AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 20 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.3233/AJW230022
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Vermicompost, Phosphorous Nano-Fertiliser and Humic Acid: Their Effect on the Activity of Inorganic Pyrophosphatase Enzyme and its  Thermodynamic Parameters

Luma Salih Jabbar Al-Taweel1* Ahmed Malik Waheed AlSaadawi1
Show Less
1 Dept. of Soil Sciences and Water Resources, College of Agriculture Al-Qadisiyah University, Al Diwaniyah Province, Iraq
AJWEP 2023, 20(2), 31–40; https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW230022
Received: 10 February 2022 | Revised: 25 January 2023 | Accepted: 25 January 2023 | Published online: 25 January 2023
© 2023 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the autumn season of 2020 in one of the fields of Afak  district - Al-Diwaniyah governorate / Iraq to investigate the effect of vermicompost, phosphorous nano-fertiliser  and humic acid on the activity of inorganic pyrophosphatase enzyme and its thermodynamic parameters at the  flowering and full maturity stages of maize. Randomized Complete Blocks Design was used at three replications.  The experimental treatments were 14 treatments, including the control treatment and these treatments consisted of  Vermicompost, Humic acid and Phosphorus and Nano-Fertiliser. The results showed that the V treatment had the  highest means of inorganic pyrophosphatase enzyme activity (152.5 and 186.9 µg PO4 -3-P g-1 soil 5h-1) and the  lowest means of Ea (10.34 and 4.72 Kj mole-1) and Q10 (1.162-1.123 and 1.071-1.054) at the flowering and full  maturity stages, respectively. The nP2 treatment achieved the highest means of inorganic pyrophosphatase enzyme  activity (71.6 and 55.9 µg PO4 -3- P g-1 soil 5h-1) at the flowering and full maturity stages, respectively, and the  lowest means of Ea (3.54 Kj mole-1) and Q10 (1.053-1.041) at the full maturity stage only. Further, the H1 treatment  gave the highest means of inorganic pyrophosphatase enzyme activity (64.5 and 75.9 µg P-nitrophenol g-1 soil  1h-1) and the lowest means of Ea (8.31 and 3.17 Kj mole-1) and Q10 (1.128-1.097 and 1.043-1.033) at flowering  and full maturity stages, respectively. Also, the VnP1 and VH1 treatments gave the highest means of inorganic  pyrophosphatase enzyme activity (159.0 and 222.3 µg PO4 -3-P g-1 soil 5h-1) for both treatments at flowering and  maturity stages, respectively, while the H1nP1 and Vnp1 treatments gave the lowest means of Ea (3.72 and 1.59 Kj  mole-1) and Q10 (1.056-1.043 and 1.023-1.018) for both treatments at flowering and maturity stages, respectively

Keywords
Inorganic pyrophosphatase
thermodynamic
enzyme activity.
References

Ahmad, F. and W.L. Kelso ( 2001). Pyrophosphate as  a source of phosphorus: Hydrolysis under different  conditions. Journal of Research (Science), (12): 2130- 2139.

Al-Khafaage, N.F., AL-Obaidi, A.A. and S.A.A. L-Shadeedi  (2012). Effect of earthworms coelomic fluid treating  on seed germination of cress (Lepidium sativum) and  radish (Raphanus saltivus). Asian JOF Plant Science and  Research, 2(4): 337-383.

Al-Taweel, L.S. and Z.J. Al-Budairy (2021). Influence of  vermicompost, seaweed extract and nitrogen fertilisers  on maize (Zea mays L.) soil rhizosphere microbes. Asian  Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 18(3): 379-385.

Dick, W.A. and M.A. Tabatabai (1978). Inorganic  pyrophosphatase activity of soils. Soil Biol. Biochem.,  10: 59-65.

Kothari, R. and K.A. Wani (2019). Environmentally friendly  slow release nano- chemicals in agriculture: A synoptic  review. In: Smart Farming Technologies for Sustainable  Agricultural Development (pp. 220-240). IGI Global.

Jain, S., Li, J., Chen, J., Wang, G., Mayes, M.A., Dzantor,  K.E., Hui, D. and Y. Luo (2016). Soil extracellular enzyme  activities, soil carbon and nitrogen storage under nitrogen  fertilization: A meta-analysis, Soil Biol. Biochem., 101: 32-43.

Pouneva, I. (2005). Effects of humic substances on the growth  of microalgal cultures. Russian J. of Plant Physiology, 52(3): 410-413.

Shulka, G. and A. Varma (2011). Soil Biology. In: Soil  Enzymology (Vol. 22). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Tabatabai, M.A. (1994). Soil enzyme. In: Weaver, R.W.,  Angle, S., Bottomyley, P., Bezdicek, D., Smith, S.,  Tabatabai, M.A. and A. Wollum (eds). Methods of  soil analysis: Part 2. Microbiological and Biochemical  Properties. Soil Science Society of America Inc., Wiley:  USA.

Tabatabai, M.A. and W.A. Dick (1979). Distribution and  stability of pyrophosphate in soils. Soil Biology and  Biochemistry, 11: 655-659.

Shah, Z.H., Rehman, H.M., Akhtar, T., Assamadany, H.,  Hamooh, B.T., Mujtaba, T., Daur, I., Al Zahrani, Y., Al  Zahrani, H.A.S., Ali, S.,Yang, S.H. and G. Chung (2018).  Humic substances: Determining potential molecular  regulatory processes in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science,  263(9): 1-12 .

Sherene, T. (2017). Role of soil enzymes in nutrient  transformation. Bio Bulletin, 3(1): 109-131.

Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing