AccScience Publishing / IJOCTA / Volume 7 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.11121/ijocta.01.2017.00340
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service

Görkem Sarıyer1
Show Less
1 Department of Business Administration, Yaşar University, Turkey
Received: 29 April 2016 | Accepted: 24 October 2016 | Published online: 1 November 2016
© 2016 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Service providers can adjust the entrance price to the state of the demand in real  life service systems where the customers' decision to receive the service, is based  on this price, state of demand and other system parameters. We analyzed service  provider's short and long term pricing problems in unobservable M/M/1 queues  having the rational customers, where, for customers, the unit cost of waiting in the  queue is higher than unit cost of waiting in the service. We showed that waiting in  the queue has a clear negative effect on customers’ utilities, hence the service  provider's price values. We also showed that, in the short term, monopolistic  pricing is optimal for congested systems with high server utilization levels,  whereas in the long term, market capturing pricing is more profitable.

Keywords
Equilibrium
Market capture pricing
Monopolistic pricing
M/M/1 Rational customers
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

[1] Leclerc, F., Schmitt, B. H., Dube, L., Waiting time  and decision making: Is time like Money? Journal of  Consumer Research, 22(1), 110-119 (1995).

[2] Naor, P., The regulation of queue size by levying  tolls. Econometrica, 37(1), 15-24 (1969).

[3] Edelson, N. M., Hildebrand, D.K., Congestion tolls  for queueing processes. Econometrica, 43, 81-92  (1975).

[4] Chen, H., Frank, M. Z., State dependent pricing with  a queue. IIE Transactions, 33, 847-860 (2001).

[5] Chen, H., Frank, M. Z., Monopoly pricing when  customers queue. IIE Transactions, 36, 569-581  (2004).

[6] Knudsen, N. C., Individual and social optimization  in a multiserver queue with a general cost-benefit  structure. Econometrica, 40, 515-528 (1972).

[7] Sariyer, G., Effective service design in strategic  customer setting. Journal of Computational and  Theoretical Nanoscience, 12(12), 5109-5113 (2015).

[8] Mendelson, H., Whang, S., Optimal incentivecompatible priority pricing for the M/M/1 queue.  Operations Research, 38, 870-883 (1990).

[9] Bradford, R., Pricing, routing, and incentive  compatibility in multi-server queues. European  Journal of Operational Research, 89(2), 226-236  (1996).

[10] Rao, S., Peterson, E. R., Optimal pricing of priority  services. Operations Research, 46, 46-56 (1998).

[11] Debo, L. G., Veeraraghavan, S. K., Equilibrium in  queues under unknown service rates and service  value. Chicago Booth Research Paper, 2011: 11-45.

[12] Anand, K. S., Pac, M. F., Veereraghavan, S. Qualityspeed conundrum: tradeoffs in customer intensive  services. Management Science, 57(1), 40-56 (2011).

[13] Alizamir, S., Vericourt, F., Sun, P., Diagnostic  accuracy under congestion. Management Science,  59(1), 157-171 (2013).

[14] Wang, S., Debo, L. G., Scheller, W. A., Smith, S. F.,  Design and analysis of diagnostic service centers.  Management Science, 56(11), 1873-1890 (2009).

[15] Oliveras, M., Lu, Y., Musalem, A., Schilkrut, A.,  Measuring the effect of queues on customer  purchases. Management Science, 59(8), 1743-1763  (2013).

[16] Giebelhausen, M. D., Robinson, S. G., Cronin, J. J.,  Worth waiting for: increasing satisfaction by making  consumers wait. Journal of the Academy of  Marketing Science, 39(6), 889-905 (2011).

[17] Sariyer, G., Effect of in queue waiting on decision  making. International Journal of Basic and Applied  Sciences, 14(6), 13-18 (2014).

[18] Hassin, R., Haviv, M., To queue or not to queue.  International Series in Operations Research and  Management Science, 59, Kluwer Publishing  (2002).

Share
Back to top
An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications, Electronic ISSN: 2146-5703 Print ISSN: 2146-0957, Published by AccScience Publishing