Laser-assisted bioprinting at different wavelengths and pulse durations with a metal dynamic release layer: A parametric study
For more than a decade, living cells and biomaterials (typically hydrogels) are printed via laser-assisted bioprinting. Often, a thin metal layer is applied as laser-absorbing material called dynamic release layer (DRL). This layer is vaporized by focused laser pulses generating vapor pressure that propels forward a coated biomaterial. Different lasers with laser wavelengths from 193 to 1064 nanometer have been used. As a metal DRL gold, silver, or titanium layers have been used. The applied laser pulse durations were usually in the nanosecond range from 1 to 30 ns. In addition, some studies with femtosecond lasers have been published. However, there are no studies on the effect of all these lasers parameters on bioprinting with a metal DRL, and on comparing different wavelengths and pulse durations – except one study comparing 500 femtosecond pulses with 15 ns pulses. In this paper, the effects of laser wavelength (355, 532, and 1064 nm) and laser pulse duration (in the range of 8 to 200 ns) are investigated. Furthermore, the effects of laser pulse energy, intensity, and focal spot size are studied. The printed droplet volume, hydrogel jet velocity, and cell viability are analyzed.
1. Palla-Papavlu A, Paraico I, Shaw-Stewart J, et al., 2011, Liposome micropatterning based on laser-induced forward transfer. Applied Physics A, vol.102(3): 651–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-010-6114-1.
2. Schiele NR, Chrisey DB, and Corr DT, 2011, Gelatin-based laser direct-write technique for the precise spatial patterning of cells. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, vol.17(3): 289–298.
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2010.0442.
3. Pirlo RK, Wu P, Liu J, et al., 2012, PLGA/hydrogel biopapers as a stackable substrate for printing HUVEC networks via BioLP™.Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol.109(1): 262–273.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.23295.
4. Dinca V, Farsari M, Kafetzopoulos D, et al., 2008, Patterning parameters for biomolecules microarrays constructed with nanosecond and femtosecond UV lasers. Thin Solid Films, vol.516(18): 6504–6511.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2008.02.043.
5. Othon CM, Wu X, Anders JJ, et al., 2008, Single-cell printing to form three-dimensional lines of olfactory ensheathing cells. Biomedical Materials, vol.3(3): 034101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/3/3/034101.
6. Horneffer V, Linz N, and Vogel A, 2007, Principles of laser-induced separation and transport of living cells. Journal of Biomedical Optics, vol.12(5): 054016.
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2799194.
7. Duocastella M, Fernández-Pradas JM, Morenza JL, et al., 2010, Sessile droplet formation in the laser-induced forward transfer of liquids: A time-resolved imaging study. Thin Solid Films, vol.518(18): 5321–5325.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2010.03.082.
8. Brown MS, Brasz CF, Ventikos Y, et al., 2012, Impulsively actuated jets from thin liquid films for high-resolution printing applications. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.709: 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2012.337.
9. Ali M, Pages E, Ducom A, et al., 2014, Controlling laser-induced jet formation for bioprinting mesenchymal stem cells with high viability and high resolution. Biofab-rication,vol.6(4): 045001.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/4/045001.
10. Taidi B, Lebernede G, Koch L, et al., 2016, Colony development of laser printed eukaryotic (yeast and microalga) microorganisms in co-culture.International Journal of Bioprinting, vol.2(2): 37–43.
https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2016.02.001.
11. Duocastella M, Patrascioiu A, Fernández-Pradas JM, et al., 2010, Film-free laser forward printing of transparent and weakly absorbing liquids. Optics Express, vol.18(21): 21815–21825. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.021815.
12. Desrus H, Chassagne B, Catros S, et al., 2016, Proceedings of SPIE 9706—Optical Interactions with Tissues and CellsXXVII,97060O, March 7, 2016: Laser assisted bioprinting using a femtosecond laser with and without a gold transductive layer: A parametric study. SPIE Digital Library, USA. https://doi.org/ 10.1117/12.2209087.
13. Lin Y, Huang Y, and Chrisey DB, 2011, Metallic foil-assisted laser cell printing. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol.133(2): 025001.
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003132.
14. Gruene M, Unger C, Koch L, et al., 2011, Dispensingpico to nanolitre of a natural hydrogel by laser-assisted bioprinting. Biomedical Engineering Online, vol. 10: 19.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-10-19.
15. Unger C, Gruene M, Koch L, et al., 2011, Time-resolved imaging of hydrogel printing via laser-induced forward transfer. Applied Physics A, vol.103(2): 271–277.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-010-6030-4.
16. Zhang Z, Xiong R, Mei R, et al., 2015, Time-resolved imaging study of jetting dynamics during laser printing of viscoelastic alginate solutions.Langmuir, vol.31(23): 6447− 6456. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00919.
17. Sharma MK, 2013, Optimization of laser induced forward transfer by finite element modeling. Master thesis, Royal Institute of Technology-KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, viewed October 2, 2016.
http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:617570/fulltext01.pdf.
18. Hopp B, Smausz T, Antal Z, et al., 2004, Absorbing film assisted laser induced forward transfer of fungi (Trichoderma conidia). Journalof Applied Physics, vol.96(6): 3478– 3481. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1782275.