Scaffold-free, Label-free, and Nozzle-free Magnetic Levitational Bioassembler for Rapid Formative Biofabrication of 3D Tissues and Organs
Scaffolding is the conceptual framework of conventional tissue engineering. Over the past decade, scaffold-free approaches as a potential alternative to classic scaffold-based methods have emerged, and scaffold-free magnetic levitational tissue engineering (magnetic force-based tissue engineering [Mag-TE]) is a type of this novel tissue engineering strategy. However, Mag-TE is often based on the use of potentially toxic magnetic nanoparticles. Scaffold-free and label-free magnetic levitational bioassembly do not employ magnetic nanoparticles and thus, the potential toxicity of magnetic nanoparticles can be avoided. In this short review, we describe the conceptual foundation of scaffold-free, label-free, and nozzle-free formative biofabrication using magnetic fields as “scaffields.” The design and implementation of “Organ.Aut,” the first commercial magnetic levitational bioassembler, and the potential applications of magnetic bioassembler are discussed as well.
1. Derby B, 2012, Printing and Prototyping of Tissues and Scaffolds. Science, 338:921–6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1226340.
2. Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and Organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32:773–85. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2958.
3. Mironov V, Kasyanov V, Drake C, et al., 2008, Organ Printing: Promises and Challenges. Regen Med, 3:93–103. DOI: 10.2217/17460751.3.1.93.
4. Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF, 2019, Print Me An Organ! Why We Are Not There Yet. Prog Polym Sci, 97:101145. DOI:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145.
5. Adine C, Ng KK, Rungarunlert S, et al., 2018, Engineering Innervated secretory Epithelial Organoids by Magnetic Three-dimensional Bioprinting for Stimulating Epithelial Growth in Salivary Glands. Biomaterials, 180:52–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.06.011.
6. Souza GR, Tseng H, Gage JA, et al., 2017, Magnetically Bioprinted Human Myometrial 3D Cell Rings as a Model for Uterine Contractility. Int J Mol Sci, 18:683. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18040683.
7. Tseng H, Gage JA, Haisler WL, et al., 2016, A High throughput In Vitro Ring Assay for Vasoactivity Using Magnetic 3D Bioprinting. Sci Rep, 6:30640. DOI: 10.1038/srep30640.
8. Tseng H, Gage JA, Shen T, et al., 2015, A Spheroid Toxicity Assay Using Magnetic 3D Bioprinting and Real-Time Mobile Device-based Imaging. Sci Rep, 5:13987. DOI: 10.1038/srep13987.
9. Hutmacher DW, 2000, Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering Bone and Cartilage. Biomaterials, 21:2529–43. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00121-6.
10. Yang S, Leong KF, Du Z, et al., 2001, The Design of Scaffolds for use in Tissue Engineering. Part I. Traditional Factors. Tissue Eng, 7:679–89. DOI: 10.1089/107632701753337645.
11. Norotte C, Marga FS, Niklason LE, et al., 2009, Scaffold-Free Vascular Tissue Engineering Using Bioprinting. Biomaterials, 30:5910–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.034.
12. Arai K, Murata D, Verissimo AR, et al., 2018, Fabrication of Scaffold-free Tubular Cardiac Constructs Using a Bio-3D Printer. PLoS One, 13:e0209162. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0209162.
13. Gruene M, Deiwick A, Koch L, et al., 2011, Laser Printing of Stem Cells for Biofabrication of Scaffold-Free Autologous Grafts. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 17:79–87. DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2010.0359.
14. Owaki T, Shimizu T, Yamato M, et al., 2014, Cell Sheet Engineering for Regenerative Medicine: Current Challenges and Strategies. Biotechnol J, 9:904–14. DOI: 10.1002/biot.201300432.
15. Dobson J, 2008, Remote Control of Cellular Behaviour with Magnetic Nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol, 3:139–43.
16. Castro E, Mano JF, 2013, Magnetic Force-Based Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. J Biomed Nanotechnol, 9:1129–36.
17. Armstrong JP, Stevens MM, 2020, Using Remote Fields for Complex Tissue Engineering. Trends Biotechnol, 38:254–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.07.005.
18. Mazuel F, Espinosa A, Luciani N, et al., 2016, Massive Intracellular Biodegradation of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Evidenced Magnetically at Single-Endosome and Tissue Levels. ACS Nano, 10:7627–38. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b02876.
19. Chua CK, Leong KF, Lim CS, 2010, Rapid Prototyping: Principles and Applications. World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore.
20. Rogosnitzky M, Branch S, 2016, Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Toxicity: A Review of Known and Proposed Mechanisms. Biometals, 29:365–76. DOI: 10.1007/s10534-016-9931-7.
21. Siew EL, Farris AF, Rashid N, et al., 2020, Genes In Vitro Toxicological Assessment of Gadolinium (III) Chloride in V79-4 Fibroblasts. Environ, 42:22. DOI: 10.1186/s41021-020-00161-3.
22. Ramalho J, Semelka RC, Ramalho M, et al., 2016, Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Accumulation and Toxicity: An Update. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 37:1192–8. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a4615.
23. Ramalho J, Ramalho M, 2017, Gadolinium Deposition and Chronic Toxicity. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 25:765–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2017.06.007.
24. Parfenov VA, Mironov VA, van Kampen KA, et al., 2020, Scaffold-free and Label-free Biofabrication Technology Using Levitational Assembly in High Magnetic Field. Biofabrication, 2020:7554. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab7554.
25. Parfenov VA, Khesuani1 YD, Petrov SV, et al., 2020, Magnetic Levitational Bioassembly of 3D Tissue Construct in Space. Sci Adv, 6:eaba4174.