AccScience Publishing / SCMR / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/SCMR026050003
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

The impact of training and traceability on operational performance in Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited: The mediating role of agility

Peiyun Yu1,2*
Show Less
1 School of Management, Guangzhou College of Commerce, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
2 Faculty of Economics and Management, National University of Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
3 Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited, Island District, Hong Kong SAR, China
Received: 26 January 2026 | Revised: 11 May 2026 | Accepted: 12 May 2026 | Published online: 26 May 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited (Hactl) handles over 40% of cargo at Hong Kong International Airport. However, its fixed infrastructure leaves little room for physical expansion. Better operational performance (OP) should come from how the terminal deploys its existing resources. Grounded in the dynamic capability theory (DCT) and the resource-based view (RBV), this study examines the roles of training, traceability, and OP, as well as the mediating role of organizational agility in these relationships. This study used partial least squares structural equation modeling on survey data gathered from 70 Hactl professionals. The findings reveal that training improves OP both directly and indirectly through agility, whereas traceability affects OP only via agility. These findings contribute to the RBV and DCT literature by showing that technological resources require full mediation through dynamic capabilities to translate into OP. In practice, managers should treat traceability not as a standalone performance driver but as an input to agility. Meanwhile, training programs should sustain both routine efficiency and adaptive capacity.

Keywords
Air-cargo logistics platforms
Operational performance
Traceability
Agility
Dynamic capability theory
Resource-based view
Partial least squares structural equation modelling
Funding
This study was supported by two research grants awarded to Chunhui Li: the Research Project of Guangdong Provincial Department of Education (grant number 2025WQNCX089), titled “Research on Sustainable Development Evaluation of ESG-based Listed Shipping Enterprises under the ‘Dual Carbon’ Goal,” and the Research Project of China Society of Logistics and China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing (grant number 2025CSLKT3-440), titled “Research on Low-carbon Path Optimization and Synergy Mechanism of Regional Multimodal Transport Network.”
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Hactl praises HKIA for holding top airport slot. 2025. Available from: https://www.hactl.com/en/media/news-press/press-release/hactl-praises-hkia-for-holding-top-airport-slot/ [Last accessed on May 9, 2026].
  2. Hong SJ, Kim W, Hiatt B. Examining airport agility at air cargo hub airports. J Air Transp Manag. 2025;122:102710. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102710
  3. Pattnaik S, Pattnaik S. Relationships Between Green Supply Chain Drivers, Triple Bottom Line Sustainability and Operational Performance: An Empirical Investigation in The UK Manufacturing Supply Chain. Oper Supply Chain Manag. 2019;12(4):198-211. doi: 10.31387/oscm0390243
  4. Jahangir S, Xie R, Iqbal A, Hussain M. The influence of sustainable human resource management practices on logistics agility: The mediating role of artificial intelligence. Sustainability. 2025;17(7):3099. doi: 10.3390/su17073099
  5. Yiu CY, Ng KKH, Yu SCM, Yu CW. Sustaining aviation workforce after the pandemic: Evidence from Hong Kong aviation students toward skills, specialised training, and career prospects through a mixed-method approach. Transp Policy. 2022;128:179-192. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.020
  6. Chakraborty A, Rani MV. A robust hybrid multicriteria decision-making approach to barriers of AI adoption in air cargo: Addressing interdependencies, prioritizing challenges, and proposing strategic solutions. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 2026;73:2456-2469. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2026.3671804
  7. Ivanov D, Sethi S, Dolgui A, Sokolov B. A survey on control theory applications to operational systems, supply chain management, and Industry 4.0. Annu Rev Control. 2018;46:134-147. doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.10.014
  8. Khan SAR, Yu Z. Assessing the eco-environmental performance: an PLS-SEM approach with practice-based view. Int J Logist Res Appl. 2021;24(3):303-321. doi: 10.1080/13675567.2020.1754773
  9. Grzybowska K, Awasthi A, Sawhney R, eds. Sustainable Logistics and Production in Industry 4.0: New Opportunities and Challenges. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33369-0
  10. Adenigbo AJ, Mageto J, Luke R, Sijuwade O. Effect of Employee Training in the Air Cargo Logistics Industry in Nigeria. Lect Notes Netw Syst. 2024:145-156. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-68628-3_14
  11. Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ, Blome C, Papadopoulos T. Big Data and Predictive Analytics and Manufacturing Performance: Integrating Institutional Theory, Resource- Based View and Big Data Culture. Brit J Manag. 2019;30(2):341-361. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12355
  12. Naghshineh B, Carvalho H. The implications of additive manufacturing technology adoption for supply chain resilience: A systematic search and review. Int J Prod Econ. 2022;247:108387. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108387
  13. Lau CW, Liu J, Ma X, Talluri S. Performance analysis of a blockchain-based messaging system implementation for air cargo supply chains. Int J Prod Res. 2025;63(14):5428-5451. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2024.2407903
  14. Helfat CE, Kaul A, Ketchen Jr. DJ, Barney JB, Chatain O, Singh H. Renewing the resource-based view: New contexts, new concepts, and new methods. Strateg Manag J. 2023;44(6):1357-1390. doi: 10.1002/smj.3500
  15. Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J. 1984;5(2):171-180. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207
  16. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J. 1997;18(7):509-533. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  17. Aslam H, Khan AQ, Rashid K, Rehman S ur. Achieving supply chain resilience: The role of supply chain ambidexterity and supply chain agility. J Manuf Technol Manag. 2020;31(6):1185-1204. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-07-2019-0263
  18. Baah C, Agyeman DO, Acquah ISK, et al. Effect of information sharing in supply chains: understanding the roles of supply chain visibility, agility, collaboration on supply chain performance. Benchmarking Int J. 2021;29(2):434-455. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-08-2020-0453
  19. Akhtar P, Ghouri AM, Saha M, Khan MR, Shamim S, Nallaluthan K. Industrial Digitization, the Use of Real- Time Information, and Operational Agility: Digital and Information Perspectives for Supply Chain Resilience. IEEE T Eng Manag. 2024;71:10387-10397. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2022.3182479
  20. Pham NT, Phan QPT, Tuckova Z, Vo N, Nguyen LHL. Enhancing the organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: the roles of green training and organizational culture. Manag Mark. 2018;13(4):1174-1189. doi: 10.2478/mmcks-2018-0030
  21. Xie X, Zhu Q. Exploring an innovative pivot: How green training can spur corporate sustainability performance. Bus Strateg Environ. 2020;29(6):2432-2449. doi: 10.1002/bse.2512
  22. Ozkan OS, Kuru SA, Uzum B, Ulu O. Enhancing prosocial behavior in the aviation industry through responsible leadership and importance of ethics and social responsibility: examining a moderated mediation model. Lead Org Dev J. 2024;45(2):208-230. doi: 10.1108/LODJ-10-2022-0481
  23. Riaz A, Rehman HM, Sohail A, Rehman M. Industry 4.0 supply chain nexus: sequential mediating effects of traceability, visibility and resilience on performance. Asia Pac J Market Logist. 2025;37(4):842-860. doi: 10.1108/APJML-02-2024-0202
  24. Ma JY, Shi L, Kang TW. The Effect of Digital Transformation on the Pharmaceutical Sustainable Supply Chain Performance: The Mediating Role of Information Sharing and Traceability Using Structural Equation Modeling. Sustainability. 2023;15(1):649. doi: 10.3390/su15010649
  25. Zhou X, Lu H, Kumar Mangla S. The impact of digital traceability on sustainability performance: Investigating the roles of sustainability-oriented innovation and supply chain learning. Supply Chain Manag Int J. 2024;29(3):497-522. doi: 10.1108/SCM-01-2023-0047
  26. Egwuonwu A, Mordi C, Egwuonwu A, Uadiale O. The influence of blockchains and internet of things on global value chain. Strateg Change. 2022;31(1):45-55. doi: 10.1002/jsc.2484
  27. Agyabeng-Mensah Y, Afum E, Acquah ISK, Dacosta E, Baah C, Ahenkorah E. The role of green logistics management practices, supply chain traceability and logistics ecocentricity in sustainability performance. Int J Logist Manag. 2021;32(2):538-566. doi: 10.1108/IJLM-05-2020-0187
  28. Khan M, Alshahrani AN, Jacquemod J. Digital Platforms and Supply Chain Traceability for Robust Information and Effective Inventory Management: The Mediating Role of Transparency. Logistics. 2023;7(2):25. doi: 10.3390/logistics7020025
  29. Reaidy P, Alaeddini M, Gunasekaran A, Lavastre O, Shahzad M. Unveiling the impact of Industry 4.0 on supply chain performance: the mediating role of integration and visibility. Prod Plan Control. 2026;37(1):45-66. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2024.2440454
  30. Ramos E, Patrucco AS, Chavez M. Dynamic capabilities in the “new normal”: a study of organizational flexibility, integration and agility in the Peruvian coffee supply chain. Supply Chain Manag Int J. 2023;28(1):55-73. doi: 10.1108/SCM-12-2020-0620
  31. Teece DJ. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J. 2007;28(13):1319-1350. doi: 10.1002/smj.640
  32. Hautala-Kankaanpää T. The impact of digitalization on firm performance: examining the role of digital culture and the effect of supply chain capability. Bus Process Manag J. 2022;28(8):90-109. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-03-2022-0122
  33. Inman RA, Green KW. Lean and green combine to impact environmental and operational performance. Int J Prod Res. 2018;56(14):4802-4818. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1447705
  34. Lange A. Does cargo matter? The impact of air cargo operations on departure on-time performance for combination carriers. Transp Res Pt A Policy Pract. 2019;119:214-223. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.005
  35. Xu Y, Li JP, Chu CC, Dinca G. Impact of COVID-19 on transportation and logistics: a case of China. Ekon Istraz. 2022;35(1):2386-2404. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2021.1947339
  36. Dey PK, Chowdhury S, Abadie A, Vann Yaroson E, Sarkar S. Artificial intelligence-driven supply chain resilience in Vietnamese manufacturing small- and medium-sized enterprises. Int J Prod Res. 2024;62(15):5417-5456. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2179859
  37. Bargouthi MI. An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Supply Chain Agility on Supply Chain Risk Management and Firm Performance. Ph.D Dissertation. Al-Quds University. 2023. Available from: https://www.proquest. com/dissertations/docview/2842672339/abstract/ D738073F68E344A4PQ/2 [Last accessed on January 22, 2024].
  38. Lopes de Sousa Jabbour AB, Chiappetta Jabbour CJ, Choi TM, Latan H. ‘Better together’: Evidence on the joint adoption of circular economy and industry 4.0 technologies. Int J Prod Econ. 2022;252. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108581
  39. Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Foropon CRH. Improving information alignment and coordination in humanitarian supply chain through blockchain technology. J Enterp Inf Manag. 2024;37(3):805-827. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-07-2022-0251
  40. Al-Khatib AW. Internet of things, big data analytics and operational performance: the mediating effect of supply chain visibility. J Manuf Technol Mana. 2023;34(1):1-24. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-08-2022-0310
  41. Cammarano A, Aquilone G, Varriale V, Michelino F, Caputo M. The potential of open innovation platforms: driving sustainable development goals through digital collaboration. Innovation. 2026;28(1):37-60. doi: 10.1080/14479338.2024.2421015
  42. Kamble S, Rana NP, Gupta S, Belhadi A, Sharma R, Kulkarni P. An effectuation and causation perspective on the role of design thinking practices and digital capabilities in platform-based ventures. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2023;193. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122646
  43. Hair J, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd Edition. SAGE; 2017.
  44. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  45. Lindell MK, Whitney DJ. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(1):114-121. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
  46. Hair JF, ed. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equations Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE; 2014.
  47. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39-50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
  48. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In: New Challenges to International Marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2009.
  49. Stone M. Cross-Validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1974;36(2):111-133. doi: 0.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x
  50. Geisser S. The predictive sample reuse method with applications. J Am Stat Assoc. 1975;70(350):320-328. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1975.10479865
Share
Back to top
Supply Chain Management Research, Published by AccScience Publishing