AccScience Publishing / IJB / Volume 10 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.36922/ijb.1589
Submit to IJB
Cite this article
27
Download
677
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

3D bioprinting of adhesive, anti-bacterial alginate/polyacrylamide-based customized boluses using digital light processing for radiotherapy applications

Ying Lu1,2 ,  Xiaomin Zhang3 ,  Youjie Rong3 ,  Yannan Xu2,4 ,  Xiaohong Yao3 ,  Guobao Pang2 ,  Qinying Shi2,4 ,  Xiaobo Huang3* ,  Meiwen An1* ,  Jianbo Song2*
Show Less
1 Biomedical Engineering Department, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
2 Radiation Therapy Center, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
3 Materials Science and Engineering Department, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
4 Shanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Translational Nuclear Medicine and Precision Protection, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
IJB 2024, 10(2), 1589 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1589
Submitted: 12 August 2023 | Accepted: 13 October 2023 | Published: 9 January 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

Boluses are a type of materials used to enhance skin dose during the treatment of superficial lesions. However, the current commercially available boluses cannot fully conform to irregular skin surfaces due to their uniform thickness, thereby compromising the efficacy of radiotherapy. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting boasts a huge potential in the creation of customized boluses, but the use of this technique is limited by shortcomings of the prevailing materials, such as their indirect printability and substance rigidity. As a potential substitute, hydrogels possessing a tensile modulus comparable to that of skin tissue are optimal candidates for customizing boluses. In this study, we developed a photocurable bioink for multifunctional boluses using digital light processing (DLP). Alginate, acrylamide, polyethylene glycol diacrylate, lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate, and protocatechuic acid were synergistically combined to fabricate the bioink. The bolus printed using this bioink was endowed with enhanced toughness, superior adhesion, tissue equivalence, anti-dehydration and anti-bacterial properties, as well as excellent biocompatibility and radiation performance. In conclusion, the DLP-based 3D bioprinting of the proposed bioink can provide an avenue for obtaining personalized boluses in radiotherapy treatment of superficial tumors.

Keywords
Photocurable 3D bioprinting
Composite gel
Multifunctional bolus
Radiotherapy
Funding
The authors wish to express their gratitude for the support received from the Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province (Number: 20210302123416), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Number: 31870934), and the Central Leading Science and Technology Development Foundation of Shanxi Province (Number: YDZJSX20231A064).
References
  1. Pugh R, Lloyd K, Collins M, et al. The use of 3D printing within radiation therapy to improve bolus conformity: A literature review. J Radiother Pract. 2017;16(3):319–325. doi: 10.1017/s1460396917000115
  2. Wang X, Wang X, Xiang Z, et al. The clinical application of 3D-printed boluses in superficial tumor radiotherapy. Front Oncol. 2021;11:698773. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.698773
  3. Lu Y, Song J, Yao X, et al. 3D printing polymer-based bolus used for radiotherapy. Int J Bioprint. 2021;7(4):414. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v7i4.414
  4. Aras S, Tanzer I O, Ikizceli T. Dosimetric comparison of superflab and specially prepared bolus materials used in radiotherapy practice. Eur J Breast Health. 2020;16(3): 167–170. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5041
  5. Robar JL, Moran K, Allan J, et al. Intrapatient study comparing 3D printed bolus versus standard vinyl gel sheet bolus for postmastectomy chest wall radiation therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018;8(4):221–229. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.12.008
  6. Khan Y, Villarreal-Barajas JE, Udowicz M, et al. Clinical and dosimetric implications of air gaps between bolus and skin surface during radiation therapy. J Cancer Ther. 2013;04(07):1251–1255. doi: 10.4236/jct.2013.47147
  7. Zheng Q, Zhao L, Wang J, et al. High-strength and high-toughness sodium alginate/polyacrylamide double physically crosslinked network hydrogel with superior self-healing and self-recovery properties prepared by a one-pot method. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp. 2020;589:124402. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124402
  8. Al-Sudani TA, Biasi G, Wilkinson D, et al. eXaSkin: A novel high-density bolus for 6MV X-rays radiotherapy. Phys Med. 2020;80:42–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.09.002
  9. Obeid JP, Gutkin PM, Lewis J, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy and 3-dimensional printed bolus in the treatment of refractory primary cutaneous gamma delta lymphoma of the bilateral legs. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019;9(4):220–225. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.02.016
  10. Baltz GC, Chi PM, Wong PF, et al. Development and validation of a 3D‐printed bolus cap for total scalp irradiation. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(3):89–96. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12552
  11. Zhao Y, Moran K, Yewondwossen M, et al. Clinical applications of 3-dimensional printing in radiation therapy. Med Dosim. 2017;42(2):150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.03.001
  12. Park SY, Choi CH, Park JM, et al. A patient-specific polylactic acid bolus made by a 3D printer for breast cancer radiation therapy. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168063
  13. Park JW, Yea JW. Three-dimensional customized bolus for intensity-modulated radiotherapy in a patient with Kimura’s disease involving the auricle. Cancer Radiother. 2016;20(3):205–209. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2015.11.003
  14. Ricotti R, Ciardo D, Pansini F, et al. Dosimetric characterization of 3D printed bolus at different infill percentage for external photon beam radiotherapy. Phys Med. 2017;39:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.06.004
  15. Chiu T, Tan J, Brenner M, et al. Three-dimensional printer-aided casting of soft, custom silicone boluses (SCSBs) for head and neck radiation therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018;8(3):e167–e174. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.11.001
  16. Park JM, Son J, An HJ, et al. Bio-compatible patient-specific elastic bolus for clinical implementation. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64(10):105006. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab1c93
  17. Kong Y, Yan T, Sun Y, et al. A dosimetric study on the use of 3D‐printed customized boluses in photon therapy: A hydrogel and silica gel study. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(1):348–355. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12489
  18. Zasadzinski K, Spalek MJ, Rutkowski P. Modern dressings in prevention and therapy of acute and chronic radiation dermatitis-A literature review. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(6). doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061204
  19. Zhao M, Wang C, Xie J, et al. Eco-friendly and scalable synthesis of fullerenols with high free radical scavenging ability for skin radioprotection. Small. 2021;17(37):e2102035. doi: 10.1002/smll.202102035
  20. Fu Z, Naghieh S, Xu C, et al. Printability in extrusion bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2021;13(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/abe7ab
  21. Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V, et al. Polyvinylpyrrolidone-based bioink: influence of bioink properties on printing performance and cell proliferation during inkjet-based bioprinting. Bio-Des Manuf. 2023;6:676–690. doi: 10.1007/s42242-023-00245-3
  22. Xu X, Awad A, Robles-Martinez P, et al. Vat photopolymerization 3D printing for advanced drug delivery and medical device applications. J Control Release. 2021;329:743–757. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.008
  23. Braghiroli FL, Amaral-Labat G, Boss AFN, et al. Tannin gels and their carbon derivatives: A review. Biomolecules. 2019;9(10):587. doi: 10.3390/biom9100587
  24. Mortezaee K, Najafi M, Farhood B, et al. Resveratrol as an adjuvant for normal tissues protection and tumor sensitization. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2020;20(2):130–145. doi: 10.2174/1568009619666191019143539
  25. Zhou LY, Fu J, He Y. A review of 3D printing technologies for soft polymer materials. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;2000187. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202000187
  26. Mau R, Nazir J, John S, et al. Preliminary study on 3D printing of PEGDA hydrogels for frontal sinus implants using digital light processing (DLP). Curr Dir Biomed Eng. 2019;5(1):249–252. doi: 10.1515/cdbme-2019-0063
  27. Zhang B, Li S, Hingorani H, et al. Highly stretchable hydrogels for UV curing based high-resolution multimaterial 3D printing. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6(20):3246–3253. doi: 10.1039/c8tb00673c
  28. Sun JY, Zhao X, Illeperuma WR, et al. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature. 2012;489(7414):133–136. doi: 10.1038/nature11409
  29. Huang B, Hu R, Xue Z, et al. Continuous liquid interface production of alginate/polyacrylamide hydrogels with supramolecular shape memory properties. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;231:115736. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115736
  30. Dávila JL, d’Ávila MA. Rheological evaluation of laponite/ alginate inks for 3D extrusion-based printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;101(1–4):675–686. doi: 10.1007/s00170-018-2876-y
  31. Xiang Z, Li N, Rong Y, et al. 3D-printed high-toughness double network hydrogels via digital light processing. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp. 2022;639:128329. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128329
  32. Li N, Xiang Z, Rong Y, et al. 3D printing tannic acid-based gels via digital light processing. Macromol Biosci. 2022;22(4):e2100455. doi: 10.1002/mabi.202100455
  33. Zhu L, Rong Y, Wang Y, et al. DLP printing of tough organogels for customized wearable sensors. Eur Polym J. 2023;187:111886. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.111886
  34. Zhu W, Ma X, Gou M, et al. 3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;40:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.014
  35. Axpe E, Oyen M. Applications of alginate-based bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(12):1976. doi: 10.3390/ijms17121976
  36. Caprioli M, Roppolo I. 3D-printed self-healing hydrogels via Digital Light Processing. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2462. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22802-z
  37. Guo J, Suma T, Richardson JJ, et al. Modular assembly of biomaterials using polyphenols as building blocks. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5(11):5578–5596. doi: 10.1021/ acsbiomaterials.8b01507
  38. Lee J, Yeo M, Kim W, et al. Development of a tannic acid cross-linking process for obtaining 3D porous cell-laden collagen structure. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;110:497–503. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.105
  39. Fischer N, Seo EJ, Efferth T. Prevention from radiation damage by natural products. Phytomedicine. 2018;47: 192–200. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2017.11.005
  40. Wang J, Liu X, Wang Y, et al. Casein micelles embedded composite organohydrogel as potential wound dressing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;211:678–688. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.05.081
  41. 41. Kalra A, Lowe A, Al-Jumaily AM. Mechanical behaviour of skin: A review. J Material Sci Eng. 2016;5: 254. doi: 10.4172/2169-0022.1000254
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept