CNT-Type Dependent Cellular Adhesion on 3D-Printed Nanocomposite for Tissue Engineering
At present, one of the main limitations of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting in tissue engineering stems from a scarcity of biomaterials tailored for specific applications. Widely used hydrogels offer an optimal printability and a suitable environment for cell growth; however, they lack the mechanical strength required for non-soft tissues, for example, cartilage, tendons, and meniscus. This work investigated the physicochemical, mechanical, and biological characteristics of a 3D-printed polycaprolactone (PCL) reinforced with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) and “bamboo-like” carbon nanotubes (BCNT) with the following w/w % concentrations: 0.005%, 0.01%, 0.02%, and 0.2%. The materials were analyzed with subsequent techniques: Scanning electron microscopy, nanoindentation, parallel plate rheometry, and differential scanning calorimetry. Biological evaluations were performed with normal human articular chondrocytes by confocal microscopy and proliferation assay. The study revealed that the carbon nanotubes (CNT) addition improved the rheological properties of the material by increasing the setting temperature. Moderate enhancement was observed in terms of mechanical properties. The most significant difference was noted in cell adhesion and proliferation. Pure PCL did not facilitate cell growth and mainly apoptotic cells were observed on its surface. The addition of 0.01% MWCNT resulted in enhanced adhesion and proliferation; however, the morphology of the cells remained spherical, signifying a suboptimal surface for proliferation. Interestingly, PCL reinforced with 0.02% BCNT displayed excellent facilitation of cellular adhesion and proliferation, which is uncharacteristic of pure PCL. In summary, this study investigated the potential of CNT-reinforced PCL for 3D bioprinting and tissue engineering, highlighting key physicochemical, mechanical, and biological aspects of this biomaterial.
1. Li L, LaBarbera DV, 2017, 3D High-Content Screening of Organoids for Drug Discovery. In: Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry III. Vol. 2-8. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, p388–415.
2. Ramasamy S, Davoodi P, Vijayavenkataraman S, et al., 2021, Optimized Construction of a Full Thickness Human Skin Equivalent using 3D Bioprinting and a PCL/Collagen Dermal Scaffold. Bioprinting, 21:e00123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00123
3. Hassanajili S, Karami-Pour A, Oryan A, et al., 2019, Preparation and Characterization of PLA/PCL/HA Composite Scaffolds Using Indirect 3D Printing for Bone Tissue Engineering. Mater Sci Eng C, 104:109960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109960
4. Zhang W, Ullah I, Shi L, et al., 2019, Fabrication and Characterization of Porous Polycaprolactone Scaffold Via Extrusion-Based Cryogenic 3D Printing for Tissue Engineering. Mater Des, 180:107946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107946
5. Duymaz BT, Erdiler FB, Alan T, et al., 2019, 3D Bio-Printing of Levan/Polycaprolactone/Gelatin Blends for Bone Tissue Engineering: Characterization of the Cellular Behavior. Eur Polym J, 119:426–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.08.015
6. Yu MF, Lourie O, Dyer MJ, et al., 2000, Strength and Breaking Mechanism of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Under Tensile Load. Science, 287:637–40. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5453.637
7. Szymański T, Mieloch AA, Richter M, et al., 2020, Utilization of Carbon Nanotubes in Manufacturing of 3D Cartilage and Bone Scaffolds. Materials (Basel), 13:4039.
8. Patel DK, Dutta SD, Ganguly K, et al., 2021, Enhanced Osteogenic Potential of Unzipped Carbon Nanotubes for Tissue Engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A, 109:1869–80.https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37179
9. Edwards SL, Werkmeister JA, Ramshaw JA, 2009, Carbon Nanotubes in Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. Expert Rev Me d. Dev, 6:499–505.
10. Haniu H, Saito N, Matsuda Y, et al., 2012, Basic Potential of Carbon Nanotubes in Tissue Engineering Applications. J Nanomater, 2012:343747.
11. Soni SK, Thomas B, Kar VR, 2020, A Comprehensive Review on CNTs and CNT-Reinforced Composites: Syntheses, Characteristics and Applications. Mater Today Commun, 25:101546.
12. Stocco TD, Antonioli E, Romagnolli ML, et al., 2020, Aligned Biomimetic Scaffolds Based on Carbon Nanotubes-Reinforced Polymeric Nanofibers for Knee Meniscus Tissue Eng Mater Lett, 264:127351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.127351
13. Lebedev SM, 2020, PCL-CNT Nanocomposites Prepared by Melt Compounding and Evaluation of Their Basic Properties. Polym Compos, 41:1830–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25501
14. Abdal-Hay A, Taha M, Mousa HM, et al., 2019, Engineering of Electrically-Conductive Poly(Ε-Caprolactone)/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Composite Nanofibers for Tissue Engineering Applications. Ceram Int, 45:15736–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.206
15. Zadehnajar P, Akbari B, Karbasi S, et al., 2019, Preparation and Characterization of Poly ε-Caprolactone-Gelatin/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Electrospun Scaffolds for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater, 69:326–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2018.1563088
16. Jahanmard F, Eslaminejad MB, Amani-Tehran M, et al., 2020, Incorporation of F-MWCNTs into Electrospun Nanofibers Regulates Osteogenesis Through Stiffness and Nanotopography. Mater Sci Eng C, 106:110163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110163
17. Zadehnajar P, Karbasi S, Akbari B, et al., 2020, Incorporation of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Into Electrospun PCL/Gelatin Scaffold: The Influence on the Physical, Chemical and Thermal Properties and Cell Response for Tissue Engineering. Mater Technol, 35:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2019.1651539
18. Wu T, Chen X, Sha J, et al., 2019, Fabrication of Shish-Kebab-Structured Carbon Nanotube/Poly(Ε-Caprolactone) Composite Nanofibers for Potential Tissue Engineering Applications. Rare Met, 38:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-017-0965-y
19. Zou Y, Zhang C, Wang P, et al., 2020, Electrospun Chitosan/Polycaprolactone Nanofibers Containing Chlorogenic Acid-Loaded Halloysite Nanotube for Active Food Packaging. Carbohydr Polym, 247:116711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116711
20. Yu W, Liu C, Fan S, 2021, Advances of CNT-Based Systems in Thermal Management. Nano Res, 14:2471–90.
21. Konstantopoulos G, Maroulas P, Dragatogiannis DA, et al., 2021, The Effect of Interfacial Resistance and Crystallinity on Heat Transfer Mechanism in Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Polyethylene. Mater Des, 199:109420. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2020.109420
22. Avramenko TG, Khutoryanskaya NV, Naumenko SM, et al., 2019, Effect of Carbon Nanofillers on Processes of Structural Relaxation in the Polymer Matrixes. In: Proceedings of the Springer Proceedings in Physics. Vol. 221. Cham: Springer, p293–305.
23. Carreau PJ, 1972, Rheological Equations from Molecular Network Theories. Trans Soc Rheol, 16:99–127. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.549276
24. Yasuda K, 1979, Investigation of the Analogies between Viscometric and Linear Viscoelastic Properties of Polystyrene Fluids, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
25. Pitt CG, Chasalow FI, Hibionada YM, et al., 1981, Aliphatic Polyesters. I. The Degradation of Poly(ϵ‐Caprolactone) In Vivo. J Appl Polym Sci, 26:3779–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1981.070261124
26. Chen J, Liu B, Gao X, et al., 2018, A Review of the Interfacial Characteristics of Polymer Nanocomposites Containing Carbon Nanotubes. RSC Adv, 8:28048–85.
27. Evans W, Prasher R, Fish J, et al., 2008, Effect of Aggregation and Interfacial Thermal Resistance on Thermal Conductivity of Nanocomposites and Colloidal Nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf, 51:1431–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.10.017
28. Klonos PA, Peoglos V, Bikiaris DN, et al., 2020, Rigid Amorphous Fraction and Thermal Diffusivity in Nanocomposites Based on Poly (L-Lactic Acid) Filled with Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Oxide. J Phys Chem C, 124:5469–79. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11843
29. Zhu H, Kim YD, de Kee D, 2005, Non-Newtonian Fluids with a Yield Stress. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech, 129:177–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2005.06.001
30. Wurm A, Herrmann A, Cornelius M, et al., 2015, TEMPERATURE dependency of Nucleation Efficiency of Carbon Nanotubes in Pet and PBT. Macromol Mater Eng, 300:637–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201400405
31. Schawe JE, Pötschke P, Alig I, 2017, Nucleation Efficiency of Fillers in Polymer Crystallization Studied by Fast Scanning Calorimetry: Carbon Nanotubes in Polypropylene. Polymer (Guildf), 116:160–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.03.072
32. Zhang S, Minus ML, Zhu L, et al., 2008, Polymer Transcrystallinity induced by Carbon Nanotubes. Polymer (Guildf), 49:1356–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.018
33. Sun H, Mei L, Song C, et al., 2006, The In Vivo Degradation, Absorption and Excretion of PCL-Based Implant. Biomaterials, 27:1735–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.019
34. Goodwin DG, Boyer I, Devahif T, et al., 2018, Biodegradation of Carbon Nanotube/Polymer Nanocomposites Using a Monoculture. Environ Sci Technol, 52:40–51. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02062
35. Frank BP, Goodwin DG, Bohutskyi P, et al., 2020, Influence of Polymer Type and Carbon Nanotube Properties on Carbon Nanotube/Polymer Nanocomposite Biodegradation. Sci Total Environ, 742:140642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140512