences and Dentistry. IntechOpen, London, pp. 854