Hybrid polycaprolactone/hydrogel scaffold fabrication and in-process plasma treatment using PABS
A challenge for tissue engineering is to produce synthetic scaffolds of adequate chemical, physical, and biological cues effectively. Due to the hydrophobicity of the commonly used synthetic polymers, the printed scaffolds are limited in cell-seeding and proliferation efficiency. Furthermore, non-uniform cell distribution along the scaffolds with rare cell attachment in the core region is a common problem. There are no available commercial systems able to produce multi-type material and gradient scaffolds which could mimic the nature tissues. This paper describes a plasma-assisted bio-extrusion system (PABS) to overcome the above limitations and capable of producing functional-gradient scaffolds; it comprises pressure-assisted and screw-assisted extruders and plasma jets. A hybrid scaffold consisting of synthetic biopolymer and natural hybrid hydrogel alginate-gelatin (Alg-Gel) methacrylate anhydride, and full-layer N2 plasma modification scaffolds were produced using PABS. Water contact angle and in vitro biological tests confirm that the plasma modification alters the hydrophilicity properties of synthetic polymers and promotes proliferation of cells, leading to homogeneous cell colonization. The results confirm the printing capability for soft hard material integration of PABS and suggest that it is promising for producing functional gradient scaffolds of biomaterials.
1. Pereira R F, Sousa A, Barrias C C, et al., 2017, Advances in bioprinted cell-laden hydrogels for skin tissue engineering. Biomanuf Rev, 2(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40898-017- 0003-8.
2. Melchels F P, Domingos M A, Klein T J, et al., 2012, Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs. Prog Polym Sci, 37(8): 1079-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. progpolymsci.2011.11.007.
3. Vyas C, Pereira R, Huang B, et al., 2017, Engineering the vasculature with additive manufacturing. Curr Opin Biomed Eng, 2: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2017.05.008.
4. Rahman S, Carter P, Bhattarai N, 2017, Aloe vera for tissue engineering applications. J Funct Biomater, 8(1): 6. https:// doi.org/10.3390/jfb8010006.
5. Maldonado M A, Bonham A J, 2017, Conductive gel polymers as an extracellular matrix mimic and cell vehicle for cardiac tissue engineering. FASEB J, 31(1_supplement): 925.921-925.921.
6. Black C R, Goriainov V, Gibbs D, et al., 2015, Bone tissue engineering. Curr Mol Biol Rep, 1(3): 132-140. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40610-015-0022-2.
7. Asghari F, Samiei M, Adibkia K, et al., 2017, Biodegradable and biocompatible polymers for tissue engineering application: A review. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol, 45(2): 185-192. https://doi.org/10.3109/21691401.2016.1146731.
8. Trombetta R, Inzana J A, Schwarz E M, et al., 2017, 3D printing of calcium phosphate ceramics for bone tissue engineering and drug delivery. Ann Biomed Eng, 45(1): 23-44. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10439-016-1678-3.
9. Vacanti J P, Langer R, 1999, Tissue engineering: The design and fabrication of living replacement devices for surgical reconstruction and transplantation. Lancet, 354: S32-S34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)90247-7.
10. Mohanty A K, Misra M, Hinrichsen G, 2000, Biofibres, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: An overview. Macromol Mater Eng, 276(1): 1-24. https://doi. org/10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W.
11. Kumar A, Mandal S, Barui S, et al., 2016, Low temperature additive manufacturing of three dimensional scaffolds for bone-tissue engineering applications: Processing related challenges and property assessment. Mater Sci Eng Rep, 103: 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2016.01.001.
12. Forrestal D P, Klein T J, Woodruff M A, 2017, Challenges in engineering large customized bone constructs. Biotechnol Bioeng, 114(6): 1129-1139. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26222.
13. Bártolo P, Chua C, Almeida H, et al., 2009, Biomanufacturing for tissue engineering: Present and future trends. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 4(4): 203-216. https://doi. org/10.1080/17452750903476288.
14. Bártolo P J, Domingos M, Patrício T, et al., 2011, Biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering. Adv Model Tissue Eng, 11: 137-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94- 007-1254-6_8.
15. Bartolo P, Kruth J P, Silva J, et al., 2012, Biomedical production of implants by additive electro-chemical and physical processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol, 61(2): 635-655. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.005.
16. Rutz A L, Hyland K E, Jakus A E, et al., 2015, A multimaterial bioink method for 3D printing tunable, cell-compatible hydrogels. Adv Mater, 27(9): 1607-1614. https://doi. org/10.1002/adma.201405076.
17. Jakus A E, Shah R N, 2017, Multi and mixed 3D-printing of graphene-hydroxyapatite hybrid materials for complex tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 105(1): 274-283. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35684.
18. Hoque M E, Chuan Y L, Pashby I, 2012, Extrusion based rapid prototyping technique: An advanced platform for tissue engineering scaffold fabrication. Biopolymers, 97(2): 83-93.
19. Bellini A, 2002, Fused Deposition of Ceramics: A Comprehensive Experimental, Analytical and Computational Study of Material Behavior, Fabrication Process and equipment Desig. Philadelphia, PA: Drexel Universityn.
20. Almeida H, Bartolo P, Mota C, et al., 2010, Process equipment for rapid bioextrusion fabrication. Portuguese Patent Appl, 104, 247.
21. Zhang L G, Fisher J P, Leong K, 2015, 3D Bioprinting and Nanotechnology in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. London: Academic Press.
22. Giannitelli S, Mozetic P, Trombetta M, et al., 2015, Combined additive manufacturing approaches in tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 24: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. actbio.2015.06.032.
23. Sobral J M, Caridade S G, Sousa R A, et al., 2011, Three-dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size gradients: Effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical performance and cell seeding efficiency. Acta Biomater, 7(3): 1009-1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003.
24. Oh S H, Lee J H, 2013, Hydrophilization of synthetic biodegradable polymer scaffolds for improved cell/tissue compatibility. Biomed Mater, 8(1): 014101. https://doi. org/10.1088/1748-6041/8/1/014101.
25. Yang J, Wan Y, Yang J, et al., 2003, Plasma-treated, collagen-anchored polylactone: Its cell affinity evaluation under shear or shear-free conditions. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 67(4): 1139-1147. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.10034.
26. Ozbolat I T, Chen H, Yu Y, 2014, Development of ‘multi-arm bioprinter’for hybrid biofabrication of tissue engineering constructs. Robot Comput Integr Manuf, 30(3): 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2013.10.005.
27. Intranuovo F, Gristina R, Brun F, et al., 2014, Plasma modification of PCL porous scaffolds fabricated by solvent-casting/particulate-leaching for tissue engineering. Plasma Process Polym, 11(2): 184-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/ ppap.201300149.
28. Intranuovo F, Gristina R, Fracassi L, et al., 2016, Plasma processing of scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Plasma Chem Plasma Process, 36(1): 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-015-9667-0.
29. Jeon O, Bouhadir K H, Mansour J M, et al., 2009, Photocrosslinked alginate hydrogels with tunable biodegradation rates and mechanical properties. Biomaterials, 30(14): 2724- 2734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.034.
30. Liu F, Hinduja S, Bartolo P, 2018, User interface tool for a novel plasma-assisted bio-additive extrusion system. Rapid Prototyp, 10: 1108.https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2016-0115.
31. Park K, Ju Y M, Son J S, et al., 2007, Surface modification of biodegradable electrospun nanofiber scaffolds and their interaction with fibroblasts. J Biomater Sci Polym , 18(4): 369-382. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856207780424997.
32. Thakur S, Neogi S, 2015, Tailoring the adhesion of polymers using plasma for biomedical applications: A critical review. Rev Adhes Adhes, 3(1): 53-97. https://doi.org/10.7569/ RAA.2015.097303.
33. Gross M, Zhao X, Mascarenhas V, et al., 2016, Effects of the surface physico-chemical properties and the surface textures on the initial colonization and the attached growth in algal biofilm. Biotechnol Biofuel, 9(1): 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13068-016-0451-z.
34. Hashimoto M, Hossain S, Masumura S, 1999, Effect of aging on plasma membrane fluidity of rat aortic endothelial cells-.☆ Exp Gerontol, 34(5): 687-698. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0531-5565(99)00025-X.
35. Wavhal D S, Fisher E R, 2002, Hydrophilic modification of polyethersulfone membranes by low temperature plasma-induced graft polymerization. J Membr Sci, 209(1): 255-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00352-6.
36. Pappa A M, Karagkiozaki V, Krol S, et al., 2015, Oxygen-plasma-modified biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for enhanced compatibility of cardiovascular implants. Beilstein J Nanotechnol, 6: 254. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.6.24.
37. Sousa I, Mendes A, Pereira R F, et al., 2014, Collagen surface modified poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffolds with improved hydrophilicity and cell adhesion properties. Mater Lett, 134: 263-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.132.