AccScience Publishing / IJB / Volume 2 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.18063/IJB.2016.01.001
Cite this article
25
Download
1021
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Utilising inkjet printed paraffin wax for cell patterning applications

Christopher Chi Wai Tse1* Shea Shin Ng1 Jonathan Stringer3 Sheila MacNeil4 John W. Haycock5 Patrick J. Smith2
Show Less
1 Additive Manufacturing Centre, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S10 2TN, UK
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S10 2TN, UK
3 Composite Systems Innovation Centre, PDRA (Inkjet Printing), University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S10 2TN, UK
4 Faculty of Engineering, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S10 2TN, UK
5 Centre for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S10 2TN, UK
© Invalid date by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

We describe a method to prepare patterned environments for eukaryotic cells by inkjet printing paraffin wax onto a substrate. This technique bypasses the requirement to create a master mould, typically required with the use of polydimethylsiloxane techniques and the printed structure could be immediately used to guide cell proliferation. In a space of 2–3 hours, the desired pattern could be created with computer assisted design, printed and have cells seeded onto the scaffold, which could reduce the cycle time of prototyping micropattern designs. Human dermal fibroblasts and RN22 Schwann cells were seen to proliferate within the fabricated patterns and survive for more than 7 days. Additionally, the wax constructs could be readily removed from the substrate at any stage after cell seeding with the cells continuing to proliferate. Thus, we report on a simple but novel approach for the controlled physical positioning of live cells by wax inkjet printing.

Keywords
cell patterning
bioprinting
paraffin wax
References

1.Théry M, 2010, Micropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions. Journal of Cell Science,vol.123: 4201–4213.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.075150
2. Kumar S and LeDuc P R, 2009, Dissecting the molecular basis of the mechanics of living cells. Experimental Mechanics, vol.49(1): 11–23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11340-007-9063-7
3. Chen C S, Mrksich M, Huang S, et al., 1997, Geometric control of cell life and death. Science, vol.276: 1425–1428.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5317.1425
4. Dike L E, Chen C S, Mrksich M, et al., 1999, Geometric control of switching between growth, apoptosis, and differentiation during angiogenesis using micropatterned substrates. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Animal, vol.35(8): 441–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11626-999-0050-4
5. McBeath R, Pirone D M, Nelson C M, et al., 2004, Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Developmental Cell, vol.6(4):483–495.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00075-9
6. Banerjee S, Sknepnek R and Marchetti M C, 2014, Optimal shapes and stresses of adherent cells on patterned substrates. Soft Matter, vol.10(14): 2424–2430.http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3sm52647j
7. Geiger B, Spatz J P and Bershadsky A D, 2009, Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol.10: 21–33.http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2593
8. Duclos G, Garcia S, Yevick H G, et al., 2014, Perfect nematic order in confined monolayers of spindle-shaped cells. Soft Matter, vol.10(14): 2346–2353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3sm52323c
9. Alvarado J, Mulder B M and Koenderink G H, 2014,Alignment of nematic and bundled semiflexible poly-mers in cell-sized confinement. Soft Matter, vol.10(14):2354–2364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3sm52421c

10. Tomba C, Braïni C, Wu B, et al., 2014, Tuning the adhesive geometry of neurons: length and polarity control. Soft Matter, vol.10(14): 2381–2387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3sm52342j

11. Röttgermann P J F, Alberola A P and Rädler J O, 2014, Cellular self-organization on micro-structured surfaces. Soft Matter, vol.10(14): 2397–2404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3sm52419a

12. Hampe N, Jonas T, Wolters B, et al., 2014, Defined 2-D microtissues on soft elastomeric silicone rubber using lift-off epoxy-membranes for biomechanical analyses. Soft Matter, vol.10(14): 2431–2443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3sm53123f 

13. Schwarz U S, Nelson C M and Silberzan P, 2014, Proteins, cells, and tissues in patterned environments. Soft Matter, vol.10(14): 2337–2340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4sm90028f

14. Fujii T, 2002, PDMS-based microfluidic devices for biomedical applications. Microelectronic Engineering, vol.61–62: 907–914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9317(02)00494-X

15. Duffy D C, McDonald J C, Schueller O J A, et al., 1998, Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Analytical Chemistry, vol.70(23): 4974– 4984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac980656z

16. Liu J, Enzelberger M and Quake S, 2002, A nanoliter rotary device for polymerase chain reaction. Electrophoresis, vol.23: 1531–1536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1522-2683(200205)23:10<153 1::AID-ELPS1531>3.0.CO;2-D

17. Linder V, Wu H, Jiang X, et al., 2003, Rapid prototyping of 2D structures with feature sizes larger than 8 μm. Analytical Chemistry, vol.75(10): 2522–2527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac026441d

18. McDonald J C, Chabinyc M L, Metallo S J, et al., 2002, Prototyping of microfluidic devices in poly(dimethylsiloxane) using solid-object printing. Analytical Chemistry, vol.74(7): 1537–1545.http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac010938q

19. Love J C, Wolfe D B, Jacobs H O, et al., 2001, Microscope projection photolithography for rapid prototyping of masters with micron-scale features for use in soft lithography. Langmuir, vol.17(19): 6005–6012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la010655t

20. Kwon K W, Choi J C, Suh K Y, et al., 2011, Multiscale fabrication of multiple proteins and topographical structures by combining capillary force lithography and microscope projection photolithography. Langmuir, vol.27(7): 3238–3243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la2000156

21. Müller A, Meyer J, Paumer T, et al., 2014, Cytoskeletal transition in patterned cells correlates with interfacial energy model. Soft Matter, vol.10(14): 2444–2452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3sm52424h

22. Sanjana N E and Fuller S B, 2004, A fast flexible ink-jet printing method for patterning dissociated neurons in culture. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol.136(2): 151–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.01.011

23. Lu Y, Shi W, Jiang L, et al., 2009, Rapid prototyping of paper-based microfluidics with wax for low-cost, portable bioassay. Electrophoresis, vol.30(9): 1497–1500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.200800563

24. Carrilho E, Martinez A W and Whitesides G M, 2009, Understanding wax printing: A simple micropatterning process for paper-based microfluidics. Analytical Chemistry, vol.81(16): 7091–7095. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac901071p

25. Renault C, Koehne J, Ricco A J, et al., 2014, Three-dimensional wax patterning of paper fluidic devices. Langmuir, vol.30(23): 7030–7036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la501212b

26. Yun Y H, Lee B K, Choi J S, et al., 2011, A glucose sensor fabricated by piezoelectric inkjet printing of conducting polymers and bienzymes. Analytical Science, vol.27(4): 375-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.2116/analsci.27.375

27. Setti L, Fraleoni-Morgera A, Ballarin B, et al., 2005, An amperometric glucose biosensor prototype fabricated by thermal inkjet printing. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol.20(10): 2019–2026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2004.09.022

28. Wang T, Cook C and Derby B, 2009, Fabrication of a glucose biosensor by piezoelectric inkjet printing: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications, 2009 (SENSORCOMM’09), 82–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SENSORCOMM.2009.20

29. Bietsch A, Zhang J, Hegner M, et al., 2004, Rapid functionalization of cantilever array sensors by inkjet printing. Nanotechnology, vol.15(8): 873–880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/15/8/002

30. Selimović Š, Dokmeci M R and Khademhosseini A, 2013, Research highlights. Lab on a Chip, vol.13(3):325–327.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2lc90145e
31. Kaigala G V, Ho S, Penterman R, et al., 2007, Rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices with a wax printer.Lab on a Chip, vol.7(3): 384–387.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b617764f

32. Li Z, Hou L, Zhang W, et al., 2014, Preparation of PDMS microfluidic devices based on drop-on-demand generation of wax molds. Analytical Methods, vol.6(13):4716–4722.http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4ay00798k
33. Simon K A, Park K M, Mosadegh B, et al., 2014, Polymer-based mesh as supports for multi-layered 3D cell culture and assays. Biomaterials, vol.35: 259–268.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.049
34. De Gans B-J and Schubert U S, 2004, Inkjet printing of well-defined polymer dots and arrays. Langmuir, vol.20(18): 7789–7793.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la049469o

35. Li R, Ashgriz N, Chandra S, et al., 2008, Shape and surface texture of molten droplets deposited on cold surfaces. Surface and Coatings Technology, vol.202(16):3960–3966.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.02.009
36. Stringer J and Derby B, 2010, Formation and stability of lines produced by inkjet printing. Langmuir, vol.26(12):10365–10372.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la101296e
37. Schiaffino S and Sonin A, 1997, Molten droplet deposition and solidification at low Weber numbers. Physics of Fluids, vol.9(11): 3172–3187.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.869434

Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing