AccScience Publishing / IJOCTA / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJOCTA026330208
Cite this article
5
Download
96
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Discrete stochastic optimal control for multi-stakeholder
governance of crop rotation and fallow insurance

Haohao Wu1* Linbo He1 Yuncheng Hu1* Junhong He2
Show Less
1 College of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan , China
2 School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei , China
Received: 11 August 2026 | Revised: 24 August 2026 | Accepted: 25 August 2026 | Published online: 31 August 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Multi-stakeholder ecological governance requires coordinated decisions under environmental uncertainty, yet existing agricultural governance models rarely integrate stochastic disturbances, dynamic stakeholder controls, and policy constraints within a unified analytical framework. This paper develops a discrete-time stochastic optimal control framework with mixed constraints for multi-agent decision systems subject to bounded random disturbances. The framework is motivated by and applied to multi-stakeholder governance of crop rotation and fallow insurance, where soil fertility serves as the system state and stakeholder decisions form the control vector. The discrete-time Pontryagin Maximum Principle yields necessary optimality conditions and analytical control laws for all agent types, including a closed-form insurance compensation ratio. Stochastic Lyapunov analysis establishes finite-horizon practical bounded mean-square behavior under the constant control law. We further propose an error feedback control law u*f,t = clamp [1 + k ( S*  St ), 0, 1] that introduces a contraction term, transforming the error dynamics from an unbounded random walk to a stable first-order autoregressive process with bounded steady-state variance ; the optimal gain k = 1 / α yields a minimum bound of σ2. Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 trials) confirms a 68.0% reduction in trajectory standard deviation and a threshold violation rate decrease from 29.7% to 14.9%. Parameter calibration based on field survey data from 1,187 valid questionnaires across three provinces validates the theoretical model. The framework generalizes to similar multi-stakeholder ecological governance systems with stochastic disturbances.

Graphical abstract
Funding
This work was supported in part by the Later-stage Funding Project of the National Social Science Fund of China under Grant No. 24FSHB019 (Research on Farmland Circulation Embedded in Three-Dimensional Structure), and in part by the Hunan Provincial Postgraduate Research and Innovation Project under Grant No. CX20251147 (Research on Object Determination, Mode Selection and Implementation Path of Cultivated Land Rotation and Fallow from the Perspective of Food Security).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Bertsekas DP, Shreve SE. Stochastic Optimal Control: The Discrete-Time Case. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1978. Accessed August 24, 2026. https://books.google.com/books/about/Stochastic_Optimal_Control_The_Discrete.html?id=sRHEAAAACAAJ
  2. Kushner HJ. Stochastic Stability and Control. Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Vol 33. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1967. Accessed August 24, 2026. https://www.sciencedirect.com/bookseries/mathematics-in-science-and-engineering/vol/33/suppl/C
  3. Liu QP. Huai he liu yu hua fei shi yong kong jian te zheng ji huan jing feng xian fen xi. [Spatial characteristics and environmental risk analysis of chemical fertilizer application in Huaihe River Basin.] Ecol Environ Sci. 2015;24(9):1512-1518. [In Chinese] https://doi.org/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2015.09.014
  4. Song HM, Li TL, Liu Y, Huang L, Yang LF. Wo guo jin 20 nian zhu yao liang shi zuo wu chan liang jin chu kou ji hua fei tou ru bian hua te zheng. [Temporal variation of main grain crops yield, import and export and fertilizer consumption of China in the past 20 years.] J Soil Water Conserv. 2023;37(1):332-339. [In Chinese] https://doi.org/10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.042
  5. Xie XX, Zhao MJ, Cai Y, Deng Y. Nong di xiu geng ru he ying xiang nong hu shou ru—ji yu xi bei xiu geng shi dian qu 1240 ge nong hu mian ban shu ju de shi zheng. [How does farmland fallow affect farmers’ income? Based on panel data of 1240 farmers in Northwest Fallow Pilot Areas.] Chin Rural Econ. 2020;(11):62-78. [In Chinese] https://doi.org/10.20077/j.cnki.11-1262/f.2020.11.005
  6. Liu D, Hu ZT, Liu JH. The impact of fallow ecological compensation on farmers’ income: taking groundwater over-exploitation areas as an example. Resour Sci. 2022;44(2):350-364. https://doi.org/10.18402/resci.2022.02.11
  7. Zheng T, Zhao GQ. The impact of policy-oriented agricultural insurance on China’s grain production resilience. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2025;8:1510953. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1510953
  8. Ainiwaerjiang A, Jin X, Xie Z, Tian T, Dang Y. Research on the multi-agent motivation coupling evolution and synergy improvement for farmland ecological protection in China. Environ Sustain Indic. 2025;25:100583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100583
  9. Ma XP, Liu XP, Zeng QM, Wu NBT. Analysis on influencing factors of farmers’ response to cultivated land fallow policy: taking Urumqi County as an example. Chin J Agric Resour Reg Plan. 2021;42(5):237-244. https://doi.org/10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20210527
  10. Wu HH, He LB. You dao — zi fa er fen xia nong hu xiu geng xing wei ying xiang yin su fen xi. [The analysis of factors influencing farmers’ fallowing behaviors under the ‘induced-spontaneous’ dichotomy.] Res Agric Mod. 2023;44(6):1014-1023. [In Chinese] https://doi.org/10.13872/j.1000-0275.2023.0105
  11. Song W, Song W. Cropland fallow reduces agricultural water consumption by 303 million tons annually in Gansu Province, China. Sci Total Environ. 2023;879:163013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163013
  12. Liu T, Yao R. Has China’s farmland rotation and fallow system contributed to an increase in grain production? Land Use Policy. 2026;162:107907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107907
  13. Sun YP, Cai YY, Xie J. Ji yu PMC zhi shu mo xing de geng di bao hu bu chang zheng ce liang hua ping jia. [Quantitative evaluation of cultivated land protection compensation policy based on PMC index model.] J Arid Land Resour Environ. 2024;38(12):1-12. [In Chinese] https://doi.org/10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2024.239
  14. Song CM, Cai YY. New old‑age insurance system for rural residents and the Conversion of Cropland to Forest and Grassland Program: theoretical analysis and empirical test. China Popul Resour Environ. 2023;33(5):193-200. https://doi.org/10.12062/cpre.20230107
  15. Sethi SP, Thompson GL. Optimal Control Theory: Applications to Management Science and Economics. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29903-3
  16. Chen F, Zeng SY, Ma J, Liu JN, Yu HC, Sun Y. Multi-scenario simulation of fallow’s impact on China’s food security. China Land Sci. 2023;37(1):90-101. https://doi.org/10.11994/zgtdkx.20221014.092941
  17. Bettiol P, Bourdin L. Pontryagin maximum principle for state-constrained optimal sampled-data control problems on time scales. ESAIM Control Optim Calc Var. 2021;27:51. https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2021046
  18. Ansori MF. Dynamic modeling and optimal control of bank balance sheets under capital adequacy constraints. Int J Optim Control Theor Appl. 2025;16(1):40-53. https://doi.org/10.36922/IJOCTA025250113
  19. Darıcı S, Şahin Z, Darıcı A. The evolution of intelligent digital profiling: a multi-sectoral synthesis of explainable artificial intelligence and federated learning frameworks. Intell Syst Res Appl J. 2026;2(2):199-229. https://doi.org/10.59543/68svs968
  20. Musbah J, Badi I. LLM-assisted virtual expert weight elicitation in pharmaceutical supply chains: a Z-number multi-agent framework. Intell Syst Res Appl J. 2026;2:27-39. https://doi.org/10.59543/mmhqdg22
  21. Wang ML. Mei guo tu di xiu geng bao hu ji hua de zhi du she ji ji ruo gan qi shi [Institutional design of the US Conservation Reserve Program and its enlightenments.] Issues Agric Econ. 2020;(5):119-122. [In Chinese] https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2020.05.010
  22. Tilahun W, Ayenew B, Atinafu S, Enyew S. A computational and geometric analysis of economic dynamics using Pontryagin’s maximum principle: advanced numerical simulations perspective. Discov Appl Sci. 2026;8(4):418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-026-08475-7
  23. Chen J, Yang S, Du H, Liang W, Liu Y. Horizontal ecological compensation zoning and standard in China’s major grain-producing areas based on virtual cultivated land flow. Front Environ Sci. 2025;13:1578780. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1578780
  24. Wijesena S, Pradhan B. Advancements in weather index insurance: a review of data-driven approaches to design, pricing and risk management. Earth Syst Environ. 2025;9(3):2355-2379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-025-00712-0
  25. Shah R, Lassoued D, Fayyaz A, Zulfiqar A, Saleem J, Ali T. Study of stability of discrete-time stochastic systems with time variations through Lyapunov’s method. Filomat. 2025;39(24):8623-8634. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL2524623S
  26. Fang J. Geng di bao hu shi jiao xia lun zuo xiu geng de fa lv biao da. [Legal expression of crop rotation and fallow from the perspective of cultivated land protection.] J Nanjing Agric Univ Soc Sci Ed. 2020;20(3):111-122. [In Chinese] https://doi.org/10.19714/j.cnki.1671-7465.2020.0044
  27. Li L, Zhang AL. Lun zuo xiu geng ji qi bu chang de fa lv yi yun, fa li zheng cheng ji ru fa jin lu. [Legal implication, legal justification and legislative approach of crop rotation and fallow and its compensation.] China Land Sci. 2021;35(11):27-35. [In Chinese] https://doi.org/10.11994/zgtdkx.20211026.093948
  28. Zhu GF, Li XC, Shi YR, Zhang Y, Li ZY. Practice comparison and policy enlightenment of cultivated land crop rotation and fallow at home and abroad. Chin J Agric Resour Reg Plan. 2018;39(6):35-41,92. https://doi.org/10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20180606
  29. Yang QY, Xin GX, Jiang JL, Chen ZT. Ou mei ji dong ya di qu geng di lun zuo xiu geng zhi du shi jian. [Practice of cultivated land crop rotation and fallow system in Europe, America and East Asia: comparison and enlightenment.] China Land Sci. 2017;31(4):71-79. [In Chinese] https://doi.org/10.11994/zgtdkx.20170421.143345
  30. Nie Y, Han XZ, Wang ZMH, Du YF, Li YB. Geng di xiu geng—guo wai jing yan yu zhong guo shi jian. [Cultivated land fallow: foreign experience and China’s practice. World Agric. 2022;(12):34-44. [In Chinese] https://doi.org/10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2022.12.003
  31. Kushwaha D, Biron Z. A review on safe reinforcement learning using Lyapunov and barrier functions. Artif Intell Rev. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-026-11611-9
  32. van Laatum B, Msaad S, van Henten EJ, McAllister RD, Boersma S. Stochastic model predictive control with reinforcement learning for greenhouse production systems under parametric uncertainty. Control Eng Pract. 2026;169:106787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2026.106787
  33. Svensen JL, Cheng X, Boersma S, Sun C. Chance-constrained stochastic MPC of greenhouse production systems with parametric uncertainty. Comput Electron Agric. 2024;217:108578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108578
  34. Ahsen R, Di Bitonto P, Novielli P, et al. Harnessing digital twins for sustainable agricultural water management: a systematic review. Appl Sci. 2025;15(8):4228. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084228
  35. Awais M, Wang X, Hussain S, Aziz F, Mahmood MQ. Advancing precision agriculture through digital twins and smart farming technologies: a review. AgriEngineering. 2025;7(5):137. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7050137
  36. Zhao T, Song C, Yu J, et al. Leveraging immersive digital twins and AI-driven decision support systems for sustainable water reserves management: a conceptual framework. Sustainability. 2025;17(8):3754. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083754
  37. Xiong WY, Meng F, Chen H, Tan Y. Geng di “san wei yi ti” bao hu shi jiao xia zhong guo sheng yu xiu geng gui mo yu kong jian bu ju. [Provincial fallow scale and fallow spatial layout of cultivated land in China from the “Trinity” protection perspective.] Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng. 2024;40(18):240-250. [In Chinese] https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202405110
  38. Zeng S, Chen F, Ma J, Liu GJ, Wanger TC. Multiscenario simulation of fallow schemes in China and their impact on food security. Land Degrad Dev. 2024;35(16):4972-4984. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5271
  39. Yin JF, Song CQ, Gao PC, Wang GL, Ye SJ. Guo ji geng di xiu geng shi jian jing yan fen xi yu zhong guo cha yi hua xiu geng kuang jia jian gou. [Analysis of international cropland fallow practice experience and construction of differentiated fallow framework in China.] Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng. 2025;41(13):22-34. [In Chinese] https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202504164
  40. Sun Y, Jiang H, Zhu X. Drivers, constraints, and policy regulation strategies for the abandonment of farmland: insights from China. Land. 2024;13(12):2096. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122096

 

Share
Back to top
An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications, Electronic ISSN: 2146-5703 Print ISSN: 2146-0957, Published by AccScience Publishing