AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/AJWEP026070037
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Non-destructive integrity assessment of roller-compacted concrete dams using multi-channel analysis of surface waves: A case study of the Se San 4 Hydropower Dam, Vietnam

Nguyen N. K. Ngan1,2* Nguyen T. Vu3
Show Less
1 Department of Geophysics, Faculty of Physics and Engineering Physics, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
2 Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
3 Department of Geological Physics, Institute of Earth Science, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
Received: 13 February 2026 | Revised: 16 March 2026 | Accepted: 20 March 2026 | Published online: 26 May 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

The structural integrity of hydropower dams is paramount for sustainable energy production and downstream safety. Traditional inspection methods, such as core drilling, are destructive, localized, and often fail to capture the spatial heterogeneity within the concrete. This study evaluates the efficacy of the multi-channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) method—a non-destructive seismic technique—for assessing the stiffness and identifying potential defects within the Se San 4 Hydropower Dam in Gia Lai, Vietnam. We conducted MASW surveys along two strategic profiles: the dam crest surface and the internal inspection tunnel. By inverting Rayleigh wave dispersion curves, we derived two-dimensional shear wave velocity (Vs) profiles and subsequently calculated shear modulus (G) distributions to map the stiffness of conventional vibrated concrete (CVC) and roller-compacted concrete (RCC) layers. The results reveal a distinct stratification in the dam body. The surface survey identified a top layer of CVC/asphalt with Vs ranging from 1,500 to 2,500 m/s, overlying a stiffer RCC layer exhibiting Vs values between 2,500 and 4,000 m/s. Conversely, the tunnel survey recorded significantly higher velocities in the RCC core (4,000–5,500 m/s), reflecting better confinement and material quality at depth. Crucially, the study detected specific low-velocity anomalies (Vs < 2,000 m/s) and reduced stiffness zones at depths of 17–30 m along the survey lines. These anomalies may indicate areas of potential water seepage, variable concrete density, or natural construction lift joints inherent to the RCC layering process. This research demonstrates that MASW is a rapid and cost-effective tool for the periodic structural integrity monitoring of large-scale hydraulic structures, providing critical baseline data for maintenance and risk mitigation in tropical operating environments.

Keywords
Dam safety
Multi-channel analysis of surface waves
Non-destructive testing
Roller-compacted concrete
Shear wave velocity
Funding
This research was funded by Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM) under a project (grant number CB2025-18-11) within the framework of the program titled “Strengthening the capacity for education and basic scientific research integrated with strategic technologies at VNU-HCM, aiming to achieve advanced standards comparable to regional and global levels during the 2025–2030 period, with a vision toward 2045.”
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Wardany AR, Ballivy G, Rivard P. Condition assessment of concrete in hydraulic structures by surface wave non-destructive testing. Mater Struct. 2009;42(2):251-261. doi: 10.1617/s11527-008-9382-x
  2. Valamanesh V, Estekanchi HE, Vafai A, Ghaemian M. Application of the endurance time method in seismic analysis of concrete gravity dams. Sci Iran. 2011;18(3):326- 337. doi: 10.1016/j.scient.2011.05.039
  3. Wang G, Wang Y, Lu W, Zhou C, Chen M, Yan P. XFEM based seismic potential failure mode analysis of concrete gravity dam-water-foundation systems through incremental dynamic analysis. Eng Struct. 2015;98:81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.023
  4. Pirooznia A, Moradloo AJ. Seismic fracture analysis of concrete arch dams incorporating the loading rate dependent size effect of concrete. Struct Eng Mech. 2021;79(2):169-198. doi: 10.12989/sem.2021.79.2.169
  5. Ouzandja D, Berrabah AT. Deterministic Seismic Damage Analysis for Concrete Gravity Dams: A Case Study of Oued Fodda Dam. Acta Mech Et Autom. 2023;17(3):347-356. doi: 10.2478/ama-2023-0039
  6. Mridha S, Maity D. Experimental investigation on nonlinear dynamic response of concrete gravity dam-reservoir system. Eng Struct. 2014;80:289-297. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.017
  7. Wang G, Lu W, Zhang S. Comparative analysis of nonlinear seismic response of concrete gravity dams using XFEM and CDP model. In: Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China. Springer Singapore; 2020:11-51. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-6194-8_2
  8. Haghani M, Neya BN, Ahmadi MT, Amiri JV. A new numerical approach in the seismic failure analysis of concrete gravity dams using extended finite element method. Eng Fail Anal. 2022;132:105835. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105835
  9. Uhlemann S, Hagedorn S, Dashwood B, et al. Landslide characterization using P- and S-wave seismic refraction tomography—The importance of elastic moduli. J Appl Geophys. 2016;134:64–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.08.014
  10. Ahmed JRA, Zainab MS, Auday YAM. Application of Multi- Channel Analysis Surface Waves and Electrical Resistivity Tomography Methods to Identify Weak Zones at University of Mosul, Northern Iraq. Iraqi Geol J. 2022;55:47-69. doi: 10.46717/igj.55.1D.4Ms-2022-04-20
  11. Oluseun S, Ahmed I. Geophysical and Geochemical Pilot Study to Characterize the Dam Foundation Rock and Source of Seepage in Part of Pensacola Dam in Oklahoma. Water. 2023;15(23):4036. doi: 10.3390/w15234036
  12. Chung AD, Minh DV. Application of the Advanced 2D Multi-electrode Electrical Exploration Method in Surveying Dyke’s Current Condition and Its Contribution to Assessing the Stability of Dyke. Nat Sci Technol. 2019;35(1):104-118. doi: 10.25073/2588-1140/vnunst.4855
  13. Camarero PL, Moreira CA, Pereira HG. Analysis of the Physical Integrity of Earth Dams from Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) in Brazil. Pure Appl Geophys. 2019;176(12):5363-5375. doi: 10.1007/s00024-019-02271-8
  14. Trong DC, Bach XM, Tuan AT, Hai TD, Trieu DC. Identification of triggered seismic sources in Song Tranh 2 reservoir based on the geological - geophysical data. Earth Sci Environ. 2022;64(8):11-16. doi: 10.31276/VJST.64(8).11-16
  15. Al-Heety AJR, Hassouneh M, Abdullah FM. Application of MASW and ERT methods for geotechnical site characterization: A case study for roads construction and infrastructure assessment in Abu Dhabi, UAE. J Appl Geophys. 2021;193:104408. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104408
  16. Park CB, Miller RD, Xia J. Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics. 1999;64(3):800-808. doi: 10.1190/1.1444590
  17. Adnan Z, Mohd JMS. Determination of shear wave velocity using multi-channel analysis of surface wave method and shear modulus estimation of peat soil at Western Johore. Procedia Eng. 2015;125:345-350. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.073
  18. Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG. Mapping of average shear wave velocity for Bangalore region: a case study. J Environ Eng Geophys. 2008;13(2):69-84. doi: 10.2113/JEEG13.2.69
  19. Lin CP, Chang CC, Chang TS. The use of MASW method in the assessment of soil liquefaction potential. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2004;24(9-10):689-698. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.06.012
  20. Parker EH, Hawman R. Multi-Channel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) in Karst Terrain, Southwest Georgia: Implications for Detecting Anomalous Features and Fracture Zones. J Environ Eng Geophys. 2012;17(3):129-150. doi: 10.2113/JEEG17.3.129
  21. Obasaju DO, Moroof O, Sunday O, Victor O, Christopher B. Subgrade soil evaluation using integrated seismic refraction tomography and geotechnical studies: A case of Ajaokuta- Anyigba Federal highway, North-Central Nigeria. NRIAG J Astron Geophys. 2022;11(1):293-305. doi: 10.1080/20909977.2022.2094530
  22. Koya S. An application of multi-channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) to hydrological study: A case history. ASEG Ext Abstr. 2012;2012(1):1-4. doi: 10.1071/ASEG2012ab044
  23. Busato L, Boaga J, Peruzzo L, et al. Combined geophysical surveys for the characterization of a reconstructed river embankment. Eng Geol. 2016;211:74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.06.023
  24. Salman R, Timothy M, Clinton W, et al. Mapping Subsurface Conditions and Detecting Seepage Channels for an Embankment Dam Using Geophysical Methods: A Case Study of the Kinion Lake Dam. J Environ Eng Geophys. 2019;24(3):373-386. doi: 10.2113/JEEG24.3.373
  25. Maniscalco SJ, Ebel JE. Geophysical imaging of the subsurface seismic structure of the Chestnut Hill Reservoir earth embankment dam (Massachusetts). Near Surf Geophys. 2025;23(2):105-120. doi: 10.1002/nsg.12330
  26. Wang G, Huang R, Kamai T, Zhang F. The internal structure of a rockslide dam induced by the 2008 Wenchuan (Mw7.9) earthquake, China. Eng Geol. 2013;156:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.01.004
  27. Cardarelli E, Cercato M, De Donno G. Characterization of an earth-filled dam through the combined use of electrical resistivity tomography, P and SH-wave seismic tomography and surface wave data. J Appl Geophys. 2014;106:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.04.007
  28. Netto LG, Gandolfo OCB, Malagutti Filho W, Dourado JC. Non-destructive investigation on small earth dams using geophysical methods: Seismic surface wave multichannel analysis (MASW) and S-wave refraction seismic methods. Braz J Geophys. 2020;38(1):5-19. doi: 10.22564/rbgf.v38i1.2031
  29. Liu P, Wang K, Wang Q, Huang S. Data acquisition method and the effectiveness of multichannel analysis of surface waves for defect detections on small earthen dams. Arab J Geosci. 2021;14(7). doi: 10.1007/s12517-021-07005-6
  30. Prosdocimi GAS, Guedes VJCB, Gomes GW, Viegas MAF, Cruz ILSC. Use of MASW for an earth dam characterization and shear modulus estimation in belo horizonte – MG, Brazil. Braz J Geophys. 2021;39(2):237. doi: 10.22564/rbgf.v39i2.2103
  31. Yordkayhun S, Wattanasen K. Characterization of the earth dam embankment using shallow seismic data: A case study at Klong Sadao dam, Southern Thailand. J Eng Sci Technol. 2021;16(1):107-121. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:254064970 [Last accessed on February 20, 2021].
  32. Guedes VJCB, Welitom BR, Luciano SC, Susanne TRM. Spatial autocorrelation of passive surface wave data for assessment of an earth dam in Brasilia, Brazil. Braz J Geophys. 2021;39(4):551. doi: 10.22564/rbgf.v39i4.2115
  33. Guedes VJCB, Welitom BR, Luciano SC, Susanne TRM. Characterization of an earth dam in Brazil from seismic refraction tomography and multichannel analysis of surface waves. J Appl Geophys. 2023;208:104893. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104893
  34. Capizzi P, Martorana R, Pirrera C, Ventura Bordenca G, Saggio C. Application of non-invasive seismic techniques for the characterisation of a gravity concrete dam. Explor Geophys. 2021;52(3):294-307. doi: 10.1080/08123985.2020.1823210
  35. Lu X, Wang W, Luo C, et al. A rapid detection method of towed array seismic surface wave for leakage passage of dyke-dam. J Appl Geophys. 2023;217:105189. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2023.105189
  36. Nguyen NNK, Le CVA, Vu TM, et al. Determination of Shear Wave Velocity Using Multichannel Analysis of Surface Wave in M’Drak District, Dak Lak Province, Vietnam. IEEJ Trans Elec Engng. 2025;20(11):1896-1900. doi: 10.1002/tee.70089
  37. Ngan NKN. Deriving Geotechnical Parameters for Foundation Design in Ea Trang, Vietnam, through Combined Seismic Methods. Econ Environ Geol. 2025;58(4):351-359. doi: 10.9719/EEG.2025.58.4.351
  38. Trupti S, Srinivas KNSSS, Kishore PP, Seshunarayana T. Site characterization studies along coastal Andhra Pradesh— India using multichannel analysis of surface waves. J Appl Geophys. 2012;79:82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.12.006
Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing