AccScience Publishing / IJOCTA / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJOCTA026250123
Cite this article
5
Download
72
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A kernel-adaptive Mittag-Leffler polynomial framework for ψ-Caputo fractional optimal control of robotic systems

Amin Jajarmi1,2* ,  Dumitru Baleanu3,4
Show Less
1 Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Bojnord, Bojnord , Iran
2 Department of Mathematics, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu , India
3 Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Lebanese American University, Beirut , Lebanon
4 Institute of Space Sciences, Magurele, Bucharest , Romania
Received: 18 June 2026 | Revised: 20 August 2026 | Accepted: 25 August 2026 | Published online: 29 September 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This paper develops a kernel-adaptive Mittag-Leffler polynomial framework for solving ψ-Caputo fractional optimal-control problems arising in robotic systems. In the proposed formulation, the function ψ is interpreted as a nonlinear operational clock that reshapes the memory structure of the fractional dynamics and influences the distribution of the control effort over physical time. A normalized operational-time transformation is introduced to convert the original ψ-Caputo system into an equivalent Caputo-type representation; at the same time, the physical-time performance index is preserved through the inverse-clock Jacobian. This formulation allows different kernel choices to be incorporated systematically without altering the underlying optimal control structure. For numerical implementation, QR-orthonormalized Mittag-Leffler polynomial bases are constructed to improve stability and conditioning. The fractional integral terms are evaluated analytically by expanding the basis functions in terms of monomials, yielding an efficient finite-dimensional approximation. For the linear planar robotic regulator, the state variables are analytically eliminated, yielding a symmetric positive-definite quadratic programming problem. For the nonlinear two-link manipulator, the same transformation and approximation strategy produce a nonlinear programming formulation. The method is first validated using a manufactured ψ-Caputo benchmark problem, confirming its accuracy and consistency. It is then applied to robotic control examples to examine the effects of kernel selection on terminal accuracy, control energy, physical-time cost, peak actuation, torque profiles, and numerical conditioning. The results demonstrate that the operational clock significantly influences both computational performance and control behavior.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Operational-time transformation
Kernel sensitivity
Reduced-space optimization
Quadratic program-ming
Numerical conditioning
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Tassaddiq A, Qureshi S, Soomro A, Abu Arqub O, Senol M. Comparative analysis of classical and Caputo models for COVID-19 spread: vaccination and stability assessment. Fixed Point Theory Algorithms Sci Eng. 2024;2024:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13663-024-00760-7
  2. Qureshi S. Fox H-functions as exact solutions for Caputo type mass spring damper system under Sumudu transform. J Appl Math Comput Mech. 2021;20(1):83-89. https://doi.org/10.17512/jamcm.2021.1.08
  3. Samko SG, Kilbas AA, Marichev OI. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications. Yverdon, Switzerland: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers; 1993.
  4. Baleanu D, Diethelm K, Scalas E, Trujillo JJ. Fractional Calculus: Models and Numerical Methods. Vol 3. Singapore: World Scientific; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1142/8180
  5. Agrawal OP. A general formulation and solution scheme for fractional optimal control problems. Nonlinear Dyn. 2004;38(1-4):323-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-004-3764-6
  6. Baleanu D, Tajani A, Zguaid K, Jajarmi A. Fractional optimal control problems in the sense of ψ-Caputo fractional derivative. Optim Control Appl Methods. 2025;46(6):2867-2881. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.70034
  7. Alqhtani M, Sadek L, Saad KM. The Mittag-Leffler-Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative and its numerical approach. 2025;17(5):800. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17050800
  8. Sadek L, Aldawish I. An efficient numerical approach for solving the Mittag-Leffler fractional differential equations. Math Sci. 2026;20(3):263-280. https://doi.org/10.57647/mathsci.2026.2003.14
  9. Zaky MA, Doha EH. A new adaptive spectral collocation method for tempered fractional differential equations with initial singularities. Comput Appl Math. 2026;45(7):302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-026-03699-0
  10. Ahmed AI. Collocation method for solving delay fractional optimal control problems by fractional-order Chelyshkov functions. Adv Cont Discr Mod. 2026;2026:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-026-04065-4
  11. Qureshi S, Argyros IK, Ramos H, et al. A stable optimal solver for nonlinear equations with semilocal convergence using majorizing sequences in Banach spaces. SeMA J. 2026;83:515-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40324-025-00402-x
  12. Jmal A, Ahmed H. Generalized Mittag-Leffler stability for k-Caputo fractional-order systems---An observer application. Asian J Control. 2026;28(1):424-430. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.3754
  13. Ma L, Zhang W. Finite-time stability for Caputo-Hadamard type fractional differential systems without and with proportional delays. 2026;36(1):013131. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0311074
  14. Ghosh I, Cheong HT, Teo KL. A novel gradient-based discrete time-delayed optimization algorithm for optimal control problems with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative. J Comput Appl Math. 2025;464:116526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2025.116526
  15. Hidayatullah AA, Subchan S, Safarina S, et al. A hybrid fractional Chebyshev-Legendre spectral collocation method for Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations. IEEE Access. 2026;14:34564-34584. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3668899
  16. Sadek L, Samei ME, Hashemi MS. The Galerkin Mittag-Leffler method for solving fractional optimal control problems with inequality constraints. Math Comput Simul. 2026;240:191-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2025.07.018
  17. Sadek L, Aldawish I, Hammouch Z, Shafee A, Popa IL. A robust Galerkin fractional Taylor technique to solve multi-dimensional fractional optimal control problems with inequality constraints. Math Sci. 2026;20(4):359-375. https://doi.org/10.57647/mathsci.89bj.w891
  18. Mao X, Wang X, Lu Y, Qin H. Synchronizations control of fractional-order multidimension-valued memristive neural networks with delays. 2024;563:126942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126942
  19. Chávez-Vázquez S, Gómez-Aguilar JF, Lavín-Delgado JE, Escobar-Jiménez RF, Olivares-Peregrino VH. Applications of fractional operators in robotics: A review. J Intell Robot Syst. 2022;104(4):63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-022-01597-1
  20. Singh AP, Bingi K. Applications of fractional-order calculus in robotics. Fractal Fract. 2024;8(7):403. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8070403
  21. Ghasempour A, Ordokhani Y, Razzaghi M. An efficient optimal control framework for robotic systems using Mittag-Leffler polynomial techniques. Optim Control Appl Methods. 2026;47(4):1004-1014. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.70110
  22. Odibat Z, Qureshi S, Cattani C, Gómez-Aguilar JF, Yang XJ, Baleanu D. Analytical solutions of fractional Burgers' equation with exponential extension kernel derivatives. J Comput Appl Math. 2026;486:117620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2026.117620
  23. Saad KM, Abdo MS, Hamanah WM. Existence and controllability analysis of multi-term fractional coupled systems with generalized [ψ,w]-Caputo-Fabrizio operators. Sci Rep. 2025;15:34434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17523-y
  24. Almeida R. A Caputo fractional derivative of a function with respect to another function. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2017;44:460-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.09.006
  25. Sousa JVC, Oliveira EC de. On the ψ-Hilfer fractional derivative. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2018;60:72-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.01.005
  26. Almeida R. What is the best fractional derivative to fit data? Appl Anal Discrete Math. 2017;11(2):358-368. https://doi.org/10.2298/AADM170428002A
  27. Baghani O. Solving state feedback control of fractional linear quadratic regulator systems using triangular functions. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2019;73:319-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.01.023
  28. Gomoyunov MI. Value functional and optimal feedback control in linear-quadratic optimal control problem for fractional-order system. Math Control Relat Fields. 2024;14(1):215-254. https://doi.org/10.3934/mcrf.2023002
  29. Zhou B, Speyer JL. Fractional linear quadratic regulators using Wiener-Hopf spectral factorization. SIAM J Control Optim. 2019;57(6):4011-4032. https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1239520
  30. Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. North-Holland Mathematics Studies. Vol 204. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-0208(06)80001-0
  31. Qureshi S, Yusuf A, Aziz S. On the use of Mohand integral transform for solving fractional-order classical Caputo differential equations. J Appl Math Comput Mech. 2020;19(3):99-109. https://doi.org/10.17512/jamcm.2020.3.08
  32. Mohiuddin M, Karim ME, Amin MR, et al. Detecting dynamical behaviors of solitary waves in the M-fractional Konopelchenko-Dubrovsky system with stability and sensitivity analysis. Phys Open. 2026;28:100454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physo.2026.100454
  33. Alam N, Ullah MS, Manafian J, et al. Bifurcation analysis, chaotic behaviors, and explicit solutions for a fractional two-mode Nizhnik-Novikov-Veselov equation in mathematical physics. AIMS Math. 2025;10(3):4558-4578. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2025211
  34. Amin MR, Hakim MA, Ullah MS. Analysis of soliton behavior and overlap phenomena in the integrable beta-fractional Akbota equation with stability evaluation of equilibrium points. AIP Adv. 2025;15(12):125205. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0308937
  35. Gambo YY, Jarad F, Baleanu D, Abdeljawad T. On Caputo modification of the Hadamard fractional derivatives. Adv Differ Equ. 2014;2014:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2014-10
  36. Roman S. The Umbral Calculus. Orlando: Academic Press; 1984. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Umbral_Calculus.html?id=JpHjkhFLfpgC
  37. Spong MW, Hutchinson S, Vidyasagar M. Robot Modeling and Control. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2006. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/shop/general-introductory-electrical-electronics-engineering/robot-modeling-and-control-2nd-edition-p-9781119524045
Share
Back to top
An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications, Electronic ISSN: 2146-5703 Print ISSN: 2146-0957, Published by AccScience Publishing