AccScience Publishing / GHES / Volume 1 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.36922/ghes.0549
Cite this article
249
Download
2664
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE

Neuroinclusive workplaces and biophilic design: Strategies for promoting occupational health and sustainability in smart cities

James Hutson1* Piper Hutson1
Show Less
1 Art History and Visual Culture, Lindenwood University, Saint Charles, Missouri, USA
Submitted: 18 April 2023 | Accepted: 20 June 2023 | Published: 6 July 2023
© 2023 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of biophilic design on occupational health and productivity, with a particular focus on addressing the needs of diverse populations, including the neurodiverse, during the post-pandemic return to work. With an estimated 15 – 20% of the global population considered neurodiverse, it is crucial to understand and accommodate their specific needs, such as those with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum condition, and learning disabilities. These individuals face increased occupational stress, necessitating the development of targeted strategies. The renewed interest in sustainability and employee well-being has led to a resurgence of biophilic design in the workplace. Grounded in the concept that humans possess an inherent inclination to affiliate with nature, the biophilic design integrates natural elements and art into the built environment. This integration has been found to reduce activity in the amygdala, promoting stress recovery, prolonged attention, and increased productivity among employees. To effectively acclimate neurodiverse individuals in the work environment, biophilic design should be complemented using extended reality (XR) technology supported by artificial intelligence. Virtual reality, in particular, has been shown to facilitate individuals’ comfort in new workspaces, aid in self-assessments through biofeedback, and enable the adjustment of surroundings for self-regulation. Furthermore, biophilic design has the potential to promote sustainability in smart cities by integrating natural elements into the built environment. This integration helps reduce the carbon footprint of buildings and enhances energy efficiency. By creating workplaces that prioritize biophilic design principles, organizations can contribute to a more inclusive, sustainable, and productive work environment.

Keywords
Autism spectrum condition
Biophilia
Biophilic design
Neuroaffirming
Neurodiversity
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Adams, J., & Kirkby, R. (2001). Exercise dependence and overtraining: The physiological and psychological consequences of excessive exercise. Sports Medicine Training and Rehabilitation, 10(3): 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10578310210395

 

Alapieti, T., Mikkola, R., Pasanen, P., & Salonen, H. (2020). The influence of wooden interior materials on indoor environment: A review. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 78: 617-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01532-x

 

Antonelli, M., Donelli, D., Carlone, L., Maggini, V., Firenzuoli, F., & Bedeschi, E. (2022). Effects of forest bathing (shinrin-yoku) on individual well-being: An umbrella review. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 32(8): 1842-1867. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2021.1919293

 

Aristizabal, S., Byun, K., Porter, P., Clements, N., Campanella, C., Li, L., & Bauer, B. (2021). Biophilic office design: Exploring the impact of a multisensory approach on human well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77: 101682.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101682

 

Ashwell, A.N. (2010). Identitiy and Belonging: Urban Nature and Adolescent Development in the City of Cape Town. Germany: Springer.

 

Asim, F., Rai, S., & Shree, V. (2020). Biophilic Architecture for restoration and therapy within the built environment. Visions for Sustainability, 15: 53-79. https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/5104

 

Badgett, A. (2020). Playing on the Spectrum: Exploring how to Create Playgrounds more Accessible for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Washington, DC: University of Washington.

 

Banaei, M., Ahmadi, A., Gramann, K., & Hatami, J. (2020). Emotional evaluation of architectural interior forms based on personality differences using virtual reality. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9(1): 138-147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.07.005

 

Barbiero, G., & Berto, R. (2021). Biophilia as evolutionary adaptation: An onto-and phylogenetic framework for biophilic design. Frontiers in Psychology, 12: 700709.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700709

 

Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature into Urban Design and Planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.

 

Beute, F., & de Kort, Y.A. (2014). Salutogenic effects of the environment: Review of health protective effects of nature and daylight. Applied Psychology: Health and Well Being, 6(1): 67-95.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12019

 

Bhardwaj, G. (2021). Light, Molecular Mechanism and Sleep (Basics): Light is the Governor of the Universe. California, USA: Notion Press.

 

Birkheim, S.L., Calogiuri, G., & Martinsen, R. (2023). Advancing immersive virtual reality-based simulation practices: Developing an evidence-based and theory-driven pedagogical framework for VR-based simulations of non-technical skills among healthcare professionals. Interactive Learning Environments.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2186896

 

Bishop, T. (2016). Amazon’s Giant Seattle Biospheres Come into Focus with Installation of First Glass Panels. Washington, DC: GeekWire. Available from: https://www.geekwire. com/2016/amazons-giant-seattle-spheres [Last accessed on 2016 Apr 24].

 

Blackhurst, B. (2022). Exploring the Relationship between Biophilic Design and Meditation Facilities (Doctoral Dissertation, Brenau University).

 

Boubekri, M., Cheung, I.N., Reid, K.J., Wang, C.H., & Zee, P.C. (2014). Impact of windows and daylight exposure on overall health and sleep quality of office workers: A case-control pilot study. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 10(6): 603-611.  https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.3780

 

Bratman, G.N., Daily, G.C., Levy, B.J., & Gross, J.J. (2015). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138: 41-50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.005

 

Browning, W.D., & Ryan, C.O. (2020). Nature Inside: A Biophilic Design Guide. England: Routledge.

 

Chae, J.H., Zoh, K.J., Kim, S.J., Hoh, Y.K., & Hwang, J.Y. (2014). A study on operational systems and planning contents of parks and green space plan-focused on London, New York, Berlin, Sydney, Seoul. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 42(2): 91-102.  https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.2.091

 

Chanda, M.L., & Levitin, D.J. (2013). The neurochemistry of music. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(4): 179-193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.007

 

Chen, L.Y., Lin, M.W., & Chuah, Y.K. (2017). Investigation of a potted plant (Hedera helix) with photo-regulation to remove volatile formaldehyde for improving indoor air quality. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 17(10): 2543-2554. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.04.0145

 

Chu, S., Narayanan, S., & Kuo, C.C.J. (2009). Environmental sound recognition with time-frequency audio features. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 17(6): 1142-1158. https://doi.org/10.1109/tasl.2009.2017438

 

Coria-Avila, G.A., Pfaus, J.G., Orihuela, A., Domínguez-Oliva, A., José-Pérez, N., Hernández, L.A., & Mota-Rojas, D. (2022). The neurobiology of behavior and its applicability for animal welfare: A review. Animals (Basel), 12(7): 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070928

 

Crawford, E., & Wu, Y. (2011). Wayfinding in the Rail Environment: Technology and Behaviour Review. Project Leader: Dr. Dhamodharan Raman. Australia: CRC for Rail Innovation. Available from: https://humanrights.gov.au/ sites/default/files/attachment%203%20carriage%20way%20 finding%20report%20updated.pdf [Last accessed on 2023 Jul 05].

 

Day, M. (2023). Amazon Pauses Construction on Second Headquarters in Virginia as it Cuts Jobs. United States: Bloomberg. Available from: https://www.bloomberg. com/news/articles/2023-03-03/amazon-hq2-pauses-construction-amid-layoffs-remote-work#xj4y7vzkg [Last accessed on 2023 Mar 03].

 

De Wilde, P., & de Souza, C.B. (2022). Interactions between buildings, building stakeholders and animals: A scoping review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 367: 133055.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133055

 

Depledge, M.H., Stone, R.J., & Bird, W.J. (2011). Can natural and virtual environments be used to promote improved human health and wellbeing? Environmental Science and Technology, 45(11): 4660-4665.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es103907m

 

Dinishak, J. (2019). Autism, aspect-perception, and neurodiversity. Philosophical Psychology, 32(6): 874-897.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2019.1632426

 

Dusek, J.A., & Benson, H. (2009). Mind-body medicine: A model of the comparative clinical impact of the acute stress and relaxation responses. Minnesota Medicine, 92(5): 47-50.

 

Erfanian, M., Mitchell, A.J., Kang, J., & Aletta, F. (2019). The psychophysiological implications of soundscape: A systematic review of empirical literature and a research agenda. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19): 3533.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193533

 

Fell, D.R. (2010). Wood in the Human Environment: Restorative Properties of Wood in the Built Indoor Environment (Doctoral Dissertation, University of British Columbia).

 

Fidan, D., Hamidi, S.B., & Hasirci, D. (2021). The Effects of Biophilic Design on Wayfinding in Elementary Schools. In: Edulearn21 Proceedings. Valencia: IATED, p.74-82.

 

Fisk, W.J., Black, D., & Brunner, G. (2011). Benefits and costs of improved IEQ in U.S. offices. Indoor Air, 21(5): 357-367.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00719.x

 

Fleck, R., Pettit, T.J., Douglas, A.N.J., Irga, P.J., & Torpy, F.R. (2020). Botanical biofiltration for reducing indoor air pollution. In: Pacheco-Torgal, F., Ivanov, V., & Tsang, D.C.W., (eds). Bio-Based Materials and Biotechnologies for Eco-Efficient Construction. Australia: Woodhead Publishing, p.305-327.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819481-2.00015-5.

 

Fox, M. (eds.). (2016). Interactive Architecture: Adaptive World. United States: Chronicle Books.

 

Frumkin, H., & Fox, J. (2011). Contact with nature. In: Making Healthy Places: Designing and Building for Health, Well-being, and Sustainability. Washington, DC: Island Press, p.229-243.

 

Gerger, E. (2012). Planning for the future of Paris: Comparing 19th century haussmanization to 21st century le grand Paris. Focus, 9(1): 24.  https://doi.org/10.15368/focus.2012v9n1.16

 

Gierbienis, M. (2019). Application of biophilic design in contemporary library architecture. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM, 19(6.2): 365-377.  https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/6.2/s27.047

 

Gillis, K., & Gatersleben, B. (2015). A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design. Buildings, 5(3): 948-963.  https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5030948

 

Grady, J. (1955). Nature and the art Nouveau. The Art Bulletin, 37(3): 187-192.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.1955.11408304

 

Hähn, N., Essah, E., & Blanusa, T. (2021). Biophilic design and office planting: A case study of effects on perceived health, well-being and performance metrics in the workplace. Intelligent Buildings International, 13(4): 241-260.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2020.1732859

 

Harder, M.K. (2022). Self-made design notes for an autistic’s office. In: Neurodivergence and Architecture. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, p.129.

 

Hartig, T., van den Berg, A.E., Hagerhall, C.M., Tomalak, M., Bauer, N., Hansmann, R., & Waaseth, G. (2011). Health benefits of nature experience: Psychological, social and cultural processes. In: Forests, Trees and Human Health. Germany: Springer, p.127-168.

 

Hu, J., He, Y., Hao, X., Li, N., Su, Y., & Qu, H. (2022). Optimal temperature ranges considering gender differences in thermal comfort, work performance, and sick building syndrome: A winter field study in university classrooms. Energy and Buildings, 254: 111554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111554

 

Hutson, J. (2022). Social virtual reality: Neurodivergence and inclusivity in the metaverse. Societies, 12(4): 102.  https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12040102

 

Jackson, Q., & Mansfield, J. (2019). Timber-the Human Material and a Case for Wellness World Engineers Convention (WEC) 2019. In: WEC2019: World Engineers Convention 2019. Melbourne: Engineers Australia, p.832-845.

 

Jha, H., & Behera, S. (2022). Exploring biophilic design and its implications for mental health. In: Understanding Psychology in the Context of Relationship, Community, Workplace and Culture. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, p.297-314.

 

Jiang, B., He, J., Chen, J., Larsen, L., & Wang, H. (2021). Perceived green at speed: A simulated driving experiment raises new questions for attention restoration theory and stress reduction theory. Environment and Behavior, 53(3): 296-335.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916520947111

 

Jiang, S., & Verderber, S. (2017). On the planning and design of hospital circulation zones: A review of the evidence-based literature. HERD, 10(2): 124-146.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586716672041

 

Jones, D.R. (2012). Looking through the “greenwashing glass cage” of the green league table towards the sustainability challenge for UK universities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(4): 630-647.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811211239263

 

Jonsson, E. (2002). Inner Navigation: Why we Get Lost and How we Find Our Way. United States: Simon and Schuster.

 

Joye, Y. (2011). Biophilic design aesthetics in art and design education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 45(2): 17-35.  https://doi.org/10.5406/jaesteduc.45.2.0017

 

Kellert, S., & Calabrese, E. (2015). The Practice of Biophilic Design. Vol. 3. London: Terrapin Bright LLC, p.21-46.

 

Kellert, S.R. (2008). Dimensions, elements, and attributes of biophilic design. In: Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life. United States: John Wiley and Sons, p.3-19.

 

Kellert, S.R., & Wilson, E.O. (eds.). (1995). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

 

Kellert, S.R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2011). Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life. United States: John Wiley and Sons.

 

Kent, M.G., & Schiavon, S. (2022). Predicting window view preferences using the environmental information criteria. LEUKOS the Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 19: 1-20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2022.2077753

 

Knight, W.E., & Rickard, N.S. (2001). Relaxing music prevents stress-induced increases in subjective anxiety, systolic blood pressure, and heart rate in healthy males and females. Journal of Music Therapy, 38(4): 254-272.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/38.4.254

 

Koppel, R. (2022). Estimating the United States’ cost of healthcare information technology. In: Healthcare Information Management Systems: Cases, Strategies, and Solutions. Cham: Springer International Publishing, p.3-38.

 

Kropman, D., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Bergefurt, L., & LeBlanc, P. (2022). The business case for a healthy office; a holistic overview of relations between office workspace design and mental health. Ergonomics, 66: 658-675.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2022.2108905

 

Lachenmyer, N.S., & Akasha, S. (2022). An aquarium of machines: A physically realized artificial life simulation. Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 5(4): 1-11.  https://doi.org/10.1145/3533388

 

Langer, J. (2021). The Impact of the Physical Office Environment on Occupant Wellbeing (Doctoral Dissertation, Cardiff University).

 

Lee, J., Park, B.J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Ohira, T., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2011). Effect of forest bathing on physiological and psychological responses in young Japanese male subjects. Public Health, 125(2): 93-100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2010.09.005

 

Lerner, A., & Stopka, M. (2016). The financial benefits of biophilic design in the workplace: A review and summary of current research. MIST International Journal of Science and Technology.

 

Luo, B., Lau, R.Y., Li, C., & Si, Y.W. (2022). A critical review of state‐of‐the‐art chatbot designs and applications. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 12(1): e1434.  https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1434

 

MacNaughton, P., Satish, U., Laurent, J.G.C., Flanigan, S., Vallarino, J., Coull, B., & Allen, J.G. (2017). The impact of working in a green certified building on cognitive function and health. Building and Environment, 114: 78-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.041

 

Marchi, L. (2013). Designing for Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Optimized LiveWorkPlayLearn Environments. United States: Clemson University.

 

Mazuch, R. (2017). Salutogenic and biophilic design as therapeutic approaches to sustainable architecture. Architectural Design, 87(2): 42-47.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2151

 

Menezes, K., de Oliveira-Smith, P., & Woodworth, A.V. (eds.). (2021). Programming for Health and Wellbeing in Architecture. England: Routledge.

 

Moslehian, A.S., Roös, P.B., Gaekwad, J.S., & Van Galen, L. (2023). Potential risks and beneficial impacts of using indoor plants in the biophilic design of healthcare facilities: A scoping review. Building and Environment, 233: 110057.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110057

 

Motti, V.G. (2019). Designing Emerging Technologies for and with Neurodiverse Users. In: Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication, p.1-10.

 

Nicolini, E. (2022). Built environment and wellbeing-standards, multi-criteria evaluation methods, certifications. Sustainability, 14(8): 4754.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084754

 

Nieuwenhuis, M., Knight, C., Postmes, T., & Haslam, S.A. (2014). The relative benefits of green versus lean office space: Three field experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(3): 199-214.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000024

 

Park, G., Nanda, U., Adams, L., Essary, J., & Hoelting, M. (2020). Creating and testing a sensory well‐being hub for adolescents with developmental disabilities. Journal of Interior Design, 45(1): 13-32.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12164

 

Parry, S., & Straker, L. (2013). The contribution of office work to sedentary behaviour associated risk. BMC Public Health, 13(1): 296.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-296

 

Parsaee, M., Demers, C.M.H., Hébert, M., Lalonde, J.F., & Potvin, A. (2019). A photobiological approach to biophilic design in extreme climates. Building and Environment, 154: 211-226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.027

 

Patel, V., Chesmore, A., Legner, C.M., & Pandey, S. (2022). Trends in workplace wearable technologies and connected‐worker solutions for next‐generation occupational safety, health, and productivity. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 4(1): 2100099.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202100099

 

Patterson, M.R. (2017). Skin Fit and Retrofit: Challenging the Sustainability of Curtainwall Practice in Tall Buildings (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California).

 

Pawar, B.S. (2013). A proposed model of organizational behavior aspects for employee performance and well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 8: 339-359.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-012-9193-7

 

Peng, W.X., Yue, X., Chen, H., Ma, N.L., Quan, Z., Yu, Q., & Sonne, C. (2022). A review of plants formaldehyde metabolism: Implications for hazardous emissions and phytoremediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 436: 129304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129304

 

Perry, B.D., & Pollard, R. (1998). Homeostasis, stress, trauma, and adaptation. A neurodevelopmental view of childhood trauma. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics North America, 7(1): 33-51, viii.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1056-4993(18)30258-x

 

Peterson, H.R., Rothschild, M., Weinberg, C.R., Fell, R.D., McLeish, K.R., & Pfeifer, M.A. (1988). Body fat and the activity of the autonomic nervous system. New England Journal of Medicine, 318(17): 1077-1083.  https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198804283181701

 

Requena, E.G. (2021). Neurodiversity and Biophilia: The Future of the Workspace in the Post-pandemic Era. Mexico: ArchDaily, p.6.

 

Robinson, S., & Pallasmaa, J. (eds.). (2015). Mind in Architecture: Neuroscience, Embodiment, and the Future of Design. United States: Mit Press.

 

Ryan, C.O., & Browning, W.D. (2020). Biophilic design. In: Sustainable Built Environments. New York: Springer, p.43-85.

 

 

Ryan, C.O., Browning, W.D., Clancy, J.O., Andrews, S.L., & Kallianpurkar, N.B. (2014). Biophilic design patterns: Emerging nature-based parameters for health and well-being in the built environment. ArchNet-IJAR, International Journal of Architectural Research, 8(2): 62-76.  https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v8i2.436

 

Sander, E.J., Caza, A., & Jordan, P.J. (2019). The physical work environment and its relationship to stress. In: Organizational Behaviour and the Physical Environment. England: Routledge, p.268-284.

 

Schumacher, S., Kirschbaum, C., Fydrich, T., & Ströhle, A. (2013). Is salivary alpha-amylase an indicator of autonomic nervous system dysregulations in mental disorders?-a review of preliminary findings and the interactions with cortisol. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(6): 729-743.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.02.003

 

Seidi, F., Deng, C., Zhong, Y., Liu, Y., Huang, Y., Li, C., & Xiao, H. (2021). Functionalized masks: Powerful materials against COVID‐19 and future pandemics. Small, 17(42): e2102453. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202102453

 

Sieghardt, M., Mursch-Radlgruber, E., Paoletti, E., Couenberg, E., Dimitrakopoulus, A., Rego, F., & Randrup, T.B. (2005). The abiotic urban environment: Impact of urban growing conditions on urban vegetation. In: Urban Forests and Trees: A Reference Book. Germany: Springer, p.281-323.

 

Söderlund, J., & Newman, P. (2017). Improving mental health in prisons through biophilic design. The Prison Journal, 97(6): 750-772.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885517734516

 

Tang, Y.Y., Tang, R., Posner, M.I., & Gross, J.J. (2022). Effortless training of attention and self-control: Mechanisms and applications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26: 567-577.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.04.006

 

Tekin, B.H., Corcoran, R., & Gutiérrez, R.U. (2023). The impact of biophilic design in Maggie’s Centres: A meta-synthesis analysis. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(1): 188-207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2022.06.013

 

Tharim, A.H.A., Ahmad, A.C., Saarani, P.S.N., Haossain, N.Q.R., Purwanto, E., Tafridj, I.S.I., & Prasetio, T. (2022). The determinant factors of biophilic design strategies and occupants’psychological performance in office building. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, 9(3): 87-106.  https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v9i3.18292

 

 

Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R.F., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3): 201-230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7

 

Van den Bosch, M., & Bird, W. (eds.). (2018). Oxford Textbook of Nature and Public Health: The Role of Nature in Improving the Health of a Population. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

 

Van der Geest, T. (2020). Twice Exceptional: Shaping Supportive Environments for Neurodiversity (Master’s Thesis).

 

Wang, X., Mo, X., Fan, M., Lee, L.H., Shi, B.E., & Hui, P. (2022). Reducing Stress and Anxiety in the Metaverse: A Systematic Review of Meditation, Mindfulness and Virtual Reality. ArXiv.  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.14645

 

Wilkinson, S., & Orr, F. (2017). The Impact of Horticulture Therapy on Mental Health Care Consumers on a Retrofitted Roof. In: Annual Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference. Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference.

 

Williams, K.J.H., Lee, K.E., Hartig, T., Sargent, L.D., Williams, N.S.G., & Johnson, K.A. (2018). Conceptualising creativity benefits of nature experience: Attention restoration and mind wandering as complementary processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 59: 36-45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.005

 

Wilson, E.O. (1986). Biophilia. United States: Harvard University Press.

 

Wood, R.A., Orwell, R.L., Tarran, J., Torpy, F., & Burchett, M. (2002). Potted-plant/growth media interactions and capacities for removal of volatiles from indoor air. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 77(1): 120-129.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2002.11511467

 

Zare, G., Faizi, M., Baharvand, M., & Masnavi, M.R. (2021). Determination of biophilic design strategies that affecting the patients’ health in hospitals. Journal of Iranian Architecture and Urbanism (JIAU), 12(1): 59-78.  https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2020.210114.1318

 

Zari, M.P. (2017). What Makes a City ‘Biophilic’? Observations and Experiences from the Wellington Nature Map project. In: Back to the Future: The Next 50 Years, 51st International Conference of the Architectural Science Association. New Zealand: The Architectural Science Association and Victoria University of Wellington, p. 105-114.

 

Zhong, W., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1): 114-141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006

Share
Back to top
Global Health Economics and Sustainability, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4570 Published by AccScience Publishing