Comparative environmental impact assessment of traditional and eco-friendly denim trousers manufacturing: A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment

The denim sector, particularly in developing nations such as Bangladesh, is drawing increasing attention due to its significant environmental impact. Traditional denim production processes involve high water and energy consumption, synthetic chemicals, and unsustainable raw materials, all of which contribute significantly to pollution and resource depletion. While environmentally friendly substitutes are emerging, their overall environmental performance in the local setting remains underexplored. Following ISO 14040/44 standards and the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) methodology, this research intends to assess and compare the environmental impacts of traditional and eco-friendly denim manufacturing in Bangladesh through a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment. Seven key impact categories were analyzed: climate change (greenhouse gas emissions), water consumption, terrestrial acidification, eutrophication, land use, fossil resource scarcity, and human toxicity. The functional unit was defined as 1,000 pairs of denim pants. Data were collected through field surveys, interviews, utility records, and secondary databases. Compared to the traditional model, the environmentally friendly scenario demonstrated significant reductions in environmental impacts, including a 30% reduction in climate effect, 64% reduction in water usage, 50% in acidification, 40% in eutrophication, 41% in fossil resource use, and 50% in human toxicity. Although sustainable production required 10% more land, the advantages in other categories outweighed this trade-off. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to address uncertainty and validate the robustness of the results. This study offers a context-specific dataset for industry players considering investments in sustainable technology and highlights the clear environmental advantages of adopting greener production techniques. These insights can inform targeted policy changes and assist in the larger shift toward environmentally friendly textile manufacturing in developing countries.
- Luo Y, Wu X, Ding X. Carbon and water footprints assessment of cotton jeans using the method based on modularity: A full life cycle perspective. J Clean Prod. 2022;332:130042. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130042
- Moorhouse D, Moorhouse D. Sustainable design: Circular economy in fashion and textiles. Design J. 2017;20(sup1):S1948-S1959. doi: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352713
- Baydar G, Ciliz N, Mammadov A. Life cycle assessment of cotton textile products in Turkey. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2015;104:213-223. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.007
- Periyasamy AP, Wiener J, Militky J. 4 - Life-cycle assessment of denim. In: Muthu SS, editor. Sustainability in Denim. The Textile Institute Book Series. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing; 2017. p. 83-110. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00004-6
- Aslund Hedmann E. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Jeans. Lexington: University of Kentucky Libraries; 2018.
- Khan AN, Begum MS, Rakib A, Ali A, Ara ZA, Ashadujjaman MM. Lifecycle analysis (LCA) of a white cotton t-shirt and investigation of sustainability hot spots : A case study. London J Res Sci Natl Formal Volume. 2018;18(3):21-31.
- Fidan FŞ, Aydoğan EK, Uzal N. An integrated life cycle assessment approach for denim fabric production using recycled cotton fibers and combined heat and power plant. J Clean Prod. 2021;287:125439. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125439
- Periyasamy AP, Militky J. Denim processing and health hazards. In: Sustainability in Denim. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing; 2017. p. 161-196. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00007-1
- Mezarcıöz S, Mutlu T, Sarker ME. Effect of sustainable cotton fibers on denim fabric selected properties. J Natl Fibers. 2022;19(15):10345-10355. doi: 10.1080/15440478.2021.1993502
- Annapoorani SG. 1 - Introduction to denim. In: Muthu SS, editor. Sustainability in Denim. The Textile Institute Book Series. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing; 2017. p. 1-26. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00001-0
- Roy Chowdhury AK. Environmental Impacts of the Textile Industry and its Assessment through Life Cycle Assessment. Singapore: Springer; 2014. p. 1-39. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-110-7-1
- Samanta KK, Basak S, Chattopadhyay SK. 12 - Environmentally friendly denim processing using water-free technologies. In: Muthu SS, editor. Sustainability in Denim. The Textile Institute Book Series. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing; 2017. p. 319-348. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00012-5
- Hossain KR, Majumder S, Parvez M. “Green Merchandising”-a sustainable approach for apparel business: A review paper. Daffodil Int University J Sci Technol 2019;14:48-52.
- Salazar-Sogamoso LM, Gómez-García MÁ, Dobrosz- Gómez I. Comparative life cycle assessment of sequential chemical and electrochemical processes for the treatment of industrial textile wastewater. J Solid State Electrochem. 2024. doi: 10.1007/s10008-024-05976-6
- Hackett T. A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Denim Jeans and a Cotton T-Shirt: The Production of Fast Fashion Essential Items from Cradle to Gate. Thesis; 2015. Available from: https://uknowledge.uky. edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=mat-etds [Last accessed on 2024 Aug 23].
- Fonseca A, Ramalho E, Gouveia A, Henriques R, Figueiredo F, Nunes J. Systematic insights into a textile industry: Reviewing life cycle assessment and eco-design. Sustainability. 2023;15(21):15267. doi: 10.3390/su152115267
- Aguiar GJA, Almeida LR, Fernandes BS, Gavazza S, Silva GL, Machado Santos S. Use of life cycle assessment as a tool to evaluate the environmental impacts of textile effluents: A systematic review. Environ Sci Pollution Res. 2023;30(31):76455-76470. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27785-6
- Rogelj J, Lamboll RD. Substantial reductions in non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions reductions implied by IPCC estimates of the remaining carbon budget. Commun Earth Environ. 2024;5(1):35. doi: 10.1038/s43247-023-01168-8
- Petchchedchoo P, Petcharaks N, Piratrakul P, Wongmuek K. Analysis of the carbon footprint of academic gowns: A case study of Thai University. J Curr Sci Technol. 2024;14(2):46. doi: 10.59796/jcst.V14N2.2024.46
- Gade AL, Hauschild MZ, Laurent A. Globally differentiated effect factors for characterising terrestrial acidification in life cycle impact assessment. Sci Total Environ. 2021;761:143280. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143280
- Kumar A, Mishra S, Bakshi S, Upadhyay P, Thakur TK. Response of eutrophication and water quality drivers on greenhouse gas emissions in lakes of China: A critical analysis. Ecohydrology. 2023;16(1):e2483. doi: 10.1002/eco.2483
- Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S. Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(11):4098-4104. doi: 10.1021/es802423e
- Schmidt JH, Weidema BP, Brandão M. A framework for modelling indirect land use changes in life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod. 2015;99:230-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.013
- Cundubey FS, Azgin ST. Comparative life cycle assessment of denim manufacturing: Evaluating conventional VS. Recycled cotton in the context of renewable energy. J Clean Prod. 2024;434:140117. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140117
- Hertwich EG, Mateles SF, Pease WS, McKone TE. Human toxicity potentials for life‐cycle assessment and toxics release inventory risk screening. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001;20(4):928-939. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620200431
- Shamsuzzaman M, Kashem A, Muhammad Sayem AS, Khan AM, Shamsuddin S, Islam M. Quantifying environmental sustainability of denim garments washing factories through effluent analysis: A case study in Bangladesh. J Clean Prod. 2021;290:125740. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125740
- Rahaman T, Hasan K, Khan SH. Environmental impact measurement and chromatic performance evaluation of denim washing: A comparison to conventional and sustainable approaches for cleaner production. Environ Sci Pollution Res. 2025;32(10):6110-6129. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36099-8
- Khatun M. Life cycle assessment of jeans production using organic and conventional cotton. Tekstilec. 2024;67(2):139-150. doi: 10.14502/tekstilec.67.2023073
- Materialien RF. The Life Cycle of a Jean. Understanding The Environmental Impact of a Pair of Levi’s 501 Jeans; 2015. Available from: https://femnet.de/informationen/ materialien-medien/datenbank-der-materialien/ materialientextile-materialien/4145-the-life-cycle-of-a-jean-understanding-the-environmental-impact-of-apair-of-levi-s-501-jeans.html [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 15].
- FitzGerald D, Bourgault G, Vadenbo C, et al. Documentation of Changes Implemented in the Ecoinvent Database v3.10. Zürich, Switzerland: Ecoinvent Association; 2023.
- Exchange T. Materials Market Report 2024. Textile Exchange: Lamesa, TX, USA; 2024. Available from: https://textileexchange.org/knowledge-center/reports/ materials-market-report-2024/ [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 14].
- Exchange T. Organic Cotton Market Report. Textile Exchange: Lamesa, TX, USA; 2022. Available from: https://textileexchange.org/knowledge-center/reports/ organic-cotton-market-report/ [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 14].
- Imran S, Mujtaba MA, Zafar MM, et al. Assessing the potential of GHG emissions for the textile sector: A baseline study. Heliyon. 2023;9(11):e22404. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22404
- Thistlethwaite G, Karagianni E, Collins A, et al. 2022 Government Greenhouse Gas Conversion Factors for Company Reporting Methodology Paper for Conversion Factors Draft Report; 2022. Available from: https:// www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence [Last accessed on 2024 Sep 04].
- Hoekstra AY. A critique on the water-scarcity weighted water footprint in LCA. Ecol Indic. 2016;66:564-573. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.026
- Roy PO, Azevedo LB, Margni M, Van Zelm R, Deschênes L, Huijbregts MAJ. Characterization factors for terrestrial acidification at the global scale: A systematic analysis of spatial variability and uncertainty. Sci Total Environ. 2014;500-501:270-276. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.099
- Dong Y, Cheng X, Li C, Xu L. Spatially eutrophication potential and policy implication of nitrogen emission for surface water: A case study in Guangzhou city, China. J Environ Manage. 2023;342:118336. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118336
- Mattila T, Helin T, Antikainen R, Soimakallio S, Pingoud K, Wessman H. Land Use in Life Cycle Assessment. Finland: Finnish Environment Institute SYKE; 2011.
- Wang J, Azam W. Natural resource scarcity, fossil fuel energy consumption, and total greenhouse gas emissions in top emitting countries. Geosci Front. 2024;15(2):101757. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101757
- Igos E, Benetto E, Meyer R, Baustert P, Othoniel B. How to treat uncertainties in life cycle assessment studies? Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2019;24(4):794-807. doi: 10.1007/s11367-018-1477-1
- Broadbent PJ, Carr CM, Lewis DM, Rigout ML, Siewers EJ, Shojai Kaveh N. Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) dyeing of cellulose acetate: An opportunity for a “greener” circular textile economy. Coloration Technol. 2023;139(4):475-488. doi: 10.1111/cote.12690
- Nahar N, Haque S, Haque SE. Groundwater conservation, and recycling and reuse of textile wastewater in a denim industry of Bangladesh. Water Resour Ind. 2024;31:100249. doi: 10.1016/j.wri.2024.100249
- Radhakrishnan S. Denim Recycling. In: Muthu SS, editor. Textiles and Clothing Sustainability: Recycled and Upcycled Textiles and Fashion. Singapore: Springer; 2017. p. 79-125. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-2146-6-3
- Valero-Gil J, Surroca JA, Tribo JA, Gutierrez L, Montiel I. Innovation VS. standardization: The conjoint effects of eco-innovation and environmental management systems on environmental performance. Res Policy. 2023;52(4):104737. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2023.104737