Nanchizi New Courtyard Housing in Beijing: Residents’ Perceptions and Experiences of the Redevelopment

© Invalid date by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )

Download PDF

Cite

XML

Abstract

Cultural sustainability is the theoretical framework for this study, which investigates Nanchizi (“South Pond”) new courtyard housing experimental project constructed in Beijing, China, in 2003. It is located in a traditional courtyard house neighborhood right to the east of the Forbidden City, in a culturally and politically sensitive area that the initial scheme had even caught the attention of UNESCO. The redevelopment project has restored numerous single-storey traditional courtyard houses that were in relatively good condition, demolished those in poor condition, and rebuilt two-storey new courtyard housing units with modern facilities and shared courtyards whose style and features resemble some aspects of Beijing siheyuan. This 2007-2008 onsite survey and semi-structured interviews with residents, project architect, and lead developer critically examine this approach to historic preservation in China. The findings reveal that communal courtyards promote social interaction and private courtyards facilitate cultural activities, despite some issues raised by the residents, including irrational unit design and poor construction quality, among others. The study attempts to offer valuable lessons and proposes a new courtyard garden house design template for discussion and future practice.

Keywords

Courtyard house

Courtyard housing

Cultural sustainability

Architectural culture

China

References

[1]

Dictionary.com. Sustain. viewed January 6, 2021 from: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/sustain

[2]

Onions CT. (Ed.). The shorter Oxford English dictionary. 1964, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

[3]

World Commission on Environment and Development. Our common future. 1987, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. ISBN: 019282080X

[4]

UNCED. Rio declaration. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, 1992, June 3-14, Rio de Janeiro.

[5]

EurActiv. Sustainable development: introduction. 2004, viewed January 6, 2021 from: https://www.euractiv.com/section/sustainable-dev/linksdossier/sustainable-development-introduction-archived

[6]

International Institute for Sustainable Development. Sustainable development. 2016, viewed 6 January 2021, https://www.iisd.org/about-iisd/sustainable-development

[7]

Kates R., Parris T. and Leiserowitz A. What is sustainable development?: goals, indicators, values, and practice [J]. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 2005, 47(3): 8-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444

[8]

Bell S., Morse S. Measuring sustainability: learning by doing. 2003, Earthscan Publications, London. ISBN: 9781853838439

[9]

OECD. Sustainable development: critical issues. 2001, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.

[10]

United Nations General Assembly. 2005 World Summit Outcome, Resolution A/60/1. Adopted by the General Assembly, 15 September 2005.

[11]

United Cities and Local Governments. Agenda 21 for Culture: working group on culture - activities (circular 1), 2006.

[12]

United Cities and Local Governments. Agenda 21 for Culture: working group on culture (circular 2), 2006.

[13]

United Cities and Local Governments. Key ideas on the Agenda 21 for Culture, 2006.

[14]

United Cities and Local Governments. Advice on local implementation of the Agenda 21 for Culture, 2006.

[15]

United Cities and Local Governments. Agenda 21 for Culture: institutional innovation in local policies for cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue, 2009.

[16]

United Cities and Local Governments. Culture: fourth pillar of sustainable development. United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) Policy Statement, 17 November 2010.

[17]

Hawkes J. The fourth pillar of sustainability: culture’s essential role in public planning. 2001, Common Ground, Australia.

[18]

Darlow A. Cultural policy and urban sustainability: making a missing link? [J]. Planning Practice and Research, 1996, 11(3): 291-301. ISSN: 13600583

[19]

Wheelwright P. The problem of sustainability: a response (Response to molecules, money, and design by Mark Jarzombek). Thresholds, 20, MIT Journal of Architecture, Fall 2000.

[20]

Brand D. Four pillars in practice at the city of Port Phillip. In Cultural Development Network, The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability: Culture, Engagement and Sustainable Communities (pp. 76-81). 2004, Report from the Fourth Pillar Conference, Melbourne.

[21]

Nurse K. Culture as the fourth pillar of sustainable development. Paper prepared for Commonwealth Secretariat, Malborough House, Pall Mall, London, UK, 2006, viewed 6 January 2021, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?rep=rep1&type=pdf&doi=10.1.1.183.5662

[22]

Creative City Network of Canada. Nurturing culture and creativity to build community. 2005, Special Edition, 2.

[23]

Zhang D. Courtyard housing and cultural sustainability: theory, practice, and product. 2013/2016, Ashgate/Routledge, Oxfordshire. ISBN: 9781409405030

[24]

Liu X. The origins of Chinese architecture. In X Fu, D Guo, X Liu, et al. (Trans. and Ed. by NS Steinhardt), Chinese architecture. 2002, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 11-31. ISBN: 9780300095593

[25]

Knapp RG. Chinese houses: the architectural heritage of a nation. 2005, Tuttle Publishing, North Clarendon, VT. ISBN: 9780804835374

[26]

Ma B. The architecture of the quadrangle in Beijing. 1999, Tianjin University Press, China. ISBN: 9787561811979

[27]

Zhang D. Classical courtyard houses of Beijing: architecture as cultural artifact [J]. Journal of Space and Communication, 2015, 1(1): 47-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15340/2148172511881

[28]

Chan CS, Xiong Y. The features and forces that define, maintain, and endanger Beijing courtyard housing [J]. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2007, 24(1): 42-64. ISSN: 0738-0895

[29]

Xu P. Feng-Shui models structured traditional Beijing courtyard houses [J]. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 1998, 15(4): 271-282. ISSN: 0738-0895

[30]

Zhang D. Courtyard houses of Beijing: past, present, and future. 2009/2010/2011, VDM Verlag, Saarbrücken, Germany. ISBN: 9783639996302

[31]

Zhang D. Courtyard houses of Beijing: lessons from the renewal [J]. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 2015, 27(1): 69-82. ISSN: 1050-2092

[32]

Zhang D. Sustainable urbanization in China: courtyard housing and cultural sustainability. In J Condie and AM Cooper (Eds.), Dialogues of sustainable urbanisation: social science research and transitions to urban contexts. 2015, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, 159-163. eISBN: 9781741083606

[33]

Zhang D. Juer Hutong new courtyard housing in Beijing: a review from the residents’ perspective [J]. International Journal of Architectural Research, 2016, 10(2): 166-191. ISSN: 1938-7806

[34]

Beijing City Planning Committee. Conservation planning of 25 historic areas in Beijing’s old city. 2002, Yan Shan Publishing House, Beijing.

[35]

Lin N., Wang K. Urban development and handing culture down to latecomer: a planning for Beijing Nanchizi preservation area of historical culture experimental project [sic] [J]. Architectural Journal, 2003, 11: 7-11. ISSN: 0529-1399

[36]

Lin N. Insist on the views of practice and development and search for method of protecting historic street areas [sic] [J]. Beijing Planning Review, 2004, 2. ISSN: 1003-627X

[37]

Shu Y. The gain and loss of Nanchizi. Beijing Planning Review, 2004, 2: 114-116. ISSN: 1003-627X

[38]

Abramson DB. The aesthetics of city-scale preservation policy in Beijing [J]. Planning Perspectives, 2007, 22(2): 129-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02665430701213531

[39]

Van Elzen S. Dragon and rose garden: art and power in China. 2010, Timezone 8/Modern Chinese Art Foundation, Hong Kong. ISBN: 9789081450300

[40]

Kong F. Dilapidated housing renewal and the conservation of traditional courtyard houses. Beijing Municipal Bureau of Cultural Heritage. 2002, viewed 6 January 2021, http://cn.obj.cc/article-5460-1.html

[41]

Groat L., Wang D. Architectural research methods. 2002, Wiley, NJ. ISBN: 9780471333654

[42]

Creswell JW. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 2002, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ. ISBN: 9780130973900

[43]

Flyvbjerg B. Five misunderstandings about case-study research [J]. Qualitative Inquiry, 2006, 12(2): 219-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363

[44]

Oliver P. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of vernacular architecture of the world: theories and principles (vol. 1). 1997, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. ISBN: 9780521564229

[45]

Zhang D. New courtyard houses of Beijing: direction of future housing development [J]. Urban Design International, 2006, 11(3): 133-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000173

[46]

Gehl J. Life between buildings: using public space (trans. by J Koch). 1971/2001, Arkitektens Forlag (The Danish Architectural Press), Copenhagen, Denmark. ISBN: 9781597268271

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Previous article in this issue

Next article in this issue

Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, Electronic ISSN: 2717-5626 Published by AccScience Publishing