Fertility outcomes of macroscopic tubal reanastomosis through mini-laparotomy: A retrospective case series study

Introduction: Tubal ligation reversal is a surgical option for restoring fertility, with outcomes influenced by technique, surgeon expertise, and patient factors.
Objective: This study evaluates the fertility outcomes of macroscopic tubal reanastomosis through mini-laparotomy.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed medical records of women who had previously undergone tubal ligation either during cesarean sections or through laparoscopic electrocoagulation at a tertiary hospital in Türkiye between 2019 and 2022. The primary surgical approach involved a mini-laparotomy, and the anastomosis was performed macroscopically—without the use of an operating microscope—relying instead on direct visual inspection to access and reconnect the fallopian tubes. The suitability of the tubes for reanastomosis was assessed based on the length of the tubes, the presence of adhesion, and the condition of the fimbriae. Fertility outcomes, including live birth rates and time to conception, and surgical success rates, were measured.
Results: The data of 23 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The surgical success rate was 78.2% (unilateral or bilateral reanastomosis of the tubas), with a pregnancy rate of 43.5% and a live birth rate of 34.8%. The mean time to conception was 3.73 months.
Conclusion: Despite lower pregnancy rates compared with the broader literature, these outcomes are deemed acceptable, particularly for centers lacking facilities for more advanced surgical options. Therefore, macroscopic tubal reanastomosis through mini-laparotomy emerges as a feasible alternative for surgeons with limited experience in more intricate microsurgical techniques, providing a viable pathway to restoring fertility with reasonable success.
- Stuart GS, Ramesh SS. Interval female sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(1):117-124. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002376
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Questionnaire (or Examination Protocol, or Laboratory Protocol); 2006. Available from: https://www. cdc.gov [Last accessed on 2025 Jul 01].
- Salehjawich A, Günther V, Ruchay Z, et al. Robot-assisted tubal reanastomosis after sterilization: A choice for family planning. J Clin Med. 2022;11(15):4385. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154385
- Godin PA, Syrios K, Rege G, Demir S, Charitidou E, Wery O. Laparoscopic reversal of tubal sterilization; a retrospective study over 135 cases. Front Surg. 2018;5:79. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00079
- Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: ASRM@ asrm.org 1. Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: A committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(5):1143-1150. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.051
- Moon HS, Joo BS, Kim SG, Nam KI, Koo JS. Where microsurgical tubal reanastomosis stands in the in vitro fertilization era. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2024;13(2):71-78. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_43_23
- Garcia CR. Oviductal anastomosis procedures. In: Human Sterilization. Springfiled: Thomas Charle; 1972. p. 116.
- Sedbon E, Delajolinieres JB, Boudouris O, Madelenat P. Tubal desterilization through exclusive laparoscopy. Hum Reprod. 1989;4(2):158-159. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136862
- Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, Stevens L. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: A human pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(5):1040-1042. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00423-4
- Elci G, Elci E, Sayan S, Hanligil E. Is there any difference between pregnancy results after tubal reanastamosis performed laparotomically, laparoscopically, and robotically? Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022;15(2):261-269. doi: 10.1111/ases.12991
- Berger GS, Thorp JM Jr., Weaver MA. Effectiveness of bilateral tubotubal anastomosis in a large outpatient population. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(5):1120-1125. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew038
- Koh CH, Janik GM. Laparoscopic microsurgery: Current and future status. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999;11(4):401-407. doi: 10.1097/00001703-199908000-00007
- Madison A, Alamri L, Schwartz A, Brolinson M, DeCherney A. Conventional laparoscopy is the better option for tubal sterilization reversal: A closer look at tubal reanastomosis. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2021;2(1):375-380. doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0039
- van Seeters JAH, Chua SJ, Mol BWJ, Koks CAM. Tubal anastomosis after previous sterilization: A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(3):358-370. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx003
- Kim SH, Shin CJ, Kim JG, Moon SY, Lee JY, Chang YS. Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization: A report on 1,118 cases. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(5):865-870. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00361-0
- Sastre J, Mínguez JA, Alcázar JL, Chiva L. Microsurgical anastomosis of the fallopian tubes after tubal ligation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023;291:168-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.10.017
- Feng Y, Zhao H, Xu H, et al. Analysis of pregnancy outcome after anastomosis of oviduct and its influencing factors. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2469-2
- Boeckxstaens A, Devroey P, Collins J, Tournaye H. Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: Surgical reversal or IVF? Hum Reprod. 2007;22(10):2660-2664. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem248
- Peregrine J, McGovern PG, Brady PC, Ginsburg ES, Schlaff W. Restoring fertility in women aged 40 years and older after tubal ligation: tubal anastomosis versus in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(4):735-742. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.041
- Karayalcin R, Ozcan S, Tokmak A, Gürlek B, Yenicesu O, Timur H. Pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis: Retrospective results from a single clinical centre. J Int Med Res. 2017;45(3):1245-1252. doi: 10.1177/0300060517709815
- Barac S, Jiga LP, Rata A, Sas I, Onofrei RR, Ionac M. Role of reconstructive microsurgery in tubal infertility in young women. J Clin Med. 2020;9(5):1300. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051300