1. Seims KB, Hunt NK, Chow LW. Strategies to Control or Mimic Growth Factor Activity for Bone, Cartilage, and Osteochondral Tissue Engineering. Bioconjug Chem. 2021;32(5):861-878. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00090
2. Golebiowska AA, Nukavarapu SP. Bio-inspired zonal-structured matrices for bone-cartilage interface engineering. Biofabrication. 2022;14(2). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac5413
3. Boyde A. The Bone Cartilage Interface and Osteoarthritis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2021;109(3):303-328. doi: 10.1007/s00223-021-00866-9
4. Yang X, Wang L, Chen X, Ling B, Xiao J. Digital light processing 3D bioprinting of collagen-based gradient osteochondral scaffold for cartilage-bone regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.148403
5. Sun Y, You Y, Jiang W, Wang B, Wu Q, Dai K. 3D bioprinting dual-factor releasing and gradient-structured constructs ready to implant for anisotropic cartilage regeneration. Sci Adv. 2020;6(37):eaay1422. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay1422
6. Xu Q, Huo L, Wei X, et al. Clinical application of customized total temporomandibular joint prosthesis by 3D printing: a five-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Investig. 2025;29(4):210. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06260-1
7. Wu X, Wang H, Li C, et al. Antioxidant functionalized double-net/TA dynamic hydrogel promotes cartilage regeneration through stabilization of chondrocyte phenotype. Mater Today Bio. 2025;34:102203. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102203
8. Doyle SE, Snow F, Duchi S, et al. 3D Printed Multiphasic Scaffolds for Osteochondral Repair: Challenges and Opportunities. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(22):12420. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212420
9. Yang Q, Chen A, Zhang X, Wu Z, Zhang C. Functional poly(ether-ketone-ketone) composite scaffold with enhanced cell-material interaction, anti-inflammatory and osteogenesis for facilitating osteointegration and bone regeneration. Mater Today Bio. 2025;31:101533. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101533
10. Xulin H, Hu L, Liang Q, et al. 369Fabrication of 3D gel-printed β-tricalcium phosphate/titanium dioxide porous scaffolds for cancellous bone tissue engineering. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(2):673. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v9i2.673
11. Gu X, Zha Y, Li Y, et al. Integrated polycaprolactone microsphere-based scaffolds with biomimetic hierarchy and tunable vascularization for osteochondral repair. Acta Biomater. 2022;141:190-197. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.01.021
12. Wubneh A, Tsekoura EK, Ayranci C, Uludağ H. Current state of fabrication technologies and materials for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2018;80:1-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.031
13. Kouhi M, Khodaei M, Behrouznejad B, Savabi O, Bodaghi M. Zein/ZnO-Modified 3D-Printed PCL/Sphene Scaffolds with Improved Bacterial Inhibition and Osteoblast Activity for Bone Regeneration Applications. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025;11(5):2898-2909. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c02193
14. Yang CJ, Huang WK, Lin KP. Three-Dimensional Printing Quality Inspection Based on Transfer Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks. Sensors. 2023;23(1):491. doi: 10.3390/s23010491
15. Ren X, Wei J, Luo X, et al. HydrogelFinder: A Foundation Model for Efficient Self-Assembling Peptide Discovery Guided by Non-Peptidal Small Molecules. Adv Sci. 2024;11(26):e2400829. doi: 10.1002/advs.202400829
16. Fielder M, Nair AK. Predicting ultrasound wave stimulated bone growth in bioinspired scaffolds using machine learning. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024;159:106684. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106684
17. Mohammadrezaei D, Podina L, Silva J, Kohandel M. Cell viability prediction and optimization in extrusion-based bioprinting via neural network-based Bayesian optimization models. Biofabrication. 2024;16(2). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad17cf
18. Bracco F, Zanderigo G, Paynabar K, Colosimo BM. Leveraging transfer learning for efficient bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2025;17(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ade62f
19. Duan Q, Shao H, Luo N, et al. 3D-printed artificial bone scaffolds: the design of materials, the incorporation of bioactive substances, and the integration of vascularized tissue flaps. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025;13:1614727. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1614727
20. Liu W, Zhang Y, Lyu Y, Bosiakov S, Liu Y. Inverse design of anisotropic bone scaffold based on machine learning and regenerative genetic algorithm. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1241151. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1241151
21. Chung JK, Im JS, Park MS. Development of Photo- Polymerization-Type 3D Printer for High-Viscosity Ceramic Resin Using CNN-Based Surface Defect Detection. Materials. 2023;16(13):4734. doi: 10.3390/ma16134734
22. Zhou L, Gjvm VO, Malda J, et al. Innovative Tissue- Engineered Strategies for Osteochondral Defect Repair and Regeneration: Current Progress and Challenges. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9(23):e2001008. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202001008
23. Semitela A, Marques PAAP, Completo A. Strategies to engineer articular cartilage with biomimetic zonal features: a review. Biomater Sci. 2024;12(23):5961-6005. doi: 10.1039/d4bm00579a
24. Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M, Mülhaupt R. Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing. Chem Rev. 2017;117(15):10212-10290. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074
25. Xia J, Yuan Y, Wu H, Huang Y, Weitz DA. Decoupling the effects of nanopore size and surface roughness on the attachment, spreading and differentiation of bone marrow-derived stem cells. Biomaterials. 2020;248:120014. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120014
26. Yang Y, Xu T, Bei HP, et al. Gaussian curvature-driven direction of cell fate toward osteogenesis with triply periodic minimal surface scaffolds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119(41):e2206684119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206684119
27. Chen H, Jiang N, Zhang J, et al. Micron/Submicron Scaled Hierarchical Ti Phosphate/Ti Oxide Hybrid Coating on 3D Printed Scaffolds for Improved Osteointegration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023;9(3):1274-1284. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01354
28. Gehrke SA, da Costa EM, Júnior JA, Eilers Treichel TL, Del Fabbro M, Scarano A. Comparison Between Micro-and Micro-Nano Surface Texturization in the Initial Osseointegration Process: An Experimental In Vitro and In Vivo Preclinical Study. Bioengineering. 2025;12(2):175. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12020175
29. Critchley S, Sheehy EJ, Cunniffe G, et al. 3D printing of fibre-reinforced cartilaginous templates for the regeneration of osteochondral defects. Acta Biomater. 2020;113:130-143. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.040
30. Wu X, Liu S, Chen K, et al. 3D printed chitosan-gelatine hydrogel coating on titanium alloy surface as biological fixation interface of artificial joint prosthesis. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;182:669-679. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.04.046
31. Tan L, Ye Z, Zhuang W, et al. 3D printed PLGA/MgO/ PDA composite scaffold by low-temperature deposition manufacturing for bone tissue engineering applications. Regen Ther. 2023;24:617-629. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2023.09.015
32. Zhang Y, Han Y, Peng Y, Lei J, Chang F. Bionic biphasic composite scaffolds with osteochondrogenic factors for regeneration of full-thickness osteochondral defects. Biomater Sci. 2022;10(7):1713-1723. doi: 10.1039/d2bm00103a
33. Freeman FE, Pitacco P, van Dommelen LHA, et al. 3D bioprinting spatiotemporally defined patterns of growth factors to tightly control tissue regeneration. Sci Adv. 2020;6(33):eabb5093. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb5093
34. Wang P, Berry D, Moran A, et al. Controlled Growth Factor Release in 3D-Printed Hydrogels. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9(15):e1900977. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201900977
35. Hunziker EB, Quinn TM, Häuselmann HJ. Quantitative structural organization of normal adult human articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002;10(7):564-572. doi: 10.1053/joca.2002.0814
36. Antons J, Marascio MGM, Nohava J, et al. Zone-dependent mechanical properties of human articular cartilage obtained by indentation measurements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018;29(5):57. doi: 10.1007/s10856-018-6066-0
37. Dennis JE, Whitney GA, Rai J, Fernandes RJ, Kean TJ. Physioxia Stimulates Extracellular Matrix Deposition and Increases Mechanical Properties of Human Chondrocyte- Derived Tissue-Engineered Cartilage. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:590743. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.590743
38. Motavalli M, Akkus O, Mansour JM. Depth-dependent shear behavior of bovine articular cartilage: relationship to structure. J Anat. 2014;225(5):519-526. doi: 10.1111/joa.12230
39. Yu X, Hu Y, Zou L, et al. A bilayered scaffold with segregated hydrophilicity-hydrophobicity enables reconstruction of goat hierarchical temporomandibular joint condyle cartilage. Acta Biomater. 2021;121:288-302. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.031
40. Camarero-Espinosa S, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Foster EJ, Weder C. Articular cartilage: from formation to tissue engineering. Biomater Sci. 2016;4(5):734-767. doi: 10.1039/c6bm00068a
41. Lei X, Wang X, Li Y, et al. Comparison of knee joint and temporomandibular joint development in pig embryos. Anim Biotechnol. 2024;35(1):2337760. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2024.2337760
42. Kupratis ME, Rahman A, Burris DL, Corbin EA, Price C. Enzymatic digestion does not compromise sliding-mediated cartilage lubrication. Acta Biomater. 2024;178:196-207. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.02.040
43. Lin W, Klein J. Recent Progress in Cartilage Lubrication. Adv Mater. 2021;33(18):e2005513. doi: 10.1002/adma.202005513
44. Forster H, Fisher J. The influence of loading time and lubricant on the friction of articular cartilage. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1996;210(2):109-119. doi: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1996_210_399_02
45. Pouran B, Raoof A, de Winter DAM, et al. Topographic features of nano-pores within the osteochondral interface and their effects on transport properties -a 3D imaging and modeling study. J Biomech. 2021;123:110504. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110504
46. Ruggiero L, Zimmerman BK, Park M, et al. Roles of the Fibrous Superficial Zone in the Mechanical Behavior of TMJ Condylar Cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015;43(11):2652- 2662. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1320-9
47. Buckley MR, Gleghorn JP, Bonassar LJ, Cohen I. Mapping the depth dependence of shear properties in articular cartilage. J Biomech. 2008;41(11):2430-2437. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.021
48. Barthold JE, McCreery KP, Martinez J, et al. Particulate ECM biomaterial ink is 3D printed and naturally crosslinked to form structurally-layered and lubricated cartilage tissue mimics. Biofabrication. 2022;14(2):025021. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac584c
49. Zubillaga V, Alonso-Varona A, Fernandes SCM, Salaberria AM, Palomares T. Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Chondrospheroids Cultured in Hypoxia and a 3D Porous Chitosan/Chitin Nanocrystal Scaffold as a Platform for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(3):1004. doi: 10.3390/ijms21031004
50. Theodoridis K, Aggelidou E, Manthou ME, Kritis A. Hypoxia Promotes Cartilage Regeneration in Cell-Seeded 3D-Printed Bioscaffolds Cultured with a Bespoke 3D Culture Device. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(7):6040. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076040
51. Jiang N, Su Z, Sun Y, et al. Spatial Heterogeneity Directs Energy Dissipation in Condylar Fibrocartilage. Small. 2023;19(37):e2301051. doi: 10.1002/smll.202301051
52. Stocum DL, Roberts WE. Part I: Development and Physiology of the Temporomandibular Joint. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018;16(4):360-368. doi: 10.1007/s11914-018-0447-7
53. Daly AC, Critchley SE, Rencsok EM, Kelly DJ. A comparison of different bioinks for 3D bioprinting of fibrocartilage and hyaline cartilage. Biofabrication. 2016;8(4):045002. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/4/045002
54. Gologorsky CJ, Middendorf JM, Cohen I, Bonassar LJ. Depth-dependent patterns in shear modulus of temporomandibular joint cartilage correspond to tissue structure and anatomic location. J Biomech. 2021;129:110815. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110815
55. Hu S, Yi Y, Ye C, Liu J, Wang J. Advances in 3D printing techniques for cartilage regeneration of temporomandibular joint disc and mandibular condyle. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(5):761. doi: 10.18063/ijb.761
56. Wang X, Wang J, Zhang Y, He Y, Chen S. Piezo1 regulates fibrocartilage stem cell in cartilage growth and osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2025;33(8):980-991. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2025.04.013
57. Zhao Y, Xie L. An Update on Mesenchymal Stem Cell- Centered Therapies in Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis. Stem Cells Int. 2021;2021:6619527. doi: 10.1155/2021/6619527
58. Su FY, Pang S, Ling YTT, et al. Deproteinization of Cortical Bone: Effects of Different Treatments. Calcif Tissue Int. 2018;103(5):554-566. doi: 10.1007/s00223-018-0453-x
59. Beverly M, Marks BE, Murray DW. Subchondral pressures and perfusion during weight bearing. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01754-y
60. Chen H, Liu Y, Wang C, et al. Design and properties of biomimetic irregular scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Comput Biol Med. 2021;130:104241. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104241
61. Jiao J, Hong Q, Zhang D, et al. Influence of porosity on osteogenesis, bone growth and osteointegration in trabecular tantalum scaffolds fabricated by additive manufacturing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1117954. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1117954
62. Cheng A, Humayun A, Cohen DJ, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Additively manufactured 3D porous Ti-6Al-4V constructs mimic trabecular bone structure and regulate osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and local factor production in a porosity and surface roughness dependent manner. Biofabrication. 2014;6(4):045007. doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/6/4/045007
63. Kumar S, Tan S, Zheng L, Kochmann DM. Inverse-designed spinodoid metamaterials. npj Comput Mater. 2020;6:73. doi: 10.1038/s41524-020-0341-6
64. Zhang M, Lin R, Wang X, et al. 3D printing of Haversian bone-mimicking scaffolds for multicellular delivery in bone regeneration. Sci Adv. 2020;6(12):eaaz6725. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz6725
65. Pathria MN, Chung CB, Resnick DL. Acute and Stress-related Injuries of Bone and Cartilage: Pertinent Anatomy, Basic Biomechanics, and Imaging Perspective. Radiology. 2016;280(1):21-38. doi: 10.1148/radiol.16142305
66. Burke G, Devine DM, Major I. Effect of Stereolithography 3D Printing on the Properties of PEGDMA Hydrogels. Polymers. 2020;12(9):2015. doi: 10.3390/polym12092015
67. Sun T, Huang H, Zhao Y, Li Z, Wang H, Zhou G. Low- Temperature Deposited Amorphous Poly(aryl ether ketone) Hierarchically Porous Scaffolds with Strontium-Doped Mineralized Coating for Bone Defect Repair. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(23):e2400927. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202400927
68. Ghobadi E, Yahay Z, Nouri N, Karamali F, Masaeli E. 3D printing of an anatomically shaped bone model inspired by vascularized tubular bone structure. Biomater Adv. 2025;176:214348. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214348
69. Chen H, Gonnella G, Huang J, Di-Silvio L. Fabrication of 3D Bioprinted Bi-Phasic Scaffold for Bone-Cartilage Interface Regeneration. Biomimetics. 2023;8(1):87. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8010087
70. Wang L, Chen X, Wang X, Chen H, Yang X, Xiao J. Highly biomimetic three-layer mineralized collagen scaffold featuring a wood-reinforced subchondral bone region for gradient chondrogenic-osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;320(Pt 1):145754. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.145754
71. Zhao Y, Cai Y, Wang W, et al. Periosteum-bone inspired hierarchical scaffold with endogenous piezoelectricity for neuro-vascularized bone regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2024;44:339-353. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.10.020
72. Tang J, Liu D. Study on the Shock-Absorption Performance of Isolation Systems in High-Rise Vertically Irregular Double-Story Structures. Buildings. 2024; 14(12):3792. doi: 10.3390/buildings14123792
73. Wu D, Zheng K, Yin W, et al. Enhanced osteochondral regeneration with a 3D-Printed biomimetic scaffold featuring a calcified interfacial layer. Bioact Mater. 2024;36:317-329. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.03.004
74. Zhou Y, Lian XJ, Lu Y, et al. Harnessing oriented arrangement of collagen fibers by 3D printing for enhancing mechanical and osteogenic properties of mineralized collagen scaffolds. Biomed Mater. 2024;19(4):045020. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ad5244
75. Burdis R, Chariyev-Prinz F, Kelly DJ. Bioprinting of biomimetic self-organised cartilage with a supporting joint fixation device. Biofabrication. 2021;14(1):015008. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac36be
76. Wang Z, Tuerxun P, Ng T, et al. Enhancing angiogenesis in peri-implant soft tissue with bioactive silk fibroin microgroove coatings on zirconia surfaces. Regen Biomater. 2024;11:rbae068. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbae068
77. Bedell ML, Torres AL, Hogan KJ, et al. Human gelatin-based composite hydrogels for osteochondral tissue engineering and their adaptation into bioinks for extrusion, inkjet, and digital light processing bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2022;14(4):045012. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac8768
78. Zub K, Hoeppener S, Schubert US. Inkjet Printing and 3D Printing Strategies for Biosensing, Analytical, and Diagnostic Applications. Adv Mater. 2022;34(31):e2105015. doi: 10.1002/adma.202105015
79. Xie M, Gao Q, Zhao H, et al. Electro-Assisted Bioprinting of Low-Concentration GelMA Microdroplets. Small. 2019;15(4):e1804216. doi: 10.1002/smll.201804216
80. Li K, Zhang F, Wang D, et al. Silkworm-inspired electrohydrodynamic jet 3D printing of composite scaffold with ordered cell scale fibers for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;172:124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.013
81. Michailidou G, Terzopoulou Z, Kehagia A, Michopoulou A, Bikiaris DN. Preliminary Evaluation of 3D Printed Chitosan/Pectin Constructs for Biomedical Applications. Mar Drugs. 2021;19(1):36. doi: 10.3390/md19010036
82. Lee J, Oh SJ, An SH, Kim WD, Kim SH. Machine learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability. Biofabrication. 2020;12(3):035018. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab8707
83. Putra NE, Leeflang MA, Klimopoulou M, et al. Extrusion-based 3D printing of biodegradable, osteogenic, paramagnetic, and porous FeMn-akermanite bone substitutes. Acta Biomater. 2023;162:182-198. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.03.033
84. Salehi S, Ghomi H, Hassanzadeh-Tabrizi SA, Koupaei N, Khodaei M. Antibacterial and osteogenic properties of chitosan-polyethylene glycol nanofibre-coated 3D printed scaffold with vancomycin and insulin-like growth factor-1 release for bone repair. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;298:139883. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.139883
85. Kuss MA, Wu S, Wang Y, et al. Prevascularization of 3D printed bone scaffolds by bioactive hydrogels and cell co-culture. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018;106(5):1788-1798. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33994
86. Xiong Z, Yan Y, Wang S, Zhang R, Zhang C. Fabrication of porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering via low-temperature deposition. Scripta Materialia. 2002;46(11):771- 776. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00071-4.
87. Li Q, Xu S, Feng Q, et al. 3D printed silk-gelatin hydrogel scaffold with different porous structure and cell seeding strategy for cartilage regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(10):3396-3410. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.013
88. Liu W, Wang D, Huang J, et al. Low-temperature deposition manufacturing: A novel and promising rapid prototyping technology for the fabrication of tissue-engineered scaffold. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;70(Pt 2):976-982. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.014
89. Luo Y, Pan H, Jiang J, et al. Desktop-Stereolithography 3D Printing of a Polyporous Extracellular Matrix Bioink for Bone Defect Regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:589094. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.589094
90. Wang Z, Huang C, Wang J, et al. Design and characterization of hydroxyapatite scaffolds fabricated by stereolithography for bone tissue engineering application. Procedia CIRP. 2020;89:170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.138
91. Eckstein KN, Hergert JE, Uzcategui AC, et al. Controlled Mechanical Property Gradients Within a Digital Light Processing Printed Hydrogel-Composite Osteochondral Scaffold. Ann Biomed Eng. 2024;52(8):2162-2177. doi: 10.1007/s10439-024-03516-x
92. Dobos A, Van Hoorick J, Steiger W, et al. Thiol-Gelatin- Norbornene Bioink for Laser-Based High-Definition Bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9(15):e1900752. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201900752
93. Chen Z, Li K, Han P, et al. Stereolithography 3D printing gyroid triply periodic minimal surface vitrified bond diamond grinding wheel. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):30054. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81641-2
94. Shuai C, Li D, Xie H, Yao X, Peng S, Gao C. Programmable Lamellar Eutectic Zn-2Al-Mg Biodegradable Implants Manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion for Synergistic Strength-Ductility and Osteogenesis. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202501917
95. Kérourédan O, Washio A, Handschin C, et al. Bioactive gelatin-sheets as novel biopapers to support prevascularization organized by laser-assisted bioprinting for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Mater. 2024;19(2):025038. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ad270a
96. Chen Z, Yan X, Yin S, et al. Influence of the pore size and porosity of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V ELI porous scaffold on cell proliferation, osteogenesis and bone ingrowth. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;106:110289. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110289
97. Yuan X, Zhu W, Yang Z, et al. Recent Advances in 3D Printing of Smart Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering and Regeneration. Adv Mater. 2024;36(34):e2403641. doi: 10.1002/adma.202403641
98. Grant-Jacob JA, Zervas MN, Mills B. Laser induced forward transfer imaging using deep learning. Discov Appl Sci. 2025;7(4):254. doi: 10.1007/s42452-025-06679-x
99. Zheng Z, Yu D, Wang H, et al. Advancement of 3D biofabrication in repairing and regeneration of cartilage defects. Biofabrication. 2025;17(2):022003. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ada8e1
100. Hall GN, Fan Y, Viellerobe B, et al. Laser-assisted bioprinting of targeted cartilaginous spheroids for high density bottom-up tissue engineering. Biofabrication. 2024;16(4):045029. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad6e1a
101. Qian Y, Gu Y, Tribukait-Riemenschneider F, Martin I, Shastri VP. Incorporation of Cross-Linked Gelatin Microparticles To Enhance Cell Attachment and Chondrogenesis in Carboxylated Agarose Bioinks for Cartilage Engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025;17(15):22293-22307. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c00077
102. Feng C, Zhang W, Deng C, et al. 3D Printing of Lotus Root- Like Biomimetic Materials for Cell Delivery and Tissue Regeneration. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2017;4(12):1700401. doi: 10.1002/advs.201700401
103. Wu Z, Li Z, Wu Y, Hong Y. The Loading of Dipyridamole and Calcium Sulfate into the Gelatin-Coated Porous Bioceramics to Synergistically Regulate Segmental Bone Regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025;17(43):59108-59123. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c14640
104. Jiang Y, Zhou C, Yang X, Ke D. 3D printed bioactive coated scaffolds boost osteogenesis and angiogenesis via the regulation of scaffold microstructure. Biofabrication. 2025;17(3):035017. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/addc9c
105. Buckley C, Wang H, O’Dell R, et al. Creation of Porous, Perfusable Microtubular Networks for Improved Cell Viability in Volumetric Hydrogels. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;16(15):18522-18533. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c00716
106. Li D, Luo F, Yang Y, et al. Molten stringing 3D printed microfibrous net-integrated mineralized hydrogels with tunable micromechanical and cell-responsive properties. J Mater Chem B. 2025;13(31):9536-9549. doi: 10.1039/d5tb00449g
107. Feng X, Xu P, Shen T, Zhang Y, Ye J, Gao C. Influence of pore architectures of silk fibroin/collagen composite scaffolds on the regeneration of osteochondral defects in vivo. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8(3):391-405. doi: 10.1039/c9tb01558b
108. Kim MJ, Lee B, Yang K, et al. BMP-2 peptide-functionalized nanopatterned substrates for enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2013;34(30):7236-7246. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.019
109. He L, Zhao M, Cheung JPY, Zhang T, Ren X. Gaussian random field-based characterization and reconstruction of cancellous bone microstructure considering the constraint of correlation structure. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024;152:106443. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106443
110. Takagishi T, Yoshioka H, Mikami Y, Oki Y. On-demand inkjet-printed microdisk laser with air cladding by liquid flow microetching. Appl Opt. 2020;59(21):6340-6346. doi: 10.1364/AO.396061
111. Mushtaq RT, Rehman M, Bao C, et al. Enhanced biomechanical compatibility of 3D-printed polylactic acid lattice structures: Synergizing mechanical, topography, and microstructural properties for trabecular bone mimicry. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;317(Pt 2):144373. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.144373
112. Enriquez-Ochoa D, Robles-Ovalle P, Mayolo-Deloisa K, Brunck MEG. Immobilization of Growth Factors for Cell Therapy Manufacturing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:620. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00620
113. Alarcin E, Akguner ZP, Ozturk AB, et al. Biomimetic 3D bioprinted bilayer GelMA scaffolds for the delivery of BMP-2 and VEGF exogenous growth factors to promote vascularized bone regeneration in a calvarial defect model in vivo. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;306(Pt 2):141440. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.141440
114. He W, Li C, Zhao S, et al. Integrating coaxial electrospinning and 3D printing technologies for the development of biphasic porous scaffolds enabling spatiotemporal control in tumor ablation and osteochondral regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2024;34:338-353. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.12.020
115. Loxley GA, Coser C, Ghaemmaghami AM, Yang J. Long-term interleukin-4 release from 3D printable affinity hydrogels promotes M2-like macrophage polarisation in vitro. Biomater Sci. 2025;13(9):2489-2502. doi: 10.1039/d4bm01623h
116. Wei P, Ma Y, Qin K, Fan Z. A 3D printed biomimetic scaffold for cartilage regeneration with lubrication, load-bearing, and adhesive fixation properties. Tribol Int. 2024;192:109328. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2024.109328
117. Ngadimin KD, Stokes A, Gentile P, Ferreira AM. Biomimetic hydrogels designed for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomater Sci. 2021;9(12):4246-4259. doi: 10.1039/d0bm01852j
118. Sasikumar SC, Goswami U, Raichur AM. Mucin-Based Dual Cross-Linkable IPN Hydrogel Bioink for 3D Bioprinting and Cartilage Tissue Engineering. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2025;8(2):1186-1200. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.4c01505
119. Wu M, Liu H, Zhu Y, et al. Bioinspired soft-hard combined system with mild photothermal therapeutic activity promotes diabetic bone defect healing via synergetic effects of immune activation and angiogenesis. Theranostics. 2024;14(10):4014-4057. doi: 10.7150/thno.97335
120. Yang J, Wang H, Huang W, et al. A natural polymer-based hydrogel with shape controllability and high toughness and its application to efficient osteochondral regeneration. Mater Horiz. 2023;10(9):3797-3806. doi: 10.1039/d3mh00544e
121. Gupta S, Sharma A, Vasantha Kumar J, Sharma V, Gupta PK, Verma RS. Meniscal tissue engineering via 3D printed PLA monolith with carbohydrate based self-healing interpenetrating network hydrogel. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;162:1358-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.238
122. Trachsel L, Johnbosco C, Lang T, Benetti EM, Zenobi-Wong M. Double-Network Hydrogels Including Enzymatically Crosslinked Poly-(2-alkyl-2-oxazoline)s for 3D Bioprinting of Cartilage-Engineering Constructs. Biomacromolecules. 2019;20(12):4502-4511. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01266
123. Chen Q, Liu S, Yuan Z, Yang H, Xie R, Ren L. Construction and Tribological Properties of Biomimetic Cartilage- Lubricating Hydrogels. Gels. 2022;8(7):415. doi: 10.3390/gels8070415
124. Ali N, Demott CJ, Dingus OF, Grunlan MA, Dunn AC. Network interactions simultaneously enhance stiffness and lubricity of triple-network hydrogels. Soft Matter. 2024;20(44):8783-8792. doi: 10.1039/d4sm00969j
125. Demott CJ, Jones MR, Chesney CD, Grunlan MA. Adhesive Hydrogel Building Blocks to Reconstruct Complex Cartilage Tissues. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023;9(4):1952-1960. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01438
126. Xu F, Zhuang C, Yao L, et al. High-mobility network hydrogel microsphere system to combat chondrocyte senescence for enhanced cartilage repair and regeneration. Mater Today Bio. 2025;34:102138. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102138
127. Lin W, Kluzek M, Iuster N, et al. Cartilage-inspired, lipid-based boundary-lubricated hydrogels. Science. 2020;370(6514):335-338. doi: 10.1126/science.aay8276
128. Li S, Tang L, Pu J, et al. Continuous Hyaluronic Acid Supply by a UHMWPE/PEEK Interlocking Scaffold for Metatarsophalangeal Joint Prosthesis Lubricating Applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025;17(8):11704- 11717. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c19390
129. Kaneko D, Tada T, Kurokawa T, Gong J. P, Osada Y. Mechanically Strong Hydrogels with Ultra-Low Frictional Coefficients. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17 (5), 535–538. doi: 10.1002/adma.200400739
130. Milner PE, Parkes M, Puetzer JL, et al. A low friction, biphasic and boundary lubricating hydrogel for cartilage replacement. Acta Biomater. 2018;65:102-111. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.002
131. Zhang S, Wang L, Kang Y, Wu J, Zhang Z. Nanomaterial-based reactive oxygen species scavengers for osteoarthritis therapy. Acta Biomater. 2023;162:1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.03.030
132. Shafiq M, Chen Y, Hashim R, He C, Mo X, Zhou X. Reactive Oxygen Species-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering Applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:821288. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.821288
133. Chen Y, Le Y, Yang J, et al. 3D Bioprinted Xanthan Hydrogels with Dual Antioxidant and Chondrogenic Functions for Post-traumatic Cartilage Regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2024;10(3):1661-1675. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01636
134. Sun X, Xu X, Zhao X, et al. Three-Dimensional Bioprinted Scaffolds Loaded with Multifunctional Magnesium-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks Improve the Senescence Microenvironment Prompting Aged Bone Defect Repair. ACS Nano. 2025;19(24):22141-22162. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c03023
135. Wang X, Wu S, Li R, et al. ROS-Activated Nanohydrogel Scaffolds with Multi-Factors Controlled Release for Targeted Dual-Lineage Repair of Osteochondral Defects. Adv Sci. 2025;12(20):e2412410. doi: 10.1002/advs.202412410
136. He F, Wu H, He B, Han Z, Chen J, Huang L. Antioxidant hydrogels for the treatment of osteoarthritis: mechanisms and recent advances. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1488036. Published 2024 Oct 25. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1488036
137. Kuang Y, Hua B, Ye X, Zhao Y, Yu M, Liu X. Dual-functional ROS-responsive hydrogel alleviates temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis by enhancing cartilage repair and mitigating inflammation. Mater Today Bio. 2025;33:102103. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102103
138. Shi W, Fang F, Kong Y, et al. Dynamic hyaluronic acid hydrogel with covalent linked gelatin as an anti-oxidative bioink for cartilage tissue engineering. Biofabrication. 2021;14(1):10.1088/1758-5090/ac42de. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac42d
139. Shu C, Qin C, Chen L, et al. Metal-Organic Framework Functionalized Bioceramic Scaffolds with Antioxidative Activity for Enhanced Osteochondral Regeneration. Adv Sci. 2023;10(13):e2206875. doi: 10.1002/advs.202206875
140. Zhu S, Zhou Z, Chen X, et al. High mechanical performance and multifunctional degraded fucoidan-derived bioink for 3D bioprinting. Carbohydr Polym. 2025;348(Pt A):122805. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122805
141. Helgeland E, Mohamed-Ahmed S, Shanbhag S, et al. 3D printed gelatin-genipin scaffolds for temporomandibular joint cartilage regeneration. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2021;7(5):055025. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac1e68
142. Kalpakci KN, Kim EJ, Athanasiou KA. Assessment of growth factor treatment on fibrochondrocyte and chondrocyte co-cultures for TMJ fibrocartilage engineering. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(4):1710-1718. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.12.015
143. Yu X, Hu Y, Zou L, et al. A bilayered scaffold with segregated hydrophilicity-hydrophobicity enables reconstruction of goat hierarchical temporomandibular joint condyle cartilage. Acta Biomater. 2021;121:288-302. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.031
144. Dufour A, Essayan L, Kim B, Salles V, Marquette C. Biofabrication of Spatially Organized Temporo-mandibular Fibrocartilage Assembloids. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025;14(15):e2405000. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202405000
145. Jeong HJ, Koch A, Park S, Tarafder S, Lee CH. Bioactive scaffolds integrated with micro-precise spatiotemporal delivery and in vivo degradation tracking for complex tissue regeneration. Eng Regen. 2025;6:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.engreg.2025.01.001
146. Yi P, Liang J, Huang F, et al. Composite system of 3D-printed polymer and acellular matrix hydrogel to repair temporomandibular joint disc. Front Mater. 2021;8:621416. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2021.621416
147. Yu Z, Xing F, Li J, et al. 3D printed polycaprolactone/ phosphoester-modified poly(amino acid)-graphene oxide scaffold for meniscal regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2025;13(35):11055-11074. doi: 10.1039/d5tb00012b
148. Trindade D, Alves N, Moura C. From Animal to Human: (Re)using Acellular Extracellular Matrices for Temporomandibular Disc Substitution. J Funct Biomater. 2022;13(2):61. doi: 10.3390/jfb13020061
149. Jiang N, Chen H, Zhang J, et al. Decellularized-disc based allograft and xenograft prosthesis for the long-term precise reconstruction of temporomandibular joint disc. Acta Biomater. 2023;159:173-187. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.01.042
150. Zhang J, Xie L, She Y, Luo H, Zhu S, Jiang N. Microstructural and Micromechanical Properties of Decellularized Fibrocartilaginous Scaffold. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025;11(3):1562-1570. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01195
151. Lee CH, Rodeo SA, Fortier LA, Lu C, Erisken C, Mao JJ. Protein-releasing polymeric scaffolds induce fibrochondrocytic differentiation of endogenous cells for knee meniscus regeneration in sheep. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(266):266ra171. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009696
152. Shen S, Li Y, Chen M, et al. Bionic scaffolds with integrated structural components based on low-temperature deposition manufacturing 3D printing technology for the treatment of meniscus defects. Bioeng Transl Med. 2025;10(5):e70022. doi: 10.1002/btm2.70022
153. Savin G, Caillol S, Bethry A, et al. Collagen/polyester-polyurethane porous scaffolds for use in meniscal repair. Biomater Sci. 2024;12(11):2960-2977. doi: 10.1039/d4bm00234b
154. Kremer A, Ribitsch I, Reboredo J, et al. Three-Dimensional Coculture of Meniscal Cells and Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Collagen Type I Hydrogel on a Small Intestinal Matrix-A Pilot Study Toward Equine Meniscus Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2017;23(9-10):390-402. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2016.0317
155. Shen S, Chen M, Gao S, et al. 3D da yin zhi bei ju ji nei zhi/I xing jiao yuan zu zhi gong cheng ban yue ban zhi jia ji qi li hua te xing de yan jiu [Study on the preparation of polycaprolactone/type I collagen tissue engineered meniscus scaffold by three-dimensional printing and its physiochemical properties]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018;32(9):1205-1210. [In Chinese]. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201803074
156. Yao K, Guo K, Wang H, Zheng X. Multi-Nozzles 3D Bioprinting Collagen/Thermoplastic Elasto-Mer Scaffold with Interconnect Pores. Micromachines. 2025;16(4):429. doi: 10.3390/mi16040429
157. Gupta T, Rath P, Pakharenko V, et al. Bioinspired thermoreversible bioink orchestrates focal adhesion-dependent osteogenesis. Trends Biotechnol. 2026;44(1):239- 265. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2025.09.007
158. Liang R, Li R, Mo W, et al. Engineering biomimetic silk fibroin hydrogel scaffolds with “organic-inorganic assembly” strategy for rapid bone regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2024;40:541-556. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.06.024
159. Lu Y, Gong T, Yang Z, Zhu H, Liu Y, Wu C. Designing anisotropic porous bone scaffolds using a self-learning convolutional neural network model. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:973275. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.973275
160. Liang H, Chao L, Xie D, et al. Trabecular-like Ti–6Al–4V scaffold for bone repair: A diversified mechanical stimulation environment for bone regeneration. Compos. Part B Eng. 2022, 241:110057. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110057
161. Luo L, Zheng W, Li J, et al. 3D-Printed Titanium Trabecular Scaffolds with Sustained Release of Hypoxia-Induced Exosomes for Dual-Mimetic Bone Regeneration. Adv Sci. 2025;12(23):e2500599. doi: 10.1002/advs.202500599
162. Lee SH, Lee J, Kang NU, et al. PCL scaffold with well-defined hierarchical pores effectively controls cell migration and alignment of human mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):11542. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96027-1
163. Tariq S, Shah SA, Hameed F, et al. Tissue engineered periosteum: Fabrication of a gelatin basedtrilayer composite scaffold with biomimetic properties for enhanced bone healing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;263(Pt 2):130371. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130371
164. Feng H, Lian X, Lv S, et al. Bioinspired bilayer 3D printing periosteum scaffold with hierarchical structure based on silk fibroin and sodium alginate for bone regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;310(Pt 2):143175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.143175
165. Chang CH, Lin FH, Lin CC, Chou CH, Liu HC. Cartilage tissue engineering on the surface of a novel gelatin-calcium-phosphate biphasic scaffold in a double-chamber bioreactor. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;71(2):313-321. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30090
166. Liu G, Wei X, Zhai Y, et al. 3D printed osteochondral scaffolds: design strategies, present applications and future perspectives. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12:1339916. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1339916
167. Bai L, Fang C, Qi Y, Wang C, Wang M. Cryogenic 3D printing of heterogeneous scaffolds with capability to spatially tune cellular morphology of mesenchymal stem cells for integrated osteochondral regeneration. Mater Today Bio. 2025;35:102560. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102560
168. Nowicki MA, Castro NJ, Plesniak MW, Zhang LG. 3D printing of novel osteochondral scaffolds with graded microstructure. Nanotechnology. 2016;27(41):414001. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/41/414001
169. Kotlarz M, O’Keeffe C, S Kronemberger G, et al. Biofabrication and in vivo evaluation of a hybrid osteochondral implant consisting of structurally organised engineered cartilage on a 3D-printed metal scaffold. Biomaterials. 2026;327:123788. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123788
170. Peng Y, Zhuang Y, Liu Y, et al. Bioinspired gradient scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering. Exploration. 2023;3(4):20210043. doi: 10.1002/EXP.20210043
171. Wang L, Chen X, Wang X, et al. Bio-inspired mineralized collagen scaffolds with precisely controlled gradients for the treatment of severe osteoarthritis in a male rabbit model. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;300:139843. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.139843
172. Shin J, Kang R, Hyun K, et al. Machine Learning-Enhanced Optimization for High-Throughput Precision in Cellular Droplet Bioprinting. Adv Sci. 2025;12(20):e2412831. doi: 10.1002/advs.202412831
173. Yuan B, Guss GM, Wilson AC, et al. Machine-Learning- Based Monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Adv Mater Technol. 2018;3(12):1800136. doi: 10.1002/admt.201800136
174. Shin J, Lee Y, Li Z, Hu J, Park SS, Kim K. Optimized 3D Bioprinting Technology Based on Machine Learning: A Review of Recent Trends and Advances. Micromachines (Basel). 2022;13(3):363. doi:10.3390/mi13030363
175. Jin Z, Zhang Z, Shao X, Gu GX. Monitoring Anomalies in 3D Bioprinting with Deep Neural Networks. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023;9(7):3945-3952. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c0176
176. Shi J, Song J, Song B, Lu WF. Multi-Objective Optimization Design through Machine Learning for Drop-on-Demand Bioprinting. Engineering. 2019;5(3):586-593. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.12.009
177. Li J, Zhou Z, Yang J, et al. MedShapeNet - a large-scale dataset of 3D medical shapes for computer vision. Biomed Tech. 2024;70(1):71-90. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2024-0396
178. Choi E, An K, Kang KT. Deep-Learning-Based Microfluidic Droplet Classification for Multijet Monitoring. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(13):15576-15586. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c22048
179. Jeong JJ, Koo G. AdaLo: Adaptive learning rate optimizer with loss for classification. Inf Sci. 2025;690:121607. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2024.121607.
180. Chitnis K, Lu Y, Rhoads B, Chakka LRJ, Choudhury S, Maniruzzaman M. Optimization of print parameters for batch and continuous manufacturing of three-dimensional (3D) printed dosage forms using artificial intelligence and machine learning. Drug Deliv and Transl Res. 2025. doi: 10.1007/s13346-025-02006-4
181. Jablonka KM, Patiny L, Smit B. Making the collective knowledge of chemistry open and machine actionable. Nat Chem. 2022;14(4):365-376. doi: 10.1038/s41557-022-00910-7
182. Li F, Han J, Cao T, et al. Design of self-assembly dipeptide hydrogels and machine learning via their chemical features. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(23):11259-11264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903376116
183. Javaid S, Gorji HT, Soulami KB, Kaabouch N. Identification and ranking biomaterials for bone scaffolds using machine learning and PROMETHEE. Res Biomed Eng. 2023;39:129- 138. doi:0.1007/s42600-022-00257-5
184. Nadernezhad A, Groll J. Machine Learning Reveals a General Understanding of Printability in Formulations Based on Rheology Additives. Adv Sci. 2022;9(29):e2202638. doi: 10.1002/advs.202202638
185. Chen H, Liu Y, Balabani S, Hirayama R, Huang J. Machine Learning in Predicting Printable Biomaterial Formulations for Direct Ink Writing. Research. 2023;6:0197. doi: 10.34133/research.0197
186. Yu J, Yao D, Wang L, Xu M. Machine Learning in Predicting and Optimizing Polymer Printability for 3D Bioprinting. Polymers (Basel). 2025;17(13):1873. doi:10.3390/polym17131873
187. Mai M, Luo S, Fasciano S, et al. Morphology-based deep learning approach for predicting adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1329840. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1329840
188. Xu H, Liu Q, Casillas J, et al. Prediction of cell viability in dynamic optical projection stereolithography-based bioprinting using machine learning. J Intell Manuf. 2022;33:995-1005. doi: 10.1007/s10845-020-01708-5
189. Zhang C., Elvitigala K.C.M.L., Mubarok W., Okano Y., Sakai S. Machine learning-based prediction and optimisation framework for as-extruded cell viability in extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2024;19:e2400330. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2024.2400330
190. Mairpady A, Mourad AI, Mozumder MS. Accelerated Discovery of the Polymer Blends for Cartilage Repair through Data-Mining Tools and Machine-Learning Algorithm. Polymers. 2022;14(9):1802. doi: 10.3390/polym14091802
191. Li Z, Song P, Li G, et al. AI energized hydrogel design, optimization and application in biomedicine. Mater Today Bio. 2024;25:101014. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101014
192. Junru Zhang, Yang Liu, Durga Chandra Sekhar.P, et al. Rapid, autonomous high-throughput characterization of hydrogel rheological properties via automated sensing and physics-guided machine learning. Appl. Mater. Today. 2023;30:14. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101720.
193. Seifermann M, Reiser P, Friederich P, Levkin PA. High- Throughput Synthesis and Machine Learning Assisted Design of Photodegradable Hydrogels. Small Methods. 2023;7(9):e2300553. doi: 10.1002/smtd.202300553
194. Zhao Y, Li H, Zhou H. et al. A review of graph neural network applications in mechanics-related domains. Artif Intell Rev. 2024;57;315. doi: 10.1007/s10462-024-10931-y
195. Zahedi S, Taherkhani A, Baserinia R, Zahedi S, Ali, H, Abdi, M. Comparative Evaluation of Neural Networks and Transfer Learning for Predicting Mechanical Properties of 3D‐Printed Bone Scaffolds. Macromol Mater Eng. 2025; 310. doi: 10.1002/mame.202500073
196. Shetty A, Fathima A, Anika B, et al. Computational optimization of 3D printed bone scaffolds using orthogonal array-driven FEA and neural network modeling. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):30515. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15122-5
197. Wang, Z., Dabaja, R., Chen, L., & Banu, M. Machine learning unifies flexibility and efficiency of spinodal structure generation for stochastic biomaterial design. Sci Rep. 2023;13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31677-7.
198. Ashkan Sedigh, Jacob E. Tulipan, Michael R. Rivlin, Ryan E. Tomlinson. Utilizing Q-Learning to Generate 3D Vascular Networks for Bioprinting Bone. bioRxiv. Preprint online 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.10.08.331611
199. Cadle R, Rogozea D, Moldovan L, Moldovan NI. Design and Implementation of Anatomically Inspired Mesenteric and Intestinal Vascular Patterns for Personalized 3D Bioprinting. Appl Sci. 2022;12(9):4430. doi: 10.3390/app12094430
200. Wu J, Zhang Y, Lyu Y, Cheng L. On the Various Numerical Techniques for the Optimization of Bone Scaffold. Materials. 2023;16(3):974. doi: 10.3390/ma16030974
201. Drakoulas G, Gortsas T, Polyzos E, Tsinopoulos S, Pyl L, Polyzos D. An explainable machine learning-based probabilistic framework for the design of scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2024;23(3):987-1012. doi: 10.1007/s10237-024-01817-7
202. Naga Ramesh JV, Sonker A, Indumathi G, Balakrishnan D, Nimma D, Karthik J. Bayesian neural networks for probabilistic modeling of thermal dynamics in multiscale tissue engineering scaffolds. J Therm Biol. 2025;130:104134. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2025.104134
203. G Taylor S, Mueller E, Jones LR, Makela AV, Ashammakhi N. Translational Aspects of 3D and 4D Printing and Bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(27):e2400463. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202400463
204. Seo E, Lee YN, Shin WY, et al. Structural influence on titanium ion dissolution in 3D-printed Ti6Al4V orthopedic implants. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):37122. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-21129-9
205. Phruekthayanon J, Kühn-Kauffeldt M, Kühn M, et al. Biofunctionalization of 3D printed PEEK using integrated cathodic arc plasma coating: a one-step solution to antimicrobial and bioactive PEEK Implant. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2025;36(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s10856-025-06971-7
206. Grijalva Garces D, Strauß S, Gretzinger S, et al. On the reproducibility of extrusion-based bioprinting: round robin study on standardization in the field. Biofabrication. 2023;16(1):10.1088/1758-5090/acfe3b. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/acfe3b
207. Eraliev O, Lee K-H, Lee C-H. Self-Loosening of a 3D-Printed Bolt by Using Three Different Materials under Cyclical Temperature Changes. Appl Sci. 2022; 12(6):3001. doi: 10.3390/app12063001
208. Mandal A, Clegg JR, Anselmo AC, Mitragotri S. Hydrogels in the clinic. Bioeng Transl Med. 2020;5(2):e10158.doi: 10.1002/btm2.10158
209. Becerra AG, Gutiérrez M, Lahoz-Beltra R. Computing within bacteria: Programming of bacterial behavior by means of a plasmid encoding a perceptron neural network. Biosystems. 2022;213:104608. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2022.104608
210. Sujeeun LY, Phul IC, Goonoo N, Kotov NA, Bhaw-Luximon A. Predicting inflammatory response of biomimetic nanofibre scaffolds for tissue regeneration using machine learning and graph theory. J Mater Chem B. 2025;13(10):3304-3318. doi: 10.1039/d4tb02494j
211. El Arab RA, Al Moosa OA, Sagbakken M. Economic, ethical, and regulatory dimensions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: an integrative review. Front Public Health. 2025;13:1617138. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1617138

212. Silva Robazzi JV, Derman ID, Gupta D, et al. The Synergy of Artificial Intelligence and 3D Bioprinting: Unlocking New Frontiers in Precision and Tissue Fabrication. Adv Funct Mater. 2025. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202509530