AccScience Publishing / IMO / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IMO025430057
PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE

Understanding genetic data: The advancing development of clinical stratification and precision oncology through machine learning

Franchesca Quezon Calero1 Elena Yang1 Hashimul Ehsan1*
Show Less
1 Department of Biology, Texas A&M University – Victoria, Victoria, TX, United States of America
Received: 22 October 2025 | Revised: 22 January 2026 | Accepted: 2 April 2026 | Published online: 5 May 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

The human genome project and subsequent projects, including the HapMap and 1000 Genomes, have laid the foundation for precision medicine, an approach tailoring treatments to patients. Precision oncology, particularly in breast cancer, applies precision medicine by analyzing a tumor’s genomic makeup to guide treatment. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) contribute to both breast cancer and gliomas, tumors originating in glial cells in the brain and spinal cord. Machine learning enhances cancer diagnosis and biomarker identification by detecting relevant patterns, improving prognosis. In breast cancer and gliomas, the support vector machine has proven 85.6% accurate in detecting tumor abnormalities. Challenges include limited accessibility, with only 8.33% of U.S. patients qualifying and 4.90% benefiting. Social and legal constraints exist because implementation includes linking a patient’s genetic information to a database. In conclusion, precision medicine offers promising applications but raises concerns regarding patient consent and ethics, with cancer patients focused on more in this article.

Keywords
Precision oncology
Breast cancer
Machine learning
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
  1. Baptiste M, Moinuddeen SS, Soliz CL, Ehsan H, Kaneko G. Making Sense of Genetic Information: The Promising Evolution of Clinical Stratification and Precision Oncology Using Machine Learning. Genes. 2021;12(5):722. doi: 10.3390/genes12050722
  2. Akhoon N. Precision Medicine: A New Paradigm in Therapeutics. Int J Prev Med. 2021;12(1):12. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_375_19
  3. Lagree A, Shiner A, Alera MA, et al. Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade. Curr Oncol. 2021;28(6):4298- 4316. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28060366
  4. Goda RY, Abdel-Aziz AK. Exploiting artificial intelligence in precision oncology: an updated comprehensive review. J Transl Med. 2025;23(1):1397. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-07308-2
  5. Pinto-Coelho L. How Artificial Intelligence Is Shaping Medical Imaging Technology: A Survey of Innovations and Applications. Bioengineering. 2023;10(12):1435. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10121435
  6. Fang Y-J, Lee K-H, Karmakar R, et al. Transforming Endoscopic Image Classification with Spectrum-Aided Vision for Early and Accurate Cancer Identification. Diagnostics. 2025; 15(21):2732. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15212732
  7. Gazola AA, Lautert-Dutra W, Archangelo LF, Reis RBD, Squire JA. Precision oncology platforms: practical strategies for genomic database utilization in cancer treatment. Mol Cytogenet. 2024;17(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13039-024-00698-w
  8. Zardavas D, Phillips WA, Loi S. PIK3CA mutations in breast cancer: reconciling findings from preclinical and clinical data. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(1):201. doi: 10.1186/bcr3605
  9. Iyer K, Saini S, Bhadra S, Kulavi S, Bandyopadhyay J. Precision medicine advancements in glioblastoma: A systematic review. Biomedicine. 2023;13(2):1-13. doi: 10.37796/2211-8039.1403
  10. Lu J, Li H, Chen Z, et al. Identification of 3 subpopulations of tumor-infiltrating immune cells for malignant transformation of low-grade glioma. Cancer Cell Int. 2019;19:265. doi: 10.1186/s12935-019-0972-1
  11. Agrahari R, Foroushani A, Docking T, et al. Applications of Bayesian network models in predicting types of hematological malignancies. Sci Rep. 2018;8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24758-5
  12. Nindrea RD, Aryandono T, Lazuardi L, Dwiprahasto I. Diagnostic Accuracy of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Breast Cancer Risk Calculation: a Meta- Analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19(7):1747-1752. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.7.1747
  13. Chang RF, Wu WJ, Moon WK, Chou YH, Chen DR. Support vector machines for diagnosis of breast tumors on US images. Acad Radiol. 2003;10(2):189-197. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80044-2
  14. Lehman CD, Arao RF, Sprague BL, et al. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Radiology. 2017;283(1):49-58. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016161174
  15. Niu B, Liang C, Lu Y, et al. Glioma stages prediction based on machine learning algorithm combined with protein-protein interaction networks. Genomics. 2020;112(1):837- 847. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.05.024
  16. Marquart J, Chen EY, Prasad V. Estimation of the Percentage of US Patients With Cancer Who Benefit From Genome- Driven Oncology. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(8):1093-1098. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1660
  17. Miller T. Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artif Intell. 2019;267:1-38. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007
  18. Díaz GM, González RAC, González DG. Interpretability Challenges in Machine Learning Models. In: Moving technology ethics at the forefront of society, organisations and governments. Universidad de La Rioja; 2021:205–217.
  19. Booth TC, Williams M, Luis A, Cardoso J, Ashkan K, Shuaib H. Machine learning and glioma imaging biomarkers. Clin Radiol. 2020;75(1):20-32. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.07.001
Share
Back to top
Innovative Medicines & Omics, Electronic ISSN: 3060-8740 Print ISSN: 3060-8910, Published by AccScience Publishing