Polyelectrolyte gelatin-chitosan hydrogel optimized for 3D bioprinting in skin tissue engineering
Bioprinting is a promising automated platform that enables the simultaneous deposition of multiple types of cells and biomaterials to fabricate complex three-dimensional (3D) tissue constructs. Collagen-based biomaterial used in most of the previous works on skin bioprinting has poor printability and long crosslinking time. This posed an immense challenge to create 3D constructs with pre-determined shape and configuration at high throughput. Recently, the use of chitosan for wound healing applications has attracted huge attention due to its attractive traits such as its antimicrobial properties and ability to trigger hemostasis. In this paper, we optimized polyelectrolyte gelatin-chitosan hydrogel for 3D bioprinting. Modification to the chitosan was carried out via the oppositely charged functional groups from chitosan and gelatin at a specific pH of ~pH 6.5 to form polyelectrolyte complexes. The polyelectrolyte hydrogels were evaluated in terms of physical interactions within polymer blend, rheological properties (viscosities, storage and loss modulus), printing resolution at varying pressures and feed rates and biocompatibility. The polyelectrolyte gelatin-chitosan hydrogels formulated in this work was optimized for 3D bioprinting at room temperature to achieve high shape fidelity of the printed 3D constructs and good biocompatibility with fibroblast skin cells.
1. Lanza R, Langer R and Vacanti J P, 2011, Principles of Tissue Engineering, 4th edn, Academic Press, San Diego.
2. Watt F M and Fujiwara H, 2011, Cell-extracellular matrix interactions in normal and diseased skin. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol.3(4): a005124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005124
3. Murphy S V and Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs, Nature biotechnology, vol.32: 773–785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
4. Ozbolat I T and Yu Y, 2013, Bioprinting towards organ fabrication: Challenges and future trends. IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering, vol.60(3): 691–693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2013.2243912
5. Lee V, Singh G, Trasatti C, et al., 2013, Design and fabrication of human skin by three-dimensional bioprinting. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, vol.20(6): 473–484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2013.0335
6. Koch L, Deiwick A, Schlie S, et al., 2012, Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol.109(7): 1855–1863. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.24455
7. Pereira R F, Barrias C C, Granja P L, et al., 2013, Advanced biofabrication strategies for skin regeneration and repair. Nanomedicine, vol.8(4): 603–621.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/nnm.13.50
8. Cui X, Breitenkamp K, Finn M, et al., 2012, Direct human cartilage repair using three-dimensional bioprinting technology. Tissue Engineering Part A, vol.18(11-12): 1304–1312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0543
9. Kundu J, Shim J H, Jang J, et al., 2013, An additive manufacturing-based PCL alginate-chondrocyte bioprinted scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, vol.9(11): 1286–1297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/term.1682
10. Chang R, Emami K, Wu H, et al., 2010, Biofabrication of a three-dimensional liver micro-organ as an in vitro drug metabolism model. Biofabrication, vol.2(4): 045004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/4/045004
11. Binder K W, Zhao W X, Aboushwareb T, et al., 2010, In situ bioprinting of the skin for burns. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol.211(3): S76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.06.198
12. Tobin D J, 2006, Biochemistry of human skin—our brain on the outside. Chemical Society Reviews, vol.35(1): 52–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B505793K
13. Ng W L, Yeong W Y and Naing M W, 2015, Cellular approaches to tissue-engineering of skin: A review. Journal of Tissue Science & Engineering, vol.6: 150. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2157-7552.1000150
14. Michael S, Sorg H, Peck C-T, et al., 2013, Tissue engineered skin substitutes created by laser-assisted bioprinting form skin-like structures in the dorsal skin fold chamber in mice. Plos One, vol.8: e57741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057741
15. Lee W, Debasitis J C, Lee V K, et al., 2009, Multi-layered culture of human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes through three-dimensional freeform fabrication. Biomaterials, vol.30(8): 1587–1595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.009
16. Lee W, Lee V, Polio S, et al., 2010, On-demand three-dimensional freeform fabrication of multi-layered hydrogel scaffold with fluidic channels. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol.105(6): 1178–1186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.22613
17. Weber L, Kirsch E, Müller P, et al., 1984, Collagen type distribution and macromolecular organization of connective tissue in different layers of human skin. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol.82(2): 156–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12259720
18. Muzzarelli R A, 2009, Chitins and chitosans for the re-pair of wounded skin, nerve, cartilage and bone. Carbohydrate Polymers, vol.76(2): 167–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.002
19. Dash M, Chiellini F, Ottenbrite R M, et al., 2011, Chitosan—A versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Progress in Polymer Science, vol.36(8): 981–1014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.001
20. Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Kumar P S, et al. 2011, Biomaterials based on chitin and chitosan in wound dressing applications. Biotechnology Advances, vol.29(3): 322–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.01.005
21. Rinaudo M, 2006, Chitin and chitosan: Properties and applications. Progress in Polymer Science, vol.31(7): 603–632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.06.001
22. Kim I Y, Seo S J, Moon H S, et al., 2008, Chitosan and its derivatives for tissue engineering applications. Biotechnology Advances, vol.26(1): 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.07.009
23. Ueno H, Nakamura F, Murakami M, et al., 2001, Evaluation effects of chitosan for the extracellular matrix production by fibroblasts and the growth factors produc-tion by macrophages. Biomaterials, vol.22(15): 2125– 2130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00401-4
24. Kong M, Chen X G, Xing K, et al., 2010, Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: A state of the art review. International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol.144(1): 51–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.012
25. Cho Y-W, Jang J, Park C R, et al., 2000, Preparation and solubility in acid and water of partially deacetylated chitins. Biomacromolecules, vol.1(4): 609–614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bm000036j
26. Geng L, Feng W, Hutmacher D W, et al., 2005, Direct writing of chitosan scaffolds using a robotic system. Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol.11(2): 90–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13552540510589458
27. Ng W L, Yeong W Y and Naing M W, 2014, Potential of bioprinted films for skin tissue engineering, in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing (eds C K Chua, W Y Yeong, M J Tan and E Liu).
28. Malafaya P B, Silva G A and Reis R L, 2007, Natural–origin polymers as carriers and scaffolds for biomolecules and cell delivery in tissue engineering applica-tions. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol.59(4–5): 207–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2007.03.012
29. Huang Y, Onyeri S, Siewe M, et al., 2005, In vitro characterization of chitosan–gelatin scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, vol.26(36): 7616–7627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.036
30. Yin Y, Li Z, Sun Y, et al., 2005, A preliminary study on chitosan/gelatin polyelectrolyte complex formation. Journal of Materials Science, vol.40(17): 4649–4652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-3929-9
31. Mao J, Zhao L G, Yin Y J, et al., 2003, Structure and properties of bilayer chitosan–gelatin scaffolds. Biomaterials, vol.24(6): 1067–1074. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00442-8
32. Mao J , Zhao L, de Yao K, et al., 2003, Study of novel chitosan-gelatin artificial skin in vitro. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol.64A(2): 301–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.10223
33. Pereda M, Ponce A, Marcovich N, et al., 2011, Chitosan-gelatin composites and bi-layer films with potential antimicrobial activity. Food Hydrocolloids, vol.25(5): 1372–1381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.01.001
34. Wang X, Yu X, Yan Y, et al., 2008, Liver tissue responses to gelatin and gelatin/chitosan gels. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol.87(1): 62–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31712
35. Nguyen K T and West J L, 2002, Photopolymerizable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials, vol.23(22): 4307–4314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00175-8
36. Cheng M, Deng J, Yang F, et al., 2003, Study on physical properties and nerve cell affinity of composite films from
chitosan and gelatin solutions. Biomaterials, vol.24(17): 2871–2880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00117-0
37. Yin Y J, Yao K D, Cheng G X, et al., 1999, Properties of polyelectrolyte complex films of chitosan and gelatin. Polymer International, vol.48(6): 429–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(199906)48:6<429::AID-PI160>3.0.CO;2-1
38. Das S, Pati F, Choi Y J, et al., 2015, Bioprintable, cell-laden silk fibroin–gelatin hydrogel supporting multilineage differentiation of stem cells for fabrication of three-dimensional tissue constructs. Acta Biomaterialia, vol.11: 233–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.023
39. Swope V B, Supp A P and Boyce S T, 2002, Regulation of cutaneous pigmentation by titration of human melanocytes in cultured skin substitutes grafted to athymic mice. Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol.10(6): 378–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475X.2002.10607.x
40. Mao J S, Cui Y L, Wang X H, et al. 2004, A preliminary study on chitosan and gelatin polyelectrolyte complex cytocompatibility by cell cycle and apoptosis analysis. Biomaterials, vol.25(18): 3973–3981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.080
41. MacNeil S, 2007, Progress and opportunities for tissue-engineered skin. Nature, vol.445: 874–880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05664