AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/AJWEP026190136
Cite this article
12
Download
112
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Low-impact development and sponge city adaptation for urban stormwater retention in Dhaka: Assessing the Hatirjheel–Gulshan–Banani lake system

Mohammad Mahabubul Haque1* Md. Sirajul Islam1 Piash Kumer Ghosh2 Tanwi Dey3
Show Less
1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE), School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
2 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary, Animal, and Biomedical Sciences, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, Bangladesh
3 Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, Bangladesh
Received: 9 May 2026 | Revised: 15 July 2026 | Accepted: 20 July 2026 | Published online: 10 August 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Urban flooding in Dhaka, Bangladesh, is intensified by rapid urbanization, loss of permeable land, and constrained drainage. This study evaluates the Hatirjheel–Gulshan–Banani lake system using low-impact development (LID), water-sensitive urban design (WSUD), and sponge city principles. Multi-year satellite mapping was retained to describe urbanization between 2010 and 2024; however, the hydrological contribution of LID was assessed through a paired single-year analysis, holding urbanization constant. The runoff assessment used the 2024 land-use condition reported for the local drainage system: 56.43% built-up land, 32.11% open and cultivated land, and 11.46% water bodies and wetlands, producing an existing composite runoff coefficient of 0.534. The LID scenario kept the same land use, catchment areas, and rainfall intensities, but assumed that 30% of existing built-up surfaces received permeable or vegetated treatment with a planning-level treated-surface coefficient of 0.25. The resulting composite coefficient was 0.475. For the five-year design event, estimated peak discharge decreased from 87.89 to 78.14 m3/s in the 19.00 km2 Hatirjheel sub-catchment and from 53.16 to 47.26 m3/s in the 8.27 km2 Gulshan–Banani sub-catchment, corresponding to an 11.1% reduction in each case. A sensitivity range for treated-surface coefficients of 0.20–0.35 yielded peak-flow reductions of 7.9–12.7%. The result is therefore presented as a planning-level scenario estimate rather than measured field performance. The study identifies permeable paving, vegetated swales, bioretention, pocket wetlands, rainwater harvesting, and restoration of lake-canal connections as locally appropriate measures. LID should complement, rather than replace, conventional drainage and regular maintenance.

Keywords
Low-impact development
Sponge city
Water-sensitive urban design
Urban flooding
Stormwater retention
Land-use change
Green–blue infrastructure
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
  1. Miller JD, Hutchins M. The impacts of urbanisation and climate change on urban flooding and urban water quality: a review of the evidence concerning the United Kingdom. J Hydrol Reg Stud. 2017;12:345-362. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.06.006
  2. Fletcher TD, Andrieu H, Hamel P. Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: a state of the art. Adv Water Resour. 2013;51:261-279. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.001
  3. Prince George’s County, Maryland, Department of Environmental Resources. Low-Impact Development Design Strategies: An Integrated Design Approach. Prince George’s County, MD: Prince George’s County Department of Environmental Resources; 1999. Accessed July 30, 2026. https://www.princegeorgescountymd.gov/sites/default/files/media-document/dcv86_low-impact-development-design-strategies-pdf.pdf
  4. Dietz ME. Low impact development practices: a review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2007;186(1-4):351-363. doi: 10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z
  5. Chan FKS, Griffiths JA, Higgitt D, Xu S, Zhu F, Tang YT, et al. “Sponge City” in China: a breakthrough of planning and flood risk management in the urban context. Land Use Policy. 2018;76:772-778. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.005
  6. Dierkes C, Lucke T, Helmreich B. General technical approvals for decentralised sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS): the current situation in Germany. Sustainability. 2015;7(3):3031-3051. doi: 10.3390/su7033031
  7. Wong THF. An overview of water sensitive urban design practices in Australia. Water Pract Technol. 2006;1(1). doi: 10.2166/wpt.2006.018
  8. Lim HS, Lu XX. Sustainable urban stormwater management in the tropics: an evaluation of Singapore’s ABC Waters Program. J Hydrol. 2016;538:842-862. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.063
  9. Ahammed F, Hewa GA, Argue JR. Introducing leaky-well concept for stormwater quantity control in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Appl Water Sci. 2013;3:115-123. doi: 10.1007/s13201-012-0065-y
  10. Sakib MS, Alam S, Shampa, Murshed SB, Kirtunia R, Mondal MS, Chowdhury AIA. Impact of urbanization on pluvial flooding: insights from a fast growing megacity, Dhaka. Water. 2023;15(21):3834. doi: 10.3390/w15213834
  11. Dewan AM, Islam MM, Kumamoto T, Nishigaki M. Evaluating flood hazard for land-use planning in Greater Dhaka of Bangladesh using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Water Resour Manag. 2007;21(9):1601-1612. doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-9116-1
  12. Khan SK, Sharif MN, Jahan K, Billah MM, Mostafiz MY. Performance evaluation of the Hatirjheel project of Bangladesh and current storm water management practice. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Innovation in Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development (IICSD 2015). Dhaka, Bangladesh; 2015. Accessed July 30, 2026. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328571581_Performance_Evaluation_of_the_Hatirjheel_Project_of_Bangladesh_Current_Storm_Water_Management_Practice
  13. Nabila FN, Mia MB, Gazi MY, Uddin MM, Al Montakim MN, Alam MM. Assessment of water quality and quantity in the lakes of Dhaka Metropolitan City: remote sensing, field and laboratory analyses. Dhaka Univ J Earth Environ Sci. 2022;11(1):27-42. doi: 10.3329/dujees.v11i1.63709
  14. Akter R, Zakir H, Noor S, Khan MSA, Salehin M. Urban flooding risk mitigation through detention-based storm water management: a case study of Hatirjheel. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Innovation in Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development (IICSD 2015). Dhaka, Bangladesh; 2015. Accessed July 30, 2026. https://www.bracu.ac.bd/urban-flooding-risk-mitigation-through-detention-based-storm-water-management-case-study-hatirjheel
  15. United States Geological Survey. EarthExplorer: Landsat Data Access Portal. Accessed July 30, 2026. https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/
  16. European Commission. Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem: Sentinel Data Access Portal. Accessed July 30, 2026. https://dataspace.copernicus.eu/
  17. Akram W, Niyommaneerat W, Phetrak A, Kittipongvises S. A review on water security in Dhaka City, Bangladesh: calling for ensuring sustainability. Appl Environ Res. 2024;46(2):024. doi: 10.35762/AER.2024024
  18. Congalton RG, Green K. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2019. doi: 10.1201/9780429052729
  19. Afrin S, Islam MM, Rahman MM. Adequacy assessment of an urban drainage system considering future land use and climate change scenario. J Water Clim Change. 2021;12(5):1944-1957. doi: 10.2166/wcc.2020.369
  20. Atauzzaman M, Ali MA. Effects of combined sewer overflow on water quality: a case study of Hatirjheel Lake in Dhaka. SN Appl Sci. 2022;4:303. doi: 10.1007/s42452-022-05187-6
  21. Moniruzzaman M, Thakur PK, Kumar P, et al. Decadal urban land use/land cover changes and its impact on surface runoff potential for Dhaka City and surroundings using remote sensing. Remote Sens. 2021;13(1):83. doi: 10.3390/rs13010083
  22. Subah Z, Bala SK, Ryu JH. Assessing urban flooding extent of the Baunia Khal watershed in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Water. 2023;15(6):1183. doi: 10.3390/w15061183
  23. Rahman MN, Azim SA. Spatiotemporal evaluation of rainfall trend during 1979-2019 in seven climatic zones of Bangladesh. Geol Ecol Landsc. 2023;7(4):340-355. doi: 10.1080/24749508.2021.2022425
  24. Yin D, Chen Y, Jia H, Wang Q, Chen Z, Xu C, et al. Sponge city practice in China: a review of construction, assessment, operation and maintenance. J Clean Prod. 2021;280:124963. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124963
  25. Islam M, Van Camp M, Hossain D, Sarker MMR, Khatun S, Walraevens K. Impacts of large-scale groundwater exploitation based on long-term evolution of hydraulic heads in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Water. 2021;13(10):1357. doi: 10.3390/w13101357
  26. Moshfika M, Biswas S, Mondal MS. Assessing groundwater level declination in Dhaka City and identifying adaptation options for sustainable water supply. Sustainability. 2022;14(3):1518. doi: 10.3390/su14031518
  27. Mahzabin A, Hossain MJ, Alam S, Shifat SE, Yunus A. Groundwater level depletion assessment of Dhaka City using MODFLOW. Am J Water Resour. 2023;11(1):28-40. doi: 10.12691/ajwr-11-1-4
  28. Arfanuzzaman M, Rahman AA. Sustainable water demand management in the face of rapid urbanization and groundwater depletion for social-ecological resilience building. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2017;10:9-22. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2017.01.005
Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing