3D bioprinting as a prospective therapeutic strategy for corneal limbal epithelial stem cell deficiency
Limbal epithelial stem cells (LESCs) are responsible for the maintenance and repair of the corneal surface. Injuries and diseases of the eye may result in a vision condition called limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). Without limbal stem cells, the cornea becomes opaque, vascularized, and inflamed. Cultured LESC therapy as a treatment method was first described in 1997, and LESCs cultured from either patients or donors have been used to treat LSCD successfully. However, the main source of cornea for LSCD treatment is from donors, which are too few to meet the demand (less than 1:70 of cases). The global shortage of donor cornea promotes the need for studies exploring corneal limbus alternatives. Many problems still remain unresolved, such as original geometry reconstruction, corneal epithelial regeneration, and ocular optical function restoration. 3D bioprinting has garnered tremendous attention in recent years, and significant advances have been made in fabricating cell–laden scaffolds. These advancements could lead to a promising treatment for LSCD. It is possible that alternative limbus stem cells can be constructed using 3D printing, which, in corneal limbus regeneration, enables personalized corneal implants and fabrication of single- or multilayer corneal limbus equivalents with corneal limbal stem cells. In this review, the progress, applications, and limitations of the most influential works regarding current treatments of LESC deficiency are discussed. The advantages of 3D bioprinting are illustrated, and some first promising steps toward the creation of a functional cornea limbus with 3D bioprinting are discussed. Finally, insights into the prospects and technical challenges facing the future research of 3D bioprinting of corneal limbus alternatives in vivo and in vitro are provided.
1. Griffith M, Osborne R, Munger R, et al., 1999, Functional Human Corneal Equivalents Constructed from Cell Lines. Science, 286:2169–72.
2. Vaezi M, Zhong G, Kalami H, et al., 2018, Chapter 10— Extrusion-based 3D printing technologies for 3D scaffold engineering, in Functional 3D Tissue Engineering Scaffolds, Y Deng, J Kuiper (eds), Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, 235–254.
3. Guillotin B, Ali M, Ducom A, et al., 2013, Chapter 6—Laser-assisted bioprinting for tissue engineering, in Biofabrication, G Forgacs, W Sun (eds), William Andrew Publishing, Boston, 95–118.
4. Kelly B, Bhattacharya I, Shusteff M, et al., 2017, Computed axial lithography (CAL): Toward single step 3D printing of arbitrary geometries. ArXiv abs/1705.05893
5. Kelly BE, Bhattacharya I, Heidari H, et al., 2019, Volumetric additive manufacturing via tomographic reconstruction. Science, 363:1075–1079.
6. Tseng SCG, Tsubota K, 1997, Important concepts for treating ocular surface and tear disorders. Am J Ophthalmol, 124:825–835.
7. DelMonte DW, Kim T, 2011, Anatomy and physiology of the cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg, 37:588–598.
8. Mishima S, Hedbys BO, 1968, Physiology of the cornea. Int Ophthalmol Clin, 8:527–560.
9. Masterton S, Ahearne M, 2018, Mechanobiology of the corneal epithelium. Exp Eye Res, 177:122–129.
10. Cotsarelis G, Sun T-T, Lavker RM, 1990, Label-retaining cells reside in the bulge area of pilosebaceous unit: Implications for follicular stem cells, hair cycle, and skin carcinogenesis. Cell, 61:1329–1337.
11. Davanger M, Evensen A, 1971, Role of the pericorneal papillary structure in renewal of corneal epithelium. Nature, 229:560–561.
12. Goldberg MF, Bron AJ, 1982, Limbal palisades of Vogt. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, 80:155–171.
13. Lagali N, Edén U, Utheim T, et al., 2013, In vivo morphology of the limbal palisades of Vogt correlates with progressive stem cell deficiency in aniridia-related keratopathy. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 54(8):5333–5342.
14. Thoft RA, Friend J, 1983, The X, Y, Z hypothesis of corneal epithelial maintenance. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 24:1442–1443.
15. Dua HS, Gomes JA, Singh A, 1994, Corneal epithelial wound healing. Br J Ophthalmol, 78:401–408.
16. Dua H, 1999, The conjunctiva in corneal epithelial wound healing. Br J Ophthalmol, 82:1407–1411.
17. Kruse FE, 1994, Stem cells and corneal epithelial regeneration. Eye, 8:170–183.
18. Dua HS, Shanmuganathan VA, Powell-Richards AO, et al.,2005, Limbal epithelial crypts: A novel anatomical structure and a putative limbal stem cell niche. Br J Ophthalmol, 89:529–532.
19. Holland EJ, Schwartz GS, 1996, The evolution of epithelial transplantation for severe ocular surface disease and a proposed classification system. Cornea, 15:549–556.
20. Chen JJY, Tseng S, 1990, Corneal epithelial wound healing in partial limbal deficiency. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 31:1301–1314.
21. Croasdale CR, Holland EJ, Mannis MJ, 2002, Conjunctival limbal autograft, in Ocular Surface Disease Medical and Surgical Management, EJ Holland, MJ Mannis (eds), Springer, New York, NY, 194–200.
22. Dua HS, Azuara-Blanco A, 2000, Autologous limbal transplantation in patients with unilateral corneal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol, 84(3):273–278.
23. Kenyon KR, Tseng SC, 1989, Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders Ophthalmology, 96:709–722; discussion 722–723.
24. Moldovan SM, Borderie V, Baudrimont M, et al., 1999, Treatment of unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency syndrome by limbal autograft. J Fr Ophtalmol, 22:302–309.
25. Kheirkhah A, Raju VK, Tseng SCG, 2008, Minimal conjunctival limbal autograft for total limbal stem cell deficiency. Cornea, 27:730–733.
26. Ramachandran C, Basu S, Sangwan VS, et al., 2014, Concise review: The coming of age of stem cell treatment for corneal surface damage. Stem Cells Transl Med, 3:1160–1168.
27. Malhotra C, Jain AK, 2014, Human amniotic membrane transplantation: Different modalities of its use in ophthalmology. World J Transpl, 4:111–121.
28. Rama P, Bonini S, Lambiase A, et al., 2001, Autologous fibrin-cultured limbal stem cells permanently restore the corneal surface of patients with total limbal stem cell deficiency. Transplantation, 72:1478–1485.
29. Pellegrini G, Traverso CE, Franzi AT, et al., 1997, Long-term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologous cultivated corneal epithelium. Lancet, 349:990–993.
30. Maria Colabelli Gisoldi RA, Pocobelli A, Villani CM, et al., 2010 Evaluation of molecular markers in corneal regeneration by means of autologous cultures of limbal cells and keratoplasty. Cornea, 29:715–722.
31. Ronfard V, Vertès AA, May MH, et al., 2016, Evaluating the past, present, and future of regenerative medicine: A global view. Tissue Eng B Rev, 23:199–210.
32. da Mata Martins TM, da Silva Cunha P, Rodrigues MA, et al., 2020, Epithelial basement membrane of human decellularized cornea as a suitable substrate for differentiation of embryonic stem cells into corneal epithelial-like cells. Mater Sci Eng C, 116:111215.
33. Furtado M, Chen L, Chen Z, et al., 2022, Development of fish collagen in tissue regeneration and drug delivery. Eng Regener, 3:217–231.
34. Levis HJ, Massie I, Dziasko MA, et al., 2013, Rapid tissue engineering of biomimetic human corneal limbal crypts with 3D niche architecture. Biomaterials, 34:8860–8868.
35. Levis HJ, Brown RA, Daniels JT, 2010, Plastic compressed collagen as a biomimetic substrate for human limbal epithelial cell culture. Biomaterials, 31:7726–7737.
36. Massie I, Kureshi AK, Schrader S, et al., 2015, Optimization of optical and mechanical properties of real architecture for 3-dimensional tissue equivalents: Towards treatment of limbal epithelial stem cell deficiency. Acta Biomater, 24:241–250.
37. Kureshi AK, Dziasko M, Funderburgh JL, 2015, Human corneal stromal stem cells support limbal epithelial cells cultured on RAFT tissue equivalents. Sci Rep, 5:16186.
38. Sangwan VS, Basu S, MacNeil S, 2012, Simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET): A novel surgical technique for the treatment of unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol, 96:931–934.
39. Basu S, Sureka SP, Shanbhag SS, et al., 2016, Simple limbal epithelial transplantation: Long-term clinical outcomes in 125 cases of unilateral chronic ocular surface burns. Ophthalmology, 123:1000–1010.
40. Shanbhag SS, Patel CN, Goyal R, et al., 2019, Simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET): Review of indications, surgical technique, mechanism, outcomes, limitations, and impact. Indian J Ophthalmol, 67:1265–1277.
41. Vazirani J, Ali MH, Sharma N, et al., 2016, Autologous simple limbal epithelial transplantation for unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency: Multicentre results. Br J Ophthalmol, 100:1416–1420.
42. Tseng SC, Prabhasawat P, Barton K, et al., 1998, Amniotic membrane transplantation with or without limbal allografts for corneal surface reconstruction in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency. Arch Ophthalmol, 116:431–441.
43. Ahmed SF, Schmutz M, Mosaed S, 2017, Case series: Keratolimbal allograft as a patch graft for glaucoma drainage devices. J Glaucoma, 26:e205–e209.
44. Croasdale CR, Schwartz GS, Malling JV, et a., 1999, Keratolimbal allograft: Recommendations for tissue procurement and preparation by eye banks, and standard surgical technique. Cornea, 18:52–58.
45. Solomon A, Ellies P, Anderson DF, et al., 2002, Long-term outcome of keratolimbal allograft with or without penetrating keratoplasty for total limbal stem cell deficiency. Ophthalmology, 109:1159–1166.
46. Daya SM, Bell RW, Habib NE, et al., 2000, Clinical and pathologic findings in human keratolimbal allograft rejection. Cornea, 19:443–450.
47. Hori J, Niederkorn JY, 2007, Immunogenicity and immune privilege of corneal allografts, in Chemical Immunology and Allergy, JY Niederkorn, HJ Kaplan (eds), KARGER, Basel, 290–299.
48. Niederkorn JY, 2003, The immune privilege of corneal grafts. J Leukoc Biol, 74:167–171.
49. Tan DT, Ficker LA, Buckley RJ, 1996, Limbal transplantation. Ophthalmology, 103:29–36.
50. Tsubota K, Toda I, Saito H, et al., 1995, Reconstruction of the corneal epithelium by limbal allograft transplantation for severe ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology, 102:1486–1496.
51. Dua H, Azuara-Blanco A, 1999, Allo-limbal transplantation in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol, 83:414–419.
52. Tseng SC, Prabhasawat P, Barton K, et al., 1998, Amniotic membrane transplantation with or without limbal allografts for corneal surface reconstruction in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency. Arch Ophthalmol, 116:431–441.
53. Koch L, Kuhn S, Sorg H, et al., 2010 Laser printing of skin cells and human stem cells. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 16:847–854.
54. Itoh M, Umegaki N, Guo Z, et al., 2013, Generation of 3D skin equivalents fully reconstituted from human induced
pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). PLoS One, 8:e77673.
55. Noor N, Shapira A, Edri R, et al., 2019, 3D printing of personalized thick and perfusable cardiac patches and hearts. Adv Sci (Weinh), 6:1900344.
56. Meinhardt A, Eberle D, Tazaki A, et al., 2014, 3D reconstitution of the patterned neural tube from embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rep, 3:987–999.
57. Ahn SH, Lee HJ, Lee J-S, et al., 2015, A novel cell-printing method and its application to hepatogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cell-embedded mesh structures. Sci Rep, 5:13427.
58. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Dietrich T, Saito K, et al., 2007, Characterization of extracellular matrix components in the limbal epithelial stem cell compartment. Exp Eye Res, 85:845–860.
59. Polisetti N, Zenkel M, Menzel-Severing J, et al., 2016, Cell adhesion molecules and stem cell-niche-interactions in the limbal stem cell niche. Stem Cells, 34:203–219.
60. Mei H, Gonzalez S, Deng SX, 2012, Extracellular matrix is an important component of limbal stem cell niche. J Funct Biomater, 3:879–894.
61. Cotsarelis G, Cheng S-Z, Dong G, et al., 1989, Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: Implications on epithelial stem cells. Cell, 57:201–209.
62. Ebato B, Friend J, Thoft RA, 1988, Comparison of limbal and peripheral human corneal epithelium in tissue culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 29:1533–1537.
63. Zhang B, Xue Q, Hu H, et al., 2019 integrated 3D bioprinting-based geometry-control strategy for fabricating corneal substitutes. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 20:945–959.
64. Sorkio A, Koch L, Koivusalo L, et al., 2018, Human stem cell based corneal tissue mimicking structures using laser-assisted 3D bioprinting and functional bioinks. Biomaterials, 171:57–71.
65. Isaacson A, Swioklo S, Connon CJ, 2018, 3D bioprinting of a corneal stroma equivalent. Exp Eye Res, 173:188–193.
66. Duarte Campos DF, Rohde M, Ross M, et al., 2019, Corneal bioprinting utilizing collagen-based bioinks and primary human keratocytes. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 107(9):1945– 1953.
67. Liu W, Deng C, McLaughlin CR, et al., 2009, Collagen– phosphorylcholine interpenetrating network hydrogels as corneal substitutes. Biomaterials, 30:1551–1559.
68. Niu G, Choi J-S, Wang Z, et al., 2014, Heparin-modified gelatin scaffolds for human corneal endothelial cell transplantation. Biomaterials, 35:4005–4014.
69. Ionescu A-M, Alaminos M, Cardona J de la C, et al., 2011, Investigating a novel nanostructured fibrin– agarose biomaterial for human cornea tissue engineering: Rheological properties. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 4: 1963–1973.
70. Gouveia RM, Koudouna E, Jester J, et al., 2017, Template curvature influences cell alignment to create improved human corneal tissue equivalents. Adv Biosyst, 1:1700135.
71. Lai J-Y, Cheng H-Y, Ma DH-K, 2015, Investigation of overrun-processed porous hyaluronic acid carriers in corneal endothelial tissue engineering. PLoS One, 10:e0136067.
72. Chen D, Qu Y, Hua X, et al., 2017, A hyaluronan hydrogel scaffold-based xeno-free culture system for ex vivo expansion of human corneal epithelial stem cells. Eye, 31:962–971.
73. Madden PW, Lai JNX, George KA, et al., 2011, Human corneal endothelial cell growth on a silk fibroin membrane. Biomaterials, 32:4076–4084.
74. Tummala GK, Lopes VR, Mihranyan A, et al., 2019, Biocompatibility of nanocellulose-reinforced PVA hydrogel with human corneal epithelial cells for ophthalmic applications. J Funct Biomater, 10:35.
75. Wilson SL, Sidney LE, Dunphy SE, et al., 2013, Keeping an eye on decellularized corneas: A review of methods, characterization and applications. J Funct Biomater, 4:114–161.
76. Lee Y-P, Liu H-Y, Lin P-C, et al., 2019, Facile fabrication of superporous and biocompatible hydrogel scaffolds for artificial corneal periphery. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 175:26–35.
77. Ma X-Y, Bao H-J, Cui L, et al., 2013, The graft of autologous adipose-derived stem cells in the corneal stromal after mechanic damage. PLoS One, 8:e76103.
78. Kim EY, Tripathy N, Cho SA, et al., 2017, Collagen type I– PLGA film as an efficient substratum for corneal endothelial cells regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regener Med, 11:2471–2478.
79. Kobayashi H, 2006, PVA-HAp nanocomposites for artificial cornea. Adv Sci Technol, 53:9–16.
80. Jiang H, Zuo Y, Zhang L, et al., 2014, Property-based design: Optimization and characterization of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel and PVA-matrix composite for artificial cornea. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 25:941–952.
81. Sinha M, Gupte T, 2018, Design and evaluation of artificial cornea with core–skirt design using polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate and graphite. Int Ophthalmol, 38:1225–1233.
82. Merrett K, Griffith CM, Deslandes Y, et al., 2001, Adhesion of corneal epithelial cells to cell adhesion peptide modified pHEMA surfaces. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 12:647–671.
83. Tanioka H, Kawasaki S, Yamasaki K, et al., 2006, Establishment of a cultivated human conjunctival epithelium as an alternative tissue source for autologous corneal epithelial transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 47:3820–3827.
84. Builles N, Janin-Manificat H, Malbouyres M, et al., 2010,
for hemi-corneal reconstruction and regeneration. Biomaterials, 31:8313–8322.
85. Mi S, Chen B, Wright B, et al., 2010, Ex vivo construction of an artificial ocular surface by combination of corneal limbal epithelial cells and a compressed collagen scaffold containing keratocytes. Tissue Eng Part A, 16:2091–2100.
86. Barbaro V, Ferrari S, Fasolo A, et al., 2009, Reconstruction of a human hemicornea through natural scaffolds compatible with the growth of corneal epithelial stem cells and stromal keratocytes. Mol Vis, 15:2084–2093.
87. Mi S, Connon CJ, 2013, The formation of a tissue-engineered cornea using plastically compressed collagen scaffolds and limbal stem cells, in Corneal Regenerative Medicine: Methods and Protocols Methods in Molecular Biology, B Wright, CJ Connon (eds), Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 143–155.
88. Gomes JÁP, Monteiro BG, Melo GB, et al., 2010 Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of human immature dental pulp stem cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 51:1408–1414.
89. Ma Y, Xu Y, Xiao Z, et al., 2006, Reconstruction of chemically burned rat corneal surface by bone marrow–derived human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells, 24(2):315–321.
90. Ye J, Yao K, Kim JC, 2006, Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in a rabbit corneal alkali burn model: Engraftment and involvement in wound healing. Eye (London, England), 20(4):482–490.
91. Fernandes-Cunha GM, Na K-S, Putra I, et al., 2019, Corneal wound healing effects of mesenchymal stem cell secretome delivered within a viscoelastic gel carrier. Stem Cells Transl Med, 8:478–489.
92. Hayashi R, Ishikawa Y, Ito M, et al., 2012, Generation of corneal epithelial cells from induced pluripotent stem cells derived from human dermal fibroblast and corneal limbal epithelium. PLoS One, 7:e45435.
93. Yoshida S, Yasuda M, Miyashita H, et al., 2011, Generation of stratified squamous epithelial progenitor cells from mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS One, 6:e28856.
94. Ahmad S, Stewart R, Yung S, et al., 2007, Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into corneal epithelial-like cells by in vitro replication of the corneal epithelial stem cell niche. Stem Cells, 25:1145–1155.
95. Rama P, Matuska S, Paganoni G, et al., 2010, Limbal stem-cell therapy and long-term corneal regeneration. N Engl J Med, 363:147–155.
96. Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashida Y, et al., 2004, Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium. N Engl J Med, 351:1187–1196.
97. Mahdavi SS, Abdekhodaie MJ, Kumar H, et al., 2020, Stereolithography 3D bioprinting method for fabrication of human corneal stroma equivalent. Ann Biomed Eng, 48:1955–1970.
98. Kim H, Jang J, Park J, et al., 2019, Shear-induced alignment of collagen fibrils using 3D cell printing for corneal stroma tissue engineering. Biofabrication, 11:035017.
99. Kong B, Chen Y, Liu R, et al., 2020, Fiber reinforced GelMA hydrogel to induce the regeneration of corneal stroma. Nat Commun, 11(1):1435.
100. Duarte Campos DF, Rohde M, Ross M, et al., 2019, Corneal bioprinting utilizing collagen-based bioinks and primary human keratocytes. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 107:1945–1953.
101. Bektas CK, Hasirci V, 2019, Cell loaded 3D bioprinted GelMA hydrogels for corneal stroma engineering. Biomater Sci, 8:438–449.
102. Ulag S, Ilhan E, Sahin A, et al., 2020, 3D printed artificial cornea for corneal stromal transplantation. Eur Polym J, 133:109744.
103. Wu Z, Kong B, Liu R, et al., 2018, Engineering of corneal tissue through an aligned PVA/collagen composite nanofibrous electrospun scaffold. Nanomaterials (Basel), 8:E124.
104. Kim H, Jang J, Kim H-K, et al., 2018, 3D cell printed corneal stromal analogues for corneal tissue engineering. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Cyborg and Bionic Systems (CBS), 191–194.