AccScience Publishing / IJB / Volume 10 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.36922/ijb.2337
Submit to IJB
Cite this article
40
Download
442
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Oozing: An accessible technique to create 3D-printed scaffolds suitable for tissue engineering

Juan Crespo-Santiago1,2* ,  Luis M. Delgado3 ,  Rafa Madariaga4 ,  Laia Millan1 ,  Oriol Chico1 ,  Pau Oliver1 ,  Román Pérez3 ,  Marta Otero-Viñas2,5*
Show Less
1 Elisava Barcelona School of Design and Engineering, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), La Rambla 30, 08002, Barcelona, Spain
2 Tissue Repair and Regeneration Laboratory (TR2Lab), Institute for Research and Innovation in Life and Health Sciences in Central Catalonia (IrisCC), Ctra. de Roda, 70 08500, Vic, Barcelona, Spain
3 Bioengineering Institute of Technology, International University of Catalonia (UIC), Immaculada 22, 08017, Barcelona, Spain
4 Data Analysis and Modeling Research Group (DAM), Department of Economics and Business, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), Sagrada Família 7, 08500, Vic, Spain
5 Faculty of Science, Technology, and Engineering. University of Vic – Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), C. de la Laura, 13, 08500, Vic, Barcelona, Spain
IJB 2024, 10(2), 2337 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.2337
Submitted: 29 November 2023 | Accepted: 22 January 2024 | Published: 12 March 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

Tissue-engineered constructs require mimicking the extracellular matrix microenvironment of native tissue for better promoting cell growth. Commercial three-dimensional (3D) printers provide a versatile platform to fabricate tissue models, but they possess certain constraints regarding the reproduction of natural tissue structures due to the limited functionality of current slicing strategies and hardware. In this study, we present a new approach to 3D-printing polylactic acid (PLA) constructs with fibers in the range of microns by combining the oozing effect and algorithm-aided design (AAD) with a conventional fused deposition modeling printer. Three different oozing geometries were compared with two controls to explore their mechanical behavior and their cellular culture growth potential. Microscopic analysis revealed that oozing groups possessed higher porosity and statistically significantly thinner fibers than controls. Sodium hydroxide treatment reversibly increased the hydrophilicity of PLA without affecting the scaffolds’ mechanical properties in the compression tests. In addition, cell culture assays showed that oozing specimens exhibited a greater capacity of promoting SaOs-2 osteoblastic cell proliferation after 7 days in comparison with controls. We demonstrated that randomly distributed microfibered environments can be fabricated with an ordinary 3D printer utilizing the oozing effect and advanced AAD, resulting in improved biomimetic 3D constructs for tissue-engineering strategies.

Keywords
Oozing
3D printing
Tissue engineering
Cell cultures
Polylactic acid
Funding
The authors would like to thank the Government of Catalonia [2017 SGR 708 and 2021 XARDI 00002]; the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation Ramón y Cajal fellowship [RYC2018-025977-I]; MINECO/FEDER Project [RTI2018-096088-J-100]; and the PO FEDER of Catalonia 2014.2020 [project PECT Osona Transformació Social, Ref. 001-P-000382].
References
  1. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993;260(5110):920-926. doi: 10.1126/science.8493529
  2. Ikada Y. Challenges in tissue engineering. J R Soc Interface. 2006;3(10):589-601. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0124
  3. Shin H, Jo S, Mikos AG. Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2003;24(24):4353-4364. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00339-9
  4. Yue B. Biology of the extracellular matrix: an overview. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(8):S20-S23. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000108
  5. Ceretti E, Ginestra P, Neto PI, Fiorentino A, da Silva JVL. Multi-layered scaffolds production via fused deposition modeling (FDM) using an open source 3D printer: process parameters optimization for dimensional accuracy and design reproducibility. Procedia CIRP. 2017;65:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.04.042
  6. Jiang X, Zheng W, Takayama S, Chapman RG, Kane RS, Whitesides GM. Micro-scale patterning of cells and their environment. In: Lanza R, Langer R, Vacanti JP, eds. Principles of Tissue Engineering. 4th ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Elsevier Inc.; 2013: 359-384. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-398358-9.00019-7
  7. Richards DJ, Tan Y, Jia J, Yao H, Mei Y. 3D printing for tissue engineering. ISR J Chem. 2013;53(9-10):805-814. doi: 10.1002/ijch.201300086
  8. Lee M, Wu BM. Recent advances in 3D printing of tissue engineering scaffolds. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;868:257-267. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-764-4_15
  9. Choi JW, Kim N. Clinical application of three-dimensional printing technology in craniofacial plastic surgery. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42(3):267-277. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.3.267
  10. Jakus AE, Secor EB, Rutz AL, Jordan SW, Hersam MC, Shah RN. Three-dimensional printing of high-content graphene scaffolds for electronic and biomedical applications. ACS Nano. 2015;9(4):4636-4648. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01179
  11. Huang H, Zhang B, Zhong J, et al. The behavior between fluid and structure from coupling system of bile, bile duct, and polydioxanone biliary stent: a numerical method. Med Eng Phys. 2023;113:103966. doi: 10.1016/J.MEDENGPHY.2023.103966
  12. Xu Y, Zhang F, Zhai W, Cheng S, Li J, Wang Y. Unraveling of advances in 3D-printed polymer-based bone scaffolds. Polymers. 2022;14(3). doi: 10.3390/polym14030566
  13. Valashani SMM, Barrett CJ, Barthelat F. Self-assembly of microscopic tablets within polymeric thin films: a possible pathway towards new hybrid materials. RSC Adv. 2015;5(7):4780-4787. doi: 10.1039/c4ra15166f
  14. Turnbull G, Clarke J, Picard F, et al. 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioact Mater. 2018;3(3):278-314. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.001
  15. Szojka A, Lalh K, Andrews SHJ, Jomha NM, Osswald M, Adesida AB. Biomimetic 3D printed scaffolds for meniscus tissue engineering. Bioprinting. 2017;8:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2017.08.001
  16. Kabirian F, Ditkowski B, Zamanian A, Heying R, Mozafari M. An innovative approach towards 3D-printed scaffolds for the next generation of tissue-engineered vascular grafts. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5(7):15586-15594. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.167
  17. DeStefano V, Khan S, Tabada A. Applications of PLA in modern medicine. Eng Regen. 2020;1:76-87. doi: 10.1016/j.engreg.2020.08.002
  18. Mota C, Puppi D, Chiellini F, Chiellini E. Additive manufacturing techniques for the production of tissue engineering constructs. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2015;9(3):174-190. doi: 10.1002/term.1635 
  19. Chung JJ, Im H, Kim SH, Park JW, Jung Y. Toward biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering: 3D printing techniques in regenerative medicine. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.586406
  20. Alagoz AS, Hasirci V. 3D printing of polymeric tissue engineering scaffolds using open-source fused deposition modeling. Emergent Mater. 2020;3(4):429-439. doi: 10.1007/s42247-019-00048-2
  21. Gillispie G, Prim P, Copus J, et al. Assessment methodologies for extrusion-based bioink printability. Biofabrication. 2020;12(2). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab6f0d
  22. Papaioannou TG, Manolesou D, Dimakakos E, Tsoucalas G, Vavuranakis M, Tousoulis D. 3D bioprinting methods and techniques: applications on artificial blood vessel fabrication. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2019;35(3):284-289. doi: 10.6515/ACS.201905_35(3).20181115A
  23. Lee JS, Hong JM, Jung JW, Shim JH, Oh JH, Cho DW. 3D printing of composite tissue with complex shape applied to ear regeneration. Biofabrication. 2014;6(2). doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024103
  24. Lee A, Hudson AR, Shiwarski DJ, et al. 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science. 2019;365(6452):482-487. doi: 10.1126/science.aav9051
  25. Jung JW, Lee JS, Cho DW. Computer-aided multiple-head 3D printing system for printing of heterogeneous organ/ tissue constructs. Sci Rep. 2016;6. doi: 10.1038/srep21685
  26. Liu J, Zhou Y, Lu J, et al. Injectable, tough and adhesive zwitterionic hydrogels for 3D-printed wearable strain sensors. Chem Eng J. 2023;475:146340. doi: 10.1016/J.CEJ.2023.146340
  27. Ramesh S, Harrysson OLA, Rao PK, et al. Extrusion bioprinting: recent progress, challenges, and future opportunities. Bioprinting. 2021;21. doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00116
  28. Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V, Suntornnond R, Yeong WY. Polyvinylpyrrolidone-based bioink: influence of bioink properties on printing performance and cell proliferation during inkjet-based bioprinting. Bio-Des Manuf. 2023;6(6):676-690. doi: 10.1007/s42242-023-00245-3
  29. Chartrain NA, Williams CB, Whittington AR. A review on fabricating tissue scaffolds using vat photopolymerization. Acta Biomater. 2018;74:90-111. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.010
  30. Moroni L, Boland T, Burdick JA, et al. Biofabrication: a guide to technology and terminology. Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36(4):384-402. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015
  31. Mwema FM, Akinlabi ET. Basics of fused deposition modelling (FDM). In: Castro M, eds. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020: 1-15. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-48259-6_1
  32. Hoque ME, Chuan YL, Pashby I. Extrusion based rapid prototyping technique: an advanced platform for tissue engineering scaffold fabrication. Biopolymers. 2012; 97(2):83-93. doi: 10.1002/bip.21701
  33. Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM. Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem. 2014;86(7):3240-3253. doi: 10.1021/ac403397r
  34. Yazar A, Top N, Bülbül R, Şahin I. Effect of infill density and infill pattern on mechanical properties in fused deposition modeling (FDM). In: Proceedings of the Innovative Approaches in Additive Manufacturing Congress (IA4AM). Gazi University; 2021.
  35. Fernandez-Vicente M, Calle W, Ferrandiz S, Conejero A. Effect of infill parameters on tensile mechanical behavior in desktop 3D printing. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2016;3(3):183-192. doi: 10.1089/3dp.2015.0036
  36. Zein I, Hutmacher DW, Cheng Tan K, Hin Teoh S. Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 2002;23(4): 1169-1185. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00232-0 
  37. Boparai KS, Singh R, Singh H. Development of rapid tooling using fused deposition modeling: a review. Rapid Prototyp J. 2016;22(2):281-299. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-04-2014-0048
  38. Günaydın K, Türkmen HS. Common FDM 3D printing defects. In: Proceedings of the International Congress on 3D Printing (Additive Manufacturing) Technologies and Digital Industry; 2018.
  39. Gupta S, Bissoyi A, Bit A. A review on 3D printable techniques for tissue engineering. Bionanoscience. 2018;8(3):868-883. doi: 10.1007/s12668-018-0525-4
  40. Yang S, Leong KF, Du ZME, Chua CK. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part II. Rapid prototyping techniques. Tissue Eng. 2002;8(1):1-11. doi: 10.1089/107632702753503009
  41. Sukindar NA, Ariffin MKA, Baharudin BTHT, Jaafar CNA, Ismail MIS. Analyzing the effect of nozzle diameter in fused deposition modeling for extruding polylactic acid using open source 3D printing. J Teknol. 2016;78(10):7-15. doi: 10.11113/jt.v78.6265
  42. del Barrio Cortés E, Matutano Molina C, Rodríguez-Lorenzo L, Cubo-Mateo N. Generation of controlled micrometric fibers inside printed scaffolds using standard FDM 3D printers. Polymers. 2023;15(1). doi: 10.3390/polym15010096
  43. Zhang Y, Harrison C. Tomo: wearable, low-cost, electrical impedance tomography for hand gesture recognition. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.; 2015:167-173. doi: 10.1145/2642918.2647356
  44. Lu Q, Song KY, Feng Y, Xie J. Fabrication of suspended uniform polymer microfibers by FDM 3D printing. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 2021;32:179-187. doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.11.005
  45. Paraskevoudis K, Karayannis P, Koumoulos EP. Real-time 3d printing remote defect detection (Stringing) with computer vision and artificial intelligence. Processes. 2020;8(11):1-15. doi: 10.3390/pr8111464
  46. Visscher DO, Bos EJ, Peeters M, et al. Cartilage tissue engineering: preventing tissue scaffold contraction using a 3D-printed polymeric cage. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2016;22(6):573-584. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2016.0073
  47. Zhang Z, He H, Fu W, Ji D, Ramakrishna S. Electro-hydrodynamic direct-writing technology toward patterned ultra-thin fibers: advances, materials and applications. Nano Today. 2020;35. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100942
  48. Lannutti J, Reneker D, Ma T, Tomasko D, Farson D. Electrospinning for tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C. 2007;27(3):504-509. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2006.05.019
  49. Chlanda A, Kijeńska E, Święszkowski W. Microscopic methods for characterization of selected surface properties of biodegradable, nanofibrous tissue engineering scaffolds. In: Proceedings of the Materials Science Forum. Trans Tech Publications Ltd; 2017:213-216. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.890.213
  50. Kara Y, Kovács NK, Nagy-György P, Boros R, Molnár K. A novel method and printhead for 3D printing combined nano-/microfiber solid structures. Addit Manuf. 2023;61. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2022.103315
  51. Gleadall A. FullControl GCode designer: open-source software for unconstrained design in additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2021;46. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102109
  52. Naghieh S, Badrossamay M, Foroozmehr E, Kharaziha M. Combination of PLA micro-fibers and PCL-gelatin nano-fibers for development of bone tissue engineering scaffolds. IJSIEC. 2017;6(1):1-4. doi: 10.4172/2090-4908.1000150
  53. Molde J, Steele JAM, Pastino AK, Mahat A, Murthy NS, Kohn J. A step toward engineering thick tissues: distributing microfibers within 3D printed frames. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2020;108(3):581-591. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36838
  54. Corapi D, Morettini G, Pascoletti G, Zitelli C. Characterization of a polylactic acid (PLA) produced by fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology. Procedia Struct Integr. 2019;24:289-295. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2020.02.026 
  55. Nagarajan S, Radhakrishnan S, Kalkura SN, Balme S, Miele P, Bechelany M. Overview of protein-based biopolymers for biomedical application. Macromol Chem Phys. 2019;220(14). doi: 10.1002/macp.201900126
  56. Ebrahimi F, Ramezani Dana H. Poly lactic acid (PLA) polymers: from properties to biomedical applications. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2022;71(15):1117-1130. doi: 10.1080/00914037.2021.1944140
  57. Gregor A, Filová E, Novák M, et al. Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer. J Biol Eng. 2017;11(1). doi: 10.1186/s13036-017-0074-3
  58. Wasyłeczko M, Sikorska W, Chwojnowski A. Review of synthetic and hybrid scaffolds in cartilage tissue engineering. Membranes. 2020;10(11):1-28. doi: 10.3390/membranes10110348
  59. Szojka A, Lalh K, Andrews SHJ, Jomha NM, Osswald M, Adesida AB. Biomimetic 3D printed scaffolds for meniscus tissue engineering. Bioprinting. 2017;8:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2017.08.001
  60. Singhvi MS, Zinjarde SS, Gokhale DV. Polylactic acid: synthesis and biomedical applications. J Appl Microbiol. 2019;127(6):1612-1626. doi: 10.1111/jam.14290
  61. Lasprilla AJR, Martinez GAR, Lunelli BH, Jardini AL, Filho RM. Poly-lactic acid synthesis for application in biomedical devices - a review. Biotechnol Adv. 2012;30(1):321-328. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.019
  62. Alafaghani A, Qattawi A, Ablat MA. Design consideration for additive manufacturing: fused deposition modelling. Open J Appl Sci. 2017;7(6):291-318. doi: 10.4236/ojapps.2017.76024
  63. Zhang B, Seong B, Nguyen VD, Byun D. 3D printing of high-resolution PLA-based structures by hybrid electrohydrodynamic and fused deposition modeling techniques. J Micromech Microeng. 2016;26(2). doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/26/2/025015
  64. Heljak MK, Kurzydlowski KJ, Swieszkowski W. Computer aided design of architecture of degradable tissue engineering scaffolds. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017;20(15):1623-1632. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1399263
  65. Chen S, McCarthy A, John JV, Su Y, Xie J. Converting 2D nanofiber membranes to 3D hierarchical assemblies with structural and compositional gradients regulates cell behavior. Adv Mater. 2020;32(43). doi: 10.1002/adma.202003754
  66. Collins MN, Ren G, Young K, Pina S, Reis RL, Oliveira JM. Scaffold fabrication technologies and structure/function properties in bone tissue engineering. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(21). doi: 10.1002/adfm.202010609
  67. Choi WJ, Hwang KS, Kwon HJ, et al. Rapid development of dual porous poly(lactic acid) foam using fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing for medical scaffold application. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;110. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110693
  68. Söhling N, Neijhoft J, Nienhaus V, et al. 3D-printing of hierarchically designed and osteoconductive bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Materials. 2020;13(8). doi: 10.3390/MA13081836
  69. Sankaravel SG, Syed RB, Manivachakan V. In vitro and mechanical characterization of PLA/egg shell biocomposite scaffold manufactured using fused deposition modeling technology for tissue engineering applications. Polym Compos. 2022;43(1):1-638. doi: 10.1002/pc.26365
  70. da Silva K, Kumar P, Choonara YE, du Toit LC, Pillay V. Three-dimensional printing of extracellular matrix (ECM)-mimicking scaffolds: a critical review of the current ECM materials. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2020;108(12): 2324-2350. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36981
  71. Zaszczyńska A, Moczulska-Heljak M, Gradys A, Sajkiewicz P. Advances in 3D printing for tissue engineering. Materials. 2021;14(12). doi: 10.3390/ma14123149 
  72. Tamay DG, Usal TD, Alagoz AS, Yucel D, Hasirci N, Hasirci V. 3D and 4D printing of polymers for tissue engineering applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7(JUL). doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00164
  73. Gleadall A, Visscher D, Yang J, Thomas D, Segal J. Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance. Burns Trauma. 2018;6. doi: 10.1186/s41038-018-0121-4
  74. Baptista R, Guedes M, Pereira MFC, Maurício A, Carrelo H, Cidade T. On the effect of design and fabrication parameters on mechanical performance of 3D printed PLA scaffolds. Bioprinting. 2020;20. doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00096
  75. Schneider M, Fritzsche N, Puciul-Malinowska A, et al. Surface etching of 3D printed poly(lactic acid) with NaOH: a systematic approach. Polymers. 2020;12(8). doi: 10.3390/POLYM12081711
  76. Guduric V, Metz C, Siadous R, et al. Layer-by-layer bioassembly of cellularized polylactic acid porous membranes for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2017;28(5). doi: 10.1007/s10856-017-5887-6
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept