AccScience Publishing / IJB / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJB026380415
Cite this article
3
Download
76
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
REVIEW ARTICLE

Nanozyme‑functionalized hydrogel bioinks for 3D bioprinting: Tumor microenvironment remodeling and spatiotemporally regulated cancer immunotherapy

Yuan Sui1† ,  Yilin Wang2† ,  Xinwen Sheng1 ,  Chengyun Li1 ,  Jiale Feng1 ,  Yan Zhang3* ,  Chun Yang4*
Show Less
1 School of Clinical Medicine, Beihua University, Jilin City, Jilin , China
2 College of Science, Beihua University, Jilin City, Jilin , China
3 School of Public Health, Beihua University, Jilin City, Jilin , China
4 College of Basic Medicine, Beihua University, Jilin City, Jilin , China
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 19 September 2026 | Revised: 15 October 2026 | Accepted: 20 October 2026 | Published online: 6 November 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioprinting in Tumor Modeling, Diagnostics, and Therapy)
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D)-bioprinted nanozyme-hydrogel composites bridge nanocatalytic therapeutics and biomimetic tumor engineering for advancing tumor modeling and localized cancer treatment. Nanozymes are catalytic nanomaterials that emulate enzyme-mimicking activities while overcoming the instability and high cost of natural enzymes. Since the discovery of Fe3O4 peroxidase (POD)-mimicking catalysis, nanozyme research has advanced from empirical exploration to rational structural engineering for biomedical applications. Compared with conventional delivery vehicles limited by rapid clearance and insufficient tumor accumulation, 3D bioprinting enables precise spatial integration of nanozymes within tunable hydrogel bioinks, offering programmable construction of biomimetic tumor microenvironments (TMEs) and localized therapeutic scaffolds. This review systematically summarizes nanozyme catalytic classification, structural modulation strategies, and biomedical advances, with a core emphasis on state-of-the-art 3D-bioprinted nanozyme–hydrogel composite systems for tumor modeling and cancer therapy. Rationally engineered nanozymes exhibit tunable POD-, oxidase-, catalase-, and superoxide dismutase–mimicking activities, often based on metal-centered electron transfer. Integrated into printable hydrogel matrices, nanozymes achieve sustained intratumoral retention, overcoming the drawbacks of free nanocatalytic agents. 3D bioprinting recapitulates TME heterogeneity by constructing scaffolds with customizable stiffness, redox gradients, and porous architecture, supporting high-fidelity tumor modeling and high-throughput drug screening. In therapeutic applications, printed nanozyme systems remodel immunosuppressive TMEs, trigger tumor ferroptosis and immunogenic cell death via the cGAS-STING pathway, and enable stepwise antitumor cascades to suppress tumor growth, invasion, and recurrence, synergizing with photothermal and sonodynamic therapies. Nevertheless, critical challenges persist, including inherent trade-offs among bioink printability, structural stability, and catalytic performance; insufficient lesion-specific selectivity; and a lack of standardized bioprinting protocols. Optimizing composite formulations and printing parameters will promote the clinical translation of next-generation nanozyme-based tumor theranostic platforms.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Nanozyme
Bioink
Bioprinting
Tumor microenvironment
Hydrogel
Three-dimensional bioprinting
Funding
This work was supported by the Provincial Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for College Students of Jilin Province (Grant No. S202610201136).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
  1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834
  2. Kurian AG, Singh RK, Sagar V, Lee JH, Kim HW. Nanozyme-engineered hydrogels for anti-inflammation and skin regeneration. Nano-Micro Lett. 2024;16(1):110. doi: 10.1007/s40820-024-01323-6
  3. Germain N, Dhayer M, Dekiouk S, Marchetti P. Current advances in 3D bioprinting for cancer modeling and personalized medicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(7):3432. doi: 10.3390/ijms23073432
  4. Gopinathan J, Noh I. Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing. Biomater Res. 2018;22(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40824-018-0122-1
  5. Derakhshanfar S, Mbeleck R, Xu K, Zhang X, Zhong W, Xing M. 3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: a review of recent trends and advances. Bioact Mater. 2018;3(2):144-156. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.008
  6. Cai B, Kilian D, Ramos Mejia D, Rios RJ, Ali A, Heilshorn SC. Diffusion-based 3D bioprinting strategies. Adv Sci. 2024;11(8):2306470. doi: 10.1002/advs.202306470
  7. Solanki R, Bhatia D. Stimulus-responsive hydrogels for targeted cancer therapy. Gels. 2024;10(7):440. doi: 10.3390/gels10070440
  8. Nie J, Wang Z, Tian H, et al. Ruthenium-gallic acid nanozymes encapsulated in 3D bioprintable photosensitive hydrogels for synergistic PTT/CDT therapy of glioblastoma. J Nanobiotechnology. Published online May 12, 2026. doi: 10.1186/s12951-026-04510-2
  9. Abaci A, Guvendiren M. 3D bioprinting of dense cellular structures within hydrogels with spatially controlled heterogeneity. Biofabrication. 2024;16(3):035027. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad52f1
  10. Zhou XY, Wang CK, Shen ZF, et al. Recent research progress on tumour-specific responsive hydrogels. J Mater Chem B. 2024;12(30):7246-7266. doi: 10.1039/d4tb00656a
  11. Kim S, Han S, Lee J, Lee C, Park S. Bioprinting of tumor immune microenvironment for immunotherapy. Int J Bioprint. 2024;10(5):3988. doi: 10.36922/ijb.3988
  12. Roy N, Paira P. Glutathione depletion and stalwart anticancer activity of metallotherapeutics inducing programmed cell death: opening a new window for cancer therapy. ACS Omega. 2024;9(19):20670-20701. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c08890
  13. Liu X, Yu Y, Dong Q, et al. Roles of reactive oxygen species in inflammation and cancer. MedComm. 2024;5(4):e519. doi: 10.1002/mco2.519
  14. Crouigneau R, Li YF, Auxillos J, et al. Mimicking and analyzing the tumor microenvironment. Cell Rep Methods. 2024;4(10):100866. doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2024.100866
  15. Agbaje T, Baithalu R, Mishra SR, Panda S. Irreversibility processes on the squeezing flow analysis of blood-based micropolar hybrid nanofluid through parallel channel: spectral quasilinearisation method. BioNanoScience. 2024;14(3):3226-3240. doi: 10.1007/s12668-024-01417-w
  16. Zafar A, Khatoon S, Khan MJ, Abu J, Naeem A. Advancements and limitations in traditional anti-cancer therapies: a comprehensive review of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormonal therapy. Discov Oncol. 2025;16(1):607. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02198-8
  17. Mao X, Wu S, Huang D, Li C. Complications and comorbidities associated with antineoplastic chemotherapy: rethinking drug design and delivery for anticancer therapy. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2024;14(7):2901-2926. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.03.006
  18. Gu Y, Yang R, Zhang Y, et al. Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies in overcoming chemotherapy resistance in cancer. Mol Biomed. 2025;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s43556-024-00239-2
  19. Berland L, Gabr Z, Chang M, et al. Further knowledge and developments in resistance mechanisms to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1384121. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1384121
  20. Ding L, Agrawal P, Singh SK, Chhonker YS, Sun J, Murry DJ. Polymer-based drug delivery systems for cancer therapeutics. Polymers. 2024;16(6):843. doi: 10.3390/polym16060843
  21. Li Y, Liu J, Xu S, Wang J. 3D bioprinting: an important tool for tumor microenvironment research. Int J Nanomedicine. 2023;18:8039-8057. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S435845
  22. Parodi I, Di Lisa D, Pastorino L, Scaglione S, Fato MM. 3D bioprinting as a powerful technique for recreating the tumor microenvironment. Gels. 2023;9(6):482. doi: 10.3390/gels9060482
  23. Weng J, Deng B, Huang X, Xue X. Advances in three-dimensional bioprinting and artificial intelligence for enhanced tumor modeling: current progress and future perspectives. Artif Intell Health. 2025;3(1):1. doi: 10.36922/aih025230052
  24. Gugulothu SB, Asthana S, Homer-Vanniasinkam S, Chatterjee K. Trends in photopolymerizable bioinks for 3D bioprinting of tumor models. JACS Au. 2023;3(8):2086-2106. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00281
  25. Cui X, Jiao J, Yang L, et al. Advanced tumor organoid bioprinting strategy for oncology research. Mater Today Bio. 2024;28:101198. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101198
  26. Liu S, Jin P. Advances and challenges in 3D bioprinted cancer models: opportunities for personalized medicine and tissue engineering. Polymers (Basel). 2025;17(7):948. doi: 10.3390/polym17070948
  27. Cheah KE, Yeoh PSQ, Lai KW, Wu S, Muhamad F. Smart and injectable hydrogels for cancer treatment and other biomedical applications. Biomater Adv. 2026;180:214624. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214624
  28. Huang Y, Ren J, Qu X. Nanozymes: classification, catalytic mechanisms, activity regulation, and applications. Chem Rev. 2019;119(6):4357-4412. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00672
  29. Liang M, Yan X. Nanozymes: from new concepts, mechanisms, and standards to applications. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52(8):2190-2200. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00140
  30. N NP, Mehla S, Begum A, et al. Smart nanozymes for cancer therapy: the next frontier in oncology. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12(25):2300768. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300768
  31. Ma Q, Liu Y, Zhu H, Zhang L, Liao X. Nanozymes in tumor theranostics. Front Oncol. 2021;11:666017. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.666017
  32. Ren X, Chen D, Wang Y, et al. Nanozymes—recent development and biomedical applications. J Nanobiotechnology. 2022;20(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01295-y
  33. Wang Q, Jiang J, Gao L. Catalytic antimicrobial therapy using nanozymes. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2022;14(2):e1769. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1769
  34. Zhang R, Yan X, Gao L, Fan K. Nanozymes expanding the boundaries of biocatalysis. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):6817. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62063-8
  35. Panferov VG, Zhang X, Wong KY, Lee JH, Liu J. Biomedical applications of nanozymes: an enzymology perspective. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2025;64(46):e202512409. doi: 10.1002/anie.202512409
  36. Yang L, Dong S, Gai S, et al. Deep insight of design, mechanism, and cancer theranostic strategy of nanozymes. Nano-Micro Lett. 2024;16(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s40820-023-01224-0
  37. Zhu X, Xu N, Zhang L, Wang D, Zhang P. Novel design of multifunctional nanozymes based on tumor microenvironment for diagnosis and therapy. Eur J Med Chem. 2022;238:114456. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114456
  38. Zhang Y, Jin Y, Cui H, Yan X, Fan K. Nanozyme-based catalytic theranostics. RSC Adv. 2020;10(1):10-20. doi: 10.1039/c9ra09021e
  39. Sun H, Bai Y, Zhao D, Wang J, Qiu L. Transition-metal-oxide-based nanozymes for antitumor applications. Materials. 2024;17(12):2896. doi: 10.3390/ma17122896
  40. Alboslemy T, Yu B, Rogers T, Kim MH. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-conditioned medium impairs macrophage-mediated antibiofilm immune response by upregulating KLF2 expression. Infect Immun. 2019;87(4):e00643-18. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00643-18
  41. Zhuang X, Gao S, Tao Y, Yuan M, Han Z, Wang Y. pH-responsive nanozymes: multifunctional platforms for biomedical catalysis toward clinical translation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2026;14:1765647. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2026.1765647
  42. Chen Z, Yin JJ, Zhou YT, et al. Dual enzyme-like activities of iron oxide nanoparticles and their implication for diminishing cytotoxicity. ACS Nano. 2012;6(5):4001-4012. doi: 10.1021/nn300291r
  43. Yang Q, Wu Q, Liu H, Wu J, Ma F, Tian X. Tumor microenvironment-responsive and modulatory manganese-based nanoenzyme for enhanced tumor immunotherapy. Front Pharmacol. 2025;15:1518983. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1518983
  44. Zheng N, Hu X, Hu J. Endogenous/exogenous dual-responsive bimetallic hollow nanozyme for photothermal/nanocatalysis/immune synergistic tumor therapy. Rare Met. 2026;45(1):e70015. doi: 10.1002/rar2.70015
  45. Kalinina EV, Gavriliuk LA. Glutathione synthesis in cancer cells. Biochemistry. 2020;85(8):895-907. doi: 10.1134/S0006297920080052
  46. Sun R, Liu R, Tian Y, Li Y, Fan B, Li S. Removing barriers to tumor “oxygenation”: depleting glutathione nanozymes in cancer therapy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2025;20:5613-5643. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S515734
  47. Liu Q, Zhang A, Wang R, Zhang Q, Cui D. A review on metal- and metal oxide-based nanozymes: properties, mechanisms, and applications. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021;13(1):154. doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00674-8
  48. Deshwal A, Tripathi RM, Saxena K, Sheikh FA, Mishra P. Auriferous nanozymes: advances in diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Nanotechnology. 2024;35(50):502003. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/ad7f5d
  49. Lou-Franco J, Das B, Elliott C, Cao C. Gold nanozymes: from concept to biomedical applications. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021;13(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s40820-020-00532-z
  50. Drozd M, Pietrzak M, Parzuchowski P, Mazurkiewicz-Pawlicka M, Malinowska E. Peroxidase-like activity of gold nanoparticles stabilized by hyperbranched polyglycidol derivatives over a wide pH range. Nanotechnology. 2015;26(49):495101. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/49/495101
  51. Wang X, Shu C, Wang G, et al. Recent progress of noble metal-based nanozymes: structural engineering and biomedical applications. Nanoscale. 2025;17(17):10557-10580. doi: 10.1039/D4NR05514D
  52. Deng C, Ye Z, Zheng CJ, Cheng H, Ge J. Iron-based nanozymes induced ferroptosis for tumor therapy. Nanoscale. 2025;17(23):14103-14117. doi: 10.1039/D5NR00880H
  53. Wang Y, Li H, Guo L, Jiang Q, Liu F. A cobalt-doped iron oxide nanozyme as a highly active peroxidase for renal tumor catalytic therapy. RSC Adv. 2019;9(33):18815-18822. doi: 10.1039/C8RA05487H
  54. Ye H, Lai Y, Wu Z, Li G, Hua Q, Zhu W. Carbon-based nanozymes: catalytic mechanisms, performance tuning, and environmental and biomedical applications. Anal Methods. 2025;17(31):6264-6281. doi: 10.1039/D5AY00997A
  55. Tripathi A, Singh Rautela S, Kumari P. Graphene-based nanozymes for revolutionizing biomedical research. RSC Adv. 2025;15(46):39092-39122. doi: 10.1039/D5RA04765J
  56. Jin J, Li L, Zhang L, Luan Z, Xin S, Song K. Progress in the application of carbon dots-based nanozymes. Front Chem. 2021;9:748044. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.748044
  57. Wang B, Cai H, Waterhouse G, Qu X, Yang B, Lu S. Carbon dots in bioimaging, biosensing and therapeutics: a comprehensive review. Small Sci. 2022;2(6):2200012. doi: 10.1002/smsc.202200012
  58. Yu Y, Zeng Q, Tao S, et al. Carbon dots-based photoinduced reactions: advances and perspective. Adv Sci. 2023;10(12):2207621. doi: 10.1002/advs.202207621
  59. Ahmad MA, Sumarsih S, Chang JY, Fahmi MZ. Mass spectrometry-based analyses of carbon nanodots: structural elucidation. ACS Omega. 2024;9(19):20720-20727. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c01674
  60. Jorns M, Pappas D. A review of fluorescent carbon dots, their synthesis, physical and chemical characteristics, and applications. Nanomaterials. 2021;11(6):1448. doi: 10.3390/nano11061448
  61. Adeola AO, Clermont-Paquette A, Piekny A, Naccache R. Advances in the design and use of carbon dots for analytical and biomedical applications. Nanotechnology. 2024;35(1):012001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/acfdaf
  62. Kong J, Zhou F. Preparation and application of carbon dots nanozymes. Antioxidants. 2024;13(5):535. doi: 10.3390/antiox13050535
  63. Kebo E, Luo Y, Wang X, et al. Multiple application strategies of carbon dots in cancer treatment: mechanisms, progress and challenges. Int J Nanomedicine. 2026;21:584122. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S584122
  64. Lin Z, Zhou H, Lu J, Yin X. Carbon-based nanozymes in cancer therapy: current trends and future prospects. Biomaterials. 2026;324:123465. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123465
  65. Cordani M, Fernández-Lucas J, Khosravi A, et al. Carbon-based nanozymes for cancer therapy and diagnosis: a review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;297:139704. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.139704
  66. Feng JH, Zhang ML, Zou YM, et al. Hollow gold-platinum nanoshells as a delivery platform for Ce6: cascading catalysis for enhanced multimodal therapy in tumor ablation and antitumor immunity. Nanoscale. 2025;17(9):5456-5471. doi: 10.1039/D4NR04627G
  67. Geng B, Yan L, Zhu Y, et al. Carbon dot@MXene nanozymes with triple enzyme-mimic activities for mild NIR-II photothermal-amplified nanocatalytic therapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12(5):2202154. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202202154
  68. Lai CM, Xiao XS, Xu J, Qin Y, He SH. Dual-enzyme nanoassemblies of carbon dots and gold for tumor microenvironment-responsive immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025;17(45):61647-61660. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c10705
  69. Luo Q, Shao N, Zhang AC, et al. Smart biomimetic nanozymes for precise molecular imaging: application and challenges. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16(2):249. doi: 10.3390/ph16020249
  70. Cao C, Zhang T, Yang N, et al. POD nanozyme optimized by charge separation engineering for light/pH-activated bacteria catalytic/photodynamic therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):86. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00900-8
  71. Zheng J, Peng W, Shi H, Zhang J, Hu Q, Chen J. Emerging engineered nanozymes: current status and future perspectives in cancer treatments. Nanoscale Adv. 2025;7(5):1226-1242. doi: 10.1039/D4NA00924J
  72. Liu B, Chen K, Han Y. Exploring mitochondrial phototoxicity: mechanisms, measurement, and mitigation. Biochimie. 2025;237:16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2025.07.008
  73. Zhang Y, Zhang L, Wang M, Li P. The applications of nanozymes in neurological diseases: from mechanism to design. Theranostics. 2023;13(8):2492-2514. doi: 10.7150/thno.83370
  74. Tian Y, Yang Q, Liu Y, et al. Multimodal antibacterial microneedles with nanozymes-mediated ROS-scavenging and oxygen-generation synergistic photothermal/photodynamic therapy to promote diabetic ulcer healing. Mater Today Bio. 2025;35:102368. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102368
  75. Khan AU, Kiani MN, Huda NU, Jin Y. Smart designer nanozymes for precision cancer therapy: recent advances and prospects. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2026;18(3):4632-4666. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c21149
  76. Yang M, Yang T, Mao C. Enhancement of photodynamic cancer therapy by physical and chemical factors. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2019;58(40):14066-14080. doi: 10.1002/anie.201814098
  77. Aziz A, Wissam Z. Reactive oxygen species: molecular mechanisms, cellular targets, and implications for genomic stability. Biomed Res Int. 2026;2026:6918118. doi: 10.1155/bmri/6918118
  78. Geevarghese R, Żur-Pińska J, Parisi D, Włodarczyk-Biegun MK. A comprehensive protocol for hydrogel-based bioink design: balancing printability, stability, and biocompatibility. J Mater Chem B. 2025;13(42):13750-13768. doi: 10.1039/D5TB00737B
  79. Fatimi A, Okoro OV, Podstawczyk D, Simińska-Stanny J, Shavandi A. Natural hydrogel-based bio-inks for 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering: a review. Gels. 2022;8(3):179. doi: 10.3390/gels8030179
  80. Picado-Tejero D, Mendoza-Cerezo L, Rodríguez-Rego JM, Macías-García A, Marcos-Romero AC. 3D bioprinted natural hydrogels: rheological characterization, cytotoxicity, and printability assessment of a polysaccharide-based bioink. ACS Omega. 2026;11(2):3115-3131. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c09668
  81. Nguyen MH, Duong GH, Huynh LTV, et al. Computer-aided hydrogel synthesis for 3D bioprinting: application of design of experiments (DoE), machine learning (ML), and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Mater Adv. 2026;7(11):5458-5482. doi: 10.1039/D6MA00268D
  82. Qiu M, Man C, Zhao Q, et al. Nanozymes meet hydrogels: fabrication, progressive applications, and perspectives. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2025;338:103404. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2025.103404
  83. Yang C, Sun M, Li Y, et al. 1+1>2: synergistic integration and biomedical applications of nanozyme@hydrogel platforms. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025;14(30):e00899. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202500899
  84. Qiu S, Xu Z, Ning X, et al. A 3D-printed composite hydrogel engineered with a coordination-reprogrammed nanozyme for synergistic chemo-physical bone therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2026;18(7):11117-11133. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c25694
  85. Tian C, Xiao S, Chen X, et al. Dual-physical-field nanocatalysis: injectable hydrogel enables piezo-photothermal synergy for breast cancer therapy. Adv Sci. 2026;13(37):e22447. doi: 10.1002/advs.202522447
  86. Zengin A, Teixeira FC, Feliciano T, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase degradable, in situ photocrosslinked nanocomposite bioinks for bioprinting applications. Biomater Adv. 2023;154:213647. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213647
  87. Wang Y, Duan Y, Yang B, Li Y. Nanocomposite hydrogel bioinks for 3D bioprinting of tumor models. Biomacromolecules. 2024;25(8):5288-5299. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.4c00671
  88. Yu C, Chen D, Feng L, et al. Piezocatalytic nanoplatform drives Mg2+-release-amplified ferroptosis-immune synergy for tumor microenvironment reprogramming. ACS Nano. 2026;20(12):10024-10042. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c22255
  89. Wang X, Yang Y, Cong L, et al. Hydrogel microbead-confined nanozyme-SERS sensor for robust detection of hydrogen peroxide in complex biological systems. ACS Sens. 2026;11(6):5106-5117. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.6c01164
  90. Chen W, Yang F, Chen X, et al. Ultrasmall self-cascade bimetallic Au2Pd3 nanozymes encapsulated hydrogel microneedles for photothermal-augmented nanocatalytic therapy of diabetic wound infections. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025;17(38):53295-53311. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c14298
  91. Xiao Z, Cao J, Liu J, Song Z, Du T, Du X. Trimetallic nanozyme-embedded smart hydrogel enables NIR-controlled bacterial killing and oxidative stress alleviation. Adv Sci. 2025;12(48):e12875. doi: 10.1002/advs.202512875
  92. Li Q, Xu S, Feng Q, et al. 3D-printed silk-gelatin hydrogel scaffold with different porous structure and cell seeding strategy for cartilage regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(10):3396-3410. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.013
  93. Li H, Liu Z, Zhang P, Zhang D. The recent research progress in the application of the nanozyme-hydrogel composite system for drug delivery. Drug Deliv. 2024;31(1):2417986. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2024.2417986
  94. Su Y, Ju J, Shen C, et al. In situ 3D bioprinted GDMA/Prussian blue nanozyme hydrogel with wet adhesion promotes macrophage phenotype modulation and intestinal defect repair. Mater Today Bio. 2025;31:101636. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101636
  95. Li L, Guo K, Hu G, Wang L. Specific nanozyme-based cascade catalysis hydrogel with oxygen-self-supplying and ROS-scavenging capacity for efficient diabetic wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater. 2026;15(21):e05890. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202505890
  96. Rizwana N, Maslekar N, Chatterjee K, Yao Y, Agarwal V, Nune M. Dual crosslinked antioxidant mixture of poly(vinyl alcohol) and cerium oxide nanoparticles as a bioink for 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2024;7(16):18177-18188. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.3c02962
  97. Fatrekar AP, Morajkar RV, Vernekar AA. Expanding limits of artificial enzymes: unprecedented catalysis by an oxidase nanozyme in activating a structural protein for covalent crosslinking and conferring remarkable proteolytic resistance. Chem Sci. 2024;15(36):14726-14738. doi: 10.1039/D4SC03767G
  98. Zhang C, Xu Y, Yu H, et al. Fabrication of an in vitro three-dimensional tumor model using liver-derived decellularized extracellular matrix/gelatin methacrylate bioink for investigating cancer characteristics and drug resistance. Int J Bioprint. 2025;11(4):392. doi: 10.36922/ijb025160142
  99. Xiao M, Zhang Y, Xing J, et al. Ru-Ph nanozyme-based hydrogels for tumor chemodynamic therapy by enhancing enzyme catalytic efficiency through multiple pathways. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025;14(4):2403868. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202403868
  100. Hu P, Feng N, Zhao S, et al. Microenvironment-responsive injectable thermosensitive hydrogel incorporating nanozymes for synergistic breast cancer therapy and postsurgical adjuvant treatment. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;35(28):2421176. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202421176
  101. Hu P, Sha J, Gong Q, Xu J, Xu K. Tumor microenvironment-responsive cascaded nanozyme-based composite hydrogel for multimodality synergistic therapies in cancer treatment. Chem Eng J. 2025;507:160591. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.160591
  102. Wang W, Zhang Z, Yu Y, Wang Y, Ni K. 3D bioprinting–microfluidics technology: pioneering advances in tumor microenvironment modeling, cancer treatment optimization, and diagnostic biomarker discovery. Int J Bioprint. 2025;11(6):23. doi: 10.36922/ijb025320314
  103. Zhu Y, Pan Y, Guo Z, et al. Photothermal enhanced and tumor microenvironment responsive nanozyme for amplified cascade enzyme catalytic therapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12(7):2202198. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202202198
  104. Liu J, Zhao Y, Ren B, et al. Multiscale vascularized tumor-on-a-chip via bioprinting for drug research. Int J Bioprint. 2025;11(4):378. doi: 10.36922/ijb025180180
  105. Cook AB, Palange A, Schlich M, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase responsive hydrogel microplates for programmed killing of invasive tumour cells. RSC Appl Polym. 2023;1(1):19-29. doi: 10.1039/D3LP00057E
  106. Zhang C, Jiang G, Gao X. Matrix metalloproteinase-responsive drug delivery systems. Bioconjug Chem. 2023;34(8):1349-1365. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.3c00266
  107. Lee G, Kim SJ, Choi Y, Park J, Park JK. Bioprinting of a multi-composition array to mimic intra-tumor heterogeneity of glioblastoma for drug evaluation. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2024;10(1):186. doi: 10.1038/s41378-024-00843-w
  108. Li J, Parra-Cantu C, Wang Z, Zhang YS. Improving bioprinted volumetric tumor microenvironments in vitro. Trends Cancer. 2020;6(9):745-756. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.06.002
  109. Mahran A, Howaili F, Bhadane R, et al. Functional enzyme delivery via surface-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles in 3D printed nanocomposite hydrogels. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2025;211:107132. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107132
  110. Tang M, Tiwari SK, Agrawal K, et al. Rapid 3D bioprinting of glioblastoma model mimicking native biophysical heterogeneity. Small. 2021;17(15):2006050. doi: 10.1002/smll.202006050
  111. Chen A, Wang W, Mao Z, et al. Multimaterial 3D and 4D bioprinting of heterogeneous constructs for tissue engineering. Adv Mater. 2024;36(34):2307686. doi: 10.1002/adma.202307686
  112. Chen L, Xu Y, Hu X, et al. In situ generation of dendritic cell vaccines in 3D printing scaffolds for cancer postsurgical therapy. Natl Sci Rev. 2026;13(5):nwag037. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwag037
  113. Perin F, Ouyang L, Lim KS, et al. Bioprinted constructs in the regulatory landscape: current state and future perspectives. Adv Mater. 2026;38(4):e04037. doi: 10.1002/adma.202504037
  114. Wang Y, Xu M, Wang Y, et al. From cold to hot: nanozyme-based strategies for reprogramming the tumour immunoenvironment. Cell Prolif. 2026;59(7):e70235. doi: 10.1111/cpr.70235
  115. Guo R, Du Q, He Y, Wu H, Zhang Y, Jing Z. Innovative strategies to overcome stability challenges of single-atom nanozymes. Nano-Micro Lett. 2026;18(1):100. doi: 10.1007/s40820-025-01939-2
  116. Wang Z, Zhai B, Sun J, et al. Recent advances of injectable in situ-forming hydrogels for preventing postoperative tumor recurrence. Drug Deliv. 2024;31(1):2400476. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2024.2400476
  117. Liu Y, Liu F, Zeng Y, et al. Hydrogel systems for spatiotemporal controlled delivery of immunomodulators: engineering the tumor immune microenvironment for enhanced cancer immunotherapy. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024;12:1514595. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1514595
  118. Colak B, Cihan MC, Ertas YN. 3D-printed, implantable alginate/CuS nanoparticle scaffolds for local tumor treatment via synergistic photothermal, photodynamic, and chemodynamic therapy. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2023;6(17):16076-16085. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.3c03433
  119. Tagaras N, Song H, Sahar S, Tong W, Mao Z, Buerki-Thurnherr T. Safety landscape of therapeutic nanozymes and future research directions. Adv Sci. 2024;11(46):2407816. doi: 10.1002/advs.202407816
  120. Park YS, Park BU, Jeon HJ. Advances in machine learning-enhanced nanozymes. Front Chem. 2024;12:1483986. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1483986
  121. Reghu G, Vemula PK, Bhat SG, Narayanan S. Harnessing the innate immune system by revolutionizing macrophage-mediated cancer immunotherapy. J Biosci. 2024;49(2):63. doi: 10.1007/s12038-024-00441-y
  122. Su Y, Wu H, Duan K, et al. Synergistic tumor microenvironment modulation enabled by a nanozyme-boosted biomimetic macrophage-derived nanovesicle for highly efficient antitumor therapy. Theranostics. 2025;15(16):7925-7939. doi: 10.7150/thno.114467
  123. Han Q, Huang D, Li S, Xia B, Wang X. Multifunctional nanozymes for disease diagnosis and therapy. Biomed J. 2024;47(4):100699. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2024.100699
  124. Swain S, Misra RDK, Rautray TR. Nanoscale generators for tissue healing: a perspective. Int J Nanomedicine. 2024;19:11859-11882. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S480938
  125. Pu Y, Zhou B, Bing J, et al. Ultrasound-triggered and glycosylation inhibition-enhanced tumor piezocatalytic immunotherapy. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):9023. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53392-1
  126. Zhou Q, Zhao W, Li S, et al. From static scaffolds to responsive implants: 3D-printed field-active bioceramics for adaptive bone regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater. 2026;15(32):e71463. doi: 10.1002/adhm.71463
  127. Agarwal T, Onesto V, Banerjee D, et al. 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering: current state-of-the-art and challenges towards system standardization and clinical translation. Biofabrication. 2025;17(4):042003. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ade47a
  128. Ruding M, Shajahan AB, Fossum M, Pennisi CP, Lind JU. When will bioprinting become a therapy? Translational and regulatory challenges in urogenital tissue engineering and surgery. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2026;14:1865005. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2026.1865005
  129. Velu A, Seth S, Ojha A, et al. Advances and challenges in 3D bioprinting for organ transplantation: bridging the gap between research and clinical applications. Cureus. 2025;17(11):e97947. doi: 10.7759/cureus.97947
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing